收藏切换
Research on the quality evaluation method of Alpiniae Officinarum Rhizoma based on quantitative analysis of multi-components by single marker method*
收藏切换
PDF
Hui WANG1, 2, Xiao-ling ZHU2, 3, Guo-yuan SUN2, 3, Jin-yang HU1, 2, Guang-jun XIANG1, 2, Yu DONG1, 2, **
Chinese Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis | 2024, 44(12) : 2154 - 2163
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis | 2024, 44(12): 2154-2163
Standard Deliberation
Research on the quality evaluation method of Alpiniae Officinarum Rhizoma based on quantitative analysis of multi-components by single marker method*
Full
Hui WANG1, 2, Xiao-ling ZHU2, 3, Guo-yuan SUN2, 3, Jin-yang HU1, 2, Guang-jun XIANG1, 2, Yu DONG1, 2, **
Affiliations
  • 1.School of Pharmacy, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010110, China
  • 2 Engineering Technology Research Center for Medicinal Substances and Quality Control of Mongolian Medicines, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot 010110, China
  • 3 Department of Pharmacology, Inner Mongolia International Mongolian Medicine Hospital, Hohhot 010065, China
Published: 2024-12-31 doi: 10.16155/j.0254-1793.2024-0218
Outline
收藏切换
Objective:

To establish a quantitative analysis of multi-components by single marker (QAMS) method to simultaneously determine the contents of kalangin, diphenylheptane A, galangin, kaempferin and galangin-3-O-methyl ether.

Methods:

Hypersil ODS2 C18 (250 mm×4.6 mm, 5 μm) was used by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and was eluted with 0.3% acetic acid in water (A) and acetonitrile (B) (0-2 min, 10%B→15%B;2-5 min, 15%B→20%B;5-20 min, 20%B→35%B;20-30 min, 35%B→40%B;30-55 min, 40%B;55-60 min, 40%B→100%B), the column temperature was 30 ℃, the volume flow rate was 0.8 mL·min-1, and the detection wavelength was 254 nm. The relative correction factors of each chemical component were calculated with gingerin as the internal reference, and the content was determined, which was compared with the results of the external standard method, and the quality of galangal from different origins was evaluated by chemical pattern recognition.

Results:

Kaempferol, diphenylheptane A, galangin, kaempferin and galangin-3-O-methyl ether had a good linear relationship in the ranges of 0.005 5-0.110 0, 0.140 0-2.800 0, 0.149 6-2.992 0, 0.021 5-0.430 0 and 0.022 2-0.444 0 μg, respectively, and the average sample recoveries were 100.7%, 101.4%, 99.9%, 100.9% and 101.7%, respectively. The RSDs were 1.3%, 2.8%, 0.83%, 1.4% and 1.8%, respectively. Quantitative analysis of multicomponents by single marker method and external standard method was no significant difference in the results.

Conclusion:

This method is rapid, accurate and specific, which can provide a reference for the quality control of galangal.

QAMS  /  galangal  /  content determination  /  cluster analysis  /  quality evaluation
Hui WANG, Xiao-ling ZHU, Guo-yuan SUN, Jin-yang HU, Guang-jun XIANG, Yu DONG. Research on the quality evaluation method of Alpiniae Officinarum Rhizoma based on quantitative analysis of multi-components by single marker method*[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 2024 , 44 (12) : 2154 -2163 . DOI: 10.16155/j.0254-1793.2024-0218
Year 2024 volume 44 Issue 12
PDF
90
42
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.16155/j.0254-1793.2024-0218
  • Receive Date:2024-04-01
  • Online Date:2026-03-13
  • Published:2024-12-31
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-04-01
Funding
Affiliations
    1.School of Pharmacy, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010110, China
    2 Engineering Technology Research Center for Medicinal Substances and Quality Control of Mongolian Medicines, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot 010110, China
    3 Department of Pharmacology, Inner Mongolia International Mongolian Medicine Hospital, Hohhot 010065, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ywfxzz/EN/10.16155/j.0254-1793.2024-0218
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT