收藏切换
Clinical value of optimizing immobilization auxiliary devices in volumetric modulated arc therapy for rectal cancer in the supine position
收藏切换
Xianzhen Liu, Haizhen Yue, Junyu Li, Shengsheng Shuai, Guochao Ren, Haitao Wang, Wenqi Chen, Shun Zhou*
Modern Instruments & Medical Treatment | 2026, 32(4) : 83 - 91
Less
收藏切换
Modern Instruments & Medical Treatment | 2026, 32(4): 83-91
Clinical value of optimizing immobilization auxiliary devices in volumetric modulated arc therapy for rectal cancer in the supine position
Full
Xianzhen Liu, Haizhen Yue, Junyu Li, Shengsheng Shuai, Guochao Ren, Haitao Wang, Wenqi Chen, Shun Zhou*
Affiliations
  • Department of Radiotherapy, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing 100142, China
Published: 2026-08-10 doi: 10.11876/mimt202604011
Outline
收藏切换
Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of an optimized pelvic immobilization protocol—combining a locked headrest with knee wedge removal—on setup accuracy and planning target volume (PTV) margins in rectal cancer patients undergoing VMAT in the supine position.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 159 fractions of cone-beam CT (CBCT) registration data from 53 patients with rectal cancer treated with pelvic volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) between December 2020 and December 2025. Patients were assigned to three cohorts: Group A (n=15) used the “non-fixed headrest + knee wedge” fixation scheme; Group B (n=18) used the “locked headrest + knee wedge” fixation scheme; Group C (n=20) used the “locked headrest + knee wedge removed” fixation scheme. Six-dimensional (Vrt, Lng, Lat, Pitch, Roll, Rtn) setup errors were collected. One-way ANOVA with LSD post-hoc tests and Mann-Whitney U tests were employed to compare individual systematic errors and random errors among the groups. Abnormal setup was defined as any linear shift >5.00 mm or rotation >2.00°. PTV margins in three translational directions were determined using the van Herk formula (Margin = 2.5Σ + 0.7σ).

Results

One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences in systematic Vrt (F = 15.89, P<0.01) and Roll (F = 3.87, P = 0.03) bias among the three groups with Group C demonstrating systematic means closest to the absolute zero center (Vrt: -0.28 mm, Roll: 0.01°). Group C achieved the lowest group systematic error (Σ) in Lng (1.14 mm vs. 1.79 mm in Group A and 1.98 mm in Group B) and Lat directions (1.43 mm vs. 1.54 mm in Group A and 2.84 mm in Group B). For random errors, Group C achieved significantly smaller Pitch rotational variation compared to Group A (Z = -2.47, P = 0.01). The abnormal setup rate in Group C was 3.33%, significantly lower than 31.11% in Group A and 22.22% in Group B (χ2 = 14.87, P<0.01). PTV margins for Group C in the Vrt, Lng, and Lat directions were safely contracted to 3.58 mm, 5.65 mm, and 6.47 mm, respectively, with the maximum narrowing of 35.50% compared to Group A.

Conclusion

The optimized pelvic immobilization protocol utilizing a locked headrest and removing the knee wedge significantly enhances the geometric reproducibility of VMAT setups for rectal cancer by stabilizing the spinal kinetic chain and engaging the knee screwing-home mechanism. This cost-free approach effectively compresses PTV margins and enhances organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing, making it highly recommended as a standardized protocol for supine pelvic radiotherapy.

Rectal cancer  /  Volumetric modulated arc therapy  /  Immobilization device  /  Setup accuracy  /  Cone-beam computed tomography  /  Setup error
刘现珍, 岳海振, 李俊禹, 率胜胜, 任国超, 王海涛, 陈文奇, 周舜. 体位固定辅助装置优化在直肠癌仰卧位容积旋转调强放疗中的应用价值. 现代仪器与医疗, 2026 , 32 (4) : 83 -91 . DOI: 10.11876/mimt202604011
Xianzhen Liu, Haizhen Yue, Junyu Li, Shengsheng Shuai, Guochao Ren, Haitao Wang, Wenqi Chen, Shun Zhou. Clinical value of optimizing immobilization auxiliary devices in volumetric modulated arc therapy for rectal cancer in the supine position[J]. Modern Instruments & Medical Treatment, 2026 , 32 (4) : 83 -91 . DOI: 10.11876/mimt202604011
Year 2026 volume 32 Issue 4
59
12
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.11876/mimt202604011
  • Receive Date:2026-08-06
  • Online Date:2026-10-23
  • Published:2026-08-10
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2026-08-06
Funding
Affiliations
    Department of Radiotherapy, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing 100142, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/xdyqyyl/EN/10.11876/mimt202604011
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT