收藏切换
Analysis of marginal expansion in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for lung cancer based on CBCT images
收藏切换
Xiqu Ye, Xinyu Li*
Modern Instruments & Medical Treatment | 2025, 31(6) : 53 - 58
Less
收藏切换
Modern Instruments & Medical Treatment | 2025, 31(6): 53-58
Analysis of marginal expansion in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for lung cancer based on CBCT images
Full
Xiqu Ye, Xinyu Li*
Affiliations
  • Department of Radiotherapy, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
Published: 2025-12-10 doi: 10.11876/mimt202506009
Outline
收藏切换
Objective

To obtain the target center positioning errors and the maximum tumor displacement positioning errors within the target volume for lung cancer patients during radiotherapy through cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image registration, and to determine two corresponding expansion margin respectively. To explore the influence of these two expansion margins on radiotherapy planning and treatment delivery for lung cancer patients, thereby improving the accuracy of clinical target volume to planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margin delineation.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on CBCT images from 40 lung cancer patients who underwent itensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the Radiotherapy Department of Southern Hospital, Southern Medical University, between March and September 2024. Displacement data were collected using two registration methods: target center registration and maximum tumor displacement registration within the target volume. The expansion margins for both registration methods were calculated based on the classic formula for MPTV (margin of planning target volume) expansion.

Results

A total of 227 CBCT scans from the 40 lung cancer patients were analyzed. Statistics showed that under the target center registration method, the positioning errors in the anterior-posterior (AP), head-foot (HF), and left-right (LR) directions were (-0.019±0.218) cm, (0.028±0.239) cm, and (0.022±0.217) cm, respectively. Under the maximum tumor displacement registration method, the positioning errors in the AP, HF, and LR directions were (-0.017±0.205) cm, (0.038±0.290) cm, and (0.025±0.241) cm, respectively. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) method confirmed a high consistency between the two datasets. Using the classic formula, the calculated expansion margins for the target center registration method in the AP, HF, and LR directions were 0.373 cm, 0.477 cm, and 0.466 cm, respectively. For the maximum tumor displacement registration method, the corresponding margins were 0.429 cm, 0.602 cm, and 0.506 cm.

Conclusion

The target center registration and maximum tumor displacement registration within the target volume were performed using CBCT images of lung cancer patients, two sets of positioning errors and expansion margins were obtained. The ICC consistency test demonstrated good agreement between the two datasets. These results can serve as a theoretical basis for determining CTV-PTV margins in lung cancer radiotherapy and possess practical clinical application value.

Lung cancer  /  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy  /  Cone-beam computed tomography  /  Expansion margin
叶锡渠, 李新宇. 基于CBCT图像的肺癌调强放射治疗外扩边界分析. 现代仪器与医疗, 2025 , 31 (6) : 53 -58 . DOI: 10.11876/mimt202506009
Xiqu Ye, Xinyu Li. Analysis of marginal expansion in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for lung cancer based on CBCT images[J]. Modern Instruments & Medical Treatment, 2025 , 31 (6) : 53 -58 . DOI: 10.11876/mimt202506009
Year 2025 volume 31 Issue 6
52
11
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.11876/mimt202506009
  • Online Date:2026-10-23
  • Published:2025-12-10
Article Data
Affiliations
History
Funding
Affiliations
    Department of Radiotherapy, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/xdyqyyl/EN/10.11876/mimt202506009
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT