Blasting excavation is widely used in engineering, often involving complex whole layouts. However, the small size of the blasthole and the large size of the three-dimensional (3D) numerical model lead to the large calculation scale of the 3D blasting numerical simulation, which requires considerable calculation time. Typically, a 3D numerical model is simplified into a two-dimensional (2D) numerical model, and a 1/2- or 1/4-scale model can be adopted to reduce the calculation scale. To solve this problem, a one-dimensional bar explosion model is adopted to replace the traditional solid explosion model under the framework of the continuous-discontinuous element method. The detonation pressure is directly distributed to the elements penetrated by the bar, and the volume expansion of the elements is used to calculate the volume expansion attenuation detonation pressure at each stage of detonation, thus avoiding the problem of local mesh refinement. Compared with the solid explosion case, the reliability of the bar explosion model is verified by the propagation of the explosion stress wave, peak explosion pressure, and damage nephogram. In combination with the engineering background, three blasting conditions are simulated, and the optimal one is evaluated based on fracture degree and blast fragment size pass rate.

As shallow underground resources are depleted, urban development is extending to greater depths, necessitating a clear understanding of soil arching at various burial depth conditions. Laboratory trapdoor tests equipped with embedded soil-pressure cells and digital image correlation captured the ground-reaction curve and soil deformation. The results reveal pronounced discrepancies between shallow and deep burial. In shallow conditions, soil arching undergoes a "failure-reconstruction" process: soil pressure plunges, then rebounds to stability. In deep strata, the arching forms rapidly and attains stability almost immediately after the minimum pressure is reached. Shallow tests generate several horizontal displacement bands rising to 4.8B (B, trapdoor width); deep tests yield one stable band, with its influence height reduced to about 3.0B. Vertical displacement above the trapdoor evolves through 'triangular-tower-para bolic" stages to 4.3B in shallow tests, but follows a persistent parabolic profile limited to 2.7B in deep tests. Additionally, shear bands under deep conditions form at smaller angles and are more vertically oriented. These findings expose the fundamental differences in deformation mechanisms between shallow and deep burial and provide quantitative criteria for depth zoning in urban underground space development.