PDF
Full
Outline
This study investigated the long-term settlement behaviour of piled buildings induced by shield tunnelling in soft ground conditions within urban environments. By integrating a detailed case study with advanced numerical modelling techniques, this study provided a nuanced understanding of the interactions between tunnel construction and existing pile foundations. Central to the investigation is the role of soil consolidation, which significantly contributes to the settlement of piled buildings. To address this, this study emphasizes the critical need for the precise calibration of tunnelling parameters such as face pressure and grouting pressures. These parameters are meticulously controlled to mitigate the adverse effects on nearby piled buildings, ensuring their stability and integrity. It is established that an optimal face pressure, set at 90% of the lateral earth pressure, consistently minimizes the settlement of piled buildings, primarily due to the minimal reduction in the pile toe resistance observed near the tunnel. Similarly, the ideal grouting pressure was identified to be within the range of 120%-160% of the vertical earth pressure, with the smallest building settlement and decrease in pile toe resistance observed at a grouting pressure of 150% of the overburden pressure. This finding elucidates the load transfer mechanism within piled buildings. This study further demonstrated that the settlement induced by the second tunnel excavation is smaller than that caused by the first tunnel excavation owing to the sheltering effects of the adjacent first tunnel and pile foundations. During the consolidation phase following tunnel excavation, the settlement caused by the second tunnel is smaller than that caused by the first tunnel, which is attributed to the dissipation of the negative excess pore pressure around the first tunnel, leading to soil volume expansion. These insights not only validate the effectiveness of the numerical model but also contribute significantly to the field of geotechnical engineering by providing actionable guidelines for future tunnelling projects.
PDF
3
0
| 科 Family | 属数 Number of genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) | 属 Genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae | 2 | 11 | 5.26 | 鹅膏菌属 Amanita | 10 | 4.78 |
| 小菇科 Mycenaceae | 2 | 12 | 5.74 | 丝盖伞属 Inocybe | 5 | 2.39 |
| 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae | 8 | 14 | 6.70 | 蜡蘑属 Laccaria | 5 | 2.39 |
| 红菇科 Russulaceae | 3 | 23 | 11.00 | 小皮伞属 Marasmius | 6 | 2.87 |
| 小菇属 Mycena | 11 | 5.26 | ||||
| 光柄菇属 Pluteus | 5 | 2.39 | ||||
| 红菇属 Russula | 17 | 8.13 | ||||
| 栓菌属 Trametes | 5 | 2.39 |
关闭全屏
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn
Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House
