收藏切换
Comparative analysis of three different pitting depth measurement methods
收藏切换
PDF
Wen-Tao NING*
Laboratory Testing | 2024, 2(7) : 141 - 144
Less
收藏切换
Laboratory Testing | 2024, 2(7): 141-144
Evaluation and Analysis
Comparative analysis of three different pitting depth measurement methods
Full
Wen-Tao NING*
Affiliations
  • Global-Standard (Shanghai) Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Shanghai 201800 China
Outline
收藏切换

Objective This article mainly introduces three methods for measuring pitting depth: metallographic method, micrometer method and microscopy method, and discusses their differences in different pitting conditions and their influence on the measurement results. Methods Pitting pits on the surface of carbon steel and stainless steel were respectively measured by using these three measuring methods. and the measured results were analyzed and discussed. Results By comparing the measurement results, we can see that the metallographic method is more accurate, but it is destructive. The micrometer method is only suitable for wide and shallow pitting pits. The microscope method is not only suitable for wide and shallow pitting pits, but also for the small pit bottom. Conclusion (1) For wide and shallow pitting pits, metallographic method, micrometer method and microscopic method are applicable and the results are consistent; (2) For the small pitting pit at the bottom, metallography and microscopy are more suitable and the results are consistent; (3) When the corrosion depth is measured by metallographic, microscope and micrometer methods, the thickness reduction caused by uniform corrosion should be taken into account and the results should be corrected, especially in the case of more obvious uniform corrosion.

metallography method  /  micrometer method  /  microscopy method  /  pitting depth
Wen-Tao NING. Comparative analysis of three different pitting depth measurement methods[J]. Laboratory Testing, 2024 , 2 (7) : 141 -144 .
Year 2024 volume 2 Issue 7
PDF
13
6
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
  • Online Date:2025-07-29
Article Data
Affiliations
History
Affiliations
    Global-Standard (Shanghai) Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Shanghai 201800 China

Corresponding:

*NING Wen-Tao, Master, Engineer, Technical Director, No. 1215, Yuanda Road, Jiading District, Shanghai 201800, China. E-mail:
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/sysjc/EN/
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT