Objective To observe and analyze the clinical effect of drychemistry and urine sediment. Methods This study selected 150 patientsin our hospital from January 2022 to June 2022, divided into threegroups, experimental group of 50 patients with routine urine test usingdry chemical method, observation group of 50 patients with urine routinetest, the control group of dry chemistry method and urine sediment, andthe detection of the index of patients in urine routine test. Results The comparison of each index in the experimental group and theobservation group with routine urine test was less than that of urineroutine test in the control group using the combined method of drychemistry and urine sediment; the misdiagnosis rate in the experimentalgroup with a routine urine test using dry chemistry was $8\%$ , the missed diagnosis rate was 14%,the total error rate was 22%; the misdiagnosis rate in the observationgroup using the routine urine test was 10%, the missed diagnosis ratewas ${18}\%$ , the total error ratewas ${28}\%$ ; the misdiagnosis rateof the control group with routine urine test using combined drychemistry and urine sediment was 2%, the missed diagnosis rate was 2%,the total error rate was 4%, the total error rate of the experimentalgroups with routine dry chemistry urine testing and the observationgroups with routine urine sediment testing was greater than that of thecontrol group with routine urine testing using combined dry chemistryand urine sediment, the statistical significant difference wassignificant $\left({P<{0.05}}\right)$ . Conclusion After the active cooperation ofrelevant researchers and patients, the clinical effect observation ofurine routine test shows that the combination of dry chemistry and urinesediment is the best clinical effect.

urinary sediment  /  dry chemical method  /  joint inspection  /  urinalysis