收藏切换
Research on the identification methods of sea sand
收藏切换
PDF
Ping SHEN*
Laboratory Testing | 2024, 2(9) : 111 - 114
Less
收藏切换
Laboratory Testing | 2024, 2(9): 111-114
Evaluation and Analysis
Research on the identification methods of sea sand
Full
Ping SHEN*
Affiliations
  • China Certification & Inspection Group Fujian Co., Ltd. Fuzhou 350015 China
Outline
收藏切换

Objective To develop a scientific method for identifyingsea sand to differentiate it from river sand. Methods Qualitative andquantitative analysis of sea sand is conducted through its sensorycharacteristics, microscopic features, chemical and physical properties,and volumetric measurement methods. Results The chemical analysis showsthat sea sand is different from river sand with high chloride content(≥0.01%) and high shell content (≥0.1%). The electrical conductivity ofsea sand is significantly higher than that of river sand. In terms ofquantitative analysis, the relative deviation of the sea sand weightcalculation method proposed in this study is ${0.25}\%\sim {0.87}\%$ , which is close tothe allowable error of $\pm {0.3}\%$ of the truck scale. Conclusion The identification method proposed inthis study can quickly and effectively distinguish sea sand, which is ofgreat significance in ensuring the safety of building materials.

seasand  /  river sand  /  chloride  /  electrical conductivity  /  measurement
Ping SHEN. Research on the identification methods of sea sand[J]. Laboratory Testing, 2024 , 2 (9) : 111 -114 .
Year 2024 volume 2 Issue 9
PDF
18
7
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
  • Online Date:2025-07-29
Article Data
Affiliations
History
Affiliations
    China Certification & Inspection Group Fujian Co., Ltd. Fuzhou 350015 China

Corresponding:

*SHEN Ping, Engineer, China Certification & Inspection Group Fujian Co., Ltd., Fuzhou 350015, China. E-mail:
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/sysjc/EN/
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT