Objective To analyze and discuss the influence of qualitycontrol on clinical laboratory results under the management of clinicallaboratory control, and to clarify the effective value of qualitycontrol in clinical laboratory. Methods A total of 80 patients who werecompletely registered in our hospital from January to August, 2023 andreceived medical examination were selected for a controlled study. Thepatients in the control group were treated with routine qualitymanagement methods, while the patients in the research group weretreated with quality control methods. Compare the qualified rate,satisfaction and examination results of nursing staff in the two groups,and collect the reasons for the unqualified examination results andevaluate them. Results Compared with the qualified rate of patients, theoverall qualified rate of the study group was ${97.5}\%$ , which was significantly higherthan that of the control group (85%), with statistical significance $\left({P <{0.05}}\right)$ .Compared with the patients’ satisfaction degree, the overallsatisfaction degree of the study group was 97.5%, which wassignificantly higher than that of the control group (72.5%), withsignificant difference (P<0.05). Compared with the examinationresults of nurses in departments, the patient education ability, samplecollection ability and sample processing ability of nurses in the studygroup were $\left({{89.91}\pm {4.56}}\right)$ points, $\left({{89.52}\pm {5.11}}\right)$ pointsand $\left({{88.88}\pm {4.44}}\right)$ points,which were significantly higher than those in the control group, withsignificant differences $\left({P<{0.05}}\right)$ . Conclusion Doing a good job in qualitycontrol and optimizing clinical medical examination can significantlyimprove the quality of hospital clinical examination, improve patients’satisfaction, improve clinical nurses’ cognition of clinical medicalexamination and enhance their clinical practice ability, which has highclinical application value and can be widely popularized.
| 科 Family | 属数 Number of genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) | 属 Genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae | 2 | 11 | 5.26 | 鹅膏菌属 Amanita | 10 | 4.78 |
| 小菇科 Mycenaceae | 2 | 12 | 5.74 | 丝盖伞属 Inocybe | 5 | 2.39 |
| 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae | 8 | 14 | 6.70 | 蜡蘑属 Laccaria | 5 | 2.39 |
| 红菇科 Russulaceae | 3 | 23 | 11.00 | 小皮伞属 Marasmius | 6 | 2.87 |
| 小菇属 Mycena | 11 | 5.26 | ||||
| 光柄菇属 Pluteus | 5 | 2.39 | ||||
| 红菇属 Russula | 17 | 8.13 | ||||
| 栓菌属 Trametes | 5 | 2.39 |