收藏切换
Physicochemical Properties of Enzymatic Chicken Soup Microcapsule Powder and the Release of Characteristic Odors during Storage
收藏切换
Jiajia ZHAO1, Siyi PENG1, Haibin GUO2, Lingjun MA1, Fang CHEN1, Xiaosong HU1, Junfu JI1, *
Science and Technology of Food Industry | 2026, 47(3) : 342 - 351
Less
收藏切换
Science and Technology of Food Industry | 2026, 47(3): 342-351
• Storage and Preservation •
Physicochemical Properties of Enzymatic Chicken Soup Microcapsule Powder and the Release of Characteristic Odors during Storage
Full
Jiajia ZHAO1, Siyi PENG1, Haibin GUO2, Lingjun MA1, Fang CHEN1, Xiaosong HU1, Junfu JI1, *
Affiliations
  • 1National Engineering Research Center for Fruit and Vegetable Processing, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
  • 2Unilever Research & Development Center, Unilever (China) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200335, China
Published: 2026-02-01 doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024120010
Outline
收藏切换

The odor of enzymatic chicken broth is volatile, leading to reduced food quality. A microencapsulation system can be employed to protect the odor. In this study, enzymatic chicken broth was used as the raw material, and three different samples were prepared by spray drying technology: unencapsulated enzymatic chicken broth powder (EB), enzymatic chicken broth microcapsule powder (BPA) with pea albumin as the wall material, and enzymatic chicken broth microcapsule powder (BPAT) with pea albumin and aciculin as a composite wall material. The physical properties and structures of the different powders were compared, and the release characteristics of key odor compounds during storage and dissolution were investigated. The results indicated that, compared to the EB sample, the particle size and moisture content of the BPA and BPAT samples increased, while solubility slightly decreased. Specifically, BPA had the largest particle size (51.58±0.08 μm), whereas BPAT displayed the highest moisture content (6.14%±0.13%) and the lowest solubility (73.33%±2.88%). During storage, significant losses of key odor compounds were observed in the EB sample. In particular, 2-n-amylfuran and 1-octene-3-ol were not detected at the start of storage. In contrast, the BPA and BPAT samples formed an odor-encapsulating microcapsule system, which effectively maintained a high retention and stable release of odor compounds. For example, the release of hexanal in the BPA sample after dissolution increased by 3.67 times, reaching 7396.94 μg/L. The BPA samples exhibited protective effects on most of the selected key odor compounds, whereas the BPAT samples demonstrated better retention of 1-octene-3-ol. Additionally, the odor released from the powder before dissolution was significantly lower than that released after dissolution, suggesting that most odor compounds were effectively confined within the powder matrix. In conclusion, this study has demonstrated that the microcapsule system formed by pea albumin and aciculin could reduce odor evaporation, providing a new theoretical basis for the microencapsulation of enzymatically hydrolyzed chicken powder and the protection of its characteristic odor substances.

enzymatic hydrolysis of chicken soup powder  /  microcapsule  /  key odor substance  /  storage  /  headspace-solid phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
赵佳佳, 彭思怡, 郭海滨, 马玲君, 陈芳, 胡小松, 季俊夫. 酶解鸡汤微胶囊粉末的理化性质及贮藏期间特征气味释放研究. 食品工业科技, 2026 , 47 (3) : 342 -351 . DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024120010
Jiajia ZHAO, Siyi PENG, Haibin GUO, Lingjun MA, Fang CHEN, Xiaosong HU, Junfu JI. Physicochemical Properties of Enzymatic Chicken Soup Microcapsule Powder and the Release of Characteristic Odors during Storage[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026 , 47 (3) : 342 -351 . DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024120010
Year 2026 volume 47 Issue 3
81
37
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024120010
  • Receive Date:2024-12-02
  • Online Date:2026-10-25
  • Published:2026-02-01
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-12-02
Affiliations
    1National Engineering Research Center for Fruit and Vegetable Processing, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
    2Unilever Research & Development Center, Unilever (China) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200335, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/spgykj/EN/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024120010
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT