收藏切换
Effects of Synergic Methods of Ice Temperature Storage, Chitosan and High Static Pressure Treatment on Storage Quality of Cantonese Soft-boiled Chicken
收藏切换
Jingyi TANG, Yijun YAN, Liyan ZHANG*
Science and Technology of Food Industry | 2026, 47(16) : 440 - 448
Less
收藏切换
Science and Technology of Food Industry | 2026, 47(16): 440-448
• Storage and Preservation •
Effects of Synergic Methods of Ice Temperature Storage, Chitosan and High Static Pressure Treatment on Storage Quality of Cantonese Soft-boiled Chicken
Full
Jingyi TANG, Yijun YAN, Liyan ZHANG*
Affiliations
  • School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
Published: 2026-08-15 doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025080016
Outline
收藏切换

Cantonese soft-boiled chicken was famous for its tender meat and rich flavor, but its short shelf life and difficulty in preservation pose significant challenges to sales and promotion. To investigate preservation methods for this product, effects of four approaches including ice storage (IS), ice storage combined with chitosan (CS) immersion (IS+CS), ice storage combined with CS immersion and high-pressure processing (IS+CS+HPP) at two pressure levels (200 and 300 MPa) on the storage quality (pH, color, texture parameters, shear force value, total viable count (TVC), TVB-N value, TBARS value and sensory evaluation) of cantonese soft-boiled chicken were studied. The results showed that: During storage, there were no significant differences in L*, a*, b* values, hardness, springiness, or chewiness of the soft-boiled chicken treated with the four aforementioned methods (P>0.05). Compared with IS, both IS+CS and IS+CS+HPP inhibited the increase in pH, TVC, TVB-N value, and TBARS value, while retarded the decline in shear force value and sensory evaluation score of chicken during storage, which implicated that those methods could significantly suppress microbial growth and mitigate quality deterioration of the chicken during storage. Furthermore, the IS+CS+HPP treatment at two pressure levels (200, 300 MPa) exhibited more outstanding preservation efficiency for soft-boiled chicken than the IS+CS treatment, but there was no obvious difference in the preservation effect between the two pressure levels (P>0.05). The soft-boiled chicken preserved by IS+CS+HPP (300 MPa) achieved the lowest TVC (4.84 lg CFU/g), TVB-N value (10.81 mg/100 g), and TBARS value (0.38 mg/kg), along with the highest sensory score (38) after 14 days of storage. The IS+CS treatment prolonged the shelf life of the chicken by 4 days, while the IS+CS+HPP treatment extended it by 8 days, indicating that there were synergistic effects among IS, CS, and HPP in prolonging the shelf life of Cantonese soft-boiled chicken. The findings of this research can provide reference and guidance for maintaining the quality, improving the safety, and extending the shelf life of Cantonese soft-boiled chicken products.

cantonese soft-boiled chicken  /  ice storage  /  high pressure processing  /  chitosan immersion  /  collaborative preservation  /  storage quality
唐静怡, 闫怡君, 张立彦. 冰温协同壳聚糖及超高压处理对广式白切鸡贮藏品质的影响. 食品工业科技, 2026 , 47 (16) : 440 -448 . DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025080016
Jingyi TANG, Yijun YAN, Liyan ZHANG. Effects of Synergic Methods of Ice Temperature Storage, Chitosan and High Static Pressure Treatment on Storage Quality of Cantonese Soft-boiled Chicken[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026 , 47 (16) : 440 -448 . DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025080016
Year 2026 volume 47 Issue 16
88
41
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025080016
  • Receive Date:2025-08-10
  • Online Date:2026-10-24
  • Published:2026-08-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-08-10
Affiliations
    School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/spgykj/EN/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025080016
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT