收藏切换
Evaluation in Quality Characteristics of Sweet Potato Powder by Different Preparation Processes
收藏切换
Tian XIONG1, Wenjie CHEN1, 2, Hongyu QIAN1, 3, Fang CAI1, Jianbin SHI1, Yong SUI1, Xueling CHEN1, Chuanhui FAN1, Xin MEI1, *
Science and Technology of Food Industry | 2026, 47(17) : 395 - 402
Less
收藏切换
Science and Technology of Food Industry | 2026, 47(17): 395-402
• Analysis and Determination •
Evaluation in Quality Characteristics of Sweet Potato Powder by Different Preparation Processes
Full
Tian XIONG1, Wenjie CHEN1, 2, Hongyu QIAN1, 3, Fang CAI1, Jianbin SHI1, Yong SUI1, Xueling CHEN1, Chuanhui FAN1, Xin MEI1, *
Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Agro−product Processing and Nuclear Agricultural Technology, Hubei Academy of Agricultural, Key Laboratory of Cold Chain Logistics Technology for Agro−product, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hubei Key Laboratory of Characteristic Resources and Utilization Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China
  • 2College of Chemical Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China
  • 3College of Food Science and Engineering, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin 300457, China
Published: 2026-09-01 doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025080203
Outline
收藏切换

To screen for whole sweet potato powder (WSP) suitable for various industrial production processes, this study employed two representative sweet potato cultivars (Lingzi and Hong'anhong) as raw materials. It compared the variations in physicochemical properties, functional characteristics, sensory quality, and other related traits among four types of WSP produced by distinct processing methods: raw WSP, cooked WSP, freeze-dried WSP, and fermented raw WSP. The results showed that the pH of raw, cooked, and freeze-dried WSP ranged from 6.31 to 6.52, whereas fermentation decreased the pH of raw WSP to 4.42~5.90. Notably, single-strain fermentation using Lactiplantibacillus plantarum exhibited the strongest acid-producing capacity, with a total titratable acidity (TTA) value approximately three fold higher than that of unfermented raw WSP. Cooked WSP exhibited no endothermic peak, attributed to complete gelatinization. Among WSP samples of the same cultivar, cooked WSP had significantly higher water-holding capacity and water absorption-swelling capacity but poor freeze-thaw stability. Regarding oil-holding capacity, raw WSP was the lowest, whereas fermentation increased this capacity to more than twice its initial level. Furthermore, raw WSP fermented with single-strain L. plantarum had the highest soluble sugar content. Freeze-dried WSP performed best in sensory evaluation, with a total sensory score 7.56%~22.54% higher than those of the other types. For purple WSP, the anthocyanin content in freeze-dried purple WSP was approximately 5.32 times that in raw purple WSP. This study provides a valuable reference for the quality control, industrial-scale production, and application expansion of WSP.

sweet potato  /  whole sweet potato powder (WSP)  /  fermentation  /  Lactiplantibacillus plantarum  /  quality characteristics
熊添, 陈文洁, 钱虹羽, 蔡芳, 施建斌, 隋勇, 陈学玲, 范传会, 梅新. 不同工艺制备的甘薯全粉品质特性评价. 食品工业科技, 2026 , 47 (17) : 395 -402 . DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025080203
Tian XIONG, Wenjie CHEN, Hongyu QIAN, Fang CAI, Jianbin SHI, Yong SUI, Xueling CHEN, Chuanhui FAN, Xin MEI. Evaluation in Quality Characteristics of Sweet Potato Powder by Different Preparation Processes[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026 , 47 (17) : 395 -402 . DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025080203
Year 2026 volume 47 Issue 17
114
51
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025080203
  • Receive Date:2025-08-20
  • Online Date:2026-10-24
  • Published:2026-09-01
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-08-20
Affiliations
    1Institute of Agro−product Processing and Nuclear Agricultural Technology, Hubei Academy of Agricultural, Key Laboratory of Cold Chain Logistics Technology for Agro−product, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hubei Key Laboratory of Characteristic Resources and Utilization Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China
    2College of Chemical Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China
    3College of Food Science and Engineering, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin 300457, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/spgykj/EN/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025080203
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT