收藏切换
Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Processing Quality Characteristics of Wheat Varieties in Henan Province
收藏切换
Bing HONG1, Tingting HU1, Haoran GONG1, *, Xiaofang GAO1, Miaoran SU1, Min LI1, Jie XIE2, *
Science and Technology of Food Industry | 2026, 47(15) : 356 - 364
Less
收藏切换
Science and Technology of Food Industry | 2026, 47(15): 356-364
• Analysis and Determination •
Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Processing Quality Characteristics of Wheat Varieties in Henan Province
Full
Bing HONG1, Tingting HU1, Haoran GONG1, *, Xiaofang GAO1, Miaoran SU1, Min LI1, Jie XIE2, *
Affiliations
  • 1Zhengzhou Product Quality Inspection and Testing Center, Zhengzhou 450000, China
  • 2Luoyang Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Luoyang 471000, China
Published: 2026-08-01 doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025080093
Outline
收藏切换

In order to effectively evaluate the quality differences among different wheat varieties, 18 varieties cultivated in the Henan region were selected as the research subjects. An analysis was conducted on their grain, flour, and dough quality characteristics. Furthermore, a comprehensive evaluation model was established by integrating correlation analysis and principal component analysis. Cluster analysis was used to classify 18 different wheat varieties, analyzing the characteristics and potential application value of each category. The results showed that the bulk density had the smallest coefficient of variation (1.89%), while the formation time had the largest (78.96%). One variety (Xinmai 26) met the quality standards for strong-gluten wheat in all six key indicators, and seven varieties met the standards for medium-strong gluten. Various quality traits exhibited different degrees of correlation, with the strongest correlation observed between development time and stability time (0.982). Principal component analysis simplified the 14 evaluation indicators into four principal components, with a cumulative contribution rate of 82.005%. Weighted scores based on these components identified the top three varieties with the best comprehensive quality: Xinmai 26, Luohan 22, and Yumai 49, indicating high value for targeted breeding and processing. Cluster analysis categorized the varieties into three groups: Group Ⅰ (10 varieties) exhibited moderate grain quality but the poorest flour and dough quality; Group Ⅱ (6 varieties) had poorer grain quality but moderate flour and dough quality, suggesting inferior milling but acceptable processing quality; Group Ⅲ (2 varieties) demonstrated the best grain and flour quality, along with good dough quality, indicating superior overall milling, processing, and end-use potential. This study provides a theoretical reference for selecting and promoting high-quality wheat varieties and for the development of the processing industry.

wheat  /  processing quality  /  principal component analysis  /  cluster analysis  /  comprehensive evaluation
洪冰, 胡婷婷, 弓浩然, 高晓芳, 苏淼冉, 李敏, 谢婕. 河南小麦品种加工品质特性分析与综合评价. 食品工业科技, 2026 , 47 (15) : 356 -364 . DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025080093
Bing HONG, Tingting HU, Haoran GONG, Xiaofang GAO, Miaoran SU, Min LI, Jie XIE. Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Processing Quality Characteristics of Wheat Varieties in Henan Province[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026 , 47 (15) : 356 -364 . DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025080093
Year 2026 volume 47 Issue 15
111
51
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025080093
  • Receive Date:2025-08-11
  • Online Date:2026-10-24
  • Published:2026-08-01
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-08-11
Affiliations
    1Zhengzhou Product Quality Inspection and Testing Center, Zhengzhou 450000, China
    2Luoyang Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Luoyang 471000, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/spgykj/EN/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025080093
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT