Full
Outline
In this study, fresh leaves of Jinxuan tea, both infested and uninfested with Empoasca onukii, were used as raw materials. A systematic comparison was conducted to analyze differences in the sensory quality characteristics, primary biochemical components, and aroma substances of cicada tea products and control tea products (black and green teas), leading to the identification of key aroma compounds. The sensory evaluation results indicated that the cicada tea exhibited distinct nectar-like aroma characteristics. The biochemical composition analysis revealed that the soluble sugar content of cicada green tea (4.75%~5.54%) was significantly higher than that of the control green tea (4.41%) (P<0.05). Similarly, the soluble sugar content of cicada black tea (4.62%~5.49%) was significantly greater than that of the control black tea (4.17%). The total flavonoid content of cicada green tea (4.88%~5.30%) was significantly higher than that of cicada black tea (3.41%~4.49%), whereas the tea polyphenol content of cicada green tea (24.53%~25.18%) was significantly greater than that of cicada black tea (14.36%~18.92%). A total of 88 volatile compounds were identified, with the total volatile components in cicada tea exceeding those in the control tea. Furthermore, dehydrolinalool, o-cymene, and benzaldehyde were identified as the characteristic aroma compounds that distinguished cicada green tea from the control green tea. Additionally, cis-linalool oxide (furan type), geraniol, phenylethanol, methyl salicylate, trans-linalool oxide (pyran type), and 2-(5-methyl-5-vinyl tetrahydrofuran-2-yl) propyl-2-yl carbonate were characteristic aromatic substances that differentiated cicada black tea from the control black tea. The relative odor activity value analysis indicated that key aroma components, such as β-ionone, benzyl alcohol, o-cymene, and geraniol, were present at significantly higher levels in the cicada tea than in the control tea (P<0.05), which may contribute to the distinctive "honey aroma" of cicada tea. In this study, the biochemical basis of the distinctive flavor of cicada tea was analyzed, and theoretical support for its quality enhancement was provided.
105
38
| 科 Family | 属数 Number of genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) | 属 Genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae | 2 | 11 | 5.26 | 鹅膏菌属 Amanita | 10 | 4.78 |
| 小菇科 Mycenaceae | 2 | 12 | 5.74 | 丝盖伞属 Inocybe | 5 | 2.39 |
| 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae | 8 | 14 | 6.70 | 蜡蘑属 Laccaria | 5 | 2.39 |
| 红菇科 Russulaceae | 3 | 23 | 11.00 | 小皮伞属 Marasmius | 6 | 2.87 |
| 小菇属 Mycena | 11 | 5.26 | ||||
| 光柄菇属 Pluteus | 5 | 2.39 | ||||
| 红菇属 Russula | 17 | 8.13 | ||||
| 栓菌属 Trametes | 5 | 2.39 |
关闭全屏
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
010-62662699(Operation and Technical Support)
qkjq@cast.org.cn
Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House
