收藏切换
Distribution characteristics of pesticide residue risks and differences among tea types in commercial tea
收藏切换
Jia-Hui WANG1, Chao QI2, Yong-Sheng XU2, Xin-Dong TAN1, Hui MENG1, Shao-Qun LIU1, *
Journal of Food Safety & Quality | 2026, 17(16) : 49 - 57
Less
收藏切换
Journal of Food Safety & Quality | 2026, 17(16): 49-57
• Special Topic: Comprehensive Utilization and Quality Safety of Agricultural Products •
Distribution characteristics of pesticide residue risks and differences among tea types in commercial tea
Full
Jia-Hui WANG1, Chao QI2, Yong-Sheng XU2, Xin-Dong TAN1, Hui MENG1, Shao-Qun LIU1, *
Affiliations
  • 1.College of Horticulture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
  • 2.Shenzhen Zhongjianlian Tea Testing Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518100, China
doi: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20260114005
Outline
收藏切换
Objective

To evaluate the pesticide residue levels and their distribution characteristics in commercial tea products.

Methods

In this study, 73 kinds of pesticide residues were detected and analyzed in 132 randomly collected commercial tea samples, in accordance with the GB 2763—2021 National food safety standard-Maximum residue limits for pesticides in food and the GB 2763.1—2022 National food safety standard-Maximum residue limits for 112 pesticides including sodium 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetate. Quality control measures such as spiked recovery experiments were adopted to ensure data accuracy.

Results

The overall qualified rate of the samples was 99.24%, with only one oolong tea sample exceeding the maximum residue limits for fenvalerate and S-fenvalerate. The total pesticide detection rate was 50.00%, and 18 kinds of pesticides were detected in total. Among them, carbendazim (35.61%), acetamiprid (28.79%) and bifenthrin (16.67%) constituted the main risk combination, showing obvious tea-type preference. Further analysis revealed significant differences in pesticide residues among different tea categories. Oolong tea (68.42%) and reprocessed tea (68.18%) exhibited significantly higher pesticide detection rates and more detected pesticide species (11 kinds and 13 kinds, respectively) than other tea types, representing relatively high-risk categories.

Conclusion

The quality and safety of commercially available tea are generally controllable at present, but pesticide application is relatively common. It is still necessary to focus on the pesticide residue risks of oolong tea and reprocessed tea, strengthen the supervision of pesticides with high detection rates such as carbendazim, as well as restricted and banned pesticides like fenvalerate and S-fenvalerate, so as to promote the sustainable development of the tea industry.

commercial tea  /  pesticide residues  /  tea type differences  /  risk assessment  /  quality and safety  /  residue distribution
王佳蕙, 戚超, 徐永升, 谭新东, 孟慧, 刘少群. 市售茶叶农药残留风险分布特征与茶类差异研究. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2026 , 17 (16) : 49 -57 . DOI: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20260114005
Jia-Hui WANG, Chao QI, Yong-Sheng XU, Xin-Dong TAN, Hui MENG, Shao-Qun LIU. Distribution characteristics of pesticide residue risks and differences among tea types in commercial tea[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2026 , 17 (16) : 49 -57 . DOI: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20260114005
Year 2026 volume 17 Issue 16
8
2
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20260114005
  • Receive Date:2026-01-14
  • Online Date:2026-11-05
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2026-01-14
Affiliations
    1.College of Horticulture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
    2.Shenzhen Zhongjianlian Tea Testing Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518100, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/spaq/EN/10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20260114005
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT