收藏切换
Formula optimization and quality analysis of low-sugar tamarind-coconut oil fruit cake
收藏切换
PDF
De-Hui HU1, 2, Xin-Yu HUANG3, Dan-Rong SHI3, Xia LIU3, Ming-Zhen CHEN3, Jing QI3, *
Journal of Food Safety & Quality | 2025, 16(14) : 267 - 275
Less
收藏切换
Journal of Food Safety & Quality | 2025, 16(14): 267-275
Food Processing and Technology
Formula optimization and quality analysis of low-sugar tamarind-coconut oil fruit cake
Full
De-Hui HU1, 2, Xin-Yu HUANG3, Dan-Rong SHI3, Xia LIU3, Ming-Zhen CHEN3, Jing QI3, *
Affiliations
  • 1 Teaching Experiment and Training Center of Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanning 530200, China
  • 2 National Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center of TCM (Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Nanning 530200, China
  • 3 Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanning 530200, China
Published: 2025-07-25 doi: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20241219002
Outline
收藏切换

Objective To investigate the formula optimization conditions for low-sugar tamarind-coconut oil fruit cake, utilizing tamarind, coconut oil and xylitol as the primary ingredients, and to assess the quality of the final product. Methods The low-sugar tamarind-coconut oil fruit cake was optimized using sensory evaluation, texture, and color difference as indicators through a single-factor orthogonal experimental design. The physical, microbial, mineral element, and flavor characteristics of the finished product were also analyzed. Results The optimal formulation for low-sugar tamarind-coconut fruit cake was: Based on a total product weight of 50 g, tamarind juice 8 g, coconut oil 4 g, carrageenan 0.27 g, konjac powder 0.54 g and xylitol 8 g. Under these optimal conditions, the sensory score of the low-sugar tamarind-coconut oil fruit cake was 94.70 points; the hardness, elasticity, adhesiveness and chewiness were 93.33 g, 2.54 mm, 79.33 g and 2.00 mJ, respectively; the color difference L*, a*, b* were 46.34, 7.13, 13.27 respectively; the total sugar, total acid and amino acid content were 27.18 g/100 g, 0.39 mg/g and 0.25 mg/g, respectively; the content of mineral elements potassium, phosphorus, calcium, and magnesium were 717.95, 62.17, 73.70 and 91.40 mg/kg, respectively, with a ratio of phosphorus to calcium close to 1:1; electronic nose analysis reveals that the aroma of the finished product primarily consists of short-chain alkanes, alcohols, ethers, aldehydes, ketones, aromatic compounds, and sulfides. The sum of contribution rates of the first and second principal components in principal component analysis (PCA) was 98.80%. Conclusion The low-sugar tamarind-coconut oil fruit cake made by this method is nutritious, moderately soft and firm in texture, with uniform color and unique flavor.

tamarind  /  coconut oil  /  fruit cake  /  formula optimization  /  quality
De-Hui HU, Xin-Yu HUANG, Dan-Rong SHI, Xia LIU, Ming-Zhen CHEN, Jing QI. Formula optimization and quality analysis of low-sugar tamarind-coconut oil fruit cake[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2025 , 16 (14) : 267 -275 . DOI: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20241219002
Year 2025 volume 16 Issue 14
PDF
186
72
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20241219002
  • Receive Date:2024-12-19
  • Online Date:2026-01-07
  • Published:2025-07-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-12-19
Funding
Affiliations
    1 Teaching Experiment and Training Center of Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanning 530200, China
    2 National Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center of TCM (Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Nanning 530200, China
    3 Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanning 530200, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/spaq/EN/10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20241219002
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT