收藏切换
Technical evaluation of the rapid detection of diazepam in the aquatic products
收藏切换
PDF
Jing YANG, Fang FANG, Yuan SHEN, Juan SUN, Lun WU, Xiang CHEN, Chen JIA, Ying LI*
Journal of Food Safety & Quality | 2025, 16(7) : 102 - 108
Less
收藏切换
Journal of Food Safety & Quality | 2025, 16(7): 102-108
Special Topic: Analysis and Monitoring of Toxic and Harmful Substances in Food
Technical evaluation of the rapid detection of diazepam in the aquatic products
Full
Jing YANG, Fang FANG, Yuan SHEN, Juan SUN, Lun WU, Xiang CHEN, Chen JIA, Ying LI*
Affiliations
  • Center for Quality and Safety of Agricultural Products of Beijing, Beijing 100053, China
Published: 2025-04-15 doi: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20241031007
Outline
收藏切换

Objective To evaluate the diazepam rapid detection products of 5 manufacturers with high recognition in Beijing. Methods In this study, common carp, grass carp and crucian carp were used as the substrate for technical evaluation from the aspects of sensitivity, HOOK effect, specificity, accuracy and ease of operation, etc. The evaluation results were referred to the Notice on the field verification of rapid detection products for drug residues in aquatic products in 2023 issued by the Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences. Results The limits of detection for sensitivity of company I-V were 92.2%, 88.9%, 100.0%, 65.6% and 33.3%, respectively. Company II HOOK effect false negative 10%; HOOK effect did not appear in the other 4 companies. The cross-reaction rate of company III to the residues of 4 kinds of common veterinary drugs was as high as 60% to 90%, the cross-reaction rate of company II to enrofloxacin was 10%, the cross-reaction rate of company V to enrofloxacin and oxytetracycline were 10.0% and 20.0%. The other 2 companies did not have cross-reaction. The overall accuracy of all samples ranged from 79.2% to 96.9%. Company I had the highest overall accuracy (96.9%) and company V had the lowest accuracy (79.2%). The average test time of 24 samples is between 57 and 82 min, which meet the requirements of rapid detection technology. The rapid detection of diazepam in aquatic products of company I was qualified. The evaluation of company II-V was not qualified. At present, the performance of diazepam rapid detection products in aquatic products sold in Beijing was still a certain gap with the national legal confirmation method, which needed to be further improved. Conclusion This study is expected to provide reference for the purchase and application of grassroots supervision staff, and promote the application of rapid detection technology in the supervision of aquatic product quality and safety.

aquatic products  /  diazepam  /  rapid detection products  /  technical evaluation
Jing YANG, Fang FANG, Yuan SHEN, Juan SUN, Lun WU, Xiang CHEN, Chen JIA, Ying LI. Technical evaluation of the rapid detection of diazepam in the aquatic products[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2025 , 16 (7) : 102 -108 . DOI: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20241031007
Year 2025 volume 16 Issue 7
PDF
220
105
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20241031007
  • Receive Date:2024-10-31
  • Online Date:2025-07-19
  • Published:2025-04-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-10-31
Funding
Affiliations
    Center for Quality and Safety of Agricultural Products of Beijing, Beijing 100053, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/spaq/EN/10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20241031007
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT