收藏切换
Analysis of differences between quality standards and safety standards for health foods and research on pathways for system improvement
收藏切换
Su-Li LIU1, Hai-Zhou HUANG2, Shao-Ming JIN1, Tong-Tong LIU1, Rui-Qiang LIANG1, Jin CAO1, Xiao NING1, *
Journal of Food Safety & Quality | 2026, 17(6) : 18 - 27
Less
收藏切换
Journal of Food Safety & Quality | 2026, 17(6): 18-27
• Special Topic: Food Safety Risk Monitoring and Assessment •
Analysis of differences between quality standards and safety standards for health foods and research on pathways for system improvement
Full
Su-Li LIU1, Hai-Zhou HUANG2, Shao-Ming JIN1, Tong-Tong LIU1, Rui-Qiang LIANG1, Jin CAO1, Xiao NING1, *
Affiliations
  • 1.Key Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety, State Administration for Market Regulation, Beijing 100050, China
  • 2.Center for Food Evaluation, State Administration for Market Regulation, Beijing 100048, China
doi: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20251022002
Outline
收藏切换

As a special food category between ordinary food and medicine, the establishment and improvement of the standard system for health food are directly related to the development of the industry and the health rights of consumers. This article conducted a deep comparison and correlation analysis of quality standards and safety standards from multiple dimensions such as regulatory concepts, formulation principles, technical requirements and evaluation methods. It was found that the 2 types of standards have different positioning and follow different regulatory logics: Quality standards were centered on ensuring product effectiveness, focusing on quality attributes such as functional ingredients and physical and chemical indicators, and were quality requirements for achieving expected product functions. Safety standards were based on the principles of risk prevention and control, committed to identifying, assessing, and controlling potential hazards, and were mandatory bottom line requirements for safeguarding public health. Although there were significant differences in the principles, technical requirements, and management models between the 2 types of standards, they were interrelated and influence each other in practical applications. To support effective regulation and high-quality industrial development, it is recommended to promote systematic coordination and integration of quality and safety standards. A modern standard system with optimized architecture, basic science and international compatibility should be established to achieve the transition from separate management to integrated governance

health foods  /  quality standards  /  safety standards  /  regulatory science  /  standard harmonization  /  comparative analysis
刘素丽, 黄海舟, 金绍明, 刘彤彤, 梁瑞强, 曹进, 宁霄. 保健食品质量标准与安全标准差异分析及体系完善路径研究. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2026 , 17 (6) : 18 -27 . DOI: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20251022002
Su-Li LIU, Hai-Zhou HUANG, Shao-Ming JIN, Tong-Tong LIU, Rui-Qiang LIANG, Jin CAO, Xiao NING. Analysis of differences between quality standards and safety standards for health foods and research on pathways for system improvement[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2026 , 17 (6) : 18 -27 . DOI: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20251022002
Year 2026 volume 17 Issue 6
14
1
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20251022002
  • Receive Date:2025-10-22
  • Online Date:2026-11-05
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-10-22
Affiliations
    1.Key Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety, State Administration for Market Regulation, Beijing 100050, China
    2.Center for Food Evaluation, State Administration for Market Regulation, Beijing 100048, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/spaq/EN/10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20251022002
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT