收藏切换
Effects of different storage environments on the quality of Pu-erh tea
收藏切换
Jia-Cai WANG1, Xin-Xin WEI2, Ting-Ting WU3, *
Journal of Food Safety & Quality | 2026, 17(2) : 81 - 87
Less
收藏切换
Journal of Food Safety & Quality | 2026, 17(2): 81-87
• Special Topic: Tea Science Research •
Effects of different storage environments on the quality of Pu-erh tea
Full
Jia-Cai WANG1, Xin-Xin WEI2, Ting-Ting WU3, *
Affiliations
  • 1.Qianxinan Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Xingyi 562400, China
  • 2.Qianxinan Agricultural and Rural Development Center, Xingyi 562400, China
  • 3.Xinyang Tea Development Center, Xinyang 464000, China
doi: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20250219001
Outline
收藏切换
Objective

To explore the differences in sensory quality and biochemical components of Pu-erh tea under different storage environments.

Methods

High performance liquid chromatography was used to quantitatively detect more than 20 active components such as catechins, flavonoids and amino acids in 3 kinds of sun-dried green tea stored in Kunming and Dongguan and 3 kinds of Pu-erh (ripe tea) stored in Kunming and Guangzhou, and the sensory quality was evaluated.

Results

The main substances affecting the quality differences of 3 kinds of sun-dried green tea stored in 2 places were catechins and amino acids. There were significant differences in the content of gallocatechin gallate, gallic acid, glutamic acid, tyrosine, valine and aspartic acid in the sun-dried green tea samples stored in Dongguan and Kunming. The content of epicatechin gallate and gallocatechin gallate in 3 kinds of sun-dried green tea samples stored in Kunming were higher than those in the tea samples stored in Dongguan. The different components of Pu-erh (ripe tea) stored in Guangzhou and Kunming were mainly manifested in amino acids and catechins. The content of theanine, methionine and phenylalanine in the tea samples stored in Kunming were higher than those in the tea samples stored in Guangzhou. Epigallocatechin, catechin gallate, epigallocatechin gallate, arginine, histidine and leucine were higher in Kunming warehouse than in Guangzhou warehouse. Gallic acid and rutin were lower in Kunming than in Guangzhou. The results of sensory evaluation showed that the scores of sun-dried green tea samples in Kunming warehouse were higher than those in Dongguan warehouse, and the sensory quality scores of Pu-erh ripe tea samples stored in Guangzhou were slightly higher than those in Kunming warehouse.

Conclusion

Different storage environments have an important impact on the quality components such as gallic acid and amino acids in Pu-erh tea. The main influencing substances are gallocatechin gallate, gallic acid and glutamic acid, theanine, etc.

sun-dried green tea  /  Pu-erh (ripe tea)  /  storage environments  /  biochemical components  /  sensory quality
王佳菜, 魏欣欣, 吴婷婷. 不同仓储环境对普洱茶品质的影响. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2026 , 17 (2) : 81 -87 . DOI: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20250219001
Jia-Cai WANG, Xin-Xin WEI, Ting-Ting WU. Effects of different storage environments on the quality of Pu-erh tea[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2026 , 17 (2) : 81 -87 . DOI: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20250219001
Year 2026 volume 17 Issue 2
14
4
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20250219001
  • Receive Date:2025-02-19
  • Online Date:2026-11-05
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-02-19
Affiliations
    1.Qianxinan Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Xingyi 562400, China
    2.Qianxinan Agricultural and Rural Development Center, Xingyi 562400, China
    3.Xinyang Tea Development Center, Xinyang 464000, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/spaq/EN/10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20250219001
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT