收藏切换
Analysis and evaluation of pork quality in major market varieties from Shanghai Region
收藏切换
PDF
Bo DENG, Rou-Han CHEN, Xiao-Jun YANG, Yu-Men ZHOU, Ying-Qing MA, Xiu-Ping SHEN*
Journal of Food Safety & Quality | 2025, 16(9) : 248 - 258
Less
收藏切换
Journal of Food Safety & Quality | 2025, 16(9): 248-258
Food Analysis and Detection
Analysis and evaluation of pork quality in major market varieties from Shanghai Region
Full
Bo DENG, Rou-Han CHEN, Xiao-Jun YANG, Yu-Men ZHOU, Ying-Qing MA, Xiu-Ping SHEN*
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Agricultural Products Quality and Safety Center, Shanghai 201708, China
Published: 2025-05-15 doi: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20250207002
Outline
收藏切换

Objective To construct a quality evaluation system for the main-sold pork in Shanghai and analyze the appearance, texture, nutrition, and flavor indicators of different pig breeds. Methods A total of 95 samples of the longissimus dorsi muscles were collected from 7 boar breeds, including Pudong White pigs. Fifty-five parameters were detected. Correlation analysis and radar charts were used to determine the core indicators for quality evaluation. Results In terms of appearance quality, different pig breeds showed differences in indicators such as pH and moisture content. Shawutou pigs, Pudong White pigs and Shanghai White pigs had slightly lower water content, while Shawutou pigs had a high drip loss rate. Topigs had slightly higher intramuscular fat content. Correlation analysis showed that the water content was negatively correlated with 24-hour drip loss. Regarding texture, Fengjing pigs had high shear force, Topigs had high hardness. Correlation analysis showed that the shear force was negatively correlated with hardness and positively correlated with elasticity. In terms of nutritional quality, it showed that the protein content in Shanghai local pig breeds was higher than that in common Duroc-Landrace-Yorkshire pigs. Three-way crossbred pigs and Shanghai White pigs had slightly lower fat content. The proportion of essential amino acids was the lowest in three-way crossbred pigs. In terms of flavor quality, the total amount of umami amino acids in each pig breed was similar. Shanghai White pigs had a high content of cytidine monophosphate, three-way crossbred pigs and Fengjing pigs had a high content of uridine monophosphate, Topigs had a low content of multiple flavor-related nucleotides, and Shawutou pigs had a high content of adenosine monophosphate. Correlation analysis showed that aspartic acid was positively correlated with the total amount of umami amino acids. Conclusion A quality evaluation system for Shanghai pork can be constructed around 13 core indicators, including water content, conductivity, shear force, hardness, resilience, protein, fat, magnesium, potassium, selenium content, adenosine monophosphate, inosine monophosphate, and aspartic acid. In the future, relevant factors need to be comprehensively considered to construct a comprehensive evaluation model.

pork quality  /  evaluation system  /  longissimus dorsi muscle  /  core indicators  /  correlation analysis
Bo DENG, Rou-Han CHEN, Xiao-Jun YANG, Yu-Men ZHOU, Ying-Qing MA, Xiu-Ping SHEN. Analysis and evaluation of pork quality in major market varieties from Shanghai Region[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2025 , 16 (9) : 248 -258 . DOI: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20250207002
Year 2025 volume 16 Issue 9
PDF
270
121
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20250207002
  • Receive Date:2025-02-07
  • Online Date:2025-07-17
  • Published:2025-05-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-02-07
Funding
Affiliations
    Shanghai Agricultural Products Quality and Safety Center, Shanghai 201708, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/spaq/EN/10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20250207002
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT