收藏切换
Quality evaluation and analysis of major Vitis vinifera L. varieties cultivated in the Shanghai Region
收藏切换
PDF
Bin ZHOU1, Xiao-Jun YANG1, Rou-Han CHEN1, Xiao-Jun XI2, Qian ZHA2, Ying-Qing MA1, Bo DENG1, *
Journal of Food Safety & Quality | 2025, 16(8) : 234 - 243
Less
收藏切换
Journal of Food Safety & Quality | 2025, 16(8): 234-243
Food Analysis and Detection
Quality evaluation and analysis of major Vitis vinifera L. varieties cultivated in the Shanghai Region
Full
Bin ZHOU1, Xiao-Jun YANG1, Rou-Han CHEN1, Xiao-Jun XI2, Qian ZHA2, Ying-Qing MA1, Bo DENG1, *
Affiliations
  • 1. Shanghai Agri-products Quality and Safety Center, Shanghai 201708, China
  • 2. Forestry and Pomology Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China
Published: 2025-04-25 doi: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20250109006
Outline
收藏切换

Objective To evaluate the quality differences among the main Vitis vinifera L. varieties in Shanghai, identify key quality indicators. Methods A total of 34 batches of Vitis vinifera L. samples were collected from 10 major cultivars cultivated by 7 enterprises in Shanghai. Twelve quality parameters, including cluster weight, berry weight, fructose, glucose, total acid, vitamin C, amino acids, and anthocyanins, were analyzed to assess Vitis vinifera L. quality from 3 perspectives: Physical appearance, intrinsic nutritional quality and overall quality. Results There were significant differences (P<0.05) in the physical appearance, intrinsic nutritional quality and overall quality of Vitis vinifera L. varieties. Shine Muscat performed exceptionally well in sugar-acid balance, Zuijinxiang showed high levels of vitamin C and overall nutritional quality, Jumeigui had a notable advantage in fructose and glucose content, and Shenyuan exhibited the highest total amino acids, though the amino acid composition needs optimization. Principal component analysis revealed that the main factors contributing to quality differences were the sugar-acid ratio, amino acid composition and fruit weight. Conclusion The major Vitis vinifera L. cultivars in Shanghai exhibit distinct quality advantages. Shine Muscat, Zuijinxiang and Jumeigui are particularly suitable for promotion as premium table Vitis vinifera L. varieties. These findings provide a scientific basis for Vitis vinifera L. varieties breeding, cultivation management, and market positioning, while also serving as a reference for consumer health and the development of functional foods.

Shanghai  /  Vitis vinifera L.  /  quality evaluation
Bin ZHOU, Xiao-Jun YANG, Rou-Han CHEN, Xiao-Jun XI, Qian ZHA, Ying-Qing MA, Bo DENG. Quality evaluation and analysis of major Vitis vinifera L. varieties cultivated in the Shanghai Region[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2025 , 16 (8) : 234 -243 . DOI: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20250109006
Year 2025 volume 16 Issue 8
PDF
273
127
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20250109006
  • Receive Date:2025-01-09
  • Online Date:2025-07-19
  • Published:2025-04-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-01-09
Funding
Affiliations
    1. Shanghai Agri-products Quality and Safety Center, Shanghai 201708, China
    2. Forestry and Pomology Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/spaq/EN/10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20250109006
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT