Objective To evaluate the diazepam rapid detection products of 5 manufacturers with high recognition in Beijing. Methods In this study, common carp, grass carp and crucian carp were used as the substrate for technical evaluation from the aspects of sensitivity, HOOK effect, specificity, accuracy and ease of operation, etc. The evaluation results were referred to the Notice on the field verification of rapid detection products for drug residues in aquatic products in 2023 issued by the Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences. Results The limits of detection for sensitivity of company I-V were 92.2%, 88.9%, 100.0%, 65.6% and 33.3%, respectively. Company II HOOK effect false negative 10%; HOOK effect did not appear in the other 4 companies. The cross-reaction rate of company III to the residues of 4 kinds of common veterinary drugs was as high as 60% to 90%, the cross-reaction rate of company II to enrofloxacin was 10%, the cross-reaction rate of company V to enrofloxacin and oxytetracycline were 10.0% and 20.0%. The other 2 companies did not have cross-reaction. The overall accuracy of all samples ranged from 79.2% to 96.9%. Company I had the highest overall accuracy (96.9%) and company V had the lowest accuracy (79.2%). The average test time of 24 samples is between 57 and 82 min, which meet the requirements of rapid detection technology. The rapid detection of diazepam in aquatic products of company I was qualified. The evaluation of company II-V was not qualified. At present, the performance of diazepam rapid detection products in aquatic products sold in Beijing was still a certain gap with the national legal confirmation method, which needed to be further improved. Conclusion This study is expected to provide reference for the purchase and application of grassroots supervision staff, and promote the application of rapid detection technology in the supervision of aquatic product quality and safety.
| 科 Family | 属数 Number of genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) | 属 Genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae | 2 | 11 | 5.26 | 鹅膏菌属 Amanita | 10 | 4.78 |
| 小菇科 Mycenaceae | 2 | 12 | 5.74 | 丝盖伞属 Inocybe | 5 | 2.39 |
| 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae | 8 | 14 | 6.70 | 蜡蘑属 Laccaria | 5 | 2.39 |
| 红菇科 Russulaceae | 3 | 23 | 11.00 | 小皮伞属 Marasmius | 6 | 2.87 |
| 小菇属 Mycena | 11 | 5.26 | ||||
| 光柄菇属 Pluteus | 5 | 2.39 | ||||
| 红菇属 Russula | 17 | 8.13 | ||||
| 栓菌属 Trametes | 5 | 2.39 |