收藏切换
Comparative study on 3 kinds of standard detection methods of Cronobacter in food
收藏切换
PDF
Jie-Ying ZHENG1, 2, Wei-Liang WU1, Jian-Yun ZHAO2, Xin GAN2, *, Li BAI1, 2, *
Journal of Food Safety & Quality | 2025, 16(1) : 195 - 201
Less
收藏切换
Journal of Food Safety & Quality | 2025, 16(1): 195-201
Special Topic: Detection and Prevention of Foodborne Pathogenic Microorganisms
Comparative study on 3 kinds of standard detection methods of Cronobacter in food
Full
Jie-Ying ZHENG1, 2, Wei-Liang WU1, Jian-Yun ZHAO2, Xin GAN2, *, Li BAI1, 2, *
Affiliations
  • 1. School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
  • 2. National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Food Safety Risk Assessment, China National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment, Beijing 100021, China
Published: 2025-01-15 doi: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20240927009
Outline
收藏切换

Objective To compare three domestic and foreign Cronobacter detection methods, for verifying the actual detection performance of three standard methods: GB 4789.40—2016 National standard for food safety food-Microbiology tests Cronobacter spp. (Enterobacter sakazakii) test, GB 4789.40—2024 National standard for food safety food-Microbiology tests Cronobacter test and ISO 22964—2017 Food chain microbiology-Horizontal detection methods for Cronobacter spp. Methods Three standard methods were used to detect Cronobacter in 403 samples collected from 2020 to 2022, including infant formula, cereal-based infant supplements, corn ingredients, and raw and supplemental ingredients of infant formula, and to test Cronobacter isolates for drug susceptibility. Results The total contamination rate of Cronobacter in 403 samples was 17.9% (72/403), and the contamination rates of corn raw material, cereal-based infant supplement and infant formula were 37.3% (38/102), 23.4% (33/141) and 1.0% (1/100), respectively. Although there was no significant difference in the total detection rate among the three standard methods (χ2=3.601, P=0.170), 41.5 ℃ could effectively improve the detection rate compared with 44 ℃ (χ2=18.813, P=0.000). The resistance rate of 72 strains of Cronobacter was 55.6% (40/72), among which the resistance rates of cefazolin, ampicillin, and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid were 52.8% (38/72), 5.6% (4/72), and 1.4% (1/72), respectively. Conclusion This study shows that GB 4789.40—2024 has reached the level of the international relevant methods, providing data support for the mutual recognition of the test results of GB 4789.40 and ISO 22964 methods. Cronobacter has high resistance to cefazolin, which should be avoided when choosing antibiotics for clinical treatment.

Cronobacter  /  GB 4789.40  /  ISO 22964  /  comparison of method  /  antibiotic susceptibility
Jie-Ying ZHENG, Wei-Liang WU, Jian-Yun ZHAO, Xin GAN, Li BAI. Comparative study on 3 kinds of standard detection methods of Cronobacter in food[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2025 , 16 (1) : 195 -201 . DOI: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20240927009
Year 2025 volume 16 Issue 1
PDF
248
110
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20240927009
  • Receive Date:2024-09-27
  • Online Date:2025-07-21
  • Published:2025-01-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-09-27
Affiliations
    1. School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
    2. National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Food Safety Risk Assessment, China National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment, Beijing 100021, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/spaq/EN/10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20240927009
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT