收藏切换
Repurposed Acarbose Targets Nidogen-1 to Remodel the Tumor Stroma and Suppress Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
收藏切换
PDF
Tao Han1, Lujun Chen2, Ning Liu3, Ying chen Han1, Zhi Zhu4, Shuyi Wang1, Haoran Song1, Ziming Gao4, Lin Su5, Qilin Hu1, Linda Hammerich6, Timothy M. Pawlik7, Yuhan Zhang8, Masatoshi Kudo9, Hao Li10, Lei Ma1, Giorgio Valabrega11, Guang Wang12, Zhengqiang Yang13, Qiuhua Luo14, Donatella Marino11, Zihang Xu5, *, Meng Niu15, *, Tingsong Chen16, *, Heming Li1, *, Kai Li4, 17, *
Research. Vol 9 Article ID 1161
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 9 Article ID 1161
• RESEARCH ARTICLE •
Repurposed Acarbose Targets Nidogen-1 to Remodel the Tumor Stroma and Suppress Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Full
Tao Han1, Lujun Chen2, Ning Liu3, Ying chen Han1, Zhi Zhu4, Shuyi Wang1, Haoran Song1, Ziming Gao4, Lin Su5, Qilin Hu1, Linda Hammerich6, Timothy M. Pawlik7, Yuhan Zhang8, Masatoshi Kudo9, Hao Li10, Lei Ma1, Giorgio Valabrega11, Guang Wang12, Zhengqiang Yang13, Qiuhua Luo14, Donatella Marino11, Zihang Xu5, *, Meng Niu15, *, Tingsong Chen16, *, Heming Li1, *, Kai Li4, 17, *
Affiliations
  • 1Department of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
  • 2Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Onco-Pathology, Cancer Institute and General Surgery Institute, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
  • 3Department of Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
  • 4Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
  • 5Shanghai Key Laboratory of Health Identification and Assessment, School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • 6Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • 7Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • 8Shenzhen Engineering Center for Translational Medicine of Precision Cancer Immunodiagnosis and Therapy, YuceBio Technology Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, China.
  • 9Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • 10Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
  • 11Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Medical Oncology, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy.
  • 12Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
  • 13Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • 14Department of Pharmacy, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
  • 15Department of Interventional Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
  • 16Department of Interventional Oncology, Seventh People’s Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • 17Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
About Author:

† These authors contributed equally to this work.

‡ Lead contact.

Published: 2026-02-20 doi: 10.34133/research.1161
Outline
收藏切换

Portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is among the most lethal complications of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), yet its molecular mechanisms and immune features remain poorly characterized. To address this gap, we performed a comprehensive multi-omics analysis of 99 specimens from 47 patients, integrating nCounter profiling, single-cell RNA sequencing, digital spatial profiling, and proteomics to construct the first spatial map of the PVTT microenvironment. These analyses revealed marked intratumoral heterogeneity and enrichment of myofibroblast-like cancer-associated fibroblasts (myCAFs) arising through a macrophage-to-myofibroblast transition. Nidogen-1 (NID1) was identified as a stromal driver of immune barriers, highly expressed in PVTT cores and associated with impaired antitumor immunity. Guided by these mechanistic insights, we repurposed acarbose, a Food and Drug Administration-approved drug, to inhibit the NID1 axis. Functional assays demonstrated that acarbose disrupted myCAF-mediated immune barriers, suppressed PVTT progression, and synergized with anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD-1) therapy in preclinical models. Furthermore, analysis of an independent clinical cohort of 810 HCC patients revealed a substantially lower incidence of PVTT among those receiving acarbose, underscoring its translational potential. Collectively, these findings establish the immune–stromal landscape of PVTT, uncover NID1-driven stromal remodeling as a mechanism of immune evasion, and highlight drug repurposing as an immediately actionable strategy to improve outcomes in HCC with PVTT.

Tao Han, Lujun Chen, Ning Liu, Ying chen Han, Zhi Zhu, Shuyi Wang, Haoran Song, Ziming Gao, Lin Su, Qilin Hu, Linda Hammerich, Timothy M. Pawlik, Yuhan Zhang, Masatoshi Kudo, Hao Li, Lei Ma, Giorgio Valabrega, Guang Wang, Zhengqiang Yang, Qiuhua Luo, Donatella Marino, Zihang Xu, Meng Niu, Tingsong Chen, Heming Li, Kai Li. Repurposed Acarbose Targets Nidogen-1 to Remodel the Tumor Stroma and Suppress Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus in Hepatocellular Carcinoma[J]. Research, 2026 , 9 (2) : 1161 - . DOI: 10.34133/research.1161
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide [1–5], with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) representing one of its most aggressive and lethal complications [6,7]. PVTT, classified as stage C in the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system, carries a dismal prognosis with a median survival of only 2.7 months without treatment [8–10]. Despite advances in systemic therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), its management remains a major challenge due to limited treatment efficacy, the difficulty of obtaining PVTT specimens, and the lack of detailed molecular and immune characterization [11–14].
PVTT formation involves tumor cell detachment, extracellular matrix (ECM) migration, vascular invasion, and colonization within the portal vein—processes shaped by interactions with the tumor microenvironment (TME) [15–19]. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), particularly myofibroblast-like CAFs (myCAFs), remodel the ECM, promote immune barriers, and modulate responses to immunotherapy [20–31]. Emerging evidence suggests that macrophage-to-myofibroblast transition (MMT) can generate pathogenic CAFs, yet its role in PVTT remains unknown. The scarcity of matched PVTT, primary tumor, and adjacent nontumor tissues has further hindered comprehensive mechanistic studies [32–35].
Here, using matched PVTT, primary tumor, and adjacent nontumor tissues, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), spatial transcriptomics, bulk transcriptomics, and proteomics to generate the first spatial immune map of PVTT. We identify an immune-excluded stromal niche driven by MMT, with nidogen-1 (NID1) as a key mediator of immune barriers’ reprogramming and ICI resistance. Targeting NID1 with the repurposed drug acarbose disrupted myCAF-driven immune barriers, enhanced anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD-1) efficacy in preclinical models, and was associated with reduced PVTT incidence in clinical cohorts, offering a cost-effective and translationally actionable strategy for this lethal complication of HCC.
Data from 810 HCC patients were collected from 2 hospital-based HCC biobanks (Fig. 1A). After applying eligibility criteria, 296 patients with advanced HCC were enrolled, including 179 with PVTT and 117 without PVTT. All patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status of 0 to 2, had a Child–Pugh classification of A/B, were aged between 18 and 75 years, had an estimated life expectancy ≥3 months, and had complete baseline and imaging data.
Among these patients (Table S1 and Fig. 1B), 60.14% were aged ≤60 years, with male predominance (89.53%). Additionally, 40.54% of the patients had a Child–Pugh A classification and 81.76% had BCLC stage C. A significant proportion of patients (41.55%) had more than 3 tumors, and 58.45% had tumors with a maximum diameter greater than 5 cm; 62.12% of the patients had cirrhosis, and 78.38% had a history of hepatitis B virus infection. Additionally, 60.47% of the patients had PVTT.
Patients with PVTT had significantly shorter median overall survival than those without PVTT (16.27 vs. 26.33 months, P = 0.00013) (Fig. 1C). Survival was longer in VP type I/II than in VP type III/IV (21.77 vs. 12.77 months, P = 0.0038) (Fig. 1D). Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data confirmed poorer survival in patients with vascular invasion, especially extrahepatic involvement (Fig. S1A and B).
In a subset of 86 patients receiving standard first-line targeted and immune therapy, objective response rate and disease control rate were both higher in patients without PVTT (Fig. 1E and F and Fig. S1C to F). Taken together, these findings demonstrated that advanced HCC patients with PVTT had a poor prognosis and limited response to immunotherapy, illustrating the need for further research to uncover the mechanism of PVTT formation and identify better treatment options.
To elucidate the mechanisms of PVTT formation, we profiled the immune microenvironment in 27 patient samples using the nCounter IO 360 panel (Table S2), including 7 adjacent tumor lesions (NTLs), 12 primary tumors, and 8 PVTT samples (Table S3).
After quality control (QC), 26 samples were analyzed (Fig. S2A and B). Principal component analysis (PCA) and uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) analyses revealed clear separation between NTL and tumor/PVTT tissues, while primary tumor and PVTT clustered together (Fig S2E to H).
Compared with NTLs, primary tumor tissues from HCC with PVTT (HCC-P) displayed stronger transcriptomic changes than primary tumor tissues from HCC without PVTT (HCC-NP) (Fig. S3A to D). Lymphotoxin beta was uniquely elevated in HCC-P samples (Fig. S3E and F). When comparing primary tumors, the up-regulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in HCC-P included LIF, LAMC2, and MMP7, whereas TDO2 and PCK2 were enriched in HCC-NP (Fig. S3G and H).
Pathway analysis indicated enhanced antigen release and angiogenesis in tumors (Figs. S4 and S5), with macrophage/neutrophil signatures enriched in HCC-NP and proliferation-, adhesion-, and motility-related genes in HCC-P. No significant differences were observed between HCC-P and PVTT or between HCC-P and HCC-NP in immune subsets or pathway activity (Figs. S6 and S7). Collectively, bulk transcriptomics highlighted general tumor–immune alterations but failed to resolve the distinct features of the PVTT microenvironment.
To comprehensively characterize the PVTT microenvironment, scRNA-seq was performed (Table S4). Cell annotation showed enrichment of B cells, endothelial cells, macrophages, and T/natural killer (NK) cells in HCC-P, while fibroblasts and hepatocytes predominated in PVTT (Fig. S8A). CellChat analysis identified strong macrophage–fibroblast interactions, validated using a public dataset (GSE149614) (Fig. S8B to D), suggesting their key role in tumor remodeling.
NanoString GeoMx digital spatial profiling (DSP) spatial transcriptomics profiled 27 tumor samples from 14 HCC patients (Table S5). Based on multiplex labeling with SYTO 13, PanCK, CD8, and CD68, regions of interest (ROIs) were classified into CD68-high tumor, CD68-low tumor, and stromal regions (Fig. 2A and B and Fig. S9). Gene expression data of 18,694 genes from 54 ROIs and 95 areas of interest (AOIs) were obtained (Fig. S10). After normalization and QC, 92 AOIs were retained (Fig. S11A to C). PCA and UMAP revealed scattered NTL and PVTT distributions, with partial overlap between primary tumor and both tissues (Fig. S11D and E). HCC-P was distinct from HCC-NP, while PVTT partially overlapped with HCC-NP, indicating high intertissue heterogeneity (Fig. 2C and Fig. S11F).
To explore spatial transcriptional diversity, the top 200 variable genes from 92 AOIs were clustered. Deviating gene expression profiling tumor heterogeneity (DEPTH) analysis divided AOIs into 3 groups with high, moderate, or low inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) scores (Fig. S11G and H) [36]. PVTT samples mainly showed high or moderate ITH (Fig. S11I), with stromal and CD68-low tumor regions enriched in the high-ITH group (Fig. S11J). These results indicate spatial ITH in PVTT, associated with HCC biological features. Collectively, the high degree of ITH observed in PVTT suggests a biologically distinct microenvironment characterized by immune exclusion, which may contribute to reduced therapeutic responsiveness and increased treatment resistance.
Due to the high heterogeneity of PVTT, the spatial stroma of the NTL, HCC-P, HCC-NP, and PVTT samples was analyzed, focusing on tumorigenesis and pathways regulating immunity, metabolism, and signaling. PVTT and HCC-P samples exhibited immunosuppression, disrupted cell adhesion, abnormal metabolism, and activation of tumor-promoting (including MAPK, PI3K/AKT, EGFR, ERBB2, and WNT signaling), immune escape (such as antigen processing and presentation, cytokine and chemokine receptor signaling, TGF-β-related signaling, and NK cell cytotoxicity), and metastatic pathways (Fig. 2D).
Knowledge-based functional gene expression (Fge) signatures were used to characterize stromal features associated with PVTT formation. As shown in Fig. 2E, HCC-P and PVTT exhibited reduced B, NK, T, regulatory T cells, M1 macrophages, and neutrophils but increased CAF signatures. Matrix remodeling and protumor cytokines were elevated in HCC-P, while PVTT samples showed lower scores for CD45+, B cells, macrophages, neutrophils, CD3+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells but higher abnormal metabolism scores, consistent with Fge results (Fig. 2F and Fig. S12A to E). These results confirmed that PVTT is characterized by high ITH and an immunosuppressive microenvironment, suggesting that high heterogeneity may contribute to immune evasion.
Cell subset distributions were further examined using SpatialDecon (Fig. 2G and H). B cells were enriched in NTLs and HCC-NP, fibroblasts were the highest in HCC-P, and vascular cancer-associated fibroblast (vCAF) infiltration was the greatest in PVTT (Fig. 2I and Fig. S12F), and dendritic cell abundance was increased in the NTL and HCC-NP samples (Fig. S12G). The number of secreted phosphoprotein 1-positive (SPP1+) macrophages was higher in the HCC-P samples, while apolipoprotein E-positive (APOE+) macrophages were lower (Fig. 2I and Fig. S12H). The number of macrophage receptor with collagenous structure-positive (MARCO+) macrophages were more abundant in the NTL samples (Fig. S12I), while T/NK cell infiltration was relatively low overall (Fig. 2I).
Spatial localization revealed that B cells were mainly stromal, with fewer in tumor regions (Fig. S12J). The infiltration of SPP1+ macrophages and T/NK cells were higher in the stromal regions of HCC-P and PVTT (Fig. S12K and L). The Fge signature analysis of the AOIs demonstrated higher immune cell infiltration, including of T cells, B cells, and M1 macrophages, in the stroma (Fig. S13). These findings further confirm the significant immunosuppression and spatial heterogeneity in primary tumors and PVTT.
Further analysis revealed that in HCC-NP samples, the expression of matrix remodeling genes was predominantly elevated in the stromal regions (Fig. S14A to F). In contrast, both HCC-P and PVTT samples showed significantly increased expression of CAF- and tumor-associated-macrophage-associated genes in the stroma (Fig. 3A and B and Fig. S14G to I). Consistently, immunostaining for alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) revealed more positive cells in the stroma of HCC-P and PVTT tissues than in that of HCC-NP, supporting enhanced fibroblast activation and expansion in these aggressive lesions (Fig. S14J and K). Notably, myCAF levels were higher in the stroma than in the tumor regions of HCC-P and PVTT samples (Fig. 3C and D), but no such difference was observed in HCC-NP (Fig. S14L and M).
Direct comparison of matched AOIs between HCC-P and HCC-NP samples further highlighted increased CAF-driven matrix remodeling in HCC-P stroma (Fig. S15A and B). Deconvolution analysis also revealed a higher abundance of myCAFs in the stroma of HCC-P and PVTT samples (Fig. 3D and Fig. S15C to E). Single-cell analysis showed that myCAF proportions were even greater in PVTT than in HCC-P (Fig. 3E and Fig. S15F). The enrichment analysis showed that the myCAF DEGs were enriched in key processes such as cell adhesion, integrin signaling, and proliferation regulation (Fig. S15G). While in the GSE149614 dataset, the DEGs in the myCAF clusters were enriched in processes like protein transport, cell adhesion, and cell junction, which further confirmed the results of our cohort (Fig. S15H). Overall, these findings reveal that CAFs, particularly myCAFs, play a crucial role in stroma remodeling and the formation of PVTT.
MyCAFs, a key CAF subset, drive cancer initiation and progression. Their diverse origins and molecular profiles may offer therapeutic targets, but the role of MMT, known in renal disease, remains unclear in cancer, particularly HCC. To investigate the origin of myCAFs and their role in PVTT, multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) was performed on tissues from 6 HCC-NP and 8 HCC-P patients (Table S6). Immunofluorescence (Fig. 3F and Fig. S16A) identified α-SMA+TAGLN+CD68+ cells (circles) in HCC-P (Fig. 3G). In stroma, CD68 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was higher in HCC-P, while α-SMA showed no difference (Fig. S16B). In tumors, CD68 MFI was unchanged, but α-SMA MFI was higher in HCC-P (Fig. S16C). Spatial analysis showed more CD68+ cells in HCC-NP tumors, with no stromal or α-SMA+ cell density differences (Fig. S16D and E). However, the stromal MMT (CD68+α-SMA+) cell density was higher in HCC-P (Fig. 3H and Fig. S16F). In HCC-P, MMT cells localized closer to tumor cells, unlike α-SMA+ cells (Fig. 3I and J and Fig. S16G). These findings suggest that MMT promotes myCAF formation and immune-barrier establishment in PVTT.
To characterize MMT transcriptionally, scRNA-seq and CellChat analysis showed strong communication between S100A+/SPP1+ macrophages and myCAFs (Fig. S17A). Macrophages exhibited up-regulation of transgelin (TAGLN) and actin alpha 2 (ACTA2) (Fig. S17B and C), while myCAFs showed increased CD68 expression (Fig. S17D). The top 12 key genes that played a key role in the MMT process are shown in Fig. S17E. Notably, complement C1q A chain (C1QA), complement C1q B chain (C1QB), complement C1q C chain (C1QC) were associated with MMT [37]. CytoTRACE identified SPP1+ macrophages as the differentiation origin and myCAFs as the endpoint (Fig. S17F). Monocle2 trajectory analysis confirmed this transition (Fig. 3K).
Validation in an external cohort (GSE149614) showed similar macrophage–myCAF communication (Fig. S18A). A subset of macrophages expressed ACTA2 and TAGLN (Fig. S18B), and Monocle2 analysis again revealed the differentiation from macrophages to myCAFs (Fig. S18C). The top 12 genes that played a key role in the MMT process are shown in Fig. S18D. These findings suggest that the MMT process in HCC-P promotes myCAF generation and the tumor immune barrier, thereby facilitating PVTT formation.
To identify key genes mediating myCAF-driven PVTT formation, DEGs (PVTT vs. primary tumor) from stromal and PanCK DSP data were intersected with myCAF DEGs from scRNA-seq, revealing NID1 as the overlapping gene (Fig. 4A). Spatial profiling revealed a stromal NID1 expression increase from HCC-NP to HCC-P and PVTT, with the highest expression in PVTT stroma (Fig. 4B). At the single-cell level, myCAFs in primary tumors expressed higher NID1 than those in PVTT, with no difference in other CAF subtypes (Fig. S18E and F). These findings indicate that NID1 is mainly expressed in stromal myCAFs of PVTT and may contribute to its immunosuppressive microenvironment and formation.
Circulating proteins are vital for assessing the tumor immune microenvironment, with the proximity extension assay (PEA) being widely used in biomarker discovery. We next analyzed 26 plasma samples from 16 HCC patients using the Olink immuno-oncology panel (Table S7). After QC, UMAP showed clear separation between HCC-NP and HCC-P (Fig. S19A to D). Compared with HCC-NP, 17 proteins were up-regulated in HCC-P, while interleukin-4 (IL-4) was down-regulated (Fig. 4C). Enrichment analysis linked these proteins to cytokine production, immune inhibition, and leukocyte migration (Fig. S19E to H). Protein levels in HCC-NP changed little after treatment (Fig. S20A and B), whereas HCC-P showed marked pre/posttherapy changes, including increased programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), interleukin-12 (IL-12), and placental growth factor (PGF) and decreased platelet-derived growth factor subunit B (PDGF-B), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2), and tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 14 (TNFSF14) (Fig. S20C to E), indicating greater sensitivity to ICIs in HCC-P.
To further probe NID1’s role in PVTT, 18 differential proteins (HCC-NP vs. HCC-P) plus NID1 were analyzed via the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) (Fig. S20F). NID1 directly interacted with matrix metallopeptidase 12 (MMP12), which connected to tumor necrosis factor (TNF), C-C motif chemokine ligand 3 (CCL3), colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1), C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 8 (CXCL8), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and IL-4. These results suggest that NID1 in myCAFs may drive PVTT formation through interactions with circulating molecules, making it a potential therapeutic target.
Given the critical role of NID1 in the formation of PVTT, there is growing interest in the development of NID1 inhibitors. No crystallographic 3-dimensional (3D) structure of NID1 exists in the Protein Data Bank, with the only available structure predicted by AlphaFold. Virtual screening of site1 using Schrödinger identified the top 10 candidate drugs (Fig. 4D), with acarbose ranking first (docking score −20.922) and its binding mode shown in 2-dimensional (2D), 3D, and surface models (Fig. 4E to H). Biacore surface plasmon resonance confirmed direct acarbose–NID1 interaction (KD = 5.17 × 10−6 M) (Fig. 4I), providing biophysical evidence of binding.
We first examined the basal expression levels of NID1 across multiple HCC cell lines. The results revealed marked heterogeneity in NID1 expression among different cell lines, with the highest expression observed in Hep3B cells, whereas lower expression levels were detected in Huh7 and CSQT2 cells (Fig. S21A). In tumor immunity assays using HepG2 cells, acarbose enhanced T cell cytotoxicity in co-culture, strongest with tislelizumab (Fig. S21B). To further evaluate the effects of NID1 and acarbose on MMT, we established a co-culture system using tumor-cell-derived conditioned media (CM) and M0 macrophages. Compared with CM derived from Huh7 cells (low NID1 expression), CM from Hep3B cells (high NID1 expression) markedly up-regulated α-SMA protein expression in macrophages and significantly increased the proportion of α-SMA+ cells, indicating that NID1-enriched Hep3B CM effectively promotes MMT (Fig. 5A to D).
Following acarbose pretreatment of Hep3B cells, the ability of their CM to induce α-SMA expression and increase the proportion of α-SMA+ macrophages was significantly attenuated. In contrast, acarbose had no obvious effect on the already weak MMT-inducing capacity of CM derived from Huh7 cells (Fig. 5A to D). Collectively, these results demonstrate that acarbose treatment significantly impairs the MMT-promoting ability of HCC cells with high NID1 expression.
In a C57BL/6 subcutaneous tumor model (Fig. S21C and D), both monotherapies inhibited tumor growth, with the combination showing further efficacy without affecting body weight (Fig. S22A to F). Immunofluorescence revealed that acarbose reduced NID1 expression and CD68+α-SMA+ cells, with the combination therapy further enhancing these effects (Fig. S22G and H).
Next, a splenic injection mouse model was established for analysis. Both acarbose and anti-PD-1 monotherapies inhibited tumor growth compared to controls (Fig. 5E and F), with stable body weights across all groups (Fig. 5G). Combination therapy markedly reduced liver index (Fig. 5H), and hematoxylin and eosin staining showed that it delayed HCC infiltration and PVTT formation more effectively than either monotherapy (Fig. 5I to K). Notably, the combination of acarbose and anti-PD-1 exerted a stronger inhibitory effect than either monotherapy alone.
Immunofluorescence analysis indicated that acarbose monotherapy significantly reduced NID1 expression, CD68+ macrophage infiltration, and α-SMA expression versus controls (Fig. 5L and M). Crucially, the combination therapy synergistically enhanced these effects—significant inhibition of NID1 signaling and profound depletion of CD68+ macrophages and α-SMA expression—consistently surpassing anti-PD-1 monotherapy outcomes. The results from the orthotopic liver implantation mouse model further support the above findings (Fig. S23). This synergy demonstrates acarbose’s capacity to remodel the TME by targeting an immunosuppressive barrier via the inhibition of NID1-mediated immune evasion and stromal fibrogenesis, thereby potentiating anti-PD-1 efficacy against primary and metastatic HCC. Taken together, these findings suggest that acarbose may serve as a promising therapeutic option for PVTT treatment and may have clinical applications.
To further evaluate the effect of acarbose on PVTT inhibition, we analyzed the real-world clinical data of 810 HCC patients. Among these patients, 241 (29.75%) had PVTT, of whom 74 had diabetes, and 8 patients had received acarbose treatment (Fig. 6A). Of the remaining 569 HCC patients without PVTT (70.25%), 174 had diabetes, and 39 of them used acarbose for blood glucose control. Interestingly, the application rate of acarbose was significantly lower in the HCC with PVTT patient group than in those without PVTT. These findings suggest that acarbose may target NID1, disrupt the immune barrier formed by myCAFs, and reduce the likelihood of PVTT by preventing the establishment of an immunosuppressive microenvironment.
Representative cases provide further evidence of this effect. Patient 1, an HCC patient without PVTT, used acarbose for diabetes management (Fig. 6B). Following HCC resection in July 2022, the patient developed lung recurrence in April 2023 but achieved partial response following treatment, with acarbose maintaining blood glucose. Conversely, patient 2, an HCC patient with PVTT, used metformin (Fig. S24) and experienced rapid disease relapse despite surgery and lenvatinib. Most importantly, the mIHC results demonstrated that the NID1 expression levels were lower in both the stroma and tumor regions of patient 1 than in those of patient 2 (Fig. 6C). Conversely, patient 2 had higher levels of α-SMA, NID1+α-SMA+, and CD68+α-SMA+ cells in the stroma. Overall, these findings may suggest that acarbose effectively targets NID1, disrupts the myCAF-mediated tumor immune barrier, and inhibits PVTT formation.
Our current study employed a multi-omics approach to delineate the tumor-associated stroma in HCC with PVTT, revealing distinct spatial transcriptomic features and region-specific ITH. We further identified acarbose as a repurposed drug that enhances anti-PD-1 efficacy by disrupting the myCAF-mediated immune barrier and promoting T cell infiltration. These findings provide new insights into the immune-excluded microenvironment of PVTT and support biomarker-driven therapeutic strategies that may inform clinical decision-making and future treatment guidelines for advanced HCC.
Collectively, previous studies have systematically elucidated the biological basis and microenvironmental features of PVTT from multiple complementary perspectives. On the one hand, abnormal cell populations in the TME, including CD45+ erythroid progenitors with myeloid-like characteristics, known as erythroid-differentiated myeloid cells, have been shown to play critical roles in PVTT formation by disrupting vascular homeostasis, enhancing hypercoagulability, and promoting tumor cell migration, thereby revealing key cellular mechanisms underlying PVTT development [18]. On the other hand, taking advantage of the hypercoagulable and thrombus-like microenvironment unique to PVTT, innovative nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems have been developed to transform traditional therapeutic barriers into delivery advantages, offering new translational treatment strategies for PVTT [38]. In addition, single-cell immune profiling studies have further demonstrated that the PVTT microenvironment is characterized by a pronounced accumulation of immunosuppressive myeloid cells, particularly specific macrophage subsets, as well as highly exhausted T cell populations, resulting in a strongly immunosuppressive and immune-excluded milieu. These findings provide an important theoretical basis for precise interventions targeting the PVTT microenvironment [39]. To elucidate the mechanisms of PVTT formation, we first performed bulk RNA sequencing of HCC with PVTT using the nCounter 770 panel, which, while informative, provided only limited resolution of the immune landscape. To achieve spatial context, we next applied spatial whole-transcriptome atlas (WTA) profiling on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples via the DSP platform, focusing on tumor-enriched regions (CD68-high/CD68-low areas) and PanCK-negative stromal zones. Unlike high-resolution methods such as 10x Visium [40,41], this targeted approach enabled precise interrogation of immune cell distribution and ITH within PVTT. Spatial WTA revealed substantial molecular subtype diversity and pronounced ITH across tumor subregions, underscoring major challenges in prognostic stratification. Comparative analyses further identified distinct molecular signatures, biological functions, immune phenotypes, and subtypes, linking specific spatial features to metastatic potential, therapeutic response, and survival. Although the sensitivity for low-abundance transcripts was limited, this work provides a regionally resolved transcriptomic resource that uncovers previously unrecognized spatial heterogeneity in HCC with PVTT, offering new insights for refining tumor classification and guiding personalized therapy.
Building on the observed spatial heterogeneity in PVTT, we investigated the stromal compartment with a particular focus on CAFs, recognized mediators of HCC progression [23,25,42,43]. CAFs engage tumor cells through multiple molecular pathways [44], yet their functional characterization is complicated by heterogeneity arising from diverse activation states and cellular origins, limiting the development of targeted therapies. By integrating scRNA-seq with spatial WTA, we identified myCAFs as the predominant stromal subtype in PVTT, characterized by ECM remodeling, immune suppression, and association with poor prognosis. SPP1+ macrophages, enriched in primary PVTT lesions, were found to drive myCAF differentiation via MMT. Their spatial colocalization with myCAFs in immune-excluded regions, together with in vivo evidence, highlights MMT as a central mechanism of stromal remodeling and immune evasion in PVTT. Given its role as a major source of pathogenic CAFs in multiple cancers [32,35,45–47], MMT emerges as a compelling therapeutic target.
To define downstream drivers of MMT, we identified NID1 as a key regulator, markedly overexpressed in both MMT cells and PVTT tissues. NID1 encodes NID1, a core ECM protein linking laminin and collagen IV [44,48,49] and regulating adhesion, tissue repair, and tumor progression [50,51]. NID1 carried in extracellular vesicles promotes metastasis via angiogenesis and fibroblast activation [52], while extracellular vesicle signaling blockade suppresses HCC malignancy [53,54]. Here, NID1 was shown to drive stromal immunosuppression in PVTT, impairing antitumor immunity. To explore therapeutic strategies targeting the NID1-driven immunosuppressive microenvironment and facilitate clinical translation, we applied 3D quantitative structure–activity relationship modeling and molecular dynamics simulations, identifying acarbose as a potential NID1 inhibitor. Unlike novel small molecules, acarbose, a widely used α-glucosidase inhibitor, offers a rapid, low-cost repurposing pathway with broad clinical applicability. Beyond delaying carbohydrate digestion and lowering postprandial glucose, acarbose may alter the portal venous microenvironment to limit tumor thrombus colonization and has been shown to enhance anti-PD-1 efficacy by modulating gut microbiota, regulating tryptophan metabolism, and promoting CD8+ T cell infiltration via the C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10)–C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3) axis [55]. In addition, acarbose may exert both local microenvironmental regulatory effects and systemic metabolic and immunomodulatory actions, which act in a complementary manner to provide multiple mechanistic supports for its potential translational application. Previous studies indicate that MMT is not unique to PVTT but has been documented in multiple solid tumors, including lung, renal, and prostate cancers, as well as in a range of fibrotic diseases such as liver fibrosis/cirrhosis, pulmonary fibrosis, and renal fibrosis [35,56–58]. Across these contexts, the core upstream drivers of MMT, particularly the transforming growth factor-β/Smad3 signaling pathway, appear to be highly conserved [35,57–59].
This study is the first to show that acarbose disrupts the myCAF-mediated immune barrier, promotes T cell infiltration, and suppresses PVTT progression. In preclinical models, acarbose synergized with anti-PD-1 therapy to achieve marked tumor control, while retrospective data linked its use to a lower incidence of PVTT. Given the prevalence of immunosuppressive thrombi in other aggressive cancers, the NID1–acarbose axis may have broader relevance. Prospective trials, especially in HCC patients with PVTT and diabetes, together with large-size real-world studies, are needed to confirm efficacy and guide treatment recommendations.
In summary, our multi-omics dissection of HCC with PVTT (Table S8) establishes MMT as a key source of immunosuppressive myCAFs and identifies NID1 as a stromal checkpoint enforcing an immune barrier. Targeting this pathway with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug acarbose disrupted stromal barriers, restored antitumor immunity, and potentiated PD-1 blockade in preclinical models. Retrospective clinical data further linked acarbose use to a reduced incidence of PVTT, underscoring both its translational relevance and immediate clinical applicability. Collectively, these findings provide mechanistic insights and a cost-effective therapeutic strategy for PVTT and support biomarker-driven trials to optimize immunotherapy in advanced HCC.
The experimental details, including methods, antibody information, gene intervention sequences, and probe information, are provided in the Supplementary Materials.
This was a translational study integrating multi-omics profiling and functional validation to investigate the mechanisms underlying PVTT formation in HCC. We applied complementary approaches including nCounter gene expression profiling, scRNA-seq, DSP, Olink proteomics, molecular docking, and in vivo models. Clinical data were collected from well-annotated HCC cohorts, and experimental validation was performed using patient samples, cell culture, and mouse models. This multilayered strategy enabled us to delineate the TME features of PVTT and to evaluate the therapeutic potential of targeting NID1 with repurposed acarbose, alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy.
Patients with advanced HCC from 2 medical centers were enrolled. Baseline clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes were collected, and tumor response was assessed using RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST. All patients provided informed consent, and this study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University (IRB Protocol No. [2024]156) and the Seventh People’s Hospital of Shanghai (IRB Protocol No. A-19). Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Population-level (1975 to 2022) analysis was performed using SEER data to evaluate risk and prognostic factors for HCC with intravascular invasion, including portal and hepatic veins. Exclusion criteria included missing data on cause of death, race, grade, tumor size, TNM/American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, and treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy). A total of 1, 505 HCC cases were analyzed (695 with intravascular invasion, 810 without). Variables included demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, alpha-fetoprotein, and fibrosis score. Overall survival was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method, with log-rank tests and multivariate Cox regression to evaluate prognostic factors. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 26.0 and R 4.3.2, with the significance set at P < 0.05.
Gene expression levels were assessed using the nCounter IO 360 panel covering 770 genes related to tumor immunity and biology (Table S2). This analysis included 14 patients, comprising 7 nontumor liver tissues (NTLs), 12 primary tumor tissues—6 from HCC with PVTT (HCC-P) and 6 from HCC without PVTT (HCC-NP)—and 8 PVTT tissues (Table S3), after the QC analysis, 1 case of HCC-P failed, the data reliability was low, a total of 26 samples were included in the data analysis. Total RNA was isolated and purified from 27 samples; a total of 100 ng of RNA was successfully extracted from the specimens on the NanoString PanCancer IO 360 panel code set according to the recommendations of NanoString.
We performed comprehensive scRNA-seq analysis on samples from our internal cohort (3 HCC-P and 3 PVTT) (Table S2) and the Gene Expression Omnibus dataset (GSE149614). Data preprocessing and QC were conducted using Seurat (v5.1.0), excluding cells with <200 unique molecular identifiers, <200 or >7,000 genes, or > 10% mitochondrial reads. Dimensionality reduction was done via PCA on the top 2,000 variable genes, followed by batch correction using Harmony (v1.2.0). Clustering was performed using the FindClusters function based on an spiking neural network algorithm. DEGs were identified using FindAllMarkers, and cell types were annotated with SingleR and manual curation. Cell–cell communication was inferred using CellChat (v1.6.1), enabling pairwise signaling analysis. Monocle2 (v2.32.0) was used for pseudotime trajectory analysis between myCAFs and macrophages, and CytoTRACE was applied to assess cellular differentiation potential. Finally, Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses of DEGs were performed using clusterProfiler (v4.12.1).
DSP was performed as per published experiment methods (NanoString). This analysis included 14 patients and 26 samples, 7 adjacent tumor tissues, 6 HCC-NP tissues, 5 HCC-P tissues, and 8 PVTT tissues (Table S5). The morphology markers consisted of SYTO 13, PanCK (ab215838), CD68 (ZM-0060), and CD8 (ab305048). These 4 markers allowed delineation of the nuclear, epithelial, macrophage, and CD8+ T cells. The ROIs were selected on a DSP prototype instrument and illuminated using ultraviolet light. For ROI selection, tumor regions were classified as CD68-high (CD68⁺, PanCK⁺) or CD68-low (CD68⁻, PanCK⁺), while stromal regions were defined as PanCK⁻. These samples were imaged, and ROIs were exposed to ultraviolet light that cleaved the linker and released the barcoded oligos for capture by microfluidics, and GeoMx DSP was then coupled to next-generation sequencing readout to profile RNA expression for identifying over 18,000 genes in samples; 95 AOIs were selected for this study.
GeoMx DSP data were analyzed using the R software package standR (v1.7.4). GeoMx DSP presents recommended QC thresholds. QC was applied according to the recommended thresholds: AOI counts >200, fluorescence >20, and surface area >16,000 μm2; 3 AOIs were excluded. In this study, we removed 3 AOIs. As for gene filtering, gene counts lower than 5 were filtered in 90% of samples. Batch removal was performed using the geomxBatchCorrection function and RUV4 correction method (k = 5). High-quality data were normalized with the geomxNorm function of standR.
DEGs were identified with edgeR (v3.35.0) using false discovery rate <0.05 and |log2FC| >1. Functional enrichment was performed with clusterProfiler (v4.4.4) using GO, KEGG, and MSigDB (hallmark sets), and the top 20 pathways were visualized after Benjamini–Hochberg correction.
To investigate intratumoral transcriptional diversity in a spatial context, we referred to a previously published method. DEPTH was used to quantify intraregional ITH for each ROI based on alterations of gene expression profiles. A low DEPTH score represents a low intraregional ITH, while a high score suggests the opposite. We calculated the ITH score using DEPTH (v0.99.6) in the HCC-NP, HCC-P, and PVTT groups.
The relative abundance of cell populations was estimated using CIBERSORT from the scRNA expression dataset (GSE149614). After annotation, the function “create_profile_matrix” from the R package SpatialDecon (v1.10.0) was used to create a gene expression matrix of the top 10 markers for each cell type. Based on the first 30 principal components that explained the largest variance in the PCA results, 2-dimensionality reduction methods, UMAP, were used to visualize the clustering of single-cell populations. For cell annotation, the function “FindAllMarkers” was employed to identify specific marker genes of cell subpopulations. The method used was the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to compare cells from specific subpopulations against all other cells to identify DEGs. In combination with the cell annotation markers from the literature, each group was annotated accordingly.
Gene set scoring was performed using the R package GSVA (v1.52.3). Gene signature set was derived from IOBR (v0.99.9) of edgeR. Pathway gene set scoring referring to KEGG and GO Biological Process datasets, along with gene sets related to immunity, metabolism, and regulatory networks from the literature, were selected for pathway scoring.
Fourteen samples were subjected to multiplex immunofluorescence staining (Table S6). FFPE sections (5 μm) were dewaxed, rehydrated, and fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin. Staining followed the Opal protocol with the following markers: CD68 (ab199016, Abcam, 1:200, Opal 780), hepatocyte paraffin 1 (Hep Par-1) (ab64088, Abcam, 1:200, Opal 520), α-SMA (ZM-0069, ZSGB-BIO, 1:100, Opal 620), NID1 (ab9514, Abcam, 1:100, Opal 480), and TAGLN (ab14106, Abcam, 1:100, Opal 570). Nuclei were counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, and sections were mounted with antifade medium (ab104135, Abcam). Slides were scanned using a Polaris slide scanner, and spectral libraries were generated with Inform (Akoya). Five random fields per sample were analyzed at ×20 magnification. Protein expression was quantified with the HALO platform, and positive cell counts were plotted with GraphPad. Statistical significance was determined by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test (P < 0.05).
Slides were baked to remove paraffin, deparaffinized with xylene, and rehydrated through graded ethanol before rinsing in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Antigen retrieval was performed using a microwave-based method, followed by cooling and PBS washes. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked, and nonspecific binding was prevented with blocking solution. Primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4 °C, and the next day, the slides were washed and incubated with secondary antibodies and the streptavidin–biotin–peroxidase complex. Diaminobenzidine served as the chromogenic substrate, and hematoxylin was used for counterstaining. Finally, the slides were dehydrated, cleared in xylene, mounted with neutral resin, and scanned for analysis.
This study analyzed 26 plasma samples from 16 HCC patients using the Olink immuno-oncology panel measuring 92 proteins via PEA (Table S7). Blood was collected in EDTA tubes and centrifuged twice, and the plasma was stored at −80 °C. In PEA, oligonucleotide-labeled antibody pairs bind target proteins, enabling DNA polymerization quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction (Biomark HD). Data were normalized with internal (incubation/immuno, extension, and detection) and external (negative and triplicate interplate) controls. QC included run-level checks (SD < 0.2) and sample-level checks (excluding samples deviating >0.3 normalized protein expression [NPX]). Results are reported as log2 NPX.
In this project, the human NID1 protein was targeted for virtual screening. The software utilized for virtual screening was Schrödinger Maestro version 12.8, and PyMOL was employed for 3D visualization. The 3D structure of human NID1 (AlphaFold ID: AF-P14543-F1) was downloaded from the AlphaFold website. The Protein Preparation Wizard module was used to add hydrogen atoms to the protein, followed by energy minimization using the OPLS2005 force field, achieving a root-mean-square deviation of 0.30 Å.
The prepared protein was then subjected to grid generation using the Receptor Grid Generation module, with the grid centered on site1 as predicted by Schrödinger, which includes key the amino acids THR1071, GLY1160, GLN1204, GLN1122, PHE985, and ALA1155. The grid box dimensions were set to 20 Å × 20 Å × 20 Å.
The 2D formats of the following compound libraries were processed through the Schrödinger software’s LigPrep Module for hydrogen addition and energy optimization, and their 3D structures were outputted for virtual screening:
•

HY-L001P Bioactive Compound Library Plus (containing 23,971 compounds)

•

HY-L122 FDA-Approved Anticancer Drug Library (containing 1,276 compounds)

•

HY-L101 Anti-Liver Cancer Compound Library (containing 1,886 compounds)

•

HY-L035P Drug Repurposing Compound Library Plus (containing 5,753 compounds)

•

HY-L149 Membrane Protein-targeted Compound Library (containing 7,167 compounds)

•

HY-L123 Human Metabolite Library (containing 6,119 compounds)

•

HY-L065 Traditional Chinese Medicine Active Compound Library (containing 2,883 compounds)

Virtual screening was conducted using the Virtual Screening Workflow module, where the prepared compounds were imported and subjected to molecular docking using the Glide module. This process involved geometric and energetic matching between the receptor and ligand molecules. After manual review of the binding affinity between the target and the compounds, as well as the structural characteristics of the compounds, the top 200 compounds from each database were selected for further analysis.
The experiment was conducted at 25 °C using a Biacore T200 instrument and a CM5 sensor chip (Cytiva). The human NID1 protein was immobilized on the CM5 chip using an amine coupling kit (Cytiva). Prior to immobilization, channel 2 of the chip was activated with a mixture of ethyldimethylaminopropyl carbodiimide and N-hydroxysuccinimide at a flow rate of 10 μl/min. Subsequently, human NID1 protein, diluted to 50 μg/ml in sodium acetate buffer, was injected into channel 2 at a flow rate of 10 μl/min. Finally, the channel was blocked with ethanolamine at the same flow rate. Channel 1 was treated identically and served as the reference, except that sodium acetate buffer without protein was used.
Acarbose was diluted into a series of concentrations into a 96-well plate and injected over the chip from low to high concentrations to interact with the immobilized target protein at a flow rate of 30 μl/min for 150 s. After each concentration was applied, the chip surface was regenerated with 10 mM glycine–HCl solution for 5 min. This cycle was repeated until all concentrations were tested. The sample injection, binding, and dissociation processes were all performed under running buffer conditions.
Data analysis was performed using the Biacore T200 instrument and its evaluation software, applying a 1:1 binding model.
Human HCC cell lines HepG2 and Hep53.4 were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin–streptomycin. Immortalized human T cells were established by Shanghai QuiCell Biotechnology Co., Ltd. using lentiviral transduction. T cells were isolated from the peripheral blood of a healthy donor and transduced with Lenti-hTERT (LV616), Lenti-Rb small interfering RNA (LV621), and a mixture of 10 lentiviruses (ID1, ID2, ID3, Nanog, EZH2, Fos, SOX2, YAP1, LMO2, and KLF4) to achieve immortalization. These T cells were grown in suspension, displayed round morphology, and expressed CD3, CD4, CD8, TNF-α, and IFN-γ.
The proliferation rate of HepG2 cells was determined using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. At the end of the 48-h treatment period, T cells and drug-containing media were removed, and DMEM containing 10% MTT reagent (5 mg/ml) was added to each well and incubated at 37 °C for 4 h. The resulting formazan crystals were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide, and the absorbance was measured at 490 nm using a microplate reader. The proliferation rate was calculated relative to the untreated control wells.
Male C57BL/6 mice, weighing 18 to 20 g, were purchased from Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd. (License No.: SYXK (Shanghai) 2017-0008). Mice were housed in the specific-pathogen-free barrier system at the Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Laboratory Animal Center under the following conditions: temperature of 20 to 26 °C with a daily fluctuation ≤4 °C, relative humidity between 30% and 70%, ≥15 air changes per hour, airflow around cages ≤0.2 m/s, and a differential static pressure ≥10 Pa relative to surrounding areas. Air cleanliness was maintained at level 7, with a bacterial sedimentation concentration of ≤3 CFU per 0.5-h exposure on a 90-mm petri dish, ammonia levels ≤14 mg/m3, noise ≤60 dB, working illumination ≥150 lx, animal cage illumination of 15 to 20 lx, and a 12- to 14-h light/12- to 10-h dark cycle. All animal procedures adhered to relevant regulations and were approved by the Ethics Committee for Laboratory Animals at the Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine.
On the day following model establishment, mice were randomly divided into 4 groups: a control group, which received 200 μl of PBS by daily oral gavage and 100 μl of intraperitoneal injections of immunoglobulin G control antibody every 3 d; an anti-PD-1 group, which received 100 μl intraperitoneal injections of anti-PD-1 antibody (Bio X Cell, InVivoMAb anti-mouse PD-1 [CD279], no. BE0146) every 3 d; an acarbose group, which was administered 50 mg/kg acarbose (MCE, no. HY-B0089) in 200 μl by daily oral gavage; and an anti-PD-1 + acarbose group, which was treated with both 100 μl of intraperitoneal injections of anti-PD-1 antibody every 3 d and daily oral gavage of 50 mg/kg acarbose (200 μl). All interventions continued for 3 weeks.
For the co-culture system, HepG2 cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 5,000 cells per well and allowed to adhere for 24 h. Subsequently, 50,000 T cells were added to each well to establish a co-culture system. To assess the effects of acarbose and/or tislelizumab on T-cell-mediated tumor killing, a co-culture system was treated under 4 conditions: no treatment (control), 10 μM acarbose, 100 ng/ml tislelizumab, or a combination of both. Treatments were applied for 48 h to evaluate their impact on tumor cell proliferation.
THP-1 cells were treated with PBS or 100 ng/ml phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA; MCE, Cat. No. HY-18739) for 24 h, followed by an additional 24-h incubation in fresh medium. Cells were harvested, washed, and stained with fluorescently conjugated antibodies against CD11b (BioLegend, 101206) and CD68 (BioLegend, 333808) for 30 min on ice. After washing, cells were analyzed using CytoFLEX S. Data were analyzed with CytExpert 2.4, and the percentage of CD11b+CD68+ cells was determined.
Huh7 and Hep3B cells were treated with PBS or 50 μM acarbose for 48 h. The medium was then replaced with a low-serum medium for 48 h to generate CM. CM were collected, centrifuged at 1,500 rpm for 10 min, and filtered through a 0.22-μm filter to remove cellular debris. The resulting CM were stored at −80 °C until use.
Verified M0 macrophages (THP-1 cells differentiated with PMA) were cultured in the collected CM from different HCC cell groups for 48 h. Cells were then lysed with radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer containing protease inhibitors. Protein concentration was determined by bicinchoninic acid assay. Equal amounts of protein were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. Membranes were blocked and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies: anti-α-SMA (1:20,000, Proteintech, 67735-1-Ig) and anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (1:50,000, Proteintech, 60004-1-Ig). After incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies, protein bands were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence substrate. Band intensity was quantified using the ImageJ software.
After a 1-week acclimation period, Hep53.4 murine HCC cells in the logarithmic growth phase were resuspended in a 1:1 mixture of Matrigel and PBS to a concentration of 2 × 107 cells/ml, maintained at 4 °C. Anesthesia was induced via isoflurane inhalation, followed by hair removal and skin preparation on the left flank. A pre-chilled 1-ml syringe was used to inject 100 μl of the cell suspension subcutaneously. Mice were monitored for vital signs until recovery from anesthesia.
Male C57BL/6 mice (18 to 20 g) were anesthetized via inhalation of 2% isoflurane for induction and maintained with 1.5% isoflurane. After abdominal shaving and disinfection with 70% ethanol, a laparotomy was performed to expose either the spleen for metastasis modeling or the left hepatic lobe for orthotopic implantation. For the liver metastasis model, Hep53.4 murine HCC cells (logarithmic growth phase) suspended in PBS at 1 × 106 cells/ml were injected into the splenic parenchyma using a 29-gauge insulin syringe (BD Biosciences; 50 μl/injection). For the orthotopic liver model, cells were suspended in a 1:1 mixture of Matrigel (Corning) and PBS at an identical density, with 50 μl injected into the left hepatic lobe parenchyma using identical syringe specifications. Matrigel was utilized to enhance tumor cell retention and mimic ECM interactions. Vital signs (respiratory rate and pedal reflex) were monitored until full recovery, and buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg) was administered subcutaneously for postoperative analgesia.
Tumor dimensions (length and width) were measured every 4 d using calipers. Tumor volume was calculated as
Volume=1/2×length×width2
Tumor growth inhibition rates were assessed by comparing tumor volumes across groups. Body weight was recorded every 4 d throughout the study to monitor any systemic treatment effects. On day 21, mice were euthanized, tumors were excised, photographed, and weighed, and the tumor-to-body weight ratio (tumor weight/body weight) was calculated.
All statistical tests and graphical visualizations were performed using GraphPad Prism (v10.0) and R software (v4.1.3). The Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Kruskal–Wallis test were used to compare continuous variables between groups.
All patients provided informed consent, and this study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University (IRB Protocol No. [2024]156) and the Seventh People’s Hospital of Shanghai (IRB Protocol No. A-19). Informed consent was obtained from all participants. All animal procedures adhered to relevant regulations and were approved by the Ethics Committee for Laboratory Animals at the Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. The approval ID for the use of animals was SYXK (Shanghai) 2017-0008.
1.
Devarbhavi H, Asrani SK, Arab JP, Nartey YA, Pose E, Kamath PS. Global burden of liver disease: 2023 update. J Hepatol. 2023;79(2):516–537.
2.
Mak LY, Liu K, Chirapongsathorn S, Yew KC, Tamaki N, Rajaram RB, Panlilio MT, Lui R, Lee HW, Lai JC-T, et al.Liver diseases and hepatocellular carcinoma in the Asia-Pacific region: Burden, trends, challenges and future directions. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;21(12):834–851.
3.
Yang X, Yang C, Zhang S, Geng H, Zhu AX, Bernards R, Qin W, Fan J, Wang C, Gao Q. Precision treatment in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2024;42(2):180–197.
4.
Zeng H, Cao M, Xia C, Wang D, Chen K, Zhu Z, Fu R, Zhang S, Zhou J, Wang H, et al.Performance and effectiveness of hepatocellular carcinoma screening in individuals with HBsAg seropositivity in China: A multicenter prospective study. Nat Cancer. 2023;4(9):1382–1394.
5.
Ye J, Gao X, Huang X, Huang S, Zeng D, Luo W, Zeng C, Lu C, Lu L, Huang H, et al.Integrating single-cell and spatial transcriptomics to uncover and elucidate GP73-mediated pro-angiogenic regulatory networks in hepatocellular carcinoma. Research. 2024;7:0387.
6.
Yuan Y, He W, Yang Z, Qiu J, Huang Z, Shi Y, Lin Z, Zheng Y, Chen M, Lau WY, et al.TACE-HAIC combined with targeted therapy and immunotherapy versus TACE alone for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumour thrombus: A propensity score matching study. Int J Surg. 2023;109(5):1222–1230.
7.
Tang S, Shi F, Xiao Y, Cai H, Ma P, Zhou Y, Wu Z, Chen S, Guo W. HAIC plus lenvatinib and tislelizumab for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with Vp4 portal vein invasion. Hepatol Int. 2025;19(1):106–117.
8.
Zhang Z-m, Lai ECH, Zhang C, Yu H-w, Liu Z, Wan B-j, Liu L-m, Tian Z-h, Deng H, Sun Q-h, et al.The strategies for treating primary hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus. Int J Surg. 2015;20:8–16.
9.
Sun J, Guo R, Bi X, Wu M, Tang Z, Lau WY, Zheng S, Wang X, Yu J, Chen X, et al.Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus in China (2021 edition). Liver Cancer. 2022;11(4):315–328.
10.
Lu J, Zhang X-P, Zhong B-Y, Lau WY, Madoff DC, Davidson JC, Qi X, Cheng S-Q, Teng G-J. Management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumour thrombosis: Comparing east and west. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;4(9):721–730.
11.
Tang C, He Q, Feng J, Liao Z, Peng Y, Gao J. Portal vein tumour thrombosis radiotherapy improves the treatment outcomes of immunotherapy plus bevacizumab in hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicentre real-world analysis with propensity score matching. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1254158.
12.
Fulgenzi CAM, Cheon J, D’Alessio A, Nishida N, Ang C, Marron TU, Wu L, Saeed A, Wietharn B, Cammarota A, et al.Reproducible safety and efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for HCC in clinical practice: Results of the AB-real study. Eur J Cancer. 2022;175:204–213.
13.
Soin A, Lesurtel M, Bhangui P, Cocchi L, Bouattour M, Clavien P-A. Are patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumour thrombosis candidates for liver transplantation? J Hepatol. 2023;78(6):1124–1129.
14.
Zhang X, Zhu F, Wen J, Pan Z, Zhu Y. Factors influencing the timing of second-line therapy for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Holist Integr Oncol. 2025;4(1):39.
15.
Ou X, Wu J, Wu J, Fu Y, Zeng Z, Li S, Li Y, Liu D, Li H, Li B, et al.Efficacy of lenvatinib combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: A retrospective multicenter study. Cancer Res Treat. 2024;56(4):1207–1218.
16.
Khan AR, Wei X, Xu X. Portal vein tumor thrombosis and hepatocellular carcinoma—The changing tides. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2021;8:1089–1115.
17.
Zhou X-H, Li J-R, Zheng T-H, Chen H, Cai C, Ye S-L, Gao B, Xue T-C. Portal vein tumor thrombosis in hepatocellular carcinoma: Molecular mechanism and therapy. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2023;40(1):5–32.
18.
Zhu W-H, Chen J, Huang R-K, Zhang Y, Huang Z-X, Pang X-Q, Hu B, Yang Y, Li X. Erythroid-transdifferentiated myeloid cells promote portal vein tumor thrombus in hepatocellular carcinoma. Theranostics. 2023;13(13):4316–4332.
19.
Tong W, Zhong J, Yang Q, Lin H, Chen B, Lu T, Chen J, Luo N. Single-cell and bulk transcriptomic datasets enable the development of prognostic models based on dynamic changes in the tumor immune microenvironment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombus. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1414121.
20.
Zheng X, Zheng X, Wang P, Li L, Yu J, Yu C, Xu L, Li L, Dai F, Feng L, et al.Cancer-associated fibroblasts promote vascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma via downregulating decorin-integrin β1 signaling. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:Article 678670.
21.
Tong W, Wang T, Bai Y, Yang X, Han P, Zhu L, Zhang Y, Shen Z. Spatial transcriptomics reveals tumor-derived SPP1 induces fibroblast chemotaxis and activation in the hepatocellular carcinoma microenvironment. J Transl Med. 2024;22(1):840.
22.
Liu Y, Xun Z, Ma K, Liang S, Li X, Zhou S, Sun L, Liu Y, Du Y, Guo X, et al.Identification of a tumour immune barrier in the HCC microenvironment that determines the efficacy of immunotherapy. J Hepatol. 2023;78(4):770–782.
23.
Zhu G-Q, Tang Z, Huang R, Qu W-F, Fang Y, Yang R, Tao C-Y, Gao J, Wu X-L, Sun H-X, et al.CD36+ cancer-associated fibroblasts provide immunosuppressive microenvironment for hepatocellular carcinoma via secretion of macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Cell Discov. 2023;9(1):25.
24.
Song M, He J, Pan Q-Z, Yang J, Zhao J, Zhang Y-J, Huang Y, Tang Y, Wang Q, He J, et al.Cancer-associated fibroblast-mediated cellular crosstalk supports hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Hepatology. 2021;73(5):1717–1735.
25.
Eun JW, Yoon JH, Ahn HR, Kim S, Kim YB, Lim SB, Park W, Kang TW, Baek GO, Yoon MG, et al.Cancer-associated fibroblast-derived secreted phosphoprotein 1 contributes to resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma to sorafenib and lenvatinib. Cancer Commun. 2023;43(4):455–479.
26.
Yu L, Shen N, Shi Y, Shi X, Fu X, Li S, Zhu B, Yu W, Zhang Z. Characterization of cancer-related fibroblasts (CAF) in hepatocellular carcinoma and construction of CAF-based risk signature based on single-cell RNA-seq and bulk RNA-seq data. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1009789.
27.
Cords L, Tietscher S, Anzeneder T, Langwieder C, Rees M, de Souza N, Bodenmiller B. Cancer-associated fibroblast classification in single-cell and spatial proteomics data. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):4294.
28.
Hutton C, Heider F, Blanco-Gomez A, Banyard A, Kononov A, Zhang X, Karim S, Paulus-Hock V, Watt D, Steele N, et al.Single-cell analysis defines a pancreatic fibroblast lineage that supports anti-tumor immunity. Cancer Cell. 2021;39(9):1227–1244.e20.
29.
Ou Z, Lin S, Qiu J, Ding W, Ren P, Chen D, Wang J, Tong Y, Wu D, Chen A, et al.Single-nucleus RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomics reveal the immunological microenvironment of cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2022;9(29):Article e2203040.
30.
Houthuijzen JM, de Bruijn R, van der Burg E, Drenth AP, Wientjens E, Filipovic T, Bullock E, Brambillasca CS, Pulver EM, Nieuwland M, et al.CD26-negative and CD26-positive tissue-resident fibroblasts contribute to functionally distinct CAF subpopulations in breast cancer. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):183.
31.
Wang H, Li N, Liu Q, Guo J, Pan Q, Cheng B, Xu J, Dong B, Yang G, Yang B, et al.Antiandrogen treatment induces stromal cell reprogramming to promote castration resistance in prostate cancer. Cancer Cell. 2023;41(7):1345–1362.e9.
32.
Tang PC-T, Chung JY-F, Xue VW-W, Xiao J, Meng X-M, Huang X-R, Zhou S, Chan AS-W, Tsang AC-M, Cheng AS-L. Smad3 promotes cancer-associated fibroblasts generation via macrophage–myofibroblast transition. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2022;9(1):Article e2101235.
33.
Tang PM-K, Zhang Y-Y, Xiao J, Tang PC-T, Chung JY-F, Li J, Xue VW, Huang X-R, Chong CC-N, Ng C-F, et al.Correction for Tang et al., Neural transcription factor Pou4f1 promotes renal fibrosis via macrophage–myofibroblast transition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119(10):Article e2200781119.
34.
Wang W, Xiao D, Lin L, Gao X, Peng L, Chen J, Xiao K, Zhu S, Chen J, Zhang F, et al.Antifibrotic effects of tetrahedral framework nucleic acids by inhibiting macrophage polarization and macrophage–myofibroblast transition in bladder remodeling. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023;12(11):Article e2203076.
35.
Tang PC-T, Chan MK-K, Chung JY-F, Chan AS-W, Zhang D, Li C, Leung K-T, Ng CS-H, Wu Y, To K-F, et al.Hematopoietic transcription factor RUNX1 is essential for promoting macrophage–myofibroblast transition in non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024;11(1):Article e2302203.
36.
Zhang Z, Sun X, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Yang Z, Dong J, Wang N, Ying J, Zhou M, Yang L. Spatial transcriptome-wide profiling of small cell lung cancer reveals intra-tumoral molecular and subtype heterogeneity. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024;11(31):Article e2402716.
37.
Qi B, Li Y, Peng Z, Luo Z, Zhang X, Chen J, Li G, Sun Y. Macrophage-myofibroblast transition as a potential origin for skeletal muscle fibrosis after injury via complement system activation. J Inflamm Res. 2024;17:1083–1094.
38.
Chen X, Li L, Fan Q, Zhang L, Li W, Hong W, Wang C, Zhang X. Promising nanoparticles-based oral therapy for effective inhibition of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus. Nano Lett. 2025;25(4):1644–1652.
39.
Zhou K-Q, Zhong Y-C, Song M-F, Sun Y-F, Zhu W, Cheng J-W, Xu Y, Zhang Z-F, Wang P-X, Tang Z, et al.Distinct immune microenvironment of venous tumor thrombus in hepatocellular carcinoma at single-cell resolution. Hepatology. 2025;82(3):566–581.
40.
Liu Y, Sinjab A, Min J, Han G, Paradiso F, Zhang Y, Wang R, Pei G, Dai Y, Liu Y, et al.Conserved spatial subtypes and cellular neighborhoods of cancer-associated fibroblasts revealed by single-cell spatial multi-omics. Cancer Cell. 2025;43(5):905–924.e6.
41.
Lee H, Park S, Yun JH, Seo C, Ahn JM, Cha H-Y, Shin YS, Park HR, Lee D, Roh J, et al.Deciphering head and neck cancer microenvironment: Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics reveals human papillomavirus-associated differences. J Med Virol. 2024;96(1):Article e29386.
42.
Zou Z, Lin Z, Wu C, Tan J, Zhang J, Peng Y, Zhang K, Li J, Wu M, Zhang Y. Micro-engineered organoid-on-a-chip based on mesenchymal stromal cells to predict immunotherapy responses of HCC patients. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023;10(27):Article e2302640.
43.
Zhu Z, Zhang K, Wu W, Zhou J, Zhang M, Chen J, Han J, Wang N, Li B, Weng W, et al.POSTN+ CAF-derived migrasomes drive hepatocellular carcinoma progression and confer resistance to immunotherapy. Research. 2025;8:0950.
44.
Mao C, Ma Z, Jia Y, Li W, Xie N, Zhao G, Ma B, Yu F, Sun J, Zhou Y, et al.Nidogen-2 maintains the contractile phenotype of vascular smooth muscle cells and prevents neointima formation via bridging Jagged1-Notch3 signaling. Circulation. 2021;144(15):1244–1261.
45.
Ji ZZ, Chan MK-K, Chan AS-W, Leung K-T, Jiang X, To K-F, Wu Y, Tang PM-K. Tumour-associated macrophages: Versatile players in the tumour microenvironment. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023;11:1261749.
46.
Tian H, Zhao S, Nie F, Yin Q, Wang S, Liu J, Ju J, Yang P, Yang C. The pro-cancer and immunosuppressive activity of macrophage-transformed cancer-associated fibroblasts in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Adv Res. 2025; 10.1016/j.jare.2025.07.027.
47.
Wu T, Zeng L, Peng C, Zhao Z, Mu W, Wang S, Tan D. SNHG12 in cancer-associated fibroblast-derived extracellular vesicle induces macrophage-myofibroblast transition. Epigenomics. 2024;16(23–24):1415–1427.
48.
Jeyagaran A, Urbanczyk M, Carvajal-Berrio D, Baldissera T, Kaiser PD, Kuhlburger L, Czemmel S, Nahnsen S, Duffy GP, Brucker SY, et al.ECM proteins nidogen-1 and decorin restore functionality of human islets of Langerhans upon hypoxic conditions. Adv Healthc Mater. 2025;14(2):Article e2403017.
49.
Cheng P, Cao T, Zhao X, Lu W, Miao S, Ning F, Wang D, Gao Y, Wang L, Pei G, et al.Nidogen1-enriched extracellular vesicles accelerate angiogenesis and bone regeneration by targeting myosin-10 to regulate endothelial cell adhesion. Bioact Mater. 2022;12:185–197.
50.
Liu W, Wu J, Lai Y, Zhang S, Yang A, Li Y, Chen C, Lu Z. NID1 promotes laryngeal cancer stemness via activating WNT pathway. Biol Direct. 2024;19(1):115.
51.
Rokavec M, Jaeckel S, Hermeking H. Nidogen-1/NID1 function and regulation during progression and metastasis of colorectal cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(22):5316.
52.
Mao X, Mao X, Tey SK, Yeung CLS, Kwong EML, Fung YME, Chung CYS, Mak L-Y, Wong DKH, Yuen M-F, et al.Nidogen 1-enriched extracellular vesicles facilitate extrahepatic metastasis of liver cancer by activating pulmonary fibroblasts to secrete tumor necrosis factor receptor 1. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2020;7(21):2002157.
53.
Hou P-P, Zheng C-M, Wu S-H, Liu X-X, Xiang G-X, Cai W-Y, Chen G, Lou Y-L. Extracellular vesicle-packaged ACSL4 induces hepatocyte senescence to promote hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Cancer Res. 2024;84(23):3953–3966.
54.
Duan J, Huang Z, Qin S, Li B, Zhang Z, Liu R, Wang K, Nice EC, Jiang J, Huang C. Oxidative stress induces extracellular vesicle release by upregulation of HEXB to facilitate tumour growth in experimental hepatocellular carcinoma. J Extracell Vesicles. 2024;13(7):Article e12468.
55.
Zhang S-L, Wang X, Cai Q-Q, Chen C, Zhang Z-Y, Xu Y-Y, Yang M-X, Jia Q-A, Wang Y, Wang Z-M. Acarbose enhances the efficacy of immunotherapy against solid tumours by modulating the gut microbiota. Nat Metab. 2024;6(10):1991–2009.
56.
Che Y, Chien Y, Zhu Y, Huang X, Wu L, Ai Y, Jiang S, Li F, Chen S. GSDMD-dependent neutrophil extracellular traps mediate portal vein thrombosis and associated fibrosis in cirrhosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(16):9099.
57.
Li X, Liu Y, Tang Y, Xia Z. Transformation of macrophages into myofibroblasts in fibrosis-related diseases: Emerging biological concepts and potential mechanism. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1474688.
58.
Ban J-Q, Ao L-H, He X, Zhao H, Li J. Advances in macrophage-myofibroblast transformation in fibrotic diseases. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1461919.
59.
Salminen A, Kaarniranta K, Kauppinen A. Tissue fibroblasts are versatile immune regulators: An evaluation of their impact on the aging process. Ageing Res Rev. 2024;97:Article 102296.
Year 2026 volume 9 Issue 2
PDF
121
65
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.1161
  • Receive Date:2025-11-20
  • Online Date:2026-10-16
  • Published:2026-02-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-11-20
  • Revised:2026-01-21
  • Accepted:2026-01-31
Affiliations
    1Department of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
    2Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Onco-Pathology, Cancer Institute and General Surgery Institute, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
    3Department of Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
    4Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
    5Shanghai Key Laboratory of Health Identification and Assessment, School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
    6Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
    7Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
    8Shenzhen Engineering Center for Translational Medicine of Precision Cancer Immunodiagnosis and Therapy, YuceBio Technology Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, China.
    9Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
    10Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
    11Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Medical Oncology, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy.
    12Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
    13Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
    14Department of Pharmacy, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
    15Department of Interventional Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
    16Department of Interventional Oncology, Seventh People’s Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
    17Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to: (Z.X.);
* Address correspondence to: (M.N.);
* Address correspondence to: (T.C.);
* Address correspondence to: (H.L.);
* Address correspondence to: (K.L.)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.1161
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT