收藏切换
3D Cardiac Constructs in Drug Discovery: Current Advances and Future Challenges
收藏切换
PDF
Chang Liu1, 2, Jing Guo1, 2, Gunash Mirzayeva1, 2, Michail Spanos3, 4, Ruoting Teng1, 2, Guoping Li3, Dragos Cretoiu5, 6, Zhaoyang Chen7, *, Junjie Xiao1, 2, *
Research. Vol 9 Article ID 1165
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 9 Article ID 1165
• REVIEW ARTICLE •
3D Cardiac Constructs in Drug Discovery: Current Advances and Future Challenges
Full
Chang Liu1, 2, Jing Guo1, 2, Gunash Mirzayeva1, 2, Michail Spanos3, 4, Ruoting Teng1, 2, Guoping Li3, Dragos Cretoiu5, 6, Zhaoyang Chen7, *, Junjie Xiao1, 2, *
Affiliations
  • 1Cardiac Regeneration and Ageing Lab, Institute of Geriatrics (Shanghai University), Affiliated Nantong Hospital of Shanghai University (The Sixth People’s Hospital of Nantong) and School of Life Science, Shanghai University, Nantong 226011, China.
  • 2Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Organ Repair, Joint International Research Laboratory of Biomaterials and Biotechnology in Organ Repair (Ministry of Education), School of Life Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
  • 3Cardiovascular Division of the Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
  • 4Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NCB, Bronx, NY, USA.
  • 5Department of Medical Genetics, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 020031, Romania.
  • 6Materno-Fetal Assistance Excellence Unit, Alessandrescu-Rusescu National Institute for Mother and Child Health, Bucharest 011062, Romania.
  • 7Department of Cardiology, Heart Center of Fujian Province, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, China.
About Author:

† These authors contributed equally to this work.

Published: 2026-03-20 doi: 10.34133/research.1165
Outline
收藏切换

Advances in 3-dimensional (3D) cardiac constructs have provided powerful preclinical models for investigating the pathological mechanisms underlying human cardiovascular diseases and facilitating drug discovery. In this review, we focused on recent advancements in 3D cardiac constructs technology and explored its potential applications in drug development. We summarized the main types of disease models built on 3D cardiac constructs, the key parameters used for assessing pathology and drug efficacy, and their role in drug discovery. We also discussed the application of novel biomaterials in 3D cardiac constructs, the latest research progress in 3D cardiac constructs-based drug screening, and the transformative potential of artificial intelligence-assisted research on 3D cardiac constructs. Finally, we addressed the existing technical limitations and outline future directions for the development of 3D cardiac constructs.

Chang Liu, Jing Guo, Gunash Mirzayeva, Michail Spanos, Ruoting Teng, Guoping Li, Dragos Cretoiu, Zhaoyang Chen, Junjie Xiao. 3D Cardiac Constructs in Drug Discovery: Current Advances and Future Challenges[J]. Research, 2026 , 9 (3) : 1165 - . DOI: 10.34133/research.1165
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are one of the major causes of global mortality and remain a marked challenge for public health. CVDs encompass various clinical manifestations, including myocardial infarction (MI), congenital heart disease, hypertension, and arrhythmias, among others [1]. Currently, rodent models are commonly utilized in CVD research; however, due to genetic differences between rodents and humans, human disease phenotypes cannot be fully recapitulated in rodent models. As a result, clinically relevant models, such as organoid models derived from human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs), are necessary for elucidating CVD pathogenesis and advancing drug discovery.
Three-dimensional (3D) cardiac constructs are in vitro models typically derived from pluripotent stem cells and cultured with specialized structural scaffolds or in suspension systems [2]. These 3D constructs provide a unique and invaluable opportunity to study diseases as they morphologically and physiologically recapitulate human hearts. This is particularly important in the context of cardiac diseases, given the unique characteristics of human heart. The term “3D cardiac constructs” has been widely applied in research through various techniques. By offering physiologically relevant and highly customizable platforms, 3D cardiac constructs bridge critical gaps in traditional cardiac research methods and provide transformative insights into the development and treatment of CVDs.
One of the primary applications of 3D cardiac constructs is to mimic human diseases for the study of pathogenic mechanisms and drug screening. Their ability to allow real-time measurement of pathological phenotypes in vitro makes them particularly useful for evaluating drug treatment effects. Additionally, the small size of 3D cardiac constructs is advantageous for constructing high-throughput drug screening platforms, thereby reducing the reliance on experimental animals. Consequently, 3D cardiac constructs have emerged as valuable preclinical platforms for evaluating drug efficacy in drug discovery.
3D cardiac constructs are classified into various types, each with distinct characteristics. A deeper understanding of these models is essential for selecting or optimizing them for specific applications. This article provides a brief overview of the latest advancements in 3D cardiac constructs research and discusses their application in disease modeling and drug screening. These insights aim to offer theoretical guidance for disease modeling and drug discovery based on 3D cardiac constructs.
3D cardiac constructs technology holds immense promise for revolutionizing cardiovascular research and regenerative medicine, yet substantial challenges persist that limit its clinical translation. Despite advancements in mimicking human heart tissue structure and function, key hurdles remain, including the difficulty in achieving mature, electromechanically coupled 3D constructs that fully replicate adult cardiomyocyte physiology. Additionally, large-scale fabrication for high-throughput applications and the need for improved vascularization to enable nutrient delivery in larger constructs pose ongoing limitations. These barriers must be addressed to improve the potential of this technology for applications including disease modeling and drug screening.
The field of 3D cardiac constructs technology is undergoing rapid development, and so is the CVD research area. The discovery of hPSCs, including human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), has made it possible to explore human cardiomyogenesis and the underlying causes of both congenital and late-onset cardiac disorders [3,4]. The challenge of limited availability of patient-derived primary cells has been addressed by iPSC technology, enabling the advancement of high-fidelity disease models. Furthermore, various complex and monogenic cardiac pathologies have been investigated in vitro with iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes (iPSC-CMs) and genome editing techniques, providing new insights into disease mechanisms [5]. Additionally, human iPSCs-CMs have become crucial tools in both drug development and repurposing [6].
Following the establishment of cardiomyocyte differentiation systems induced by hPSCs, multiple in vitro 3D cardiac constructs have been developed, each with unique features and capabilities (Fig. 1). Engineered heart tissue (EHT) was first generated from neonatal rat cardiomyocytes mixed with collagen I in 2002 [7]. Human EHT was then generated from hESCs in 2009 using activin A and BMP4 in a suspension culture system [8]. EHT exhibited spontaneous contraction and electrophysiological properties, making it suitable for drug testing and transplantation. The concept of heart-on-chip emerged around 2014 and typically refers to a small chip containing a network of microchannels and cardiac cells [9]. This system enables real-time measurement of cardiac contractility and electrophysiological functions, facilitating high-throughput drug testing [10,11]. With the advancement of technology, the so-called body-on-chip integrating various organoids (including cardiac organoid) was developed around 2020 [12]. Scaffold-free cardiac spherical microtissues, composed of cardiomyocytes and other cell types, were developed around 2017. These microtissues, commonly self-organized in suspension culture, are easy to construct and small in size, making them suitable for drug screening [13–15]. The self-assembling human heart organoids (hHOs) (so-called cardioid) are self-organized structure with chamber, derived from human PSCs that mimic early heart development, which appeared in 2021 [16,17], and then multi-chamber cardioids were established in 2023 [18]. These 3D models replicate key features of embryonic hearts, including cavity formation and multi-lineage cell organization. On anti-adhesion surfaces, hPSCs typically self-assemble into aggregates that differentiate into cardiac cells within organoids [16,19]. This system is particularly well-suited for studying cardiogenesis and congenital heart disease.
The distinctions among human EHT, heart-on-chip, scaffold-free cardiac spherical microtissues, and cardioids lie in their structural complexity, functional features, and underlying mechanisms (Fig. 2 and Table 1). EHTs are traditionally fabricated using scaffolds or hydrogel to support cardiomyocyte growth, enabling 3D organization and electromechanical coupling, which better recapitulates native heart tissue architecture [20]. In contrast, heart-on-chip systems integrate microfluidic channels with embedded cardiomyocytes on flexible substrates, allowing precise control of mechanical and biochemical cues, such as fluid shear stress and oxygen gradients, to simulate dynamic physiological environments and enhance relevance for drug testing and disease modeling [9,11]. Scaffold-free cardiac spherical microtissues, however, self-assemble into spheroidal structures through cell–cell adhesion and extracellular matrix secretion, eliminating scaffold dependence and promoting cellular communication via gap junctions and paracrine signaling, which improves tissue maturation [14,21]. Cardioids, as advanced microphysiological systems, specify human stem cell into heart-like cavity structures in engineered microenvironments to model cardiac development and disease with high fidelity, emphasizing organotypic complexity and biochemical responsiveness [16]. At the mechanism level, EHTs rely on the property of scaffold and matrix for tissue integration, while heart-on-chip systems use microfluidic dynamics to mimic circulation. Scaffold-free microtissues exploit stem cell aggregation capacity, and cardioids depend on stem cell differentiation signals. Collectively, these platforms vary in scalability, biological relevance, and application focus, with EHTs and cardioids excelling in structural realism, heart-on-chip in dynamic modeling, and scaffold-free microtissues in simplicity and adaptability. For experiment design, cardioids offer high physiological fidelity by mimicking human heart development and disease progression, making them ideal for studying complex cardiac pathologies. In contrast, microfluidic heart-on-chips are superior in throughput and scalability, enabling rapid screening of drug candidates or environmental stressors. Cardioids prioritize accuracy at the expense of throughput and cost efficiency, while heart-on-chips sacrifice some organ-level complexity for efficiency. By comparing these models, including cardioids’ strength in disease modeling versus heart-on-chips’ advantages in high-throughput assays, researchers should choose their experimental platform with their priorities, whether they seek mechanistic insights or scalable solutions.
A pivotal strength of iPSCs in disease modeling is that they are genetically matched to the donor, making them particularly suited for modeling diseases with a defined genetic cause. Since iPSCs are reprogrammed from adult cells into a pluripotent state, many epigenetic changes induced by environmental influences are erased. Consequently, for non-genetic disease modeling, external stimuli must be re-applied [22]. Several genetic cardiac 3D disease models have been established employing iPSCs derived from patients carrying mutations associated with CVDs (Table 2). In Table 2, we compile various genetic cardiac 3D disease models along with their corresponding genetic alterations, pathological manifestations, and testing methodologies. Cardioids derived from hPSCs have been employed to investigate genetic cardiac defects (such as conditions leading to arrhythmias and reduced contractility) using advanced techniques including gene expression profiling and electrophysiological testing [16,19]. iPSC lines carrying mutations in C10orf71 have been used to generate organoids, while gene editing of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) models with contractility defects has facilitated the evaluation of different stages of functional and pharmacological responses [23]. 3D cardiac constructs have also been used to study arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM), where they exhibited loss of contractile function, validating their utility for drug screening and gene expression analysis [24]. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has been modeled using ACTN2-mutant hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes, which successfully replicated key pathological features such as hypertrophy, hypercontractility, and myofibrillar disarray. Subsequent functional assays with L-type calcium channel blockers such as diltiazem demonstrated clinical benefit by enhancing contraction and relaxation [25]. In summary, 3D cardiac constructs are particularly well-suited for simulating the phenotypic manifestations of cardiac diseases caused by genetic mutations and underpin the clinical translation of drug discovery.
Beyond genetic determinants, non-genetic variables including chronic inflammation, metabolic alterations, and environmental stressors also play a crucial role in disease progression. Currently, many non-genetic CVDs have been successfully recapitulated by organoid models (Table 3), which simulate how these environmental factors affect mixed cellular populations, including cardiac, endothelial, and vascular. Functional testing, transcriptomics, and immunostaining have demonstrated that cardiac organoids exposed to metabolic stress and environmental pollutants exhibit phenotypes associated with oxidative stress and inflammation, leading to structural defects and reduced contractility (Table 3). Vascular organoids can model endothelial dysfunction, vascular stress, and reduced vessel branching, which might be influenced by environmental toxins and chronic inflammation [26]. These models are evaluated using sophisticated techniques such as gene expression analysis, elasticity measurements, and live imaging [26]. With the help of tissue imaging and functional testing, heart assembloids containing tissue-resident macrophages replicate normal immune–cardiac interactions, allowing the study of immune-mediated heart disease, inflammation, and altered contractility [27]. In summary, cardiac 3D models provide a valuable platform for investigating the pathogenic mechanism of CVDs influenced by environmental factors and offer key insights for drug discovery.
The selection of cell types derived from PSCs critically shapes the functionality and disease relevance of cardiac organoids. Cardiomyocytes (CMs) form the core contractile units, enabling organoids to mimic heart rhythm and response to stimuli [7], but their maturation level often falls short of adult cardiomyocytes [28], limiting physiological fidelity. Endothelial cells are essential for vascularization [29], facilitating nutrient delivery and waste removal. Cardiac fibroblasts (CFs) provide structural support and influence extracellular matrix remodeling [24], but their overrepresentation may shift organoid behavior toward fibrosis rather than healthy cardiac dynamics. Meanwhile, immune cells like macrophages, when incorporated, enhance inflammation modeling and response to injury, though their presence introduces variability due to complex cell–cell interactions [27]. Each cell type offers distinct advantages: CMs for contractility, endothelial cells for perfusion, CFs for tissue integrity, and macrophages for immune modulation. Optimizing ratios and differentiation protocols is thus pivotal to balance organoid realism with experimental reproducibility, ensuring they serve as robust models for cardiac development, disease, and therapy testing.
Ongoing advancements in hPSC-derived 3D cardiac constructs rely on novel technologies or the adaptation of existing technologies to further investigate physiological and pathological mechanisms [30]. Various quantitative and qualitative methods are used to assess their morphology and function (Fig. 3). These methods are essential for evaluating the accuracy and sensitivity of the 3D models and for collecting meaningful experimental readouts.
Electrophysiology is one of the key parameters in assessing heart function (Fig. 3). Commonly used methods are discussed in the following sections.
The development of multielectrode array (MEA) in cardiology has enabled scientists to evaluate the electrophysiological properties of cardiac organoids and cardiomyocytes, providing a non-invasive method for monitoring heart rhythm and conduction. MEA devices consist of arrays of microelectrodes embedded in a substrate, allowing for the recording of extracellular potentials from cells [31]. This technology provides a high-resolution view of network dynamics, tissue connectivity, and cellular behavior. MEA has revolutionized the understanding of cardiac tissues and neural networks, where electrical activity underpins the functionality of both physiological function and disease pathogenesis [31]. It serves as a crucial platform for disease modeling and drug screening, enabling researchers to measure electrophysiological changes in cardiac tissues in response to pharmacological compounds, genetic modifications, and environmental stressors. This approach not only enhances our understanding of heart conditions but also holds potential for personalized medicine and the design of novel therapeutic approaches for patients with arrhythmias and other heart disorders [30,31]. However, the integration of sensors within organoids may disrupt their 3D structure and alter normal physiology [32]. Therefore, it is essential to develop MEA devices capable of assessing electrophysiological properties in intact 3D organoids [33,34].
The patch-clamp technique facilitates precise evaluation of cellular membrane potential and provides high-resolution analysis of cardiomyocyte electrophysiology [35–37]. It is a widely used electrophysiological method for assessing the electrical characteristics of individual cells, particularly those in cardiac tissues. This technique involves the insertion of a fine-tipped, high-resistance electrode into a cell, allowing for the accurate recording of cellular membrane electrical activity [31]. Optical mapping is another approach that utilizes a voltage-sensitive dye, which changes intensity in response to membrane potential alterations. A previous study demonstrated the electrophysiological characteristics of cardiac microtissues using optical mapping [38], showing that cardiac microtissues serve as effective models for assessing the proarrhythmic risk of drugs. A fundamental strength of optical mapping is its ability to record action potentials in intact organoids without disrupting their native 3D structure. However, dye-induced cytotoxicity and photobleaching limit its applicability for long-term culture and repeated recordings.
In addition to patch-clamp and MEA, voltage-sensitive dye-based calcium imaging is a prominent technique for assessing organoid functionality, particularly when maintaining structural integrity is essential for readout acquisition [19,39,40]. Calcium imaging enables the monitoring of intercellular calcium concentration changes, facilitating research on excitation–contraction coupling [41,42]. The processes of calcium uptake, release, and buffering dynamics are essential for coordinating cardiomyocyte contraction, underscoring the importance of replicating these mechanisms in organoids [41]. This field has been further advanced by state-of-the-art calcium imaging techniques, which provide powerful tools for analyzing calcium handling in cardiac tissues that have undergone genetic or pharmacological modifications [42]. In recent studies, a customized spectral-domain optical coherence tomography system was employed to enable fast, label-free, and non-invasive 3D imaging of hHOs [43,44]. Calcium imaging was concurrently utilized to visualize the dynamic beating patterns of hHOs. Together, optical coherence tomography and calcium imaging form a synergistic multimodal platform that correlates structural morphogenesis with physiological function, offering a powerful in vitro model for studying early heart development and disease mechanisms. However, dye-induced cytotoxicity and photobleaching limit the long-term use of voltage-sensitive dyes in culture [45]. To address these challenges, genetic calcium reporters have emerged as effective alternatives for studying cardiac calcium signaling [45,46].
By combining optimized algorithms with genetic calcium reporters, a method utilizing standard video microscopy has been developed to simultaneously analyze the coupling of calcium flux and contractility in human iPSC-CM [47]. The readouts include contraction magnitude, beating rate, and beating velocity, which have been widely used in conventional cardiomyocyte research. The open-source software used in this study was validated through drug response analysis and can be modified and applied to engineered microtissues. However, in contrast to 2D monolayer cultures, cardiac organoids on ultra-low attachment surfaces can experience positional and orientation shifts as a result of hypercontractile activity. This phenomenon warrants inclusion in the analytical framework to avoid miscalculations of contraction magnitude [48].
Key factors such as energy output, mitochondrial function, and substrate utilization in organoid models can be analyzed using various readouts and testing techniques. One of the primary functions of cardiomyocyte respiration is to generate adenosine triphosphate (ATP) required for the myocardium contraction from energy-providing substrates, including fatty acids, lactate, and glucose. Although multiple pathways contribute to energy production, mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation accounts for approximately 90% of total energy generation [49]. Recent studies have demonstrated that cardiac organoids effectively model key metabolic processes, such as changes in mitochondrial activity and substrate utilization under both physiological and pathological conditions [17,50]. Using cutting-edge techniques such as metabolomics and Seahorse XF analysis, researchers have identified novel therapeutic targets and evaluated drug-induced cardiotoxicity by gaining crucial insights into energy metabolism and disease phenotypes. The Seahorse Extracellular Flux Analyzer facilitates real-time, high-precision quantification of oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) in living cells [49,51]. OCR reflects mitochondrial respiration, while ECAR corresponds to proton excretion via glycolysis. These parameters allow researchers to assess mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and glycolytic activity, providing a comprehensive view of the metabolic state of cardiac organoids [52]. Furthermore, real-time cell respiration assays dynamically track dissolved oxygen levels and proton flux in extracellular media [51]. Variations in OCR and ECAR are directly linked to ATP turnover, reflecting ATP synthesis and consumption rates, which are critical for understanding cardiac energy metabolism [53].
In addition to metabolic profiling, which provides crucial insights into the bioenergetic state and functional condition of cardiac organoids, a complementary analysis of gene expression is also necessary to understand the underlying molecular mechanisms. Multi-scale analyses of the genome, transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome are fundamental for identifying pathological biomarkers and gaining insights into the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of CVDs [54]. Gene expression studies in cardioids have identified key pathways associated with developmental heart chamber defects, including mesodermal WNT and BMP signaling and the HAND1 transcription factor [16]. Additionally, time-course RNA sequencing analysis during differentiation has revealed the production of pivotal morphogens, growth factors, and receptors at various cardiac developmental stages [17]. In terms of developmental mechanisms, a study constructed single-cell molecular maps and spatial maps during cardiac development using single-cell RNA sequencing and multiplex error-robust fluorescence in situ hybridization technology, revealing the regional specialization of cell subpopulations and the formation mechanism of cell community structures [55]. This study establishes a theoretical foundation for utilizing cardiac organoids to model heart development. These findings highlight how molecular insights into cardiovascular development and disease can be obtained from cardiac organoids, providing valuable models for studying cardiac pathophysiology and potential therapeutic targets.
To conduct these functional measurements in clinically relevant models, the integration of advanced biomaterials with tailored mechanical and biochemical cues is indispensable. The development of novel materials is continuously driving advancements in 3D cardiac constructs functional enhancement. Current mainstream fabrication technologies primarily include 3 approaches: (a) suspension culture methods utilizing rotating bioreactor systems, (b) Matrigel embedding techniques supported by hydrogels or decellularized matrices, and (c) 3D bioprinting for precise spatial control of cell deposition [56]. The emergence of advanced biomaterials, particularly photopolymerizable hydrogel (the photo-initiator absorbs light to generate free radicals that cross-link monomers into a 3D network) and conductive nanofibers, has overcome critical challenges in structural precision and electrical signal transmission that previously restricted conventional 3D culture systems. This technological breakthrough enables the engineering of complex tissue models, including vascularized 3D cardiac constructs with enhanced physiological relevance. Recent advancements have shown that integrating organoids with microfluidic chip technology enables the creation of functional “human-on-a-chip” systems capable of simulating multi-organ interactions [57]. This breakthrough provides novel opportunities for investigating cross-organ pharmacological effects in vitro.
Recent breakthroughs in cardiac tissue engineering have witnessed expanding applications of conductive biomaterials. These functional materials serve dual purposes: they can be utilized as substrates for cardiomyocyte culture in vitro or engineered into conductive cardiac patches for implantation into MI regions [58–60]. Experimental studies have demonstrated that culturing H9C2 rat cardiomyocytes on graphene-incorporated conductive composite membranes with charged surface properties markedly enhances cellular adhesion and promotes proliferation rates [61]. These findings substantiate the suitability of such conductive biomaterials for cardiac tissue engineering applications. A research team has successfully developed conductive electroactive fiber scaffolds with an elastic modulus matching that of natural myocardium [62]. When cultured on these scaffolds, H9C2 cells demonstrate enhanced adhesion, migration, and proliferation capabilities. The scaffolds effectively guide cardiomyocyte alignment along the fiber orientation while simultaneously promoting angiogenesis. Notably, these scaffolds exhibit excellent biocompatibility in rat models [62]. By precisely adjusting the fiber architecture and scaffold composition, advanced modeling techniques mimic the intricate microstructure of cardiac tissue with precision. In another example, when culturing murine embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (ESC-CMs) within engineered matrices, the incorporation of graphene-based biohybrid matrices markedly enhances cellular metabolic activity and facilitates sarcomere development, demonstrating superior matrix compatibility [63]. Furthermore, the application of electrical stimulation through these conductive biohybrid matrices yields additional benefits, driving substantial improvements in ESC-CM organization and physiological maturation [63].
Moreover, the development of “nano-conductive” cardiac organoids, a construct engineered through the integration of conductive silicon nanowires (e-SiNWs) with hPSC-derived CMs (hPSC-CMs), demonstrates dual functional enhancements: improved electrical conduction capacity and enhanced intercellular electrical synchronization [64]. After transplantation into myocardial infarct models, these constructs exhibit measurable therapeutic benefits, including reduced fibrotic area and improved ventricular ejection fraction. The e-SiNWs effectively mimic native cardiomyocyte electrical conduction pathways, thereby establishing functional electrical coupling between the transplanted organoids and host myocardium, ultimately enhancing MI treatment outcomes [64]. Previous research has demonstrated the development of a self-powered triboelectric nanogenerator patch designed to generate electrical stimulation through cardiac contraction simulation [65]. This innovative device effectively delivers therapeutic stimulation to infarcted myocardial regions, thereby enhancing electrical signal propagation between healthy and damaged cardiac tissues. Furthermore, the supplemental electrical stimulation provided by the patch accelerates cardiomyocyte maturation and functional development. In porcine MI models, implementation of this generator patch yielded 2 important benefits: (a) increased electrical conduction velocity within the infarct zone, and (b) capability for wireless electrocardiographic signal monitoring, achieving an integrated approach combining both treatment and diagnostic functions [65]. A recent study used biopolymers combined with conductive materials and 3D printing technology to simulate the layered structure of natural cardiac tissue, enabling the printing of multi-layered structures containing cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells, and stromal cells [66]. The incorporated conductive components serve multiple critical functions: (a) facilitating intercellular electrical signal propagation, (b) promoting synchronous electromechanical coupling, (c) enhancing functional maturation of cardiomyocytes, and (d) maintaining rhythmic contractile activity. Collectively, these features greatly improve the electrophysiological performance and functional integration of the engineered cardiac tissues [66].
In cardiac tissue engineering, hydrogel materials have gained extensive research attention owing to their dual functional advantages of injectability and transplantability. These versatile biomaterials can be either directly injected into myocardial tissue or fabricated into cardiac patches via 3D printing technology for precise implantation into infarcted regions [67]. Notably, the application of 3D printing technology with biocompatible hydrogel materials permits precise spatial control of diverse cell types within organoids, effectively mimicking the cellular architecture of the developing heart [68]. This technological advancement enables cardiac organoids to more faithfully replicate developmental processes, providing critical insights into both the pathogenesis of congenital heart defects and the pharmacological responses of the embryonic heart [68]. Notably, hydrogel-based systems incorporating bioactive factors demonstrate synergistic therapeutic effects. A representative example involves the injection of conductive hydrogels loaded with human mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes (hMSC-exosomes) into MI models [69]. This combined approach provides dual therapeutic benefits: (a) the conductive matrix facilitates sustained exosome release while restoring cardiac electrical conduction, and (b) the exosomes exert multifaceted regenerative effects including angiogenesis promotion, apoptosis inhibition, and arrhythmia reduction. Recent advances have substantially broadened the therapeutic scope of this approach. Experimental studies have demonstrated that a pH-responsive multifunctional conductive hydrogel (OHA/Col-CDH/MWCNT) loaded with metformin and exosomes synergistically regulates oxidative stress, electrical conduction, and angiogenesis through an intelligent release system [70]. This combinatorial strategy has been shown to markedly enhance myocardial regeneration outcomes in preclinical models [70]. In the field of bionic structural engineering, researchers have developed fiber-reinforced hydrogel inks for 3D bioprinting of cardiac-mimetic scaffolds [71]. These advanced constructs precisely recapitulate both intracellular and extracellular cardiac tissue architectures. The embedded fibrous network not only promotes anisotropic cell alignment but also faithfully reproduces the heart’s spatiotemporal excitation–contraction coupling dynamics at the organ scale [71]. Recently, researchers have successfully combined hiPSC-CMs with collagen hydrogels to create functional “cardiac patches” [72]. In rhesus monkey models, these patches restored cardiac function by thickening ventricular walls and improving ejection fractions. Human trials confirmed sustained functional benefits in heart failure patients, offering a bridge to transplantation and a novel regenerative approach.
The improvement of the conductive properties of hydrogels is of vital importance for enhancing their functionality in 3D tissue construction. A groundbreaking conductive hydrogel with mechanical and electrical properties mimicking native myocardial tissue [73] overcomes biocompatibility limitations of conventional hydrogels. This material offers 5 key benefits: (a) minimal inflammatory response, (b) enhanced cardiomyocyte maturation, (c) guided sarcomere assembly, (d) infarct size stabilization, and (e) extended stem cell therapy viability. These attributes position it as a superior scaffold for bioengineered cardiac organoids. Conductive hydrogel patches offer unique advantages for cardiac repair by precisely replicating the electrophysiological properties of myocardial tissue [74]. Their matched conductivity restores synchronized electrical activity in infarcted regions, while preclinical studies demonstrate multiple therapeutic benefits: they enhance electrical signal conduction, accelerate impulse propagation at lesion sites, promote angiogenesis, and reduce cardiomyocyte apoptosis [74]. These synergistic effects highlight their potential in improving heart function post-infarction.
Biomedical nanofabrication and integrated sensing technologies enhance cardiac organoid maturation by precisely simulating the biomechanical microenvironment, including tensile forces and fluid shear stress. Recent studies show that multimodal, implantable sensors synchronize with organoid growth, creating an “intra-organoid interface” for long-term electrophysiological monitoring and stimulation [75]. A key advancement is the dual functionality of embedded electrodes: they not only record electrophysiological signals but also actively regulate development by influencing cardiomyocyte maturation. Specifically, electrical pulses improve sarcomere alignment and calcium transient synchronization. Additionally, these sensors enable real-time tracking of functional parameters (e.g., contraction frequency and pressure dynamics), overcoming limitations of conventional optical methods that lack comprehensive morphological and functional data [75]. Micropore arrays provide geometric constraints that drive cellular self-organization, offering a precisely controlled microenvironment for cardiac organoid development [32]. Co-culturing hiPSC-CMs with rat cardiac endothelial cells within these micropores promotes cell aggregation and spontaneous contraction. The resulting anisotropic stress gradients, combined with vascular network formation, facilitate the assembly of multi-chamber structures, including pacemaker cells, fibroblasts, and cardiac layers, that mimic native heart architecture and improve cardiomyocyte maturation [32]. In addition to improving cardiac function, nano-fabrication and integrated sensing technologies also present an innovative framework for drug screening in CVDs. The 3D-printed flexible nano-silver electrode array (FlexNEA) can capture intracellular signals through electroporation, synchronously recording contraction stress and action potential conduction velocity [76]. This array enables high-fidelity recording of cardiomyocyte action potential dynamics under pharmacological modulation by specific ion channel blockers, showcasing robust drug screening utility. It provides precise, quantitative assessment of ion channel drug effects, thereby establishing a novel high-precision platform for evaluating drug-induced arrhythmogenic risk [76].
Furthermore, for the construction of vascularized cardiac organoids, co-culturing endothelial cells with biocompatible matrices enables the development of perfusable microvascular networks. This approach better recapitulates in vivo blood perfusion and nutrient delivery, consequently improving the physiological fidelity of organoid systems [77,78]. It is worth noting that cardiac organoids with spatial structures and vascular networks can be constructed by optimizing culture formulas and using specific combinations of growth factors, overcoming the problems of limited organoid size and maturity due to the lack of a vascular system [79]. Such vascularized cardiac organoids offer superior capabilities in recapitulating cardiac physiological functions and investigating drug effects on cardiac development. From a materials innovation perspective, recent studies have demonstrated a novel strategy: modulating matrix viscoelasticity to guide hPSC-derived vascular organoids toward forming arteriole-like structures [77]. In this technology, dynamic hydrogels facilitate outward vascular expansion, yielding complex networks with enlarged luminal diameters. This approach greatly enhances arteriole reorganization in infarcted hearts and improves post-transplant functional recovery, offering a transformative solution for vascularized cardiac organoid engineering and functional maturation.
Currently, multiple technical approaches have emerged for constructing vascularized cardiac organoids. Conducting detailed comparative analyses of different vascularization strategies holds substantial practical guidance value: co-culture represents a commonly employed method. This involves co-culturing endothelial cells with biomaterials and cardiac lineage cells, mimicking in vivo paracrine effects and the microenvironment of intercellular interactions to achieve spontaneous vascular network formation. This approach more authentically simulates the organ’s blood flow and nutrient supply [77]. The process is relatively straightforward, yet suffers from poor controllability of vascular distribution and insufficient network regularity. Bioprinting technology employs precise layer-by-layer deposition to print bio-inks containing endothelial cells, cardiomyocytes, and supportive biomaterials according to predefined structures, enabling directed construction of vascular networks. Research utilizing a 6-axis robotic bioprinter integrated with an oil bath printing system has successfully engineered long-term viable myocardial tissue with rhythmic contractions and capillary networks on vascular scaffolds [80]. However, this technology commonly faces the challenge of balancing the printing performance of bio-inks with cell viability.
It is noteworthy that vascularization construction effectively overcomes the limitations in organoid size and maturity caused by the lack of a vascular system. Specifically, the formation of functional vascular networks not only enlarges the maximum diameter of organoids to hundreds of micrometers [29] but also markedly enhances the survival rate of cells within the core region of organoids [80]. Finally, vascularization also promotes the maturation and differentiation of cardiomyocytes while enhancing the expression levels of relevant maturation markers [81].
Although vascularized organoid technology has developed rapidly, it should be noted that current vascularized cardiac organoid construction still faces enormous limitations. Specifically, it remains challenging to obtain fully functional vascular systems. Existing vascular networks often lack the hierarchical structure comprising small arteries, capillaries, and small veins. The vascular endothelial barrier function is incomplete, and post-transplantation integration with the host vascular system is weak.
A recent study demonstrates the potential of novel materials with simulated biological properties to optimize cell seeding techniques and microenvironment reconstruction in cardiac 3D constructs engineering, based on cellular spatial distribution patterns and their interaction dynamics [55]. Previous studies confirm a critical cardiomyocyte–macrophage interaction network in cardiac homeostasis [82]. This system regulates heart metabolism and function, providing new insights for stable cardiac organoid development. The core mechanism involves the binding of damage-associated molecular patterns released by cardiomyocytes to pattern recognition receptors on macrophage surfaces, and the intercellular transmission of mitochondrial quality control signals [82]. Therefore, novel materials could be designed to efficiently promote macrophage mitochondrial phagocytosis. One approach involves modifying the surface of nanomaterials with integrin β1 activation fragments to enhance intercellular signaling [83]. Secondly, by simulating the physical properties of the extracellular matrix, piezoelectric material regulates macrophage polarization and enhances phagocytic activity [84]. In cardiac organoids, these materials may be used to guide macrophages to phagocytose cardiomyocyte-derived exosomes containing defective mitochondria, thereby maintaining mitochondrial and metabolic equilibrium. This approach holds therapeutic potential for mitochondrial cardiomyopathy and related disorders. In the aspect of tissue regeneration, a recent study showed that paracrine signals secreted by iPSC-derived macrophages promote adult cardiomyocyte proliferation [85]; this finding supports the design of composite biomaterials to promote the repair of injured tissues.
Furthermore, integrating immune components including macrophages, pericytes, and supporting biomaterials into vascularized cardiac organoid construction to simulate the in vivo immune–vascular microenvironment represents a crucial developmental direction for creating more physiologically relevant cardiac organoid models. Research has also demonstrated that a 3D extracellular matrix-rich microenvironment promotes cardiomyocyte maturation and enriches cardiac organoids with immunoregulatory signals, thereby enhancing myocardial repair in infarct hearts [29].
In summary, the integration of these advanced biomaterials not only elevates the architectural sophistication of cardiac organoids but also augments their key physiological functionalities, including contractile dynamics, electrophysiological signaling, and pharmacological responsiveness [86,87]. This technological breakthrough establishes a robust, physiologically relevant platform with transformative potential for precision disease modeling, high-throughput drug discovery, diagnostic applications, and regenerative therapies.
Pharmacological intervention remains one of the most critical approaches for CVD management [88]. Cardiovascular drug screening typically involves testing a library of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved compounds on cardiac cells, such as CFs [89], cardiomyocytes [90], or endothelial cells [91] (Table 4). However, these simplified 2D systems lack the intricate 3D architecture and dynamic cellular cross-talk found in native cardiac tissue [92], thereby reducing the predictive validity of pharmacological outcomes and toxicity assessments. Recent breakthroughs in human 3D cardiac models have facilitated scalable drug screening platforms [27,93–95] (Fig. 4). A study screening 105 potential regenerative compounds (screened out from 5,000 chemical compounds via 2D high-content primary screening experiment) identified 2 that enhanced cardiomyocyte proliferation without impairing rhythm or contractility [50]. Notably, some compounds effective in 2D cultures proved ineffective or detrimental in 3D organoids, demonstrating traditional models’ limitations and organoids’ superior predictive power.
Recent studies using human cardiac organoids (hCOs) combined with phosphoproteomic and single-nucleus RNA sequencing have identified inflammatory cytokine storms as key contributors to diastolic dysfunction, with interferon-γ, interleukin-1β, and poly(I) as primary mediators [96]. Notably, BET inhibitors like Apabetalone effectively counter SARS-CoV-2-induced cardiac infection and prevent cardiac insufficiency, highlighting their therapeutic potential for COVID-19-related cardiac injury [96]. In a separate model, MI organoids were created using an oxygen diffusion gradient and norepinephrine stimulation [97]. Treatment with JQ1, a BET inhibitor, reduced asynchronous beating and fibrosis, demonstrating MI organoids’ utility as a platform for heart failure drug screening [97]. A recent study investigating myocardial regeneration employed hCOs to screen small molecules targeting calcium cycling proteins in cardiomyocytes. The results revealed that nifedipine, an L-type calcium channel (LTCC) inhibitor, successfully re-induced proliferation in mature cardiomyocytes [98]. Vascularized chambered cardiac organoids (vcCOs) overcome key limitations of traditional organoids by integrating cardiomyocytes, vascular progenitors, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts, enabling functional vascular networks and native-like tissue complexity [99]. Created via co-encapsulation of hiPSC-derived vascular spheres with cardiomyocytes, these 3D constructs exhibit spontaneous contractions and cellular cross-talk. When modeled with cryoinjury, vcCOs recapitulate MI features, while therapeutics like captopril mitigate damage and doxorubicin induces dose-dependent cardiotoxicity (arrhythmias, ATP depletion, and apoptosis). Collectively, these findings demonstrate that hCOs serve as versatile platforms for therapeutic development for CVDs.
Researchers engineered an innovative 3D cardiac model incorporating iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes and CFs to address unpredictable drug toxicity [12]. The system incorporated multiple functional assays to evaluate both FDA-withdrawn (hepatotoxic/cardiotoxic) drugs and safe controls. Compared to 2D cultures, the 3D organoids showed higher sensitivity to cardiotoxins like astemizole, cisapride, mibefradil, and trodifacoum, detecting toxicity at lower doses and earlier time points. Strikingly, observed toxic concentrations matched clinically reported human plasma levels. Importantly, non-toxic drugs at therapeutic doses did not impair organoid contractility or viability, validating their physiological relevance for cardiotoxicity prediction. To enhance its utility, the cardiac organoids were integrated into a multi-organ microplatform (liver, lung, vascular, brain, testis, and colon) [12]. This system maintained long-term tissue viability and biomarker expression, serving as a robust tool for systemic toxicity screening across organ interactions.
3D cardiac models offer great potential for drug screening but face limitations in replicating dynamic physiological conditions. Static 3D cultures lack fluidic interactions, which are crucial for modeling micro-physiological environments [100]. Organ-on-a-chip platforms address this by integrating organoid technology with microfluidics, creating perfusable chambers that replicate the 3D architecture and physiological functions of human organs. These systems enhance drug development and toxicity studies by simulating in vivo conditions through controlled flow and nutrient exchange [101]. By developing microfluidic multi-cellular heart-on-chip models, drug permeability has been improved, and the pathological phenotypes observed are more consistent with in vivo conditions [10,11]. Using organ-on-chip technology, it is possible to simultaneously assess the hepatic metabolism of cardiac drugs and evaluate the cardiotoxicity of antineoplastic drugs [102], as well as the impact of environmental factors on multiple organs, including the heart [103].
Using stem or patient-derived cells, they self-assemble into functional organ-like units while microfluidics enables precise regulation of nutrient delivery, mechanical forces, and biochemical gradients, essential for studying dynamic pathologies and drug responses. Organoids-on-a-chip exhibit 3 key advancements: (a) enhanced physiological fidelity, accurately replicating tissue interfaces and cell–cell interactions; (b) versatile construct design, allowing assembly from either stem/progenitor cell differentiation or patient biopsies for personalized drug testing; and (c) scalability, supporting high-throughput integration for efficient screening. Moreover, multi-organoid integrated systems demonstrate superior capability in detecting drug toxicity post-hepatic metabolism, owing to the incorporation of functional liver organoids [12]. This is particularly critical for prodrugs like cyclophosphamide, which are inherently non-toxic but metabolize into harmful compounds, a process the platform reliably replicates to reflect clinical outcomes [12]. The micro-physiological system-on-a-chip platform (MSCP) addresses limitations of conventional preclinical models by integrating pneumatic microvalves and a 304-well array, enabling dynamic switching between “organ formation” and “blood flow” modes [102]. This system supported a functional 4-organ model (heart, liver, intestines, and lung cancer spheroids). Evaluation of 4 anti-lung cancer drugs (doxorubicin, cisplatin, docetaxel, and pemetrexed) revealed the following: (a) universal normal organ toxicity; (b) severe cardiotoxicity from docetaxel/doxorubicin (reduced cardiac spheroid viability); and (c) attenuated antitumor efficacy due to intestinal/hepatic drug metabolism. The MSCP uniquely combines high-throughput multi-organ modeling with physiological inter-organ communication simulation and concurrent efficacy/toxicity assessment (particularly cardiotoxicity) [102]. Collectively, this platform demonstrates transformative potential for improving drug safety prediction and personalized medicine approaches.
Traditional static cell cultures and electrophysiological methods (e.g., microelectrode arrays and patch-clamp) struggle to replicate the heart’s 3D microenvironment, limiting their predictive accuracy for drug screening. To address this, researchers have introduced the Heart-on-a-Miniscope, an organoid-chip system combining microfluidics with a miniaturized fluorescence microscope [104]. The key innovations include the following: (a) Optical redesign: The open-source miniscope was modified to achieve long working distance (LWD-Miniscope), enabling high-resolution calcium imaging through ~100-μm glass chips. (b) Integrated stimulation: A 7-microwell chip with carbon rod electrodes delivers programmable electrical pacing for precise beat frequency control. (c) Pathological modeling: Successful recapitulation of Ivabradine-induced beating suppression demonstrated frequency-dependent drug evaluation. The platform detected the cardiotoxic effects of compounds (e.g., dofetilide and quinidine) by analyzing calcium transient kinetics (TTP, CD90, and Decay50/30), showcasing robust toxicity assessment capabilities. This cost-effective system integrates real-time 3D optical imaging, electrophysiological modulation, and organoid-based physiological modeling, thereby enhancing preclinical cardiotoxicity screening and enabling early-stage compound risk assessment.
Regarding practical implementation of cardiac 3D constructs, there are still several challenges that remain. In terms of cost, 3D models have higher initial construction and culture expenses than the conventional 2D culture system but remain relatively more economical than animal models [105]. Its upfront costs are markedly higher than simple 2D culture, involving stem cell maintenance, 3D matrices, growth factors, and potential functional readout equipment [106]. However, cardiac 3D models enable earlier and more accurate detection of cardiotoxicity or lack of efficacy, potentially reducing downstream costs associated with late-stage clinical failures [12,50].
Second, throughput and scalability are core bottlenecks for drug screening in current technological development. Traditionally manual cardiac organoid culture suffers from low throughput and high variability, making it unsuitable for large-scale compound library screening. Scalability has been improved through platforms such as 96-well plates for medium-throughput screening, and automation coupled with microfluidic organ-on-chip systems is further enhancing throughput and reproducibility [101,107]. However, achieving industrial-scale ultra-high-throughput screening requires further breakthroughs in organoid production standardization and data analysis pipeline.
The experimental period is also an important influencing factor. A typical experiment cycle includes several weeks to a month for hiPSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes and organoid maturation, followed by several days to a week of drug treatment and phenotypic analysis. The entire process usually takes 1 to 2 months, which is shorter than the multi-month cycle required to establish animal disease models. While longer than simple 2D cell viability assays that can be completed in days, organoids provide multi-dimensional data integrating structure and cellular heterogeneity, offering far more information than 2D endpoint assays [108].
While cardiac 3D models have proven invaluable for drug screening, their scalability and data-driven optimization demand integration with artificial intelligence (AI) to facilitate next-generation precision medicine. Current cardiac 3D model research faces key limitations: (a) Matrix-dependent culture systems with variable growth factor formulations introduce batch inconsistencies, potentially compromising reproducibility. (b) Static imaging paradigms lack temporal resolution to capture dynamic processes like cell migration/differentiation. (c) Light scattering obscures 3D architecture while manual microscope adjustments prevent volumetric high-resolution reconstruction [109]. To address these issues, AI technology is deeply integrated into cardiac organoid research, providing powerful innovative tools for high-throughput phenotypic assessment, deep mechanism analysis, model parameter optimization, and intelligent imaging analysis.
AI technology demonstrates exceptional efficiency in rapidly quantifying complex cardiac 3D pathological models through computer vision and machine learning. One study systematically extracted over 110 high-dimensional features from numerous control and inflammatory cardiac organoids [110]. This research combined automated image segmentation and feature extraction with brightfield microscopy videos. The resulting inflammation scoring model completes the entire workflow from video acquisition to quantitative assessment within 30 min, demonstrating close correlation with molecular biomarker levels.
Beyond rapid evaluation of complex pathological phenotypes, AI plays a pivotal role in deciphering the underlying molecular mechanisms of cardiac development and disease. For instance, in a study investigating NKX2-5 deficiency [111], researchers established atrioventricular-specific cardiac organoid models and obtained high-resolution single-cell RNA sequencing data. To address the subjectivity and low throughput of manual annotation, the team developed a machine learning label transfer method based on random forests. Using annotated human fetal heart single-cell data as the training set, this method successfully achieved automated and precise annotation of organoid cell types, chamber identity, and left–right lateralization. Applying this model to analyze organoids with the NKX2-5 c.673C>A mutation revealed a marked presence of cells predicted as atrial identity within the ventricular lineage, precisely quantifying the pathological defect of “atrialization of ventricles”. This study demonstrates AI’s powerful capabilities in uncovering cell lineage defects in cardiac organoid disease models.
Moreover, AI technology has been applied to guide the rational design and functional optimization of cardiac organoid construction. One study integrated micro-patterning technology with machine learning to construct a library of 230 cardiac organoids featuring 7 geometric shapes, extracting 10 key physiological parameters [112]. Subsequently, supervised learning models identified calcium transient rise time as the primary feature distinguishing functional impacts of different geometric designs, suggesting that geometric constraints primarily act by modulating calcium handling capacity. Direct experimental validation confirmed that the AI-predicted superior rectangular 1:4 organoids exhibited enhanced sarcomere alignment, calcium handling gene expression, and contraction coordination. This study demonstrates AI’s value in deciphering structure–function relationships and guiding rational organoid design. Another integrated approach is demonstrated by the AI analysis software Organalysis [113]. This model incorporates machine learning modules to automatically analyze high-throughput images and quantify the relative importance of culture conditions on cardiac organoid formation. Therefore, this AI-driven model can also be used to optimize cardiac organoid construction protocols.
Traditional imaging and quantification methods for cardiac organoids heavily rely on physical fluorescent labeling and manual analysis, suffering from limitations such as invasiveness and low throughput. Generative AI offers novel solutions for label-free cell identification. For instance, researchers successfully trained a conditional GAN model capable of directly converting brightfield images of cardiac organoids into virtual fluorescent images specific to cardiovascular cell types, enabling label-free cell identification and quantification [114]. This application demonstrates that AI is expanding from backend data analysis into frontend experimental image generation, comprehensively enhancing organoid research.
Since high-throughput screening requires large quantities of cells, an increase in throughput also leads to higher screening costs. Because of the high production cost of cardiac organoids, drug screening is still primarily conducted at the cellular level in many cases. Thus, reducing the cost of drug screening has become a major challenge. AI-assisted drug screening can improve screening accuracy by predicting drug efficacy based on ADMET (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity) [89,115]. Additionally, AI-assisted digital screening can be performed using RNA sequencing data to analyze pathway alterations, thereby narrowing down compound candidates for functional screening and reducing overall screening costs [91,116]. Furthermore, imaging-based AI can be applied in digital drug screening for cardiac fibrosis [117]. In this approach, fibrosis image features are extracted for machine learning-based classification to determine the presence of fibrosis. Specifically, a linear classifier can be trained to identify the fibrogenic phenotype from microscope images. This machine learning algorithm processes over 100 extracted features from each analyzed cell, resulting in an optimized linear separation between phenotypic groups [118]. Currently, the primary application of organoids in drug discovery is to evaluate the efficacy of a limited number of drugs. However, by integrating AI-assisted drug screening, researchers can narrow the scope of drug efficacy testing and greatly enhance drug development efficiency.
AI-assisted research on non-cardiac organoids also provides valuable insights for technology development. For instance, in drug-induced liver injury (DILI) level prediction, the DILITracer model employs the BEiT-V2 pre-trained network to analyze spatiotemporal features in brightfield liver organoid images [119]. Integrating an image–space–time encoding layer enhances multidimensional data fusion, achieving 82.34% accuracy in ternary DILI classification (no, low, or high risk). Notably, it identifies non-DILI compounds with 90.16% accuracy. The reported overall accuracy was derived from the model’s performance on the test set split from its primary dataset, evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation with an 80:20 train–test split applied within each fold, ensuring a robust internal evaluation.
Accurate cell segmentation in organoid imaging is crucial for long-term in vivo studies and high-throughput screening. AI-driven tools, such as the Cellos platform, combine classical image processing with the StarDist-3D Convolutional Neural Networks to segment organoid cells/nuclei efficiently [120]. In triple-negative breast cancer organoids, it achieved 96.07% accuracy, enabling quantification of cisplatin-induced dynamic changes in volume, nuclear morphology, and spatial cell interactions [120]. The reported accuracy was validated by manually evaluating 321 segmented organoids from cisplatin-treated wells, and the model’s generalizability was further confirmed on 3 external datasets: published breast cancer spheroids, HL60 leukemia synthetic images, and a mouse embryo image, demonstrating cross-sample applicability. In summary, these AI-driven studies offer valuable insights for organoid technical improvement through digital transformation and AI integration.
Although AI-assisted cardiac organoid research is booming, there are still barriers restricting the AI-based analysis across different laboratories. First, variations in organoid culture protocols, imaging systems, and acquisition parameters lead to notable data distribution shifts. Furthermore, inconsistent fluorescent labeling strategies and cell-type annotation criteria hinder the creation of harmonized datasets necessary for robust multi-center validation. Finally, there are no universally accepted benchmark datasets or validation protocols for comparing AI performance in organoid analysis, making cross-study comparisons and clinical validation difficult.
In summary, cardiac organoids combined with AI and nanofabrication technologies are exerting growing influence on drug development strategies, laying the foundation for next-generation screening approaches that are more economical and physiologically accurate.
Despite considerable advancements in 3D cardiac constructs development, their application and reliability remain limited due to technical barriers. These limitations include variability in iPSC induction efficiency and differentiation [5], heterogeneity in cardiomyocyte and non-cardiomyocyte ratios affecting functional readouts [48], the need for Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP)-compliant scalable production [121], and the current resource-intensive nature of organoid generation. Addressing these aspects is critical for advancing organoids toward drug discovery and clinical applications.
One big challenge involves the formation of cardiac organoids using iPSC-EC, iPSC-CM, and iPSC-CF within a shared culture medium. However, such universal culture media often fail to replicate the special microenvironment required by each cell type. This results in a loss of cell-type specificity, as growth factors, metabolites, and small molecules cannot be tailored to the needs of the individual cells. Another major challenge is the integration of iPSC-derived cardiac tissues into host hearts. Poor electromechanical integration often leads to incomplete synchronization between the graft and the host, which may result in arrhythmias and conduction blocks. This limitation is likely due to the immaturity of organoids, which currently exhibit simplified tissue organization and electrical functionality of the adult heart. Advanced tissue engineering techniques, such as scaffolding, electrical pacing, and vascularization strategies, may enhance tissue maturation and improve compatibility with host organs. Additionally, personalized transplantation strategies using patient-specific iPSCs could enhance transplantation success rates and reduce the risks of immune rejection.
Cardiomyocyte immaturity represents one of the most critical limitations restricting the translational relevance of cardiac organoids. hPSC-CMs generally resemble a fetal or neonatal state rather than adult myocardium. Immature cardiomyocytes are characterized by disorganized sarcomeres with incomplete α-actinin alignment, reduced sarcomere length, absence or poor development of T-tubules, smaller cell size, and a predominantly mononucleated phenotype [122]. At the metabolic level, immature cardiomyocytes rely mainly on glycolysis, whereas adult cardiomyocytes undergo a postnatal metabolic switch toward fatty acid oxidation accompanied by mitochondrial biogenesis and transcriptional remodeling [123]. These structural, electrophysiological, and metabolic features collectively distinguish immature organoid cardiomyocytes from adult human heart tissue.
To address this limitation, multiple maturation strategies have been developed. Electrical pacing enhances action potential propagation, calcium handling, and sarcomere organization [124], while mechanical loading or cyclic stretch promotes structural alignment, increased cell size, and improved contractile performance [125]. Prolonged culture duration allows gradual maturation [126] but is often insufficient on its own. Hormonal stimulation, particularly with triiodothyronine (T3) and glucocorticoids such as dexamethasone, accelerates structural and electrophysiological maturation [127]. Importantly, metabolic maturation media that reduce glucose and insulin while promoting fatty acid availability have been shown to drive the metabolic switch to fatty acid oxidation, induce mitochondrial maturation, and promote cardiomyocyte cell cycle exit [128]. These findings highlight that distinct aspects of cardiomyocyte maturation, including structural, electrophysiological, and metabolic properties, are regulated by partially independent cues and require combinatorial optimization.
Cardiomyocyte maturation status has direct consequences for drug response prediction and cardiotoxicity assessment. Immature cardiomyocytes exhibit altered ion channel expression, calcium handling, β-adrenergic signaling, and metabolic enzyme profiles, which can lead to inaccurate prediction of drug efficacy and arrhythmogenic or cardiotoxic effects [129]. For example, immature models may underestimate pro-arrhythmic risk due to incomplete repolarization reserve or misrepresent metabolic drug toxicity, because of their reliance on glycolysis rather than oxidative metabolism [130]. Enhanced maturation improves concordance with adult human cardiac responses, thereby increasing the reliability of pharmacological screening, safety pharmacology, and disease modeling. Consequently, improving cardiomyocyte maturation is essential for advancing cardiac organoids from developmental models toward clinically predictive platforms.
Several key areas for improvement and future opportunities include the following: (a) Enhancing imaging depth and resolution; currently, whole-mount imaging of organoids is limited to the outer layers, while imaging of the organoid center often requires frozen sectioning, increasing experimental time and complexity. The development of confocal microscopy with higher resolution and imaging depth could substantially advance organoid research. Moreover, real-time imaging in fluorescent reporter organoids will require next-generation imaging systems with higher resolution and sensitivity. (b) Another area of improvement is establishing functional vascular networks, as most organoids lack self-organized vascular networks, leading to inadequate nutrient supply in deeper layers, difficulty in long-term culture, and poor permeability of viral vector-based drugs. Developing efficient vascularization strategies would greatly enhance organoid viability and enable more physiologically relevant models. (c) Furthermore, developing functional measurement platforms and standardized assays is critical, as most commonly used experimental platforms are designed for 2D culture systems, which do not fully support functional assessments of 3D cardiac organoids. There is also a lack of standardized functional parameter sets for measuring electrophysiology, calcium signaling, and contractility in organoids. The development of 3D-compatible functional measurement platforms and standardized benchmarking assays is urgently needed. (d) Additionally, large batch-to-batch and donor-to-donor variability is frequently observed in organoids derived from different cell sources, requiring more robust and standardized 3D culture strategies to improve reproducibility and reliability in organoid-based research.
With continuous advancements in technology, cardiovascular organoids are becoming increasingly complex and powerful. Currently, cardiac organoids have demonstrated the ability to produce blood [131], and it is foreseeable that in the future, autonomous blood circulation between multiple organoids will be achievable. Multichambered cardiac organoids can model distinct chamber-specific responses to drugs [18,93]. Additionally, constructing microfluidic 3D multicellular heart-on-chip models can enhance nutrient supply, physiological complexity, and drug penetration [11]. Recent studies on heart-on-chip technology have highlighted the contribution of primitive macrophages to sustained vascular network formation in myocardial tissue [132]. Moreover, co-culturing multiple cell types has been shown to increase tissue complexity, allowing for a more realistic simulation of pathological phenotypes in heart-on-chip models [10,11]. In 3D cardiac microtissues, stromal cells derived from human iPSC have demonstrated the critical roles of non-cardiomyocytes in heart disorders such as fibrosis and dysfunction [24]. Therefore, the development of multicellular organoids is essential for recapitulating in vivo organ functions.
Despite the tremendous progress in cardiovascular organoid technology, further refinements are needed. In diseases such as COVID-19, inflammatory responses are key contributors to cardiac pathogenesis. To replicate the inflammatory storm caused by COVID-19 infection, researchers have used inflammatory factors to induce pathological responses in cardiac organoids, leading to diastolic dysfunction [96]. Studies on heart-on-chip models containing primitive macrophages have also revealed the indispensable contribution of immune cells in the development and maturation of cardiac tissue [132]. However, the immunoregulatory function of tissue-resident mature macrophages in organoids remains largely unknown. There is no doubt that cardiac organoids incorporating mature cardiac-resident macrophages will become an essential tool for studying cardiovascular homeostasis.
While 3D constructs offer great potential for modeling human cardiac diseases and testing therapies, their path to regulatory acceptance by agencies like the FDA (USA) or European Medicines Agency (Europe) remains unclear. Key challenges include establishing reproducibility standards across labs, ensuring scalability under GMP for clinical-grade production, and addressing cost barriers to make 3D constructs viable for large-scale drug screening or personalized medicine. Improvements on these aspects, such as regulatory alignment, cost-effective protocols, and scalable manufacturing, would strengthen this technology for applications in drug development and patient-specific therapy.
To advance the field of cardiac 3D models, a structured roadmap with clear milestones is essential. In the near term, the focus should be on refining protocols for generating standardized, scalable cardiac 3D constructs with enhanced vascularization and immune cell integration. These advancements will enable high-fidelity modeling of complex cardiac pathologies, such as arrhythmias and environmental-induced cardiomyopathies, positioning organoids as powerful tools for drug toxicity screening and mechanistic studies. Emerging technologies like spatial omics could revolutionize this landscape by enabling single-cell resolution mapping of cardiac organoid microenvironments, revealing how cell–cell interactions drive disease phenotypes. Similarly, comprehensive databases linking organoid models to patient-specific genomic and clinical data may promote predictive modeling of individual responses to therapies. Clinical translation is expected within 5 to 10 years, with initial applications in personalized medicine. Importantly, 3D cardiac constructs should not replace but complement existing preclinical animal studies, offering unique advantages in human relevance. By integrating 3D cardiac constructs into the broader preclinical applications, researchers can accelerate discoveries while maintaining ethical and practical feasibility.
In summary, the future development of 3D cardiac constructs technology is expected to focus on (a) achieving functional interactions between multiple organ systems; (b) constructing organoids with enhanced vascularization and immune cell integration; (c) generating 3D models with increased maturity and structural diversity; and (d) establishing standardized detection parameter sets and consensus protocols for scalable manufacturing. As research in this field continues to advance, cardiac 3D constructs with diverse functions and capabilities will continue to emerge, engineering physiologically relevant in vitro platforms for preclinical drug testing and drug discovery.
A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and the Web of Science Core Collection database. Keywords include cardiac organoid, cardiac microtissues, EHT, heart on chip, vascularized cardiac organoids, biomaterials, artificial intelligence, and drug screening. Inclusion criteria focused on studies addressing construction methods, functional evaluation systems, material innovations, or clinical translation potential for 3D cardiac constructs. Document types were restricted to original research papers and systematic reviews.
1.
Yusuf S, Joseph P, Rangarajan S, Islam S, Mente A, Hystad P, Brauer M, Kutty VR, Gupta R, Wielgosz A, et al.Modifiable risk factors, cardiovascular disease, and mortality in 155 722 individuals from 21 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (PURE): A prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10226):795–808.
2.
Liu C, Feng X, Li G, Gokulnath P, Xiao J. Generating 3D human cardiac constructs from pluripotent stem cells. EBioMedicine. 2022;76:Article 103813.
3.
Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS, Jones JM. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science. 1998;282(5391):1145–1147.
4.
Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006;126(4):663–676.
5.
Thomas D, Cunningham NJ, Shenoy S, Wu JC. Human-induced pluripotent stem cells in cardiovascular research: Current approaches in cardiac differentiation, maturation strategies, and scalable production. Cardiovasc Res. 2022;118(1):20–36.
6.
Paik DT, Chandy M, Wu JC. Patient and disease-specific induced pluripotent stem cells for discovery of personalized cardiovascular drugs and therapeutics. Pharmacol Rev. 2020;72(1):320–342.
7.
Zimmermann WH, Schneiderbanger K, Schubert P, Didié M, Münzel F, Heubach JF, Kostin S, Neuhuber WL, Eschenhagen T. Tissue engineering of a differentiated cardiac muscle construct. Circ Res. 2002;90(2):223–230.
8.
Stevens KR, Kreutziger KL, Dupras SK, Korte FS, Regnier M, Muskheli V, Nourse MB, Bendixen K, Reinecke H, Murry CE. Physiological function and transplantation of scaffold-free and vascularized human cardiac muscle tissue. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(39):16568–16573.
9.
Wang G, McCain M, Yang L, He A, Pasqualini FS, Agarwal A, Yuan H, Jiang D, Zhang D, Zangi L, et al.Modeling the mitochondrial cardiomyopathy of Barth syndrome with induced pluripotent stem cell and heart-on-chip technologies. Nat Med. 2014;20(6):616–623.
10.
Visone R, Paoletti C, Cordiale A, Nicoletti L, Divieto C, Rasponi M, Chiono V, Occhetta P. In vitro mechanical stimulation to reproduce the pathological hallmarks of human cardiac fibrosis on a beating chip and predict the efficacy of drugs and advanced therapies. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024;13(4):Article e2301481.
11.
Cofiño-Fabres C, Boonen T, Rivera-Arbeláez JM, Rijpkema M, Blauw L, Rensen PCN, Schwach V, Ribeiro MC, Passier R. Micro-engineered heart tissues on-chip with heterotypic cell composition display self-organization and improved cardiac function. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024;13(18):Article e2303664.
12.
Skardal A, Aleman J, Forsythe S, Rajan S, Murphy S, Devarasetty M, Pourhabibi Zarandi N, Nzou G, Wicks R, Sadri-Ardekani H, et al.Drug compound screening in single and integrated multi-organoid body-on-a-chip systems. Biofabrication. 2020;12(2):Article 025017.
13.
Tan Y, Richards D, Coyle RC, Yao J, Xu R, Gou W, Wang H, Menick DR, Tian B, Mei Y. Cell number per spheroid and electrical conductivity of nanowires influence the function of silicon nanowired human cardiac spheroids. Acta Biomater. 2017;51:495–504.
14.
Polonchuk L, Chabria M, Badi L, Hoflack JC, Figtree G, Davies MJ, Gentile C. Cardiac spheroids as promising in vitro models to study the human heart microenvironment. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):7005.
15.
Thomas D, Kim H, Lopez N, Wu JC. Fabrication of 3D cardiac microtissue arrays using human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes, cardiac fibroblasts, and endothelial cells. J Vis Exp. 2021;169.
16.
Hofbauer P, Jahnel SM, Papai N, Giesshammer M, Deyett A, Schmidt C, Penc M, Tavernini K, Grdseloff N, Meledeth C, et al.Cardioids reveal self-organizing principles of human cardiogenesis. Cell. 2021;184(12):3299–3317.e22.
17.
Lewis-Israeli YR, Wasserman AH, Gabalski MA, Volmert BD, Ming Y, Ball KA, Yang W, Zou J, Ni G, Pajares N, et al.Self-assembling human heart organoids for the modeling of cardiac development and congenital heart disease. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):5142.
18.
Schmidt C, Deyett A, Ilmer T, Haendeler S, Torres Caballero A, Novatchkova M, Netzer MA, Ceci Ginistrelli L, Mancheno Juncosa E, Bhattacharya T, et al.Multi-chamber cardioids unravel human heart development and cardiac defects. Cell. 2023;186(25):5587–5605 e27.
19.
Drakhlis L, Biswanath S, Farr CM, Lupanow V, Teske J, Ritzenhoff K, Franke A, Manstein F, Bolesani E, Kempf H, et al.Human heart-forming organoids recapitulate early heart and foregut development. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39(6):737–746.
20.
Dostanić M, Wiendels M, Windt LM, Mol MPH, van den Hil F, Davis RP, Orlova V, van Meer B, Mastrangeli M, Mummery CL. Tapered pillar design for high-precision force readout in miniaturized engineered heart tissues from human pluripotent stem cells. Adv Healthc Mater. 2025;14(31):Article e01664.
21.
Liu C, Yao J, Wu X, Guo J, Zhan Q, Zhu Y, Chatterjee E, Keswani T, Meng D, Li G, et al.Modeling myocardial physiological growth using human pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes and 3D cardiac microtissues. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2025;82(1):377.
22.
Musunuru K, Sheikh F, Gupta RM, Houser SR, Maher KO, Milan DJ, Terzic A, Wu JC, American Heart Association Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology; Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; and Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing. Induced pluripotent stem cells for cardiovascular disease modeling and precision medicine: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2018;11(1):Article e000043.
23.
Li Y, Ma K, Dong Z, Gao S, Zhang J, Huang S, Yang J, Fang G, Li Y, Li X, et al.Frameshift variants in C10orf71 cause dilated cardiomyopathy in human, mouse, and organoid models. J Clin Invest. 2024;134(12):Article e177172.
24.
Giacomelli E, Meraviglia V, Campostrini G, Cochrane A, Cao X, van Helden R, Krotenberg Garcia A, Mircea M, Kostidis S, Davis RP, et al.Human-iPSC-derived cardiac stromal cells enhance maturation in 3D cardiac microtissues and reveal non-cardiomyocyte contributions to heart disease. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;26(6):862–879 e11.
25.
Prondzynski M, Lemoine MD, Zech AT, Horváth A, di Mauro V, Koivumäki JT, Kresin N, Busch J, Krause T, Krämer E, et al.Disease modeling of a mutation in alpha-actinin 2 guides clinical therapy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. EMBO Mol Med. 2019;11(12):Article e11115.
26.
Naderi-Meshkin H, Cornelius VA, Eleftheriadou M, Potel KN, Setyaningsih WAW, Margariti A. Vascular organoids: Unveiling advantages, applications, challenges, and disease modelling strategies. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2023;14(1):292.
27.
O’Hern C, Caywood S, Aminova S, Kiselev A, Volmert B, Cao W, Wang F, Dionise M, Sewavi ML, Skoric M, et al.Human heart-macrophage assembloids mimic immune-cardiac interactions and enable arrhythmia disease modeling. Cell Stem Cell. 2025;32(11):1671–1690.e13.
28.
Ronaldson-Bouchard K, Ma SP, Yeager K, Chen T, Song L, Sirabella D, Morikawa K, Teles D, Yazawa M, Vunjak-Novakovic G. Advanced maturation of human cardiac tissue grown from pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2018;556(7700):239–243.
29.
Gong L, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Lee U, Luo AC, Li X, Wang X, Chen D, Pu WT, Lin RZ, et al.Rapid generation of functional vascular organoids via simultaneous transcription factor activation of endothelial and mural lineages. Cell Stem Cell. 2025;32(8):1200–1217 e6.
30.
Venkateshappa R, Yildirim Z, Zhao SR, Wu MA, Vacante F, Abilez OJ, Wu JC. Protocol to study electrophysiological properties of hPSC-derived 3D cardiac organoids using MEA and sharp electrode techniques. STAR Protoc. 2024;5(4):Article 103406.
31.
Spira ME, Hai A. Multi-electrode array technologies for neuroscience and cardiology. Nat Nanotechnol. 2013;8(2):83–94.
32.
Ghosheh M, Ehrlich A, Ioannidis K, Ayyash M, Goldfracht I, Cohen M, Fischer A, Mintz Y, Gepstein L, Nahmias Y. Electro-metabolic coupling in multi-chambered vascularized human cardiac organoids. Nat Biomed Eng. 2023;7(11):1493–1513.
33.
Martinelli E, Akouissi O, Liebi L, Furfaro I, Maulà D, Savoia N, Remy A, Nikles L, Roux A, Stoppini L, et al.The e-flower: A hydrogel-actuated 3D MEA for brain spheroid electrophysiology. Sci Adv. 2024;10(42):Article eadp8054.
34.
Huang Q, Tang B, Romero JC, Yang Y, Elsayed SK, Pahapale G, Lee TJ, Morales Pantoja IE, Han F, Berlinicke C, et al.Shell microelectrode arrays (MEAs) for brain organoids. Sci Adv. 2022;8(33):Article eabq5031.
35.
Gao J, Liao C, Liu S, Xia T, Jiang G. Nanotechnology: New opportunities for the development of patch-clamps. J Nanobiotechnology. 2021;19(1):97.
36.
Li WC, Soffe SR, Roberts A. A direct comparison of whole cell patch and sharp electrodes by simultaneous recording from single spinal neurons in frog tadpoles. J Neurophysiol. 2004;92(1):380–386.
37.
Shi YP, Pang Z, Venkateshappa R, Gunawan M, Kemp J, Truong E, Chang C, Lin E, Shafaattalab S, Faizi S, et al.The hERG channel activator, RPR260243, enhances protective I(Kr) current early in the refractory period reducing arrhythmogenicity in zebrafish hearts. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2020;319(2):H251–H261.
38.
Daley MC, Moreau M, Bronk P, Fisher J, Kofron CM, Mende U, McMullen P, Choi BR, Coulombe K. In vitro to in vivo extrapolation from 3D hiPSC-derived cardiac microtissues and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling to inform next-generation arrhythmia risk assessment. Toxicol Sci. 2024;201(1):145–157.
39.
Lee J, Sutani A, Kaneko R, Takeuchi J, Sasano T, Kohda T, Ihara K, Takahashi K, Yamazoe M, Morio T, et al.In vitro generation of functional murine heart organoids via FGF4 and extracellular matrix. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4283.
40.
Passaro AP, Stice SL. Electrophysiological analysis of brain organoids: Current approaches and advancements. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:Article 622137.
41.
Eisner DA, Caldwell JL, Kistamás K, Trafford AW. Calcium and excitation-contraction coupling in the heart. Circ Res. 2017;121(2):181–195.
42.
Zhang JZ, Zhao SR, Tu C, Pang P, Zhang M, Wu JC. Protocol to measure contraction, calcium, and action potential in human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. STAR Protoc. 2021;2(4):Article 100859.
43.
Ming Y, Hao S, Wang F, Lewis-Israeli YR, Volmert BD, Xu Z, Goestenkors A, Aguirre A, Zhou C. Longitudinal morphological and functional characterization of human heart organoids using optical coherence tomography. Biosens Bioelectron. 2022;207:Article 114136.
44.
Hao S, Ren C, Wang F, Park K, Volmert BD, Aguirre A, Zhou C. Dual-modality imaging system for monitoring human heart organoids beating in vitro. Opt Lett. 2023;48(15):3929–3932.
45.
Hou JH, Kralj JM, Douglass AD, Engert F, Cohen AE. Simultaneous mapping of membrane voltage and calcium in zebrafish heart in vivo reveals chamber-specific developmental transitions in ionic currents. Front Physiol. 2014;5:344.
46.
Shroff SN, das S, Tseng HA, Noueihed J, Fernandez F, White JA, Chen CS, Han X. Voltage imaging of cardiac cells and tissue using the genetically encoded voltage sensor Archon1. iScience. 2020;23(4):Article 100974.
47.
Huebsch N, Loskill P, Mandegar MA, Marks NC, Sheehan AS, Ma Z, Mathur A, Nguyen TN, Yoo JC, Judge LM, et al.Automated video-based analysis of contractility and calcium flux in human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes cultured over different spatial scales. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2015;21(5):467–479.
48.
Kim H, Kamm RD, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Wu JC. Progress in multicellular human cardiac organoids for clinical applications. Cell Stem Cell. 2022;29(4):503–514.
49.
Taegtmeyer H, Young ME, Lopaschuk GD, Abel ED, Brunengraber H, Darley-Usmar V, Des Rosiers C, Gerszten R, Glatz JF, Wang TJ, et al.Assessing cardiac metabolism: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Res. 2016;118(10):1659–1701.
50.
Mills RJ, Parker BL, Quaife-Ryan GA, Voges HK, Needham EJ, Bornot A, Ding M, Andersson H, Polla M, Elliott DA, et al.Drug screening in human PSC-cardiac organoids identifies pro-proliferative compounds acting via the mevalonate pathway. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;24(6):895–907 e6.
51.
Plitzko B, Loesgen S. Measurement of oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) in culture cells for assessment of the energy metabolism. Bio Protoc. 2018;8(10):Article e2850.
52.
Zoccarato A. Extending the cardiac metabolism toolkit: Bringing extracellular flux analyses to the living cardiac tissue slice. Acta Physiol. 2023;239(2):Article e14032.
53.
Ferrick DA, Neilson A, Beeson C. Advances in measuring cellular bioenergetics using extracellular flux. Drug Discov Today. 2008;13(5–6):268–274.
54.
Matkovich SJ. Multiomic approaches to delineate the pathogenesis of cardiac disease. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2019;34(3):246–253.
55.
Farah EN, Hu RK, Kern C, Zhang Q, Lu TY, Ma Q, Tran S, Zhang B, Carlin D, Monell A, et al.Spatially organized cellular communities form the developing human heart. Nature. 2024;627(8005):854–864.
56.
Li J, Li Y, Song G, Wang H, Zhang Q, Wang M, Zhao M, Wang B, Zhu HG, Ranzhi L, et al.Revolutionizing cardiovascular research: Human organoids as a beacon of hope for understanding and treating cardiovascular diseases. Mater Today Bio. 2025;30:Article 101396.
57.
Huang Y, Liu T, Huang Q, Wang Y. From organ-on-a-chip to human-on-a-chip: A review of research progress and latest applications. ACS Sens. 2024;9(7):3466–3488.
58.
Wang L, Liu Y, Ye G, He Y, Li B, Guan Y, Gong B, Mequanint K, Xing MMQ, Qiu X. Injectable and conductive cardiac patches repair infarcted myocardium in rats and minipigs. Nat Biomed Eng. 2021;5(10):1157–1173.
59.
Jia Y, Wei Z, Feng J, Lei M, Yang Y, Liu J, Ma Y, Chen W, Huang G, Genin GM, et al.A heart rate matched patch for mechano-chemical treatment of myocardial infarction: Optimal design and transspecies application. Research. 2024;7:0517.
60.
Song X, Zhang J, Shen S, Liu D, Zhang J, Yin W, Ye G, Wang L, Cai L, Hou H, et al.Cardiac-adaptive conductive hydrogel patch enabling construction of mechanical-electrical anisotropic microenvironment for heart repair. Research. 2023;6:0161.
61.
Meira RM, Ribeiro S, Irastorza I, Silván U, Lanceros-Mendez S, Ribeiro C. Electroactive poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene)/graphene composites for cardiac tissue engineering applications. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2024;663:73–81.
62.
Wu Z, Li Q, Wang L, Zhang Y, Liu W, Zhao S, Geng X, Fan Y. A novel biomimetic nanofibrous cardiac tissue engineering scaffold with adjustable mechanical and electrical properties based on poly(glycerol sebacate) and polyaniline. Mater Today Bio. 2023;23:Article 100798.
63.
Ryan AJ, Kearney CJ, Shen N, Khan U, Kelly AG, Probst C, Brauchle E, Biccai S, Garciarena CD, Vega-Mayoral V, et al.Electroconductive biohybrid collagen/pristine graphene composite biomaterials with enhanced biological activity. Adv Mater. 2018;30(15):Article e1706442.
64.
Tan Y, Coyle RC, Barrs RW, Silver SE, Li M, Richards DJ, Lin Y, Jiang Y, Wang H, Menick DR, et al.Nanowired human cardiac organoid transplantation enables highly efficient and effective recovery of infarcted hearts. Sci Adv. 2023;9(31):Article eadf2898.
65.
Qiu R, Zhang X, Song C, Xu K, Nong H, Li Y, Xing X, Mequanint K, Liu Q, Yuan Q, et al.E-cardiac patch to sense and repair infarcted myocardium. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):4133.
66.
Tamo AK, Doench I, Roshanbinfar K, Montembault A, Serghei A, Engel FB, Osorio-Madrazo A. Electrically conductive biopolymer-based hydrogels and fibrous materials fabricated using 3D printing and electrospinning for cardiac tissue engineering. Bioact Mater. 2025;51:650–719.
67.
Zhang L, Bei Z, Li T, Qian Z. An injectable conductive hydrogel with dual responsive release of rosmarinic acid improves cardiac function and promotes repair after myocardial infarction. Bioact Mater. 2023;29:132–150.
68.
Du X, Jia H, Chang Y, Zhao Y, Song J. Progress of organoid platform in cardiovascular research. Bioact Mater. 2024;40:88–103.
69.
Yan C, Wang X, Wang Q, Li H, Song H, Zhou J, Peng Z, Yin W, Fan X, Yang K, et al.A novel conductive polypyrrole-chitosan hydrogel containing human endometrial mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes facilitated sustained release for cardiac repair. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024;13(10):Article e2304207.
70.
Cheng N, Luo Q, Yang Y, Shao N, Nie T, Deng X, Chen J, Zhang S, Huang Y, Hu K, et al.Injectable pH responsive conductive hydrogel for intelligent delivery of metformin and exosomes to enhance cardiac repair after myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Adv Sci. 2025;12(24):Article e2410590.
71.
Choi S, Lee KY, Kim SL, MacQueen L, Chang H, Zimmerman JF, Jin Q, Peters MM, Ardoña HAM, Liu X, et al.Fibre-infused gel scaffolds guide cardiomyocyte alignment in 3D-printed ventricles. Nat Mater. 2023;22(8):1039–1046.
72.
Jebran AF, Seidler T, Tiburcy M, Daskalaki M, Kutschka I, Fujita B, Ensminger S, Bremmer F, Moussavi A, Yang H, et al.Engineered heart muscle allografts for heart repair in primates and humans. Nature. 2025;639(8054):503–511.
73.
Yu CJ, Yue Z, Zhang H, Shi M, Yao M, Yu Q, Liu M, Guo B, Zhang H, Tian L, et al.Ultra-histocompatible and electrophysiological-adapted PEDOT-based hydrogels designed for cardiac repair. Adv Funct Mater. 2023;33(15):Article 2211023.
74.
Wang X, Wang H, Liu X, Zhang Y, Li J, Liu H, Feng J, Jiang W, Liu L, Chen Y, et al.Self-adhesion conductive cardiac patch based on methoxytriethylene glycol-functionalized graphene effectively improves cardiac function after myocardial infarction. J Adv Res. 2024;76:745–759.
75.
Kim M, Hwang JC, Min S, Park YG, Kim S, Kim E, Seo H, Chung WG, Lee J, Cho SW, et al.Multimodal characterization of cardiac organoids using integrations of pressure-sensitive transistor arrays with three-dimensional liquid metal electrodes. Nano Lett. 2022;22(19):7892–7901.
76.
Shi K, Hu L, Cai D, Liu X, Zheng J, Xu D, Yuan Q, Xiong Q, Gong H, Zhu X, et al.Three-dimensional-printed flexible nanosilver electrode array for parallel and robust intracellular electrophysiological recording. ACS Nano. 2025;19(20):19198–19212.
77.
Sun D, Zhang K, Zheng F, Yang G, Yang M, Xu Y, Qin Y, Lin M, Li Y, Tan J, et al.Matrix viscoelasticity controls differentiation of human blood vessel organoids into arterioles and promotes neovascularization in myocardial infarction. Adv Mater. 2025;37(5):Article e2410802.
78.
Garreta E, Moya-Rull D, Marco A, Amato G, Ullate-Agote A, Tarantino C, Gallo M, Esporrín-Ubieto D, Centeno A, Vilas-Zornoza A, et al.Natural hydrogels support kidney organoid generation and promote in vitro angiogenesis. Adv Mater. 2024;36(34):Article e2400306.
79.
Abilez OJ, Yang H, Guan Y, Shen M, Yildirim Z, Zhuge Y, Venkateshappa R, Zhao SR, Gomez AH, el-Mokahal M, et al.Gastruloids enable modeling of the earliest stages of human cardiac and hepatic vascularization. Science. 2025;388(6751):Article eadu9375.
80.
Zhang Z, Wu C, Dai C, Shi Q, Fang G, Xie D, Zhao X, Liu YJ, Wang CCL, Wang XJ. A multi-axis robot-based bioprinting system supporting natural cell function preservation and cardiac tissue fabrication. Bioact Mater. 2022;18:138–150.
81.
Zhang F, Qiu H, Dong X, Zhang X, Wang C, Li X, Zhang X, Na J, Zhou J, Wang C. Single-cell atlas of multilineage cardiac organoids derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Life Med. 2022;1(2):179–195.
82.
Nicolás-Ávila JA, Lechuga-Vieco AV, Esteban-Martínez L, Sánchez-Díaz M, Díaz-García E, Santiago DJ, Rubio-Ponce A, Li JL, Balachander A, Quintana JA, et al.A network of macrophages supports mitochondrial homeostasis in the heart. Cell. 2020;183(1):94–109.e23.
83.
de Lau WBM, Wijnakker JJAPM, van Son GJF, Krueger D, Wang D, Abendroth MS, Schreurs R, Janda CY, van Rijt FLH, Chalopin BJP, et al.A single-chain derivative of an integrin-activating antibody potentiates organoid growth in Matrigel and collagen hydrogels. Nat Biotechnol. 2025; 10.1038/s41587-025-02874-8.
84.
Kong Y, Liu F, Ma B, Duan J, Yuan W, Sang Y, Han L, Wang S, Liu H. Wireless localized electrical stimulation generated by an ultrasound-driven piezoelectric discharge regulates proinflammatory macrophage polarization. Adv Sci. 2021;8(13):2100962.
85.
Xiao Y, Zhang H, Liu X, Xu P, du H, Wang J, Shen J, Li Y, Wang Y, He C, et al.Medium from human iPSC-derived primitive macrophages promotes adult cardiomyocyte proliferation and cardiac regeneration. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):3012.
86.
Dvir T, Timko BP, Brigham MD, Naik SR, Karajanagi SS, Levy O, Jin H, Parker KK, Langer R, Kohane DS. Nanowired three-dimensional cardiac patches. Nat Nanotechnol. 2011;6(11):720–725.
87.
Ashtari K, Nazari H, Ko H, Tebon P, Akhshik M, Akbari M, Alhosseini SN, Mozafari M, Mehravi B, Soleimani M, et al.Electrically conductive nanomaterials for cardiac tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2019;144:162–179.
88.
Mohamed NA, Marei I, Crovella S, Abou-Saleh H. Recent developments in nanomaterials-based drug delivery and upgrading treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(3):1404.
89.
Zhang H, Thai PN, Shivnaraine RV, Ren L, Wu X, Siepe DH, Liu Y, Tu C, Shin HS, Caudal A, et al.Multiscale drug screening for cardiac fibrosis identifies MD2 as a therapeutic target. Cell. 2024;187(25):7143–7163.e22.
90.
Perea-Gil I, Seeger T, Bruyneel AAN, Termglinchan V, Monte E, Lim EW, Vadgama N, Furihata T, Gavidia AA, Arthur Ataam J, et al.Serine biosynthesis as a novel therapeutic target for dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(36):3477–3489.
91.
Pan Z, Yao Q, Kong W, Ma X, Tian L, Zhao Y, Zhu S, Chen S, Sun M, Liu J, et al.Generation of iPSC-derived human venous endothelial cells for the modeling of vascular malformations and drug discovery. Cell Stem Cell. 2024;32(2):227–245.e9.
92.
Chandy M, Obal D, Wu JC. Elucidating effects of environmental exposure using human-induced pluripotent stem cell disease modeling. EMBO Mol Med. 2022;14(11):Article e13260.
93.
Volmert B, Kiselev A, Juhong A, Wang F, Riggs A, Kostina A, O’Hern C, Muniyandi P, Wasserman A, Huang A, et al.A patterned human primitive heart organoid model generated by pluripotent stem cell self-organization. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):8245.
94.
Kostina A, Lewis-Israeli YR, Abdelhamid M, Gabalski MA, Kiselev A, Volmert BD, Lankerd H, Huang AR, Wasserman AH, Lydic T, et al.ER stress and lipid imbalance drive diabetic embryonic cardiomyopathy in an organoid model of human heart development. Stem Cell Rep. 2024;19(3):317–330.
95.
Kostina A, Kiselev A, Huang A, Lankerd H, Caywood S, Jurado-Fernandez A, Volmert B, O’Hern C, Juhong A, Liu Y, et al. Self-organizing human heart assembloids with autologous and developmentally relevant cardiac neural crest-derived tissues. bioRxiv. 2024. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.11.627627v1.full
96.
Mills RJ, Humphrey SJ, Fortuna PRJ, Lor M, Foster SR, Quaife-Ryan GA, Johnston RL, Dumenil T, Bishop C, Rudraraju R, et al.BET inhibition blocks inflammation-induced cardiac dysfunction and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cell. 2021;184(8):2167–2182.e22.
97.
Richards DJ, Li Y, Kerr CM, Yao J, Beeson GC, Coyle RC, Chen X, Jia J, Damon B, Wilson R, et al.Human cardiac organoids for the modelling of myocardial infarction and drug cardiotoxicity. Nat Biomed Eng. 2020;4(4):446–462.
98.
Devilée LAC, Salama AM, Miller JM, Reid JD, Ou Q, Baraka NM, Abou Farraj K, Jamal M, Nong Y, Rosengart TK, et al.Pharmacological or genetic inhibition of LTCC promotes cardiomyocyte proliferation through inhibition of calcineurin activity. NPJ Regener Med. 2025;10(1):1.
99.
Yang J, Lei W, Xiao Y, Tan S, Yang J, Lin Y, Yang Z, Zhao D, Zhang C, Shen Z, et al.Generation of human vascularized and chambered cardiac organoids for cardiac disease modelling and drug evaluation. Cell Prolif. 2024;57(8):Article e13631.
100.
Saorin G, Caligiuri I, Rizzolio F. Microfluidic organoids-on-a-chip: The future of human models. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2023;144:41–54.
101.
Man Y, Liu Y, Chen Q, Zhang Z, Li M, Xu L, Tan Y, Liu Z. Organoids-on-a-chip for personalized precision medicine. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024;13(30):Article e2401843.
102.
Zhu Y, Jiang D, Qiu Y, Liu X, Bian Y, Tian S, Wang X, Hsia KJ, Wan H, Zhuang L, et al.Dynamic microphysiological system chip platform for high-throughput, customizable, and multi-dimensional drug screening. Bioact Mater. 2024;39:59–73.
103.
Tavakol DN, Nash TR, Kim Y, Graney PL, Liberman M, Fleischer S, Lock RI, O’Donnell A, Andrews L, Ning D, et al.Modeling the effects of protracted cosmic radiation in a human organ-on-chip platform. Adv Sci. 2024;11(42):Article e2401415.
104.
Tirgar P, Vikstrom A, Sepúlveda JMR, Srivastava LK, Amini A, Tabata T, Higo S, Bub G, Ehrlicher A. Heart-on-a-miniscope: A miniaturized solution for electrophysiological drug screening in cardiac organoids. Small. 2025;21(6):Article e2409571.
105.
Abuwatfa WH, Pitt WG, Husseini GA. Scaffold-based 3D cell culture models in cancer research. J Biomed Sci. 2024;31(1):7.
106.
Chandra Sekar N, Khoshmanesh K, Baratchi S. Bioengineered models of cardiovascular diseases. Atherosclerosis. 2024;393:Article 117565.
107.
Lai BFL, Lu RXZ, Davenport Huyer L, Kakinoki S, Yazbeck J, Wang EY, Wu Q, Zhang B, Radisic M. A well plate-based multiplexed platform for incorporation of organoids into an organ-on-a-chip system with a perfusable vasculature. Nat Protoc. 2021;16(4):2158–2189.
108.
Fontanelli L, Nisini N, Pirola S, Recchia FA. Neuromuscular and cardiac organoids and assembloids: Advanced platforms for drug testing. Pharmacol Ther. 2025;272:Article 108876.
109.
Varinelli L, Illescas O, Lorenc EJ, Battistessa D, di Bella M, Zanutto S, Gariboldi M. Organoids technology in cancer research: From basic applications to advanced ex vivo models. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025;13:1569337.
110.
Lin H, Cheng J, Zhu C, Yang Z, Shen Q, Zou Y, Huang Y,Lv F, Bai H, Wang S. Artificial intelligence-enabled quantitative assessment and intervention for heart inflammation model organoids. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2025;64(25):Article e202503252.
111.
Feng W, Schriever H, Jiang S, Bais A, Wu H, Kostka D, Li G. Computational profiling of hiPSC-derived heart organoids reveals chamber defects associated with NKX2-5 deficiency. Commun Biol. 2022;5(1):399.
112.
Kowalczewski A, Sun S, Mai NY, Song Y, Hoang P, Liu X, Yang H, Ma Z. Design optimization of geometrically confined cardiac organoids enabled by machine learning techniques. Cell Rep Methods. 2024;4(6):Article 100798.
113.
Singaraju JP, Kadiresan A, Bhoi RK, Gomez AH, Ma Z, Yang H. Organalysis: Multifunctional image preprocessing and analysis software for cardiac organoid studies. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2023;29(12):572–582.
114.
Kandula AKR, Phamornratanakun T, Gomez AH, el-Mokahal M, Ma Z, Feng Y, Yang H. Generative AI for cardiovascular cell type-specific fluorescence colorization of live-cell hPSC-derived cardiac organoids. Adv Intell Discov. 2025;1(2).
115.
Swanson K, Walther P, Leitz J, Mukherjee S, Wu JC, Shivnaraine RV, Zou J. ADMET-AI: A machine learning ADMET platform for evaluation of large-scale chemical libraries. Bioinformatics. 2024;40(7):Article btae416.
116.
Zhu J, Wang J, Wang X, Gao M, Guo B, Gao M, Liu J, Yu Y, Wang L, Kong W, et al.Prediction of drug efficacy from transcriptional profiles with deep learning. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39(11):1444–1452.
117.
Palano G, Foinquinos A, Mullers E. In vitro assays and imaging methods for drug discovery for cardiac fibrosis. Front Physiol. 2021;12:Article 697270.
118.
Palano G, Jansson M, Backmark A, Martinsson S, Sabirsh A, Hultenby K, Åkerblad P, Granberg KL, Jennbacken K, Müllers E, et al.A high-content, in vitro cardiac fibrosis assay for high-throughput, phenotypic identification of compounds with anti-fibrotic activity. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2020;142:105–117.
119.
Tan S, Ding Y, Wang W, Rao J, Cheng F, Zhang Q, Xu T, Hu T, Hu Q, Ye Z, et al.Development of an AI model for DILI-level prediction using liver organoid brightfield images. Commun Biol. 2025;8(1):886.
120.
Mukashyaka P, Kumar P, Mellert DJ, Nicholas S, Noorbakhsh J, Brugiolo M, Courtois ET, Anczukow O, Liu ET, Chuang JH. High-throughput deconvolution of 3D organoid dynamics at cellular resolution for cancer pharmacology with cellos. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):8406.
121.
Thomas D, Choi S, Alamana C, Parker KK, Wu JC. Cellular and engineered organoids for cardiovascular models. Circ Res. 2022;130(12):1780–1802.
122.
Rodriguez ML, Beussman KM, Chun KS, Walzer MS, Yang X, Murry CE, Sniadecki NJ. Substrate stiffness, cell anisotropy, and cell-cell contact contribute to enhanced structural and calcium handling properties of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2019;5(8):3876–3888.
123.
Wickramasinghe NM, Sachs D, Shewale B, Gonzalez DM, Dhanan-Krishnan P, Torre D, LaMarca E, Raimo S, Dariolli R, Serasinghe MN, et al.PPARdelta activation induces metabolic and contractile maturation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Cell Stem Cell. 2022;29(4):559–576.e7.
124.
Shen S, Sewanan LR, Shao S, Halder SS, Stankey P, Li X, Campbell SG. Physiological calcium combined with electrical pacing accelerates maturation of human engineered heart tissue. Stem Cell Rep. 2022;17(9):2037–2049.
125.
Mihic A, Li J, Miyagi Y, Gagliardi M, Li SH, Zu J, Weisel RD, Keller G, Li RK. The effect of cyclic stretch on maturation and 3D tissue formation of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Biomaterials. 2014;35(9):2798–2808.
126.
Kamakura T, Makiyama T, Sasaki K, Yoshida Y, Wuriyanghai Y, Chen J, Hattori T, Ohno S, Kita T, Horie M, et al.Ultrastructural maturation of human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes in a long-term culture.Circ J. 2013;77(5):1307–1314.
127.
Parikh SS, Blackwell DJ, Gomez-Hurtado N, Frisk M, Wang L, Kim K, Dahl CP, Fiane A, Tønnessen T, Kryshtal DO, et al.Thyroid and glucocorticoid hormones promote functional T-tubule development in human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Circ Res. 2017;121(12):1323–1330.
128.
Feyen DAM, McKeithan W, Bruyneel AAN, Spiering S, Hörmann L, Ulmer B, Zhang H, Briganti F, Schweizer M, Hegyi B, et al.Metabolic maturation media improve physiological function of human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. Cell Rep. 2020;32(3):Article 107925.
129.
Karbassi E, Fenix A, Marchiano S, Muraoka N, Nakamura K, Yang X, Murry CE. Cardiomyocyte maturation: Advances in knowledge and implications for regenerative medicine. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17(6):341–359.
130.
Kofron CM, Kim TY, Munarin F, Soepriatna AH, Kant RJ, Mende U, Choi BR, Coulombe KLK. A predictive in vitro risk assessment platform for pro-arrhythmic toxicity using human 3D cardiac microtissues. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):10228.
131.
Dardano M, Kleemiß F, Kosanke M, Lang D, Wilson L, Franke A, Teske J, Shivaraj A, de la Roche J, Fischer M, et al.Blood-generating heart-forming organoids recapitulate co-development of the human haematopoietic system and the embryonic heart. Nat Cell Biol. 2024;26(11):1984–1996.
132.
Landau S, Zhao Y, Hamidzada H, Kent GM, Okhovatian S, Lu RXZ, Liu C, Wagner KT, Cheung K, Shawky SA, et al.Primitive macrophages enable long-term vascularization of human heart-on-a-chip platforms. Cell Stem Cell. 2024;31(8):1222–1238.e10.
133.
Liu Y, Kamran R, Han X, Wang M, Li Q, Lai D, Naruse K, Takahashi K. Human heart-on-a-chip microphysiological system comprising endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):18063.
134.
Ergir E, Oliver-de la Cruz J, Fernandes S, Cassani M, Niro F, Pereira-Sousa D, Vrbský J, Vinarský V, Perestrelo AR, Debellis D, et al.Generation and maturation of human iPSC-derived 3D organotypic cardiac microtissues in long-term culture. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):17409.
135.
Madsen A, Krause J, Höppner G, Hirt MN, Tan WLW, Lim I, Hansen A, Nikolaev VO, Foo RSY, Eschenhagen T, et al.Hypertrophic signaling compensates for contractile and metabolic consequences of DNA methyltransferase 3A loss in human cardiomyocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2021;154:115–123.
136.
Kim SL, Trembley MA, Lee KY, Choi S, MacQueen L, Zimmerman JF, de Wit LHC, Shani K, Henze DE, Drennan DJ, et al.Spatiotemporal cell junction assembly in human iPSC-CM models of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.Stem Cell Rep. 2023;18(9):1811–1826.
137.
Friedman CE, Cheetham SW, Negi S, Mills RJ, Ogawa M, Redd MA, Chiu HS, Shen S, Sun Y, Mizikovsky D, et al.HOPX-associated molecular programs control cardiomyocyte cell states underpinning cardiac structure and function.Dev Cell. 2024;59(1):91–107 e6.
138.
Mills RJ, Titmarsh DM, Koenig X, Parker BL, Ryall JG, Quaife-Ryan GA, Voges HK, Hodson MP, Ferguson C, Drowley L, et al.Functional screening in human cardiac organoids reveals a metabolic mechanism for cardiomyocyte cell cycle arrest. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114(40):E8372–E8381.
139.
Yang P, Zhu L, Wang S, Gong J, Selvaraj JN, Ye L, Chen H, Zhang Y, Wang G, Song W, et al.Engineered model of heart tissue repair for exploring fibrotic processes and therapeutic interventions. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):7996.
140.
Sun Y, Su J, Wang X, Wang J, Guo F, Qiu H, Fan H, Cai D,Wang H, Lin M, et al.Patient-specific iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes reveal variable phenotypic severity of Brugada syndrome. EBioMedicine. 2023;95:Article 104741.
141.
Reyes Gaido OE, Pavlaki N, Granger JM, Mesubi OO, Liu B, Lin BL, Long A, Walker D, Mayourian J, Schole KL, et al.An improved reporter identifies ruxolitinib as a potent and cardioprotective CaMKII inhibitor. Sci Transl Med. 2023;15(701):Article eabq7839.
142.
Wang Z, Shi W, Wu T, Peng T, Wang X, Liu S, Yang Z, Wang J, Li PL, Tian R, et al.A high-throughput drug screening identifies luteolin as a therapeutic candidate for pathological cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1130635.
143.
Schimmel K, Jung M, Foinquinos A, José GS, Beaumont J, Bock K, Grote-Levi L, Xiao K, Bär C, Pfanne A, et al.Natural compound library screening identifies new molecules for the treatment of cardiac fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction. Circulation. 2020;141(9):751–767.
Year 2026 volume 9 Issue 3
PDF
69
39
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.1165
  • Receive Date:2025-11-27
  • Online Date:2026-10-16
  • Published:2026-03-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-11-27
  • Revised:2026-01-31
  • Accepted:2026-02-01
Affiliations
    1Cardiac Regeneration and Ageing Lab, Institute of Geriatrics (Shanghai University), Affiliated Nantong Hospital of Shanghai University (The Sixth People’s Hospital of Nantong) and School of Life Science, Shanghai University, Nantong 226011, China.
    2Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Organ Repair, Joint International Research Laboratory of Biomaterials and Biotechnology in Organ Repair (Ministry of Education), School of Life Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
    3Cardiovascular Division of the Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
    4Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NCB, Bronx, NY, USA.
    5Department of Medical Genetics, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 020031, Romania.
    6Materno-Fetal Assistance Excellence Unit, Alessandrescu-Rusescu National Institute for Mother and Child Health, Bucharest 011062, Romania.
    7Department of Cardiology, Heart Center of Fujian Province, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, China.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to: (Z.C.);
* Address correspondence to: (J.X.)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.1165
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT