Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Improving the Precision of First-Principles Calculation of Parton Physics from Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics
收藏切换
PDF
Yong Zhao*
Research. Vol 9 Article ID 1181
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 9 Article ID 1181
• PERSPECTIVE •
Improving the Precision of First-Principles Calculation of Parton Physics from Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics
Full
Yong Zhao*
Affiliations
  • Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439, USA.
Published: 2026-03-20 doi: 10.34133/research.1181
Outline
收藏切换

Large momentum effective theory (LaMET) provides a general framework for computing the multi-dimensional partonic structure of the proton from first principles using lattice quantum chromodynamics (QCD). In this effective field theory approach, LaMET predicts parton distributions through a power expansion and perturbative matching of a class of Euclidean observables—quasi-distributions—evaluated at large proton momenta. Recent advances in lattice renormalization, such as the hybrid scheme with leading renormalon resummation, together with improved matching kernel that incorporates higher-loop corrections and resummations, have enhanced both the perturbative and power accuracy of LaMET, enabling a reliable quantification of theoretical uncertainties. Moreover, the Coulomb-gauge correlator approach further simplifies lattice analyses and improves the precision of transverse-momentum-dependent structures, particularly in the non-perturbative region. State-of-the-art LaMET calculations have already yielded certain parton observables with important phenomenological impact. In addition, the recently proposed kinematically enhanced lattice interpolation operators promise access to unprecedented proton momenta with greatly improved signal-to-noise ratios, which will extend the range of LaMET prediction and further suppress the power corrections. The remaining challenges, such as controlling excited-state contamination in lattice matrix elements and extracting gluonic distributions, are expected to benefit from emerging lattice techniques for ground-state isolation and noise reduction. Thus, lattice QCD studies of parton physics have entered an exciting stage of precision control and systematic improvement, which will have a broader impact for nuclear and particle experiments.

Yong Zhao. Improving the Precision of First-Principles Calculation of Parton Physics from Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics[J]. Research, 2026 , 9 (3) : 1181 - . DOI: 10.34133/research.1181
Full Text
Less
Understanding the quark and gluon structure of the proton is a central goal of nuclear and particle physics. It not only provides essential inputs for precision standard model predictions at collider experiments but also reveals the origin of proton’s mass and spin and the mechanism of color confinement, which are fundamental to understanding our visible universe. High-energy scattering offers the only direct probe of the proton’s inner structure, which can be described by the parton distribution functions (PDFs) in longitudinal momentum space. This picture can also be extended to the transverse momentum and position spaces to include the transverse-momentum-dependent distributions (TMDs) and generalized parton distributions (GPDs), both of which descend from the 5-dimensional Wigner distributions. Deciphering these multi-dimensional distributions is a top priority of current and future experiments at Jefferson Lab [1], the Electron-Ion Collider at Brookhaven National Laboratory [2,3] and in China [4], and CERN [5].
As intrinsic properties of the proton, parton distributions are non-perturbative objects in quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the fundamental theory of the strong interaction. For more than half a century, they have been extracted from experiments through global fitting with remarkable successes [6–12]. Nevertheless, challenges remain in certain kinematic regions, spin-dependent effects, and multi-dimensional structures. Lattice QCD is a powerful first-principles tool that can make non-perturbative predictions to complement the experiments. The early efforts were focused on the Mellin moments of PDFs and GPDs as they are time independent and directly calculable on a Euclidean lattice [13,14]. However, due to increasing statistical noise and power-divergent operator mixings, only the lowest few moments are accessible. Over the past decade, several new approaches have been developed to access higher Mellin moments or the x-dependence [15–24]. Unlike other methods that typically rely on phenomenological reconstruction of the PDFs, large momentum effective theory (LaMET) [20,25,26] enables direct calculations of their x-dependence and has been further extended to the GPDs, TMDs, and Wigner distributions.
LaMET is motivated by Feynman’s parton model [27], which can be viewed as an effective field theory (EFT) of QCD in the infinite momentum limit [28–30]. The EFT operator defining the PDF can be expanded and matched from a QCD operator under a large Lorentz boost. To be calculable on a Euclidean lattice, the QCD operator is chosen to be time independent, while the Lorentz boost is realized through a large-momentum external state [20]. Consequently, the EFT expansion is controlled by the momentum Pz.
Since its proposal, LaMET has undergone key developments for systematic uncertainty control. These include proving multiplicative renormalizability for the nonlocal Wilson line operators defining quasi-PDFs [31–33]; establishing non-perturbative renormalization from regularization-independent momentum subtraction [34–37] and ratio schemes [38–41] to the hybrid scheme [42], such as the self-renormalization approach [43]; introducing leading renormalon resummation (LRR) [44,45]; and incorporating higher-order perturbative corrections [40,46–48] and resummations [49–52]. The hybrid scheme ensures that all renormalized matrix elements can be perturbatively matched to the MS¯ scheme, while LRR removes ambiguities in the matching kernel, thereby eliminating the linear power correction in LaMET expansion and improving perturbative convergence. Furthermore, renormalization group and threshold resummations (RGR and TR) systematically resum the large logarithms in the matching kernel as x→0 and x→1. The residual power corrections can then be estimated through infinite momentum extrapolation. Therefore, LaMET enables PDF calculations with controlled theoretical uncertainties for x∈x01−x0 with x0∼ΛQCD/Pz. Fig. 1 presents a calculation of the pion valence PDF at Pz=1.94 GeV using next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) matching with LRR, RGR, and TR [52]. The error band reflects both statistical and scale-variation uncertainties, the latter becoming uncontrolled outside 0.2≲x≲0.8as perturbation theory breaks down. Across this range, the combined uncertainties from statistics, scale variation, higher order, and power corrections are estimated to be from 10% to 20% [53]. Remarkably, the lattice prediction agrees well with global fits for 0.4<x<0.6, despite using entirely independent methods. The discrepancies outside this range may arise from residual lattice systematics, including discretization, unphysical quark masses, and finite-volume effects, as well as from uncertainties in the global fits of the pion valence PDF. Therefore, continued efforts are necessary to fully control the systematic uncertainties for a definitive comparison.
The hybrid scheme and LRR can be readily applied to the GPDs and light-cone distribution amplitudes [44,54–56], as they are defined from the same operators as the PDFs. Moreover, the corresponding RGR and TR have been derived [57,58]. Notably, a new method has been developed to extract quasi-GPD matrix elements from the asymmetric frame on the lattice [59], which significantly reduces the computational cost compared to the symmetric frame.
The TMDs and Wigner distributions are more complex because they involve both a beam and a soft function, and the Collins–Soper (CS) kernel for their evolution can also be non-perturbative. To date, LaMET remains the only approach that can calculate the x-dependence of TMDs and Wigner distributions [60–72] with soft function subtraction [65], as well as the CS kernel [60,62,73]. Recently, a state-of-the-art calculation of the quark CS kernel was carried out at physical quark masses with continuum limit and next-to-next-to-leading-logarithmic matching [74,75], achieving sufficient precision to differentiate among parameterizations in global analyses. The first lattice results for the soft function and proton and pion TMDs are also now available [76–79].
Traditionally, the TMD is calculated from a gauge-invariant correlator with a staple-shaped Wilson line. However, due to the linear divergence in the Wilson line self-energy, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) decays exponentially at large transverse separation bT, making it increasingly difficult to access the non-perturbative region. To overcome this bottleneck, new quasi-observables defined in the Coulomb gauge (CG) without Wilson lines have recently been constructed [80,81], which also admit a LaMET expansion [81]. Free from linear divergences and preserving 3D rotational symmetry [80,82], they not only exponentially enhances the SNR at large bT but also greatly simplifies lattice renormalization. The efficacy of this method has been demonstrated in calculations of the CS kernel [83], soft function [84], and pion and proton TMDs [84,85]. The exponential improvement of the SNR at large distances also reduces Fourier transform uncertainties, particularly in the gluon sector [86,87]. Therefore, the CG approach has the potential to become a standard framework for calculating TMDs and Wigner distributions, at least for the charge-parity-even sector [81], while also complementing the computations of PDFs and GPDs.
Finally, the precision of LaMET calculations is ultimately limited by the maximum attainable momentum. While finer lattices remain desirable, the recently proposed kinematically enhanced hadron interpolators [88] provide a practical means of reaching unprecedented momenta at current spacings. Besides, as a common source of lattice systematics, the excited-state contamination [89] could be mitigated through interpolator optimization using the generalized eigenvalue problem approach [90] and the recently developed Lanczos method for matrix-element extraction [91–96].
To summarize, LaMET enables first-principles calculations of parton physics with systematically improvable uncertainties. With ongoing theoretical and computational advances, LaMET is expected to reach ~10% or better precision in the valence region, thereby exerting an increasingly significant impact on collider experiments.
References
Less
1.
Dudek J, Ent R, Essig R, Kumar KS, Meyer C, McKeown RD, Meziani ZE, Miller GA, Pennington M, Richards D, et al.Physics opportunities with the 12 GeV upgrade at Jefferson Lab. Eur Phys J A. 2012;48:187.
2.
Accardi A, Albacete JL, Anselmino M, Armesto N, Aschenauer EC, Bacchetta A, Boer D, Brooks WK, Burton T, Chang N-B, et al.Electron ion collider: The next QCD frontier: Understanding the glue that binds us all. Eur Phys J A. 2016;52:268.
3.
Abdul R, Accardi A, Adam J, Adamiak D, Akers W, Albaladejo M, Al-bataineh A, Alexeev MG, Ameli F, Antonioli P, et al.Science requirements and detector concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report. Nucl Phys A. 2022;1026:Article 122447.
4.
Anderle DP, Bertone V, Cao X, Chang L, Chang N, Chen G, Chen X, Chen Z, Cui Z, Dai L, et al.Electron-ion collider in China. Front Phys. 2021;16:64701.
5.
Adams B, Aidala CA, Akhunzyanov R, Alexeev GD, Alexeev MG, Amoroso A, Andrieux V, Anfimov NV, Anosov V, Antoshkin A, et al. Letter of Intent: A New QCD facility at the M2 beam line of the CERN SPS (COMPASS++/AMBER). arXiv. 2018. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1808.00848
6.
Jimenez-Delgado P, Reya E. Delineating parton distributions and the strong coupling. Phys Rev D. 2014;89:Article 074049.
7.
Abramowicz H, Abt I, Adamczyk L, Adamus M, Andreev V, Antonelli S, Antunovic B, Aushev V, Aushev Y, Baghdasaryan A, et al.Combination of measurements of inclusive deep inelastic e±p scattering cross sections and QCD analysis of HERA data. Eur Phys J C. 2015;75:580.
8.
Alekhin S, Blumlein J, Moch S, Placakyte R. Parton distribution functions, αs, and heavy-quark masses for LHC run II. Phys Rev D. 2017;96(1):Article 014011.
9.
Hou TJ, Gao J, Hobbs TJ, Xie K, Dulat S, Guzzi M, Huston J, Nadolsky P, Pumplin J, Schmidt C, et al.New CTEQ global analysis of quantum chromodynamics with high-precision data from the LHC. Phys Rev D. 2021;103(1):Article 014013.
10.
Bailey S, Cridge T, Harland-Lang LA, Martin AD, Thorne RS. Parton distributions from LHC, HERA, Tevatron and fixed target data: MSHT20 PDFs. Eur Phys J C. 2021;81:341.
11.
Ball RD, Carrazza S, Cruz-Martinez J, del Debbio L, Forte S, Giani T, Iranipour S, Kassabov Z, Latorre JI, Nocera ER, et al.The path to proton structure at 1% accuracy. Eur Phys J C. 2022;82:428.
12.
Aad G, Abbott B, Abbott DC, Abed Abud A, Abeling K, Abhayasinghe DK, Abidi SH, Aboulhorma A, Abramowicz H, Abreu H, et al.Determination of the parton distribution functions of the proton using diverse √ATLAS data from pp collisions at s = 7, 8 and 13 TeV. Eur Phys J C. 2022;82:438.
13.
Kronfeld AS, Photiadis DM. Phenomenology on the lattice: Composite operators in lattice gauge theory. Phys Rev D. 1985;31(11):2939.
14.
Martinelli G, Sachrajda CT. A lattice calculation of the second moment of the pion’s distribution amplitude. Phys Lett B. 1987;190(1–2):151–156.
15.
Liu KF, Dong SJ. Origin of difference between anti-d and anti-u partons in the nucleon. Phys Rev Lett. 1994;72:1790–1793.
16.
Shindler A. Moments of parton distribution functions of any order from lattice QCD. Phys Rev D. 2024;110(5):L051503.
17.
Detmold W, Lin CJD. Deep-inelastic scattering and the operator product expansion in lattice QCD. Phys Rev D. 2006;73(1):Article 014501.
18.
Detmold W, Grebe AV, Kanamori I, Lin CD, Perry RJ, Zhao Y. Parton physics from a heavy-quark operator product expansion: Formalism and Wilson coefficients. Phys Rev D. 2021;104(7):Article 074511.
19.
Braun V, Muller D. Exclusive processes in position space and the pion distribution amplitude. Eur Phys J C. 2008;55:349–361.
20.
Davoudi Z, Savage MJ. Restoration of rotational symmetry in the continuum limit of lattice field theories. Phys Rev D. 2012;86(5):Article 054505.
21.
Ji X. Parton physics on a Euclidean lattice. Phys Rev Lett. 2013;110(26):Article 262002.
22.
Chambers AJ, Horsley R, Nakamura Y, Perlt H, Rakow PEL, Schierholz G, Schiller A, Somfleth K, Young RD, Zanotti JM, et al.Nucleon structure functions from operator product expansion on the lattice. Phys Rev Lett. 2017;118(24):Article 242001.
23.
Radyushkin AV. Quasi-parton distribution functions, momentum distributions, and pseudoparton distribution functions. Phys Rev D. 2017;96(3):Article 034025.
24.
Ma YQ, Qiu JW. Exploring partonic structure of hadrons using ab initio lattice QCD calculations. Phys Rev Lett. 2018;120(2):Article 022003.
25.
Ji X. Parton physics from large-momentum effective field theory. Sci China Phys Mech Astron. 2014;57:1407–1412.
26.
Ji X, Liu YS, Liu Y, Zhang JH, Zhao Y. Large-momentum effective theory. Rev Mod Phys. 2021;93(3):Article 035005.
27.
Feynman RP. Very high-energy collisions of hadrons. Phys Rev Lett. 1969;23(24):1415–1417.
28.
Ji X. Why is LaMET an effective field theory for partonic structure? AAPPS Bull. 2020;30:5.
29.
Ji X. Large-momentum effective theory vs. short-distance operator expansion: Contrast and complementarity. Research. 2025;8:0695.
30.
Ji X. Euclidean effective theory for partons in the spirit of Steven Weinberg. Nucl Phys B. 2024;1007:Article 116670.
31.
Ji X, Zhang JH, Zhao Y. Renormalization in large momentum effective theory of parton physics. Phys Rev Lett. 2018;120:Article 112001.
32.
Ishikawa T, Ma YQ, Qiu JW, Yoshida S. Renormalizability of quasiparton distribution functions. Phys Rev D. 2017;96(9):Article 094019.
33.
Green J, Jansen K, Steffens F. Nonperturbative renormalization of nonlocal quark bilinears for parton quasidistribution functions on the lattice using an auxiliary field. Phys Rev Lett. 2018;121(2):Article 022004.
34.
Constantinou M, Panagopoulos H. Perturbative renormalization of quasi-parton distribution functions. Phys Rev D. 2017;96(5):Article 054506.
35.
Stewart IW, Zhao Y. Matching the quasiparton distribution in a momentum subtraction scheme. Phys Rev D. 2018;97(5):Article 054512.
36.
Alexandrou C, Cichy K, Constantinou M, Hadjiyiannakou K, Jansen K, Panagopoulos H, Steffens F. A complete non-perturbative renormalization prescription for quasi-PDFs. Nucl Phys B. 2017;923:394–415.
37.
Chen JW, Ishikawa T, Jin L, Lin HW, Yang YB, Zhang JH, Zhao Y. Parton distribution function with nonperturbative renormalization from lattice QCD. Phys Rev D. 2018;97(1):Article 014505.
38.
Orginos K, Radyushkin A, Karpie J, Zafeiropoulos S. Lattice QCD exploration of parton pseudo-distribution functions. Phys Rev D. 2017;96(9):Article 094503.
39.
Braun VM, Vladimirov A, Zhang JH. Power corrections and renormalons in parton quasidistributions. Phys Rev D. 2019;99(1):Article 014013.
40.
Li ZY, Ma YQ, Qiu JW. Extraction of next-to-next-to-leading-order parton distribution functions from lattice QCD calculations. Phys Rev Lett. 2021;126(7):Article 072001.
41.
Fan Z, Gao X, Li R, Lin HW, Karthik N, Mukherjee S, Petreczky P, Syritsyn S, Yang YB, Zhang R. Isovector parton distribution functions of the proton on a superfine lattice. Phys Rev D. 2020;102(7):Article 074504.
42.
Ji X, Liu Y, Schafer A, Wang W, Yang YB, Zhang JH, Zhao Y. A hybrid renormalization scheme for quasi light-front correlations in large-momentum effective theory. Nucl Phys B. 2021;964:Article 115311.
43.
Huo YK, Su Y, Gui LC, Ji X, Li YY, Liu Y, Schäfer A, Schlemmer M, Sun P, Wang W, et al.Self-renormalization of quasi-light-front correlators on the lattice. Nucl Phys B. 2021;969:Article 115443.
44.
Holligan J, Ji X, Lin HW, Su Y, Zhang R. Precision control in lattice calculation of x-dependent pion distribution amplitude. Nucl Phys B. 2023;993:Article 116282.
45.
Zhang R, Holligan J, Ji X, Su Y. Leading power accuracy in lattice calculations of parton distributions. Phys Lett B. 2023;844:Article 138081.
46.
Chen LB, Wang W, Zhu R. Next-to-next-to-leading order calculation of quasiparton distribution functions. Phys Rev Lett. 2021;126:Article 072002.
47.
Cheng C, Huang LH, Li X, Li ZY, Ma YQ. Lattice-QCD computable quark correlation functions at three-loop order and extraction of splitting functions. Phys Rev Lett. 2025;134:Article 251902.
48.
Ji Y, Yao F, Zhang JH. Extracting meson distribution amplitudes from nonlocal Euclidean correlations at next-to-next-to-leading order. arXiv. 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.09367
49.
Gao X, Lee K, Mukherjee S, Shugert C, Zhao Y. Origin and resummation of threshold logarithms in the lattice QCD calculations of PDFs. Phys Rev D. 2021;103:Article 094504.
50.
Su Y, Holligan J, Ji X, Yao F, Zhang JH, Zhang R. Resumming quark’s longitudinal momentum logarithms in LaMET expansion of lattice PDFs. Nucl Phys B. 2023;991:Article 116201.
51.
Ji X, Liu Y, Su Y. Threshold resummation for computing large-x parton distribution through large-momentum effective theory. J High Energy Phys. 2023;08:037.
52.
Ji X, Liu Y, Su Y, Zhang R. Effects of threshold resummation for large-x PDF in large momentum effective theory. J High Energy Phys. 2025;03:045.
53.
Gao X, Hanlon AD, Mukherjee S, Petreczky P, Scior P, Syritsyn S, Zhao Y. Lattice QCD determination of the Bjorken-x dependence of parton distribution functions at next-to-next-to-leading order. Phys Rev Lett. 2022;128(14):Article 142003.
54.
Lin HW. Pion valence-quark generalized parton distribution at physical pion mass. Phys Lett B. 2023;846:Article 138181.
55.
Holligan J, Lin HW. Systematic improvement of x-dependent unpolarized nucleon generalized parton distributions in lattice-QCD calculation. Phys Rev D. 2024;110:Article 034503.
56.
Ding HT, Gao X, Mukherjee S, Petreczky P, Shi Q, Syritsyn S, Zhao Y. Three-dimensional imaging of pion using lattice QCD: Generalized parton distributions. J High Energy Phys. 2025;02:056.
57.
Baker E, Bollweg D, Boyle P, Cloet I, Gao X, Mukherjee S, Petreczky P, Zhang R, Zhao Y. Lattice QCD calculation of the pion distribution amplitude with domain wall fermions at physical pion mass. J High Energy Phys. 2024;07:211.
58.
Holligan J, Lin HW, Zhang R, Zhao Y. Resummation for lattice QCD calculation of generalized parton distributions at nonzero skewness. J High Energy Phys. 2025;207:241.
59.
Bhattacharya S, Cichy K, Constantinou M, Dodson J, Gao X, Metz A, Mukherjee S, Scapellato A, Steffens F, Zhao Y. Generalized parton distributions from lattice QCD with asymmetric momentum transfer: Unpolarized quarks. Phys Rev D. 2022;106:Article 114512.
60.
Ji X, Sun P, Xiong X, Yuan F. Soft factor subtraction and transverse momentum dependent parton distributions on the lattice. Phys Rev D. 2015;91(7):Article 074009.
61.
Ji X, Liu Y. Computing light-front wave functions without light-front quantization: A large-momentum effective theory approach. Phys Rev D. 2022;105:Article 076014.
62.
Ebert MA, Schindler ST, Stewart IW, Zhao Y. Factorization connecting continuum & lattice TMDs. J High Energy Phys. 2022;04:178.
63.
Deng ZF, Wang W, Zeng J. Transverse-momentum-dependent wave functions and soft functions at one-loop in large momentum effective theory. J High Energy Phys. 2022;09:046.
64.
Schindler ST, Stewart IW, Zhao Y. One-loop matching for gluon lattice TMDs. J High Energy Phys. 2022;08:084.
65.
Ji X, Jin LC, Yuan F, Zhang JH, Zhao Y. Transverse momentum dependent parton quasidistributions. Phys Rev D. 2019;99(11):Article 114006.
66.
Ebert MA, Stewart IW, Zhao Y. Determining the nonperturbative Collins-Soper kernel from lattice QCD. Phys Rev D. 2019;99(3):Article 034505.
67.
Ebert MA, Stewart IW, Zhao Y. Towards quasi-transverse momentum dependent PDFs computable on the lattice. J High Energy Phys. 2019;09:037.
68.
Ebert MA, Stewart IW, Zhao Y. Renormalization and matching for the Collins-Soper kernel from lattice QCD. J High Energy Phys. 2020;03:099.
69.
Ji X, Liu Y, Liu YS. TMD soft function from large-momentum effective theory. Nucl Phys B. 2020;955:Article 115054.
70.
Ji X, Liu Y, Liu YS. Transverse-momentum-dependent parton distribution functions from large-momentum effective theory. Phys Lett B. 2020;811:Article 135946.
71.
Ebert MA, Schindler ST, Stewart IW, Zhao Y. One-loop matching for spin-dependent quasi-TMDs. J High Energy Phys. 2020;09:099.
72.
Ji X, Liu Y, Schafer A, Yuan F. Single transverse-spin asymmetry and Sivers function in large momentum effective theory. Phys Rev D. 2021;103:Article 074005.
73.
Shanahan P, Wagman M, Zhao Y. Collins-Soper kernel for TMD evolution from lattice QCD. Phys Rev D. 2020;102:Article 014511.
74.
Avkhadiev A, Shanahan PE, Wagman ML, Zhao Y. Collins-Soper kernel from lattice QCD at the physical pion mass. Phys Rev D. 2023;108:Article 114505.
75.
Avkhadiev A, Shanahan PE, Wagman ML, Zhao Y. Determination of the Collins-Soper kernel from lattice QCD. Phys Rev Lett. 2024;132:Article 231901.
76.
Zhang QA, Hua J, Huo Y, Ji X, Liu Y, Liu YS, Schlemmer M, Schäfer A, Sun P, Wang W, et al.Lattice-QCD calculations of TMD soft function through large-momentum effective theory. Phys Rev Lett. 2020;125:Article 192001.
77.
Li Y, Xia SC, Alexandrou C, Cichy K, Constantinou M, Feng X, Hadjiyiannakou K, Jansen K, Liu C, Scapellato A, et al.Lattice QCD study of transverse-momentum dependent soft function. Phys Rev Lett. 2022;128:Article 062002.
78.
He JC, Chu MH, Hua J, Ji X, Schafer A, Su Y, Wang W, Yang YB, Zhang JH, Zhnag JH, et al.Unpolarized transverse momentum dependent parton distributions of the nucleon from lattice QCD. Phys Rev D. 2024;109(11):Article 114513.
79.
Walter L, Hua J, Lahrtz S, Ma L, Schäfer A, Shu HT, Su Y, Sun P, Wang W, Xiong X, et al.Quark transverse spin-momentum correlation of the pion from lattice QCD: The Boer-Mulders function. Phys Rev D. 2025;111(9):Article 094507.
80.
Gao X, Liu WY, Zhao Y. Parton distributions from boosted fields in the Coulomb gauge. Phys Rev D. 2024;109(9):Article 094506.
81.
Zhao Y. Transverse momentum distributions from lattice QCD without Wilson lines. Phys Rev Lett. 2024;133(24):Article 241904.
82.
Zhang K, Huo YK, Ji X, Schafer A, Shi CJ, Sun P, Wang W, Yang YB, Zhnag JH. Impact of gauge fixing precision on the continuum limit of nonlocal quark-bilinear lattice operators. Phys Rev D. 2024;110(7):Article 074505.
83.
Bollweg D, Gao X, Mukherjee S, Zhao Y. Nonperturbative Collins-Soper kernel from chiral quarks with physical masses. Phys Lett B. 2024;852:Article 138617.
84.
Bollweg D, Gao X, He J, Mukherjee S, Zhao Y. Transverse-momentum-dependent pion structures from lattice QCD: Collins-Soper kernel, soft factor, TMDWF, and TMDPDF. Phys Rev D. 2025;112:Article 034501.
85.
Bollweg D, Gao X, Mukherjee S, Zhao Y. Lattice QCD benchmark of proton helicity and flavor-dependent unpolarized transverse momentum-dependent parton distribution functions at physical quark masses. Phys Rev Lett. 2025;135:Article 201901.
86.
Good W, Hasan K, Lin HW. Toward the first gluon parton distribution from the LaMET. J Phys G. 2025;52:Article 035105.
87.
Good W, Yao F, Lin HW. First nucleon gluon PDF from large momentum effective theory. Phys Lett B. 2026;872:Article 140067.
88.
Zhang R, Grebe AV, Hackett DC, Wagman ML, Zhao Y. Kinematically enhanced interpolating operators for boosted hadrons. Phys Rev D. 2025;112:L051502.
89.
Alexandrou C, Cichy K, Constantinou M, Green JR, Hadjiyiannakou K, Jansen K, Manigrasso F, Scapellato A, Steffens F. Lattice continuum-limit study of nucleon quasi-PDFs. Phys Rev D. 2021;103:Article 094512.
90.
Blossier B, Della Morte M, von Hippel G, Mendes T, Sommer R. On the generalized eigenvalue method for energies and matrix elements in lattice field theory. J High Energy Phys. 2009;04:094.
91.
Wagman ML. Lanczos algorithm, the transfer matrix, and the signal-to-noise problem. Phys Rev Lett. 2025;134:Article 241901.
92.
Hackett DC, Wagman ML. Lanczos algorithm for lattice QCD matrix elements. Phys Rev D. 2025;112:Article 054506.
93.
Ostmeyer J, Sen A, Urbach C. On the equivalence of Prony and Lanczos methods for Euclidean correlation functions. Eur Phys J A. 2025;61:26.
94.
Chakraborty D, Sood D, Radhakrishnan A, Mathur N. Estimating energy levels from lattice QCD correlation functions using a transfer matrix formalism. Phys Rev D. 2025;112:Article 074506.
95.
Hackett DC, Wagman ML. Block Lanczos algorithm for lattice QCD spectroscopy and matrix elements. Phys Rev D. 2025;112:Article 014514.
96.
Abbott R, Hackett DC, Fleming GT, Pefkou DA, Wagman ML. Filtered Rayleigh-Ritz is all you need. arXiv. 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.17357
97.
Gao X, Jin L, Kallidonis C, Karthik N, Mukherjee S, Petrecky P, Shugert C, Syritsyn S, Zhao Y. Valence parton distribution of the pion from lattice QCD: Approaching the continuum limit. Phys Rev D. 2020;102(9):Article 094513.
98.
Gluck M, Reya E, Vogt A. Pionic parton distributions. Z Phys. 1992;53:651–656.
99.
Aicher M, Schafer A, Vogelsang W. Soft-gluon resummation and the valence parton distribution function of the pion. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;105(25):Article 252003.
100.
Novikov I, Abdolmaleki H, Britzger D, Cooper-Sarkar A, Giuli F, Glazov A, Kusina A, Luszczak A, Olness F, Starovoitov P, et al.Parton distribution functions of the charged pion within the xFitter framework. Phys Rev D. 2020;102(1):Article 014040.
101.
Barry PC, Ji CR, Sato N, Melnitchouk W. Global QCD analysis of pion parton distributions with threshold resummation. Phys Rev Lett. 2021;127(23):Article 232001.
Appendix
Less
Year 2026 volume 9 Issue 3
PDF
116
63
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.1181
  • Receive Date：2025-08-26
  • Online Date：2026-10-16
  • Published：2026-03-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2025-08-26
  • Revised：2025-12-22
  • Accepted：2026-02-09
Affiliations
    Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439, USA.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to:
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.1181
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62662699(Operation and Technical Support)
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House