收藏切换
Transferrin Is Up-Regulated by Microbes and Acts as a Negative Regulator of Immunity to Induce Intestinal Immunotolerance
收藏切换
PDF
Xiaopeng Tang1, 2, , Mingqian Fang1, , Ruomei Cheng1, , Junkun Niu3, 4, , Xiaoshan Huang1, 5, , Kuanhong Xu6, , Gan Wang1, Yang Sun3, 4, Zhiyi Liao1, 5, Zhiye Zhang1, James Mwangi1, 5, Qiumin Lu1, Aili Wang7, Longbao Lv1, Chao Liu1, Yinglei Miao3, 4, *, Ren Lai1, *,
Research. Vol 7 Article ID 0301
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 7 Article ID 0301
Research Article
Transferrin Is Up-Regulated by Microbes and Acts as a Negative Regulator of Immunity to Induce Intestinal Immunotolerance
Full
Xiaopeng Tang1, 2, , Mingqian Fang1, , Ruomei Cheng1, , Junkun Niu3, 4, , Xiaoshan Huang1, 5, , Kuanhong Xu6, , Gan Wang1, Yang Sun3, 4, Zhiyi Liao1, 5, Zhiye Zhang1, James Mwangi1, 5, Qiumin Lu1, Aili Wang7, Longbao Lv1, Chao Liu1, Yinglei Miao3, 4, *, Ren Lai1, *,
Affiliations
  • 1Engineering Laboratory of Peptides of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Key Laboratory of Bioactive Peptides of Yunnan Province, KIZ-CUHK Joint Laboratory of Bioresources and Molecular Research in Common Diseases, National Resource Center for Non-Human Primates, National Research Facility for Phenotypic & Genetic Analysis of Model Animals (Primate Facility), and Sino-African Joint Research Center, New Cornerstone Science Institute, Kunming Institute of Zoology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.17 Longxin Road, Kunming, Yunnan, 650201, China.
  • 2School of Basic Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, China.
  • 3Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Institute of Digestive Disease, Kunming 650032, Yunnan, China.
  • 4 Yunnan Province Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Kunming 650032, Yunnan, China.
  • 5Kunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650204, Yunnan, China.
  • 6Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale and School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, Anhui, China.
  • 7 Center for Evolution and Conservation Biology, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory, Guangzhou 511458, Guangdong, China.
Published: 2024-01-25 doi: 10.34133/research.0301
Outline
收藏切换

Cross-talks (e.g., host-driven iron withdrawal and microbial iron uptake between host gastrointestinal tract and commensal microbes) regulate immunotolerance and intestinal homeostasis. However, underlying mechanisms that regulate the cross-talks remain poorly understood. Here, we show that bacterial products up-regulate iron-transporter transferrin and transferrin acts as an immunosuppressor by interacting with cluster of differentiation 14 (CD14) to inhibit pattern recognition receptor (PRR) signaling and induce host immunotolerance. Decreased intestinal transferrin is found in germ-free mice and human patients with ulcerative colitis, which are characterized by impaired intestinal immunotolerance. Intestinal transferrin and host immunotolerance are returned to normal when germ-free mice get normal microbial commensalism, suggesting an association between microbial commensalism, transferrin, and host immunotolerance. Mouse colitis models show that transferrin shortage impairs host's tolerogenic responses, while its supplementation promotes immunotolerance. Designed peptide blocking transferrin–CD14 interaction inhibits immunosuppressive effects of transferrin. In monkeys with idiopathic chronic diarrhea, transferrin shows comparable or even better therapeutic effects than hydrocortisone. Our findings reveal that by up-regulating host transferrin to silence PRR signaling, commensal bacteria counteract immune activation induced by themselves to shape host immunity and contribute for intestinal tolerance.

Xiaopeng Tang, Mingqian Fang, Ruomei Cheng, Junkun Niu, Xiaoshan Huang, Kuanhong Xu, Gan Wang, Yang Sun, Zhiyi Liao, Zhiye Zhang, James Mwangi, Qiumin Lu, Aili Wang, Longbao Lv, Chao Liu, Yinglei Miao, Ren Lai. Transferrin Is Up-Regulated by Microbes and Acts as a Negative Regulator of Immunity to Induce Intestinal Immunotolerance[J]. Research, 2024 , 7 (1) : 0301 . DOI: 10.34133/research.0301
The animal gastrointestinal tract is colonized by various microorganisms including bacteria, fungi, and viruses [1,2]. The largest population of intestinal microbiota is bacteria (commensal bacteria). The animal host and its intestinal microbial flora affect one another to function together as a complex ecologic system [3]. On the one hand, a healthy intestine has the ability to shape the microbiota and to limit the colonization of the intestinal tract by harmful bacteria through a symbiotic relationship [4,5]. Host colon mucus layers create a physical barrier, which is composed of mucin glycoproteins that effect host–microbial interactions by separating bacterial flora and intestinal epithelial cells [6,7]. Moreover, hosts secrete antibacterial factors such as defensins, C-type lectins, lysozyme, phospholipase A2, and secreted immunoglobulin A to regulate the microbiota's growth [8,9]. On the other hand, the intestinal microbiota plays a crucial role in shaping immune functions of their hosts [10]. The intestinal microbiota stimulates the development of both local and systemic immunity of hosts [11]. Very down-regulated immune responses and much smaller lymphoid organs have been found in germ-free animals [12,13], while microbial colonization of the animals increases in the systemic immunological capacity by elevating immunoglobulin and antibodies levels and changing mucosal-associated lymphocyte tissues and cell populations [1416]. One main characteristic feature of the intestine is its ability to maintain tolerance to microbial antigens, showing a symbiotic host relationship [10,17]. Long evolution by mutually adapting and selecting each other creates the close symbiosis of the microbiota and its hosts. The symbiotic relationship maintains a constant homeostasis by perfectly regulating the microbial load and the immune response generated against it in the healthy human intestine, while dysbiosis of intestinal flora may result in various pathological conditions [1820].
Hosts recognize invading microorganisms and trigger the activation of innate immunity, which then leads to the development of antigen-specific adaptive immunity through recognizing microbial components by Toll-like receptors (TLRs) [21]. TLRs and their coreceptor cluster of differentiation 14 (CD14) are up-regulated and activated by microbe components to induce host immunity [22,23]. However, commensal bacteria appear to use a mechanism to enhance colonization of the gut and thereby establish host–microbial tolerance [2,2427], but the mechanism is unknown. Here, we reported that although microbiome-derived products (e.g., lipopolysaccharide [LPS], lipoteichoic acid [LTA], and bacterial DNA) stimulate immunity by up-regulating and activating TLR signaling, they also up-regulate and beneficially use host transferrin as a negative regulator of the TLR signaling to establish host's immune tolerance.
As literatures reported, microbial infections cause iron deficiency anemia (IDA) and IDA promotes transferrin expression [2830]. We tested effects of microbial products from both pathogenic and probiotic bacteria on transferrin expression in human primary macrophages and mouse normal embryonic liver cell line (BNL CL.2) to investigate the association of transferrin with bacterial infection and/or commensalism (Fig. 1). Western blot analysis (Fig. 1A), quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR, Fig. S1A and B), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA, Fig. S1C and D) indicated that transferrin was up-regulated by LPS from conditional pathogen bacterium Escherichia coli or probiotic bacterium Bacteroides fragilis (Fig. 1B), LTA from Staphylococcus aureus (Fig. 1C and Fig. S2), and bacterial DNA from E. coli, S. aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes free from enterotoxin contamination (Fig. 1D and Fig. S3) in a dose-dependent manner in all the cells.
Bacterial DNA containing multiple CpG nucleotides display stronger inflammatogenic properties than eukaryotic nuclear DNA [31,32]. As a comparison, mouse DNA, which contains fewer unmethylated CpG repeats and less inflammatogenic properties than bacterial DNA, showed little effect on transferrin expression in those cells (Fig. 1D), suggesting that the up-regulation of transferrin is involved in inflammatory response-induced bacterial products, in which NF-κB plays a central role. In addition, bacterial pathogens, E. coli and S. aureus, also up-regulate transferrin expression (Fig. S4). We next investigated the effects of the specific NF-κB inhibitor caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) on transferrin expression promoted by bacterial products. As illustrated in Fig. 1E, all the transferrin up-regulation induced by LPS, LTA, and bacterial DNA was blocked by CAPE in primary macrophages, indicating that transferrin up-regulation induced by bacterial products was via NF-κB activation.
Mass spectrometry-based coimmunoprecipitation analysis was used to screen targets of transferrin in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Results showed that transferrin interacted with CD14 directly (Fig. S5), as confirmed by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) (Fig. 2A) and native-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Fig. 2B). The association (Ka), dissociation (Kd), and equilibrium dissociation constants (KD) of the interaction between transferrin and CD14 were 2.4 × 104 M−1 s−1, 3.3 × 10−4 s−1, and 14 nM, respectively, thus showing high affinity (Fig. 2A). The interactions between transferrin and CD14 were further proved by using coimmunoprecipitation analysis (Fig. 2C) with comparative human serum albumin (HSA), which showed no interaction with CD14 (Fig. S6). Given the involvement of transferrin expression in NF-κB activation, and that many pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) are recognized and presented by CD14 to activate NF-κB [33], transferrin–CD14 interaction may affect the recognition of PAMPs, such as LPS, by CD14.
CD14 is critical in the signaling pathways of several TLRs [34,35]. Notably, CD14 transfers LPS molecules to the TLR4/MD-2 complex to facilitate LPS recognition by TLR4 [3639] and controls LPS-induced internalization of TLR4 [40,41]. We next investigated whether transferrin interferes with CD14–LPS interaction. As illustrated in Fig. 2D, the binding between CD14 and LPS was blocked by transferrin. The LPS-binding pocket is located in the N-terminal hydrophobic region of CD14 [42,43]. Here, the docking model of the transferrin–CD14 complex (Fig. S7) suggested that the LPS binding region (CD14N: E​LDD​EDF​RCV​CNF​SEP​QPD​WSE​AFQ​CVS​AVE​VEIHAGGLN) was responsible for the transferrin–CD14 interaction, as confirmed by SPR analysis (Fig. 2E). We identified 2 key residues of transferrin (R663 and K664) that likely play key roles in transferrin–CD14 interactions. Thus, transferrin mutants (R663A and K664A) were constructed (Fig. S8A, B, and E). Notably, the mutants exhibited weak interactions with CD14 (Fig. 2F). Furthermore, the docking model suggested that 3 key residues of the LPS-binding region of CD14 (D44, S46, and Q50) may participate in the transferrin–CD14 interaction. Compared with wild-type CD14 (Fig. 2G), the corresponding mutants (D44A, S46A, and Q50A) of CD14 (Fig. S8C to E) exhibited weak interactions with transferrin.
Given that LPS up-regulates the expression of CD14, TLRs [22,23], and transferrin (Fig. S1 and Fig. 1), we next investigated whether transferrin is colocalized with TLR4 or CD14 on cell membranes and whether the colocalizations are enhanced by LPS. As reported previously [22,23], LPS stimulation for 30 min increased the expression of CD14 on the cell membranes of the human monocytic cell line (THP-1) and the colocalization of FITC-labeled transferrin and CD14, while application of the transferrin antibody decreased the colocalization (Fig. 2H), further confirming direct CD14–transferrin interaction. Similarly, LPS also up-regulated TLR4 expression on the membranes of the cells and thus promoted the colocalization of TLR4 with FITC-labeled soluble CD14 (sCD14), while transferrin interfered with the colocalization (Fig. 2I). Notably, at the 5 μM dosage, transferrin diminished most of the TLR4-sCD14 colocalization.
Based on CD14's function transferring LPS to TLR4 and the current finding that transferrin interferes with interactions of CD14–LPS as above, we next tested if transferrin inhibited TLR4 activation induced by LPS. As illustrated in Fig. 3A, transferrin blocked LPS-induced TLR4 dimerization in THP-1 cells, which consequently decreased phosphorylation of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)-activating kinase 1 (TAK1), IκB (inhibitory subunit of nuclear factor κB [NF-κB]) kinase α (IKKα), IκBα, and NF-κB p65 of the myD88-dependent pathway and TRAF-associated NF-κB activator (TANK)-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) and interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) of the myD88-independent pathway in THP-1 cells (Fig. 3B). Moreover, LPS-induced phosphorylation of JNK and p38 of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway was also inhibited by transferrin in THP-1 cells (Fig. 3C). Confocal microscopy showed that nuclear translocations of p-p65 and p-IRF3 in THP-1 cells by LPS stimulation for 30 min (Fig. 3D and E) were also blocked by transferrin. In addition, NF-κB reporter assay showed that transferrin inhibited NF-κB activation induced by LPS in primary macrophages (Fig. 3F).
TLR4 stimulation by LPS induces the release of many cytokines to activate potent immune responses [44]. Given transferrin's inhibition on TLR4 activation evoked by LPS, we investigated its effects on cytokine release stimulated by LPS. As an iron carrier, transferrin exists in plasma in both the ferric iron-bound (holo-transferrin) and unbound states (apo-transferrin). As illustrated in Fig. 4 and Fig. S10A to F, both apo- and holo-transferrin showed similar inhibition on LPS-induced production of TNF-α, IL-6, IFN-β, or TGF-β in human PBMCs, polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs), mice bone marrow dendritic cells (BMDCs), THP-1 cells, and HUVECs in a dose-dependent manner. Importantly, the blockage of transferrin-transferrin receptor (TfR) interaction using anti-TfR antibody (TfR AB) had no effect on the inhibition of elicited by transferrin, suggesting that the inhibition was independent of TfR.
To prove that transferrin–CD14 interaction is responsible to drive the phenotype seen in the subsequent cell and animal models, we designed a peptide TC6 (TTPEPC) that specifically inhibits transferrin–CD14 interaction (Fig. S9A) without affecting LPS's binding to CD14 (Fig. S9B) and activation on TLR4 (Fig. S9A and B and Fig. 4P and Q), based on the structure of the LPS–CD14 complex [43,45] and the docking model of the transferrin–CD14 complex (Fig. S7). TC6 showed a high affinity (KD 13 nM) with transferrin (Fig. S9C) and no interaction with CD14 and LPS (Fig. S9D and E). As expected, transferrin's inhibition on TNF-α and IFN-β release induced by LPS in primary macrophages was blocked by TC6 (Fig. S10G and H).
Transferrin overexpression (PLP-Tf) and knockdown mice (RNR-Tf) were used to further elucidate the role of transferrin in inflammatory responses (Fig. S11). As illustrated in Fig. 5A to D, the plasma levels of inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, and IFN-β) induced by LPS were decreased by both transferrin overexpression and intravenous injection of exogenous transferrin, but were exacerbated by transferrin knockdown. Effects of transferrin on inflammatory injury induced by LPS were evaluated by histological examination (Fig. 5E and F). Transferrin overexpression and exogenous transferrin administration alleviated LPS-induced liver injury, whereas the injury was aggravated by transferrin knockdown (Fig. 5E). Transferrin overexpression and exogenous transferrin administration inhibited LPS-induced apoptosis, while transferrin knockdown promoted it (Fig. 5F). As illustrated in Fig. S12A and B, plasma levels of alanine transaminase and aspartate aminotransferase up-regulated by LPS were decreased by both transferrin overexpression and intravenous injection of exogenous transferrin, but were exacerbated by transferrin knockdown. Importantly, transferrin overexpression, intravenous injection of exogenous transferrin, or transferrin knockdown showed no effects on iron level of plasma and liver tissue (Fig. S12C and D). In addition, transferrin overexpression and exogenous transferrin administration alleviated LPS or bacteria-induced mice lethality, whereas the lethality was aggravated by transferrin knockdown (Fig. S12E and F). As expected, the interference peptide TC6 blocked the transferrin's inhibition on plasma TNF-α and IFN-β secretion in the mouse model (Fig. S13).
Transferrin showed marked ability to inhibit inflammation induced by LPS as above, suggesting its potential to promote host immune tolerance. Germ-free (GF) mice have little microbial commensalism and impaired immunotolerance [46,47]. We first compared transferrin levels in GF and specific pathogen-free (SPF) mice to investigate the association among microbial commensalism, transferrin level, and immunotolerance. The average transferrin concentration in the plasma of GF mice (n = 10; 5 male and 5 female) was 1.84 mg/ml (SD 0.32), whereas that in SPF mice (n = 10; 5 male and 5 female) was 2.237 mg/ml (SD 0.27) (Fig. 6A). Decreased levels of transferrin were also observed in the liver and spleen of GF mice (Fig. S14). Plasma and tissue transferrin levels were returned to normal when the GF mice lived at an SPF environment for 4 weeks (Fig. S14).
As above, markedly down-regulated transferrin was observed in germ-free mice that share impaired immunotolerance, suggesting a possible association of transferrin down-regulation with immunotolerance. Given that GF mice are broadly impaired in many aspects of development and early immune education [48], we next compared the ability of intestinal tolerance in GF mice and in broad-spectrum antibiotics (BsA)-treated mice to specifically investigate the association of intestinal microbiota with transferrin and host–microbial homeostasis. As illustrated in Fig. 6A, transferrin levels in different segments of gut tissue (duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and colon [D, J, I, and C2]) of GF mice were markedly lower (~5- to 100-fold reduction) than those in SPF mice. This was consistent with the lower levels of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family member A2 (ALDH1A2), CCL22, TGF-β, and IL-10 observed in GF mice, which are known to play key roles in maintaining intestinal tolerance [49]. After treatment with BsA to deplete gut microbiota, decreases in transferrin and corresponding ALDH1A2, CCL22, TGF-β, and IL-10 levels were also observed in the gut of BsA-treated mice (Fig. 6B). No obvious change of transferrin and other factors related with intestinal tolerance was observed in the segment of cecum (C1), which shows little function in maintaining intestinal tolerance [49].
As illustrated in Fig. 6C and D, the levels of makers of immune tolerance including ALDH1A2, CCL22, TGF-β, and IL-10 [49,50] were decreased in the gut and gLN of transferrin-knockdown SPF mice, which were consistent with the decreased transferrin level. CD103+CD11b+ dendritic cells (DCs), regulatory T cells (Tregs), and regulatory B cells (Bregs) have been implicated in gut tolerogenic responses [49,50]. A gating strategy was used to analyze the DCs, Tregs, and Bregs subsets in intestinal tissues and lymph node (Fig. S15). As illustrated in Fig. 6E and F and Fig. S16, marked reductions in the frequency, number, and proliferation of CD103+CD11b+ DCs in the D-gut and D-gLN of both transferrin-knockdown and BsA-treated mice were observed. Similar decreased patterns were also observed for Foxp3+ Tregs, RORγT+ Tregs (Fig. 6G and H and Fig. S17), and CD19+CD5+Bregs (Fig. S18). Notably, Treg was decreased in D- and C2-gLN of TC6-treated SPF mice (Fig. S19).
The pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis (UC) is complex, involving multiple genetic and environmental factors, epithelial barrier damage, gut dysbiosis, and abnormal immunological response [18,5160]. Human UC is characterized by impaired immunotolerance, which is similar to GF mice [46,47]. UC results from the breakdown in immunotolerance to gut bacteria [47,61]. We next wonder if there is decreased transferrin expression in human UC as found in GF mice. As illustrated in Fig. 7A, decreased transferrin level was found in plasma of UC patients. The average transferrin concentration in the plasma of UC patients (n = 20; 10 male and 10 female) was 1.779 mg/ml (SD 0.27), whereas in healthy individuals (n = 20; 10 male and 10 female), the average concentration was 2.381 mg/ml (SD 0.37) (Fig. 7A). An obvious decreased level of transferrin was also observed in the colon tissue of UC patients (Fig. 7B).
Two experimental colitis models (dextran sodium sulfate [DSS] and T cell receptor α chain-deficient [TCRαKO] colitis murine models), which result in intestinal dysbiosis and immune imbalance [6264], and monkeys with spontaneous chronic colitis were used to further investigate the effects of transferrin on chronic dysregulated immune response in intestinal tract. In the DSS colitis model, weight loss in mouse group with transferrin overexpression was lower than that in the control and transferrin knockdown group (Fig. 7C). Compared with the control and transferrin knockdown mice, there was a lower score of disease activity index (Fig. 7D), a longer colon length (Fig. 7E and Fig. S20), and alleviation of inflammation-associated histological changes (Fig. 7F and Fig. S21) in mice of transferrin overexpression. In addition, obvious elevation or reduction in the frequency, number, and proliferation of Foxp3+ Tregs in the lymph node of transferrin-overexpression or -knockdown mice was observed, respectively (Fig. 7G and Fig. S22). In the TCRαKO colitis model, alleviation of inflammation-associated histological changes (Fig. 7H and Fig. S23) was observed in transferrin overexpression mice compared with the control and transferrin knockdown mice. Importantly, TC6 blocked transferrin's improvement on disease activity index (Fig. 7I) and inhibition on colon length shortening (Fig. 7J and Fig. S24) in the colitis model.
Idiopathic chronic diarrhea (ICD) of rhesus macaques leads to dehydration and weight loss affecting as many as 15% of animals in some colonies [65]. This type of chronic colitis resembles UC and may provide clues about the pathogenesis of human inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [66,67]. By using hydrocortisone (the first line drug to treat UC) as a control, the therapeutic effects of transferrin on ICD were tested. As illustrated in Fig. 7K, the mean fecal consistency score for transferrin enema administration in rhesus macaques showed marked improvement. Alleviation of inflammation-associated colon biopsy scores (Fig. 7L) and colonic histology changes (Fig. 7M and N) was observed in transferrin-treated monkeys. In addition, decreased C-reactive protein (CRP) level in plasma (Fig. 7O) and TNF-α in colon tissue (Fig. 7P) in transferrin treated monkeys were also observed. Generally, transferrin showed better therapeutic effect on ICD than hydrocortisone.
The studies reported here have shown that transferrin, the main iron transporter in serum, is a negative regulator of pattern recognition receptor (PRR) signaling to induce intestinal immunotolerance. Transferrin was up-regulated by the disturbances of iron metabolism as well as by PAMPs including LPS, LTA, and bacterial DNA. Transferrin interacted directly with CD14 to block PRR signaling and consequently to silence host immunity and induce immune tolerance. Here as an endogenous protein, transferrin is firstly reported to regulate the presentation of LPS from CD14 to TLR4. The results show here that, on one hand, microbes possibly beneficially up-regulate host transferrin as a negative regulator of PRRs signaling to counteract immune-mediated iron withdrawal upon infections, but on the other hand, given its function as a clotting regulator in our recent reports [29,68], transferrin up-regulation in host possibly evokes immunothrombosis to defend invading pathogens, demonstrating an important role of transferrin in mediating reciprocal interactions among iron homeostasis, infection, and immunity.
The concentration of transferrin in the plasma is normally 2 to 4 g/l with an iron saturation 15% to 45%. There is a well-described interaction between iron status and immune function, but the link between the abnormalities of immune function associated with disorders of iron homeostasis remains a black box in most cases [69]. We found that bacterial products including LPS, LTA, and bacterial DNA from both pathogenic and probiotic bacteria up-regulated transferrin expression, suggesting that microbe commensalism and/or infections have the ability to up-regulate transferrin expression. As an immune strategy aimed at limiting the microbial iron availability, host immune activation is initiated upon microbe invasion to cause a reduction in plasma iron or iron withdrawal and anemia and iron sequestration (IS) for invading microbes. The up-regulated transferrin by microbes in hosts may act as an iron-mobilizing protein to withhold iron and thus contribute to the IS. Given that iron deficiency up-regulated transferrin as reported [29,30], the host-driven iron withdrawal upon microbial infection likely expands transferrin's up-regulation induced by microbial products.
Microorganisms stimulate PRRs to initiate a range of host defense mechanisms [70]. In particular, the activation of proinflammatory responses mediated by PRRs is essential for host defense, but excessive inflammation itself is maladaptive [71]. Regulation of PRRs signaling provides one point of control for excessive inflammation. In particular, TLRs play critical roles in immunotolerance and the mechanisms are complex [72]. Gomez-Llorente et al. [72] suggested that TLRs' negative regulation may be another possible mechanism to induce immunotolerance. Although different types of microbial products (e.g., LPS, LTA, and DNA) studied here are recognized by different TLRs, all of them showed the ability to up-regulate transferrin expression, suggesting that these bacterial products may share a common pathway for the regulation of transferrin expression. We found that NF-κB plays a key role in transferrin up-regulation induced by bacterial products. NF-κB can be activated by members of TLR family that recognize conserved microbial structures (i.e., LPS, LTA, and bacterial DNA) [73] and is a pivotal transcription factor involved in the regulation of a variety of proteins, including transferrin [74]. Here, transferrin up-regulation by bacterial products was inhibited by the specific NF-κB inhibitor CAPE, indicating that transferrin up-regulation promoted by different microbe products is involved in NF-κB activation. This finding reveals that transferrin directly interacted with CD14, which is not only a TLR coreceptor but also a PRR and plays multiple roles in microbial recognition and signaling, to block signal intracellular responses after recognition of a vast array of bacterial products, thus resulting in negative regulation of PRRs signaling and inducing intestinal immunotolerance.
The immunosuppressive function of transferrin was further demonstrated by mouse colitis models induced by DSS and TCRαKO and monkey with spontaneous chronic colitis, which are widely used to study IBD, immune imbalance, and intestinal dysbiosis. The DSS model induces epithelial damage [75], and the TCRαKO colitis murine model develops spontaneous chronic colitis similar to human UC at 16 to 20 weeks of age [76]. Monkey chronic colitis resembles human UC. Transferrin down-regulation impaired host tolerogenic responses by dysregulating DC, Tregs, and Bregs homeostasis in the gut while its overexpression or exogenous administration of transferrin showed protective effects by suppressing the inflammatory response to repair colitis.
The peptide TC6 inhibits transferrin–CD14 interaction but has no effect on LPS's binding to CD14, and thus does not affect inflammatory responses induced by LPS. TC6 counteracts transferrin's immunosuppressive functions to block transferrin's inhibition on LPS-induced inflammatory responses both in vitro and in vivo (Figs. S10G and H, S13, and S19) and to inhibit the protective effects of transferrin on intestinal immune imbalance induced by gut microbial dysbiosis, and consequently diminishes transferrin's improvement on pathological insults in the colitis models (Fig. S7I and J and Fig. S24), demonstrating that transferrin's immunosuppressive phenotypes seen in the cell and animal models are mediated by transferrin–CD14 interaction.
In conclusion, our findings revealed that immune activation due to microbe infection results in iron withdrawal, while both infection and iron withdrawal promote host transferrin expression. For microbes, the up-regulated transferrin is beneficially used as an immunosuppressor to negatively regulate PRRs signaling and promote immune tolerance. For hosts, the up-regulated transferrin takes part in iron mobilization to contribute to IS, and also likely promotes immunothrombosis to facilitate the clearance of invading pathogens (Fig. 7Q). Combined with our recent discovery [29,68], transferrin is identified as a multi-tasking plasma protein with functions of iron transportation, coagulation promotion, and immunoregulation. The strong immunosuppressive ability of transferrin by targeting multiple PRRs provides a promising strategy to treat autoimmune diseases, such as IBD.
All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Kunming Institute of Zoology (SMKX-20181115-174) and conformed to the US National Institutes of Health's Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Academies Press, 8th Edition, 2011). SPF C57BL/6J and GF mice (8 weeks old) were purchased from the Institute of Laboratory Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. TCRα KO mice (#002116, male, 16 weeks old) were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. All mice were housed under a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle at 24 °C and tested at 10 weeks of age. BsA-treated mice (SPF C57BL/6J) were fed water with ampicillin (1 g/l), streptomycin (1 g/l), metronidazole (0.5 g/ml), and vancomycin (1 g/l) for 3 weeks. Lentivirus for transferrin overexpression (107 transducing units [TU]), retrovirus for transferrin knockdown (107 TU), or their blank viruses (107 TU) were injected into SPF C57BL/6J mice through the tail vein to induce transferrin overexpression or knockdown, and the transferrin concentration was detected periodically until it was successfully overexpressed or knocked down.
The Institutional Review Board of the Kunming Institute of Zoology (KIZ) and the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University approved this study (2017L15). All human specimens were collected with the informed consent of patients prior to the study. Plasma and colon tissue samples from UC patients (n = 20) and healthy controls (n = 20) were collected from the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University. In total, 20 subjects with UC showed typical clinical features, including continuous mucosa, diffuse hyperemia, edema, and erosion; blurred or disordered vascular network texture; diffuse erosion and superficial ulcers in lesions; and scattered pseudopolyps, with purulent secretions, white moss, and spontaneous bleeding. Immediately following blood draw (with anticoagulant agent 1.5% EDTA-Na2), plasma was obtained by centrifugation at 3,000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C and stored at −80 °C after being sub-packed.
Bacterial products including E. coli LPS or B. fragilis LPS, S. aureus LTA, mouse DNA, E. coli DNA, S. aureus DNA, or L. monocytogenes DNA on transferrin expression were determined by Western blotting, ELISA, and qRT-PCR in primary macrophages and BNL CL.2. Detailed information can be found in the Supplementary Materials.
THP-1 cells were stimulated by 2 μg/ml LPS mixed with different concentrations of apo-transferrin (0.05, 0.5, and 5 μM) at 37 °C for 2 h. Cells were washed 3 times with phosphate buffer solution (PBS) and incubated with 5 mM of the cross-linking reagent disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS, 21555, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) for 30 min at room temperature. After terminating the reaction with 50 mM Tris, cells were washed with ice-cold PBS and lysed in 100 μl of radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (R0278, Sigma, USA) with protease inhibitor cocktail. TLR4 dimerization was detected by Western blot analysis as described above. The phosphorylation of TAK1, IKKα, IκBα, NF-κB, and p65 subunits of the myD88-dependent pathway; TBK1 and IRF3 of the myD88-independent pathway; and JNK and p38 of the MAPK signaling pathway in THP-1 cells was also analyzed by Western blotting.
BIAcore 2000 (GE, USA) was used to analyze the interaction between transferrin coupled at a CM5 sensor chip (BR100012, GE, USA) and CD14. Detailed information can be found in the Supplementary Materials.
LPS (750 μg/kg) was intravenously injected into mice (C57BL/6J, male, 8 weeks old) to induce an inflammatory response for 2 h, and effects of transferrin overexpression and transferrin knockdown on LPS-induced inflammatory response were tested. Detailed information can be found in the Supplementary Materials.
Levels of ALDH1A2, CCL22, TGF-β, and IL-10 or frequency, number, and proliferation of CD103+CD11b+ DCs, Tregs, and Bregs in GF mice and transferrin-knockdown SPF mice were determined by Western blotting or flow cytometry. Detailed information can be found in the Supplementary Materials.
DSS (1.5%)-induced and TCRαKO colitis mice models, and monkeys with spontaneous chronic colitis were used to test the effects of transferrin on dysregulated gut immune response. Detailed information can be found in the Supplementary Materials.
The data obtained from independent experiments were presented as the mean ± SD. All statistical analyses were 2-tailed and with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used in the analysis of normal distribution, and data were then analyzed using 1-way ANOVA, or 2-way ANOVA in case of measuring the effects of 2 factors simultaneously, with post-hoc Dunnett or Bonferroni adjustment for P values. If only 2 groups were compared, unpaired t test was applied. Data were analyzed using Prism 6 (GraphPad Software) and SPSS (SPSS Inc., USA). Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences(SAJC202103)
  • China Academy Sciences(KFJ-BRP-008)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province (202003AD150008)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province (202202AA100002)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province (202301AS070074)
  • Kunming Science and Technology Bureau (2022SCP007)
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2018YFA0801403)
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2022YFC2105003)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (U2002219)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31930015)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (32100907)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China(2022YFF1301601)
  • PI Project of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou)(GML2021GD0807)
  • Excellent Young Scientists Foundation of Shandong Province(ZR2023YQ025)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (32371162)
1.
Hooper LV, Gordon JI. Commensal host-bacterial relationships in the gut. Science. 2001;292(5519):1115–1118.
2.
Frosali S, Pagliari D, Gambassi G, Landolfi R, Pandolfi F, Cianci R. How the intricate interaction among toll-like receptors, microbiota, and intestinal immunity can influence gastrointestinal pathology. J Immunol Res. 2015;2015: Article 489821.
3.
Rolfe RD. Interactions among microorganisms of the indigenous intestinal flora and their influence on the host. Rev Infect Dis. 1984;6(1):S73–S79.
4.
Hooper LV, Macpherson AJ. Immune adaptations that maintain homeostasis with the intestinal microbiota. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10(3):159–169.
5.
MacPherson AJ, Uhr T. Compartmentalization of the mucosal immune responses to commensal intestinal bacteria. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1029:36–43.
6.
Johansson MEV, Larsson JMH, Hansson GC. The two mucus layers of colon are organized by the MUC2 mucin, whereas the outer layer is a legislator of host-microbial interactions. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(Suppl 1):4659–4665.
7.
Johansson MEV, Hansson GC. Keeping bacteria at a distance. Science. 2011;334(6053):182–183.
8.
Gallo RL, Hooper LV. Epithelial antimicrobial defence of the skin and intestine. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12(7):503–516.
9.
Benckert J, Schmolka N, Kreschel C, Zoller MJ, Sturm A, Wiedenmann B, Wardemann H. The majority of intestinal IgA+ and IgG+ plasmablasts in the human gut are antigen-specific. J Clin Investig. 2011;121(5):1946–1955.
10.
Mowat AM. To respond or not to respond—A personal perspective of intestinal tolerance. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18(6):405–415.
11.
Tlaskalova-Hogenova H, Stěpánková R, Kozáková H, Hudcovic T, Vannucci L, Tučková L, Rossmann P, Hrnčíř T, Kverka M, Zákostelská Z, et al. The role of gut microbiota (commensal bacteria) and the mucosal barrier in the pathogenesis of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases and cancer: Contribution of germ-free and gnotobiotic animal models of human diseases. Cell Mol Immunol. 2011;8(2):110–120.
12.
Tlaskalova H, Kamarýtová V, Mandel L, Prokesová L, Kruml J, Lanc A, Miler I. Immune response of germ-free piglets after peroral monocontamination with living Escherichia-coli strain 086.1. Fate of antigen, dynamics and site of antibody formation, nature of antibodies and formation of heterohaemagglutinins. Folia Biol-Prague. 1970;16(3):177.
13.
Carter PB, Pollard M. Host responses to normal microbial flora in germ-free mice. J Reticuloendoth Soc. 1971;9(6):580.
14.
Tlaskalovahogenova H, Cerna J, Mandel L. Peroral immunization of germ-free piglets—Appearance of antibody-forming-cells and antibodies of different isotypes. Scand J Immunol. 1981;13(5):467–472.
15.
Tlaskalovahogenova H. Development of immunological capacity under germfree and conventional conditions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1983;409:96–113.
16.
Stepankova R, Sinkora J, Hudcovic T, Kozakova H, Tlaskalova-Hogenova H. Differences in development of lymphocyte subpopulations from gut-associated lymphatic tissue (GALT) of germfree and conventional rats: Effect of aging. Folia Microbiol. 1998;43(5):531–534.
17.
Guarner F, Malagelada JR. Gut flora in health and disease. Lancet. 2003;361(9356):512–519.
18.
Xavier RJ, Podolsky DK. Unravelling the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature. 2007;448(7152):427–434.
19.
Sartor RB. Microbial influences in inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(2):577–594.
20.
Abraham C, Cho JH. Mechanisms of disease inflammatory bowel disease. New Engl J Med. 2009;361(1):2066–2078.
21.
Takeda K, Akira S. Roles of toll-like receptors in innate immune responses. Genes Cells. 2001;6(9):733–742.
22.
Hadley JS, Wang JE, Foster SJ, Thiemermann C, Hinds CJ. Peptidoglycan of Staphylococcus aureus upregulates monocyte expression of CD14, toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), and TLR4 in human blood: Possible implications for priming of lipopolysaccharide signaling. Infect Immun. 2005;73(11):7613–7619.
23.
Gomes NE, Brunialti MKC, Mendes ME, Freudenberg M, Galanos C, Salomão R. Lipopolysaccharide-induced expression of cell surface receptors and cell activation of neutrophils and monocytes in whole human blood. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2010;43(9):853–858.
24.
Round JL, Lee SM, Li J, Tran G, Jabri B, Chatila TA, Mazmanian SK. The toll-like receptor 2 pathway establishes colonization by a commensal of the human microbiota. Science. 2011;332(6032):974–977.
25.
Yoon HS, Kim G, Ju YJ, Cheon IS, Hong SW, Kim DW, Park BC, Han SH, Yun CH. Distinct pattern of immune tolerance in dendritic cells treated with lipopolysaccharide or lipoteichoic acid. Mol Immunol. 2017;91:57–64.
26.
Astiz ME, Rackow EC, Still JG, Howell ST, Cato A, B. von Eschen K, Ulrich JT, Rudbach JA, McMahon G, Vargas R, et al. Pretreatment of normal humans with monophosphoryl lipid-A induces tolerance to endotoxin—A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 1995;23(1):9–17.
27.
Seeley JJ, Ghosh S. Molecular mechanisms of innate memory and tolerance to LPS. J Leukoc Biol. 2017;101(1):107–119.
28.
Nairz M, Weiss G. Iron in infection and immunity. Mol Asp Med. 2020;13(5):509–519.
29.
Tang X, Fang M, Cheng R, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Shen C, Han Y, Lu Q, du Y, Liu Y, et al. Iron-deficiency and estrogen are associated with ischemic stroke by up-regulating transferrin to induce hypercoagulability. Circ Res. 2020;127(5):651–663.
30.
Camaschella C. Iron-deficiency anemia. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1832–1843.
31.
Collins LV, Hajizadeh S, Holme E, Jonsson IM, Tarkowski A. Endogenously oxidized mitochondrial DNA induces in vivo and in vitro inflammatory responses. J Leukoc Biol. 2004;75(6):995–1000.
32.
Zhang Z, Meng P, Han Y, Shen C, Li B, Hakim MA, Zhang X, Lu Q, Rong M, Lai R. Mitochondrial DNA-LL-37 complex promotes atherosclerosis by escaping from autophagic recognition. Immunity. 2015;43(6):1137–1147.
33.
Kawasaki T, Kawai T. Toll-like receptor signaling pathways. Front Immunol. 2014;5:461.
34.
Akashi-Takamura S, Miyake K. TLR accessory molecules. Curr Opin Immunol. 2008;20(4):420–425.
35.
Baumann CL, Aspalter IM, Sharif O, Pichlmair A, Blüml S, Grebien F, Bruckner M, Pasierbek P, Aumayr K, Planyavsky M, et al. CD14 is a coreceptor of toll-like receptors 7 and 9. J Exp Med. 2010;207(12):2689–2701.
36.
Gioannini TL, Teghanemt A, Zhang D, Levis EN, Weiss JP. Monomeric endotoxin:protein complexes are essential for TLR4-dependent cell activation. J Endotoxin Res. 2005;11(2):117–123.
37.
Ryu JK, Kim SJ, Rah SH, Kang JI, Jung HE, Lee D, Lee HK, Lee JO, Park BS, Yoon TY, et al. Reconstruction of LPS transfer cascade reveals structural determinants within LBP, CD14, and TLR4-MD2 for efficient LPS recognition and transfer. Immunity. 2017;46(1):38–50.
38.
Correia JD, Soldau K, Christen U, Tobias PS, Ulevitch RJ. Lipopolysaccharide is in close proximity to each of the proteins in its membrane receptor complex—Transfer from CD14 to TLR4 and MD-2. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(24):21129–21135.
39.
Ciesielska A, Matyjek M, Kwiatkowska K. TLR4 and CD14 trafficking and its influence on LPS-induced pro-inflammatory signaling. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020;78(4):1233–1261.
40.
Jiang ZF, Georgel P, du X, Shamel L, Sovath S, Mudd S, Huber M, Kalis C, Keck S, Galanos C, et al. CD14 is required for MyD88-independent LPS signaling. Nat Immunol. 2005;6(6):565–570.
41.
Zanoni I, Ostuni R, Marek LR, Barresi S, Barbalat R, Barton GM, Granucci F, Kagan JC. CD14 controls the LPS-induced endocytosis of toll-like receptor 4. Cell. 2011;147(4):868–880.
42.
Kelley SL, Lukk T, Nair SK, Tapping RI. The crystal structure of human soluble CD14 reveals a bent solenoid with a hydrophobic amino-terminal pocket. J Immunol. 2013;190(3):1304–1311.
43.
Kim JI, Lee CJ, Jin MS, Lee CH, Paik SG, Lee H, Lee JO. Crystal structure of CD14 and its implications for lipopolysaccharide signaling. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(12):11347–11351.
44.
Lu YC, Yeh WC, Ohashi PS. LPS/TLR4 signal transduction pathway. Cytokine. 2008;42(2):145–151.
45.
Cunningham MD, Shapiro RA, Seachord C, Ratcliffe K, Cassiano L, Darveau RP. CD14 employs hydrophilic regions to “capture” lipopolysaccharides. J Immunol. 2000;164(6):3255–3263.
46.
Ostman S, Rask C, Wold AE, Hultkrantz S, Telemo E. Impaired regulatory T cell function in germ-free mice. Eur J Immunol. 2006;36(9):2336–2346.
47.
Round JL, Mazmanian SK. The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(5):313–323.
48.
Kennedy EA, King KY, Baldridge MT. Mouse microbiota models: Comparing germ-free mice and antibiotics treatment as tools for modifying gut bacteria. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1534.
49.
Esterházy D, Canesso MCC, Mesin L, Muller PA, de Castro TBR, Lockhart A, ElJalby M, Faria AMC, Mucida D. Compartmentalized gut lymph node drainage dictates adaptive immune responses. Nature. 2019;569(7754):126.
50.
Mortha A, Chudnovskiy A, Hashimoto D, Bogunovic M, Spencer SP, Belkaid Y, Merad M. Microbiota-dependent crosstalk between macrophages and ILC3 promotes intestinal homeostasis. Science. 2014;343(6178):1477.
51.
Ordas I, Eckmann L, Talamini M, Baumgart DC, Sandborn WJ. Ulcerative colitis. Lancet. 2012;380(9853):1606–1619.
52.
Langan RC, Gotsch PB, Krafczyk MA, Skillinge DD. Ulcerative colitis: Diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2007;76:1323–1330.
53.
Abraham C, Cho JH. Inflammatory bowel disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(7634):2066–2078.
54.
Du L, Ha C. Epidemiology and pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2020;49(4):643–654.
55.
Danese S, Fiocchi C. Ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1713–1725.
56.
Porter RJ, Kalla R, Ho GT. Ulcerative colitis: Recent advances in the understanding of disease pathogenesis. F1000Res. 2020;9: 10.12688/f1000research.20805.1.
57.
Sartor RB. Mechanisms of disease: Pathogenesis of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;3(7):390–407.
58.
Schirmer M, Garner A, Vlamakis H, Xavier RJ. Microbial genes and pathways in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019;17(8):497–511.
59.
Mata R, Yao Y, Cao W, Ding J, Zhou T, Zhai Z, Gao C. The dynamic inflammatory tissue microenvironment: Signality and disease therapy by biomaterials. Research. 2021;2021:4189516.
60.
Chi XX, Huang M, Tu H, Zhang B, Lin X, Xu H, Dong C, Hu X. Innate and adaptive immune abnormalities underlying autoimmune diseases: The genetic connections. Sci China Life Sci. 2023;66(7):1482–1517.
61.
Liu YJ, Jiao C, Zhang T, Li X, Li P, Lu M, Ye Z, du Y, du R, Zhang W, et al. Early-life gut microbiota governs susceptibility to colitis via microbial-derived ether lipids. Research. 2023;6:0037.
62.
Tamboli CP, Neut C, Desreumaux P, Colombel JF. Dysbiosis in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2004;53:1–4.
63.
Munyaka PM, Rabbi MF, Khafipour E, Ghia JE. Acute dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis promotes gut microbial dysbiosis in mice. J Basic Microbiol. 2016;56(9):986–998.
64.
Fei YQ, Zhang S, Han S, Qiu B, Lu Y, Huang W, Li F, Chen D, Berglund B, Xiao H, et al. The role of dihydroresveratrol in enhancing the synergistic effect of Li01 and resveratrol in ameliorating colitis in mice. Research. 2022;2022:9863845.
65.
Kapusinszky B, Ardeshir A, Mulvaney U, Deng X, Delwart E. Case-control comparison of enteric viromes in captive rhesus macaques with acute or idiopathic chronic diarrhea. J Virol. 2017;91(18):e00952-17.
66.
Sonnenberg A, Melton SD, Genta RM, Lewis AD. Absence of focally enhanced gastritis in macaques with idiopathic colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17(12):2456–2461.
67.
Broadhurst MJ, Ardeshir A, Kanwar B, Mirpuri J, Gundra UM, Leung JM, Wiens KE, Vujkovic-Cvijin I, Kim CC, Yarovinsky F, et al. Therapeutic helminth infection of macaques with idiopathic chronic diarrhea alters the inflammatory signature and mucosal microbiota of the colon. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(11): Article e1003000.
68.
Tang X, Zhang Z, Fang M, Han Y, Wang G, Wang S, Xue M, Li Y, Zhang L, Wu J, et al. Transferrin plays a central role in coagulation balance by interacting with clotting factors. Cell Res. 2020;30(2):119–132.
69.
Schaible UE, Kaufmann SH. Iron and microbial infection. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2(12):946–953.
70.
Takeda K, Kaisho T, Akira S. Toll-like receptors. Annu Rev Immunol. 2003;21:335–376.
71.
Divanovic S, Trompette A, Atabani SF, Madan R, Golenbock DT, Visintin A, Finberg RW, Tarakhovsky A, Vogel SN, Belkaid Y, et al. Negative regulation of toll-like receptor 4 signaling by the toll-like receptor homolog RP105. Nat Immunol. 2005;6(6):571–578.
72.
Gomez-Llorente C, Munoz S, Gil A. Role of toll-like receptors in the development of immunotolerance mediated by probiotics. Proc Nutr Soc. 2010;69(3):381–389.
73.
Barton GM, Medzhitov R. Toll-like receptor signaling pathways. Science. 2003;300:1524–1525.
74.
Harizanova N, Georgieva T, Dunkov BC, Yoshiga T, Law JH. Aedes aegypti transferrin. Gene structure, expression pattern, and regulation. Insect Mol Biol. 2005;14(1):79–88.
75.
Eichele DD, Kharbanda KK. Dextran sodium sulfate colitis murine model: An indispensable tool for advancing our understanding of inflammatory bowel diseases pathogenesis. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(33):6016–6029.
76.
Mombaerts P, Mizoguchi E, Grusby MJ, Glimcher LH, Bhan AK, Tonegawa S. Spontaneous development of inflammatory bowel-disease in T-cell receptor mutant mice. Cell. 1993;75(2):275–282.
Year 2024 volume 7 Issue 1
PDF
153
86
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.0301
  • Receive Date:2023-10-30
  • Online Date:2025-07-24
  • Published:2024-01-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2023-10-30
  • Accepted:2023-12-26
Funding
Chinese Academy of Sciences(SAJC202103)
China Academy Sciences(KFJ-BRP-008)
Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province (202003AD150008)
Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province (202202AA100002)
Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province (202301AS070074)
Kunming Science and Technology Bureau (2022SCP007)
Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2018YFA0801403)
Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2022YFC2105003)
National Natural Science Foundation of China (U2002219)
National Natural Science Foundation of China (31930015)
National Natural Science Foundation of China (32100907)
National Key Research and Development Program of China(2022YFF1301601)
PI Project of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou)(GML2021GD0807)
Excellent Young Scientists Foundation of Shandong Province(ZR2023YQ025)
National Natural Science Foundation of China (32371162)
Affiliations
    1Engineering Laboratory of Peptides of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Key Laboratory of Bioactive Peptides of Yunnan Province, KIZ-CUHK Joint Laboratory of Bioresources and Molecular Research in Common Diseases, National Resource Center for Non-Human Primates, National Research Facility for Phenotypic & Genetic Analysis of Model Animals (Primate Facility), and Sino-African Joint Research Center, New Cornerstone Science Institute, Kunming Institute of Zoology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.17 Longxin Road, Kunming, Yunnan, 650201, China.
    2School of Basic Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, China.
    3Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Institute of Digestive Disease, Kunming 650032, Yunnan, China.
    4 Yunnan Province Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Kunming 650032, Yunnan, China.
    5Kunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650204, Yunnan, China.
    6Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale and School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, Anhui, China.
    7 Center for Evolution and Conservation Biology, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory, Guangzhou 511458, Guangdong, China.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to: (R.L.); (Y.M.)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.0301
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT