收藏切换
The Common Hallmarks and Interconnected Pathways of Aging, Circadian Rhythms, and Cancer: Implications for Therapeutic Strategies
收藏切换
PDF
Jie Wang1, , Fanglin Shao2, , Qing Xin Yu3, 4, , Luxia Ye5, , Dilinaer Wusiman6, 7, Ruicheng Wu1, Zhouting Tuo8, Zhipeng Wang9, Dengxiong Li1, William C. Cho10, Wuran Wei1, *, Dechao Feng1, 11, *
Research. Vol 8 Article ID 0612
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 8 Article ID 0612
Review Article
The Common Hallmarks and Interconnected Pathways of Aging, Circadian Rhythms, and Cancer: Implications for Therapeutic Strategies
Full
Jie Wang1, , Fanglin Shao2, , Qing Xin Yu3, 4, , Luxia Ye5, , Dilinaer Wusiman6, 7, Ruicheng Wu1, Zhouting Tuo8, Zhipeng Wang9, Dengxiong Li1, William C. Cho10, Wuran Wei1, *, Dechao Feng1, 11, *
Affiliations
  • 1 Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
  • 2 Department of Rehabilitation, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.
  • 3 Department of Pathology, Ningbo Clinical Pathology Diagnosis Center, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, China.
  • 4 Department of Pathology, Ningbo Medical Centre Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315040, China.
  • 5 Department of Public Research Platform, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai, China.
  • 6Department of Comparative Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
  • 7Purdue Institute for Cancer Research, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA.
  • 8 Department of Urological Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical Center of PLA, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
  • 9 Department of Urology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
  • 10 Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
  • 11 Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London W1W 7TS, UK.
Published: 2025-03-05 doi: 10.34133/research.0612
Outline
收藏切换

The intricate relationship between cancer, circadian rhythms, and aging is increasingly recognized as a critical factor in understanding the mechanisms underlying tumorigenesis and cancer progression. Aging is a well-established primary risk factor for cancer, while disruptions in circadian rhythms are intricately associated with the tumorigenesis and progression of various tumors. Moreover, aging itself disrupts circadian rhythms, leading to physiological changes that may accelerate cancer development. Despite these connections, the specific interplay between these processes and their collective impact on cancer remains inadequately explored in the literature. In this review, we systematically explore the physiological mechanisms of circadian rhythms and their influence on cancer development. We discuss how core circadian genes impact tumor risk and prognosis, highlighting the shared hallmarks of cancer and aging such as genomic instability, cellular senescence, and chronic inflammation. Furthermore, we examine the interplay between circadian rhythms and aging, focusing on how this crosstalk contributes to tumorigenesis, tumor proliferation, and apoptosis, as well as the impact on cellular metabolism and genomic stability. By elucidating the common pathways linking aging, circadian rhythms, and cancer, this review provides new insights into the pathophysiology of cancer and identifies potential therapeutic strategies. We propose that targeting the circadian regulation of cancer hallmarks could pave the way for novel treatments, including chronotherapy and antiaging interventions, which may offer important benefits in the clinical management of cancer.

Jie Wang, Fanglin Shao, Qing Xin Yu, Luxia Ye, Dilinaer Wusiman, Ruicheng Wu, Zhouting Tuo, Zhipeng Wang, Dengxiong Li, William C. Cho, Wuran Wei, Dechao Feng. The Common Hallmarks and Interconnected Pathways of Aging, Circadian Rhythms, and Cancer: Implications for Therapeutic Strategies[J]. Research, 2025 , 8 (3) : 0612 . DOI: 10.34133/research.0612
Cancer, circadian rhythms, and aging are 3 biological processes closely associated with health and disease. While they may appear to be independent, increasing evidence suggests that there are complex interactions among them. The relationship between aging and cancer is very clear. Aging remains to represent the foremost risk factor across various cancer types, correlating with an elevated incidence of cancer that typically reaches its peak around the age of 85 years [13]. Reportedly, excluding other objective factors and causes of competitive death, the cumulative risk of developing cancer by the age of 75 reaches as high as 21.4% [4]. Furthermore, for prostate cancer, the incidence of latent prostate cancer, which is defined as prostate cancer detected by autopsy, can be as high as 35.1% to 51% [5,6]. These truths seem that as long as one lives long enough, developing cancer becomes an inevitable occurrence. On the mechanism, aging and cancer share many common hallmarks, including genomic instability, epigenetic alterations, chronic inflammation, cellular senescence, and so on, which serve as intermediaries between aging and cancer [2,7,8].
Similarly, circadian rhythms are 24-h cycles that govern a range of physiological processes in living organisms, such as sleep–wake cycles, hormone release, metabolism, and cell proliferation [9,10]. Disruption of circadian rhythms has also been shown to contribute importantly to the development and progression of cancers, although the exact mechanisms are not yet fully understood [11,12]. Chronic sleep deprivation, insomnia, and shift work have been linked to an increased risk of cancer, especially breast cancer [13,14], prostate cancer [14,15], and colorectal cancer [16,17]. This is connected to the regulation of sleep, immune function, and metabolism by circadian rhythms [12,18]. In 2007, the International Agency for Research on Cancer, part of the World Health Organization, classified circadian rhythm disruption as a probable carcinogen for humans (Group 2A) due to the increased cancer susceptibility observed in individuals engaged in shift work [19]. Mechanistically, circadian rhythm proteins exhibit physical interactions with molecules implicated in cancer-related pathways, thus exerting influence over cancer initiation and progression [20,21]. Concurrently, components of circadian rhythms have the ability to directly or indirectly regulate the expression of numerous genes in different cell types. This regulatory effect extends to key cellular processes, including but not limited to nutrient metabolism, redox balance, autophagy, and DNA damage repair [21,22]. Therefore, circadian rhythm dysfunction is intricately linked to cancer hallmarks.
Furthermore, there also exist complex and multifaceted relationships between aging and circadian rhythms. On the one hand, the aging process reduces the resilience of circadian rhythms, resulting in disrupted sleep–wake cycles, a diminished ability to synchronize circadian rhythms in peripheral tissues, and changes in the molecular functioning of circadian clock outputs [23,24]. On the other hand, circadian rhythm dysfunction can accelerate the aging process by compromising essential bodily functions. These disruptions lead to increased oxidative stress, which refers to cellular damage caused by an imbalance between the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the cell's ability to neutralize them [25,26]. This imbalance of ROS can lead to DNA damage, protein denaturation, and lipid peroxidation, ultimately contributing to inflammation and the development of age-related health issues [24,27,28]. Numerous hallmarks of aging and cancer, including genomic instability, cellular senescence, deregulating cellular metabolism, and so on, either directly impact the function of the circadian rhythms or are under the regulation of circadian rhythms. Therefore, we review the current understanding of the shared hallmarks and mechanisms between circadian rhythms, aging, and cancer, as well as how the interplay between circadian rhythms and aging influences tumorigenesis and the progression of tumors. Figure 1 shows the interplay among cancer, circadian rhythms, and aging.
A functional circadian clock is characterized by 3 key features: First, gene expression or protein production must follow a rhythmic oscillation pattern that repeats approximately every 24 h, reflecting the biological processes' alignment with the day–night cycle. Second, this circadian rhythm is entrained, or synchronized, by an external environmental stimulus known as a zeitgeber, with light being the most common, but also including factors like temperature and feeding cycles. Lastly, even after the external stimulus (zeitgeber) is removed, the circadian clock continues to maintain its oscillatory rhythm, demonstrating its intrinsic ability to function autonomously over time [29]. At the molecular level, circadian rhythms regulate various biochemical, physiological, and behavioral processes, creating a roughly 24-h cycle through the transcription–translation feedback loop (TTFL) [30] involving core clock genes such as brain and muscle arnt-like (BMAL1), circadian locomotor output cycles kaput (CLOCK), period (PERs), cryptochrome (CRYs), nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group D member (NR1D1/2), and retinoic acid-related receptor alpha beta gamma (RORαβϒ) [31]. These transcription factors interact with each other in a feedback loop to maintain the circadian rhythms.
CLOCK and BMAL1 form heterodimers and bind to enhancer or “E-box” sequences (CACGTG) in the promoters of PER and CRY genes, stimulating transcription. Subsequently, PER and CRY proteins function as a negative component of the clock by forming heterodimers in the nucleus, thereby repressing CLOCK–BMAL1 activity [32]. The turnover of inhibitory PER and CRY proteins initiates a new cycle driven by CLOCK and BMAL1 through E-box elements. NR1D1/2 and RORα/β/γ play roles in various physiological processes [33]. Another feedback loop involves nuclear orphan receptors RORα, RORβ, and RORγ as activators, and NR1D1 and NR1D2 as inhibitors, controlling the circadian transcription of BMAL1 [34,35]. Furthermore, NR1D and ROR establish feedback loops that regulate BMAL1 expression [36]. The CLOCK/BMAL1 heterodimer enhances NR1D transcription, while a ROR/NR1D-response element-dependent mechanism negatively regulates BMAL1 expression [37]. Figure 2 demonstrates the physiological mechanisms of normal circadian rhythms.
Studies have demonstrated that disturbances in circadian rhythm genes can increase the likelihood of proliferation, invasion, and migration in various types of cancer such as breast cancer [38], colon cancer [39], hepatocellular carcinoma [40], melanoma [41], and ovarian cancer [42]. Researches have increasingly concentrated on comparing the expression levels of circadian core genes in tumor and normal tissues to better understand the potential connection between circadian rhythm disturbances and cancer. In this review, we systematically summarized the expression of 11 circadian core genes across various types of tumors, including CRY1 [4349], CRY2 [4951], CLOCK [5154], BMAL1 [5559], NPAS2 [6066], RORα [6776], TIM [49,69,7784], NR1D1 [8588], PER1 [49,8993], PER2 [49,9496], and PER3 [49,97101]. In addition, many studies highlight that single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of core circadian genes are associated with an increased risk of various tumors and their prognosis. In this review, we systematically summarized the relationship between different SNPs in 10 core circadian genes and the risk and prognosis of various tumors, including CRY1 (rs3809236 [102]), CRY2 (rs10838524 [103], rs11038689 [50,104], rs1401417 [50,104,105], rs2292912 [106], rs7123390 [50,104]), CLOCK (rs10462028 [107], rs11133399 [108], rs11932595 [109], rs3749474 [110,111], rs6855837 [112]), BMAL1 (rs2278749 [111], rs2279284 [108], rs2279287 [103], rs2290035 [111], rs3816358 [107], rs3816360 [113], rs7950226 [106], rs969485 [111]), NPAS2 (rs10165970 [114], rs1053096 [115], rs1369481 [106], rs17024869 [114], rs17024926 [106,111], rs2305160 [105,115,116], rs7581886 [114], rs895520 [114,117], rs895521 [106]), RORα (rs10519097 [114,118], rs12914272 [109], rs1482057 [109], rs17204952 [119], rs339972 [117,118], rs7164773 [114], rs76436997 [120], rs782917 [119]), TIM (rs2291738 [121], rs7302060 [121]), PER1 (rs2289591 [106], rs2735611 [103], rs3027178 [102,117], rs885747 [106]), PER2 (rs934945 [103,117]), and PER3 (rs1012477 [106,111], rs10462020 [122], rs228644 [112], rs228669 [102], rs228727 [112], rs228729 [102,112], rs2640908 [102], rs707467 [112]). Figure 3 illustrates the expression of core circadian genes in different tumors and the SNPs associated with tumor risk and prognosis.
Circadian rhythm genes can influence various aspects of cancer biology, including proliferation, DNA repair, apoptosis, and stem cell regulation [123126]. The cell cycle is regulated by cyclin/cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) complexes, with many genes controlling key steps in cell cycle phases being influenced by the circadian rhythms [123]. For example, c-MYC and cyclin D1, involved in the DNA synthesis phase (S phase), exhibit circadian expression cycles through CLOCK/BMAL1-dependent transactivation [127,128]. Knockdown of BMAL1/CLOCK led to the down-regulation of Wee1, which activated apoptosis and up-regulated p21, resulting in cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase. The combined effects of Wee1 and p21 contribute to tumor cell death [123]. In addition to these factors, circadian rhythms also control several other factors that regulate the cell cycle, including checkpoint regulators like p16INK4a, p27, p57, and CDK1/cyclin B1, as well as components of cell cycle signaling pathways such as MAPK, Wnt/beta-catenin, and TGF, thereby coordinating the daily rhythm of cell proliferation [129].
The accumulation of DNA damage and the failure of DNA repair mechanisms can lead to apoptosis. The TP53 gene, which encodes the cellular tumor antigen p53, is the most mutated gene in human cancers [130]. p53 plays a key role in the cellular response to DNA damage by regulating the DNA damage checkpoint, controlling cell cycle arrest, and inducing apoptosis [129]. BMAL1 and PER2 tightly regulate the transcription, stability, and activity of p53 [131,132]. BMAL1 down-regulation hinders p53-dependent p21 induction, while the absence of PER2 impairs p53 activation in response to DNA damage [133]. Mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2) is a crucial negative regulator of p53, maintaining its cellular levels low in normal cells. PER2 interacts with MDM2, shielding p53 from MDM2-mediated degradation [134,135]. Changes in PER2 levels can impact p53 levels, and PER2 overexpression can affect both p53 protein stability and the transcription of p53 target genes [135,136]. Additionally, p53 inhibits the binding of BMAL1/CLOCK to the PER2 promoter, resulting in the suppression of PER2 expression [137]. Hence, circadian rhythm genes play an important role in regulating p53 at multiple levels.
DNA repair mechanisms encompass direct repair, base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, double-strand break repair, and cross-link repair. Recent studies suggest that circadian rhythms regulate all of these repair processes [138]. Nucleotide excision repair is a critical mechanism that fixes a broad range of base lesions. In humans, this process involves 6 key factors: RPA, XPA, XPC-HR23, GTF2H1, ERCC5, and XPF-ERCC1. The circadian rhythms directly influence nucleotide excision repair through the repair factor XPA [139], which is activated by CLOCK/BMAL1 and inhibited by CRY/PER [140,141]. Additionally, the circadian rhythms directly regulate double-strand breaks. Through the BMAL1–CLOCK–H4Ac axis, it facilitates DNA end resection to generate single-stranded DNA, thereby promoting homologous recombination. The depletion of BMAL1 significantly enhances the sensitivity of adrenocortical carcinoma to DNA damage-based therapies [124].
Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a type of cancer cell capable of self-renewal and differentiation into various cell types within a tumor [142,143]. They are crucial in tumor recurrence, metastasis, chemoresistance, and mortality. In cancers like glioblastoma [144], prostate cancer [145], and breast cancer [146], disturbances in circadian rhythm genes can affect the immune response, metabolism, and survival of CSCs [147]. For example, reducing the expression of BMAL1 or CLOCK in glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) can induce cell cycle arrest and trigger apoptosis [147]. Additionally, CLOCK and BMAL1 in GSCs play a role in immunosuppression in glioblastoma [144]. Conversely, overexpression of PER2 can induce stasis in GSCs, inhibiting their proliferation, migration, and invasiveness [148].
Although the total number of neurons in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) remains unchanged with age, the strength of the SCN firing rhythm decreases [149]. As the human body ages, the synchronization between the central biological clock and peripheral clocks also changes [30]. The expression and rhythms of core circadian genes, along with their downstream regulatory genes, are disrupted with age, potentially affecting aging at the cellular, tissue, and organismal levels. This includes processes such as immune cell senescence and immunosenescence [24,150]. Conversely, aging may also affect the rhythms at these levels. There is an inseparable interaction between the two, collectively leading to the decline of bodily functions and the occurrence of diseases, including tumors [24,151].
The chronotype changes as individuals age, with the timing of sleep onset and awakening shifting earlier, resulting in a morning chronotype [152]. Older adults generally have an earlier circadian rhythm compared to younger adults, typically by 1 to 2 h. Aging individuals may experience disruptions to their circadian rhythms, leading to more fragmented sleep patterns. Older individuals often show lower levels of daytime activity, poorer sleep quality, and longer periods before falling asleep. Additionally, older adults are more likely to be awakened during the night compared to younger individuals [153]. The circadian clock located in the hypothalamus SCN is responsible for controlling melatonin secretion. This secretion tends to decrease with age, leading to a smaller and earlier peak at night in older adults [154]. Similarly, cortisol rhythms also undergo changes with age, exhibiting a reduction in amplitude and an earlier peak [155].
Aging alters circadian rhythms at the molecular level, with both behavioral and molecular changes driven by the body clock, which, in turn, accelerate the aging process. Melatonin plays a role in various aging processes by protecting the body against oxidative stress, preserving mitochondrial function, and impacting sirtuin 1 levels [156]. Glucocorticoids influence energy and lipid metabolism, inflammation, and cell proliferation. Metabolic rhythms tend to weaken with age, potentially contributing to the increased susceptibility to metabolic disorders in older individuals, such as diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension [157]. Additionally, as immune function decreases with age, there is a gradual activation of a chronic, low-grade proinflammatory process in aging organisms, which may increase the risk of chronic conditions like metabolic syndrome and neurodegenerative diseases. Notably, 2 recent studies indicate that the synergistic interaction between the central biological clock and peripheral clocks can prevent muscle aging and improve muscle function. Kumar et al. [158]. found that in mouse models, restoring circadian rhythms can mitigate the loss of muscle mass and strength, thereby enhancing motor function that declines with age. Mice that had both their central and peripheral clocks restored simultaneously experienced the most significant improvements. This demonstrates the essential communication between the central clock in the brain and the peripheral clocks in muscles, highlighting the importance of their synchronization for maintaining muscle function and preventing premature muscle aging. Mortimer et al. [159]. demonstrated that the peripheral clock in skin tissue can integrate and even override signals from the central clock in the brain by constructing a minimal circadian interaction network in mice with only 2 nodes. This coordination is crucial for maintaining the normal circadian rhythms of epidermal tissue. These results suggest new knowledge and strategies for addressing age-related decline in physical function through circadian rhythm regulation.
Aging is a complex process that impacts multiple biological systems, resulting in a gradual deterioration of physiological functions [7]. Its impact on cancer development and progression is profound and complex, intertwining at the molecular, cellular, and systemic levels [160,161]. As one of the key risk factors for cancer, it is widely recognized that the incidence of cancer significantly increases with age [2,162,163]. The study indicates that between 1980 and 2000, the population of the United States grew by 23% (from 227 million to 279 million), while the annual incidence of cancer rose by 66% (from 807,000 to 1.34 million) [164]. The increase in cancer incidence was driven primarily by cases diagnosed in patients ≥65 years of age. Moreover, this trend was consistent across different cancer types and populations, indicating an intrinsic link between the aging process and cancer development [164]. This pattern suggests that the cumulative effect of prolonged exposure to carcinogens, along with physiological changes inherent to the aging process, significantly influences cancer risk [164,165].
Several hallmarks of aging, such as genomic instability, epigenetic alterations, cellular senescence, and chronic inflammation, are similar and partially related to the hallmarks of cancer in some aspects [2]. These hallmarks highlight the mechanisms through which aging influences tumor characteristics, emphasizing the intertwined nature of aging and cancer development.
Both aging and cancer are characterized by increased genomic instability and mutation. Genomic instability refers to the increased tendency of genome to acquire mutations, chromosomal rearrangements, or changes in chromosome number over time. This instability leads to alterations and damage to the genetic material, which can result in cellular dysfunction, tumorigenesis, and the progression of various diseases [166,167]. DNA damage accumulates with age, due in part to a decline in repair mechanisms and the natural wear and tear on the genome [168]. Cancer exploits this instability, with mutations in key genes driving uncontrolled cell growth. Cancers often show genomic instability, including significant chromosomal changes and minor nucleotide alterations, which drive malignant cell transformation [166,167]. For example, a recent study revealed that mitochondria-derived ROS disrupt the structural integrity of micronuclei in aggressive cancers by inducing CHMP7 accumulation and oligomerization, which interferes with its interaction with other ESCRT-III components. This disruption leads to the rupture of micronuclear envelopes and promotes chromosomal shattering. The findings also link these ROS-induced changes to tumor hypoxia, thereby connecting the cellular stress from hypoxia to critical mechanisms that drive cancer progression [169]. While organisms have developed intricate DNA repair systems to counteract genetic damage and preserve cellular balance, these processes are not infallible and decline in efficiency with age [170]. Women with germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 have breast epithelium that is more susceptible to accelerated aging. These mutations also increase their risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer due to impaired DNA repair mechanisms [171]. This gradual decline contributes to increased cancer risk and other age-related diseases due to the steady buildup of genomic damage.
Chronic inflammation is a hallmark of aging, which also contributes to the development and progression of cancer. Inflammation results from various aging-related deficits at molecular, cellular, and systemic levels. Genomic instability, for example, can lead to changes in blood cell populations, increasing pro-inflammatory types that accelerate cardiovascular aging [172]. Additionally, aging-related epigenetic changes, loss of proteostasis, and impaired macroautophagy can lead to the overexpression of pro-inflammatory proteins [7]. Furthermore, aging disrupts nutrient-sensing pathways through overactive growth and insulin signals, exacerbating inflammation [7]. Moreover, as individuals age, senescent cells accumulate and secrete pro-inflammatory and tumor-promoting factors. While cellular senescence acts as a protective mechanism against cancer by halting the proliferation of damaged cells [173], the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) can create a microenvironment that promotes tumor progression [174]. Studies have shown that inflammatory environment can promote genetic instability, tumor cell proliferation, and metastasis [175]. Chronic inflammation associated with aging may play a key role in the development and progression of cancer.
Aging and cancer also share multiple epigenetic changes. Human DNA undergoes age-related changes, including widespread hypomethylation and hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes, significantly affecting the epigenetic landscape in aging and cancer [176]. These alterations, particularly in introns or intergenic areas, lead to the silencing of crucial oncosuppressor genes like p16 and p53, fueling tumor development [177]. Targeting epigenomic changes could slow the epigenetic clock and combat hematological cancers. DNMT3A and TET2, pivotal in methylation and demethylation, are often mutated in conditions predisposing individuals to hematologic cancers and heart disease [172]. Chromatin remodeling is also an important part of epigenetic alterations. Factors involved in chromatin remodeling include HP1a, SWI/SNF complex members, and polycomb protein group, which play important roles in antiaging and cancer processes [178]. Lack of function of these proteins results in disordered chromatin structure, manifested by extensive heterochromatin loss and rearrangements. For example, alterations in the SWI/SNF complex are found in up to 25% of human cancer cases [179]. Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), including long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs), and circular RNAs [180,181], play a crucial role in aging and cancer by regulating key elements of the pathways involved in longevity and tumor formation at the posttranscriptional level [182]. Research involving gain- and loss-of-function experiments in both cell cultures and animal models has established the direct impact of ncRNAs, particularly miRNAs, on the processes of aging and cancer development [183]. These alterations affect gene activity and critical cellular functions, playing a marked role in the progression of aging and cancer.
Metabolism is a fundamental aspect of life, and the aging process leads to a decline in bioenergetic function, manifested by disturbances in lipid synthesis and breakdown, as well as glucose utilization [184]. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) is a crucial coenzyme involved in redox reactions and plays an essential role in energy metabolism [185]. Starting after puberty, NAD+ shows an age-related decline [186]. The loss of NAD+ caused by aging can damage the function and homeostasis of mitochondria [187]. In addition, the aging process is accompanied by a decrease in mitochondrial transport capacity [188]. Decreased NAD+ levels and mitochondrial dysfunction accelerate the aging process. Key NAD+ enzymes, including de novo synthesis–nicotinate phosphoribosyl transferase and salvage synthesis–nicotinamide phosphoribosyl transferase, are overexpressed in various cancers. Their overexpression is linked to increased glycolytic activity, cancer progression, chemotherapy resistance, and poor prognosis [188,189]. Mitochondrial damage and dysfunction, including increased mitochondrial fission, decreased mitochondrial fusion, mutations and depletion of mitochondrial DNA, and disruption of mitochondrial proteins, are frequently observed in various cancers [190,191]. These impairments and dysfunctions lead to cancer proliferation, metastasis, invasion, and resistance to treatment [192,193].
Cellular senescence is a key factor in the aging process and contributes to age-related disorders. As individuals age, senescent cells accumulate in aging tissues and in areas affected by age-related diseases, such as osteoarthritis and atherosclerosis [194,195]. These cells can affect the normal functioning of tissues, leading to a gradual decline in their performance. Cellular senescence plays crucial roles at various stages of tumorigenesis, including tumor initiation, progression, and immune escape [196]. The process of senescence triggered by oncogene activation is known as oncogene-induced senescence (OIS). BRAF mutations commonly seen in melanoma initially promote rapid cell growth in melanocytes. This growth is soon limited by OIS, where cells cease to divide and age, often forming benign skin tumors (melanocytic nevi). However, the loss of specific tumor-suppressor genes or proteins, such as PTEN or IGFBP7, can disrupt this senescent state, leading to the progression from benign tumors to malignant melanoma [197,198]. Mutations in the NF1 gene, associated with type I neurofibromatosis, activate the N-RAS pathway, leading to senescence in both central and peripheral nervous system tumors, marked by high levels of senescence markers like SA-Gal and p16INK4a [199]. Similarly, inactivation of the VHL gene, an important tumor suppressor, triggers cellular senescence and benign tumor formation in kidneys through mechanisms involving pRB and p27 [200]. Additionally, deletion of the RB1 gene in thyroid cells activates senescence through the N-RAS pathway, initially leading to benign adenomas that will progress to cancer upon inactivation of the RAS pathway [201]. Moreover, reactivating the tumor suppressor gene p53 in p53-deficient tumors can induce senescence and cause tumor regression in certain cancers like lymphoma and sarcoma [202]. Collectively, these results emphasize that cellular senescence is a critical barrier against tumor progression and that disruption of the balance between cell proliferation and senescence generally leads to the development of malignant tumors.
Tumorigenesis is a complex process influenced by multiple factors, including genetic, environmental, and immunological factors. Interactions between these factors can disrupt cellular homeostasis, leading to uncontrolled cell growth and the formation of tumors [8,203]. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of tumorigenesis is crucial for developing effective prevention and treatment strategies tailored to individual patients and tumor types. Several studies have shown a link between shift work and an increased risk of breast cancer in various occupational groups [14,204207]. However, the mechanisms underlying the association between night shift work and increasing cancer risk remain largely elusive.
Telomere shortening may be one of the reasons why shift work increases the risk of breast cancer. Telomeres are structures located at the ends of chromosomes, consisting of DNA sequences and associated proteins. Their primary function is to protect the chromosomes from damage and instability, as well as to regulate processes such as cell proliferation and aging [208]. With the shortening of telomeres, chromosome instability escalates, leading to cellular senescence and apoptosis [209]. Employment schedules involving night shifts have demonstrated an impact on telomere length [210,211]. Using qPCR in DNA, Samulin Erdem et al. [212]. assessed telomere length of 563 breast cancer patients and 619 controls. They found that working 6 consecutive night shifts for more than 5 years was associated with shorter telomere lengths. In addition, telomere shortening has been linked to increasing breast cancer risk among individuals engaged in prolonged consecutive night shifts. Furthermore, many researchers also utilize various animal models to investigate the mechanisms by which circadian rhythms influence aging and tumorigenesis. Anisimov et al. [213218]. demonstrated through a series of rat experiments that circadian rhythm disruption could impact the lifespan of rats and significantly accelerate the development of spontaneous tumors and metabolic syndrome. They divided the rats into 3 groups: those exposed to standard, natural light conditions for Northwestern Russia, and constant illumination. They found that compared to the control group, rats under constant or natural light conditions exhibited accelerated aging, with significantly reduced average and maximum lifespans, as well as faster development of spontaneous tumors. The use of the Ala-Glu-Asp-Gly peptide (Epithalon) and melatonin was shown to alleviate the adverse effects of circadian rhythm disruption on the lifespan and tumor development of rats to some extent [215,216,219]. In addition, exposure to constant illumination can disrupt the levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase, 2 essential antioxidant enzymes [220]. Antioxidants play a crucial role in cellular defense by neutralizing and eliminating free radicals, such as superoxide radicals and hydrogen peroxide, which can otherwise cause significant oxidative damage to cells [221,222]. Superoxide dismutase catalyzes the dismutation of superoxide radicals (O2•−) into hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and oxygen (O2), while catalase further breaks down hydrogen peroxide into water (H2O) and oxygen, preventing the accumulation of hydrogen peroxide and its potential cytotoxic effects [221,223]. Through these mechanisms, antioxidant enzymes help maintain the cellular redox balance, reducing oxidative stress and protecting cells from damage and apoptosis [224,225]. However, constant illumination can disrupt this balance by decreasing the activity of these antioxidant enzymes, exposing cells to excessive oxidative stress, which may accelerate aging processes and increase the risk of cancer. The disruption of antioxidant enzymes caused by circadian rhythm disruption may be a potential mechanism through which constant illumination exposure accelerates aging and tumorigenesis in rats. Moreover, at the cellular and molecular level, the different components of circadian rhythms have varying effects on aging and tumors. Katamune et al. [226]. reported distinct roles of negative and positive transcriptional regulators within the circadian feedback loop in oncogene-induced neoplastic transformation. They revealed that deficiency in negative regulators, such as PER2 and CRY1/2, increases susceptibility to transformation by suppressing cell senescence-associated proteins through ATF4 induction, while deficiency in positive regulators like BMAL1 and CLOCK confers resistance to transformation by maintaining the expression of these senescence-associated proteins. In addition, Hashikawa et al. [227] also demonstrated that mice with a mutated CLOCK gene were protected against tumorigenesis induced by chemical carcinogens, by inhibiting the proliferation signals mediated by the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor. While wild-type mice developed significant tumors upon exposure to 7,12-dimethylbenzαanthracene (DMBA), chemically induced tumorigenesis was alleviated in CLOCK mutated mice. Despite similar levels of DMBA-induced DNA damage in both groups, CLOCK mutated mice did not exhibit EGF receptor-mediated RAS activation, which was associated with the expression of the cellular senescence factor p16INK4a. The research of Antoch et al. [228]. also supports this finding. This study reveals that mice with a functional deficiency of CLOCK (CLOCK/CLOCK mutant mice) do not exhibit an increased predisposition to tumorigenesis, even when challenged by γ-radiation. Instead, they demonstrate high apoptotic rates and low proliferation rates in lymphoid tissues, suggesting a protective effect against cancer development. However, CLOCK mutant mice exhibit an accelerated aging process in response to low-dose irradiation, displaying phenotypes similar to those seen in BMAL1-deficient mice. Research suggests that BMAL1 helps maintain genomic stability by suppressing transposable elements like LINE1 and reducing cellular senescence. A deficiency in BMAL1 can result in genomic instability and heightened oxidative stress, which, in turn, accelerates cellular senescence [229]. Additionally, BMAL1 plays a crucial role in regulating cell proliferation, metabolism, and DNA repair to prevent tumorigenesis [230]. When BMAL1 expression or function is disrupted, it can lead to cell cycle imbalance, DNA damage accumulation, and increased oxidative stress, thereby promoting cancer development [231,232]. The differential roles of BMAL1 in various cancers and cellular senescence, along with the complexity of its regulatory network, make it a potential target for anticancer therapies. In summary, these findings emphasize the complex relationship between circadian disruption, aging, and tumorigenesis, highlighting the interplay of circadian clock components.
The most fundamental hallmarks of cancer cells is their ability to sustain chronic proliferation [8,203]. In normal tissues, cells carefully control the generation and release of signals that promote growth, which guide the entry and progression of the cell growth and division cycle. However, in tumor tissues, cancer cells obtain the ability to continuously promote their own growth signals, leading to uncontrolled proliferation. In addition, apoptosis or programmed cell death acts as an inherent barrier against cancer progression. Evading apoptosis plays a critical role in tumor development by allowing abnormal cells to proliferate without restraint [203,233]. Aging may affect tumor sustaining proliferative signal through several mechanisms. For example, following the emergence of cellular senescence, it can inhibit tumor cell proliferation by inducing cell cycle arrest and secreting SASP factors. However, it may also promote tumor growth by altering immune regulation, modulating gene expression, and influencing the tumor microenvironment [2,7,234]. This highlights the complex and important regulatory role of cellular senescence in tumor development. The influence of circadian rhythms on sustaining proliferative signaling and evading apoptosis is multifaceted. The cell cycle within organisms is regulated by circadian rhythms. This means that cellular processes such as DNA synthesis and division are influenced by internal circadian rhythms, thereby affecting the rate and frequency of cell proliferation. In many organisms, there is a tendency for DNA replication to be more active during the night [235,236]. This temporal preference ensures that cells divide within a designated time frame, effectively restraining unregulated cell proliferation. The phenomenon of nocturnal DNA replication suggests that the evolution of the circadian rhythms may have been driven by the need to shield DNA from potential damage caused by UV light exposure [237]. Additionally, circadian rhythms regulate the secretion of hormones like growth hormone, insulin, and thyroid hormones, which are crucial for cancer cell proliferation [238240]. Some hormones may promote cell growth and division, while others may inhibit proliferation. For example, some laboratory and animal studies have shown that melatonin may have a certain inhibitory effect on cancer development. This is because melatonin possesses antioxidant and immune-modulating properties, which can reduce the generation of free radicals, decrease cellular damage, and enhance the immune function, potentially inhibiting the growth and spread of tumor cells [241,242]. Recent studies have also elucidated a direct relationship between the fundamental circadian rhythms and apoptosis. Circadian factors can exhibit dual roles in modulating apoptosis, either promoting or restricting it, depending on the specific cellular context and the status of the circadian rhythms [236]. Circadian factors like CRY1/2 and PER1 play marked roles in apoptosis regulation through various pathways. While PER2 enhances cancer cell sensitivity to radiation-induced apoptosis, PER1 knockdown increases apoptosis by altering the expression of antiapoptotic and proapoptotic genes. Conversely, CLOCK inhibits apoptosis, as evidenced by decreased expression of apoptosis-inducing factors in CLOCK-defective mice, leading to enhanced tumor growth [243,244]. This underscores the intricate involvement of circadian mechanisms in modulating cancer cell death.
We are beginning to understand the potential role of crosstalk between circadian rhythm machinery and aging in sustaining proliferative signals and evading apoptosis in cancers. Zhang et al. [245] found that the anticancer molecule MLN4924, a Nedd8-activating enzyme inhibitor, induces cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and senescence in cancer cells. It suppresses osteosarcoma cell proliferation by causing G2/M arrest and apoptosis. It achieved this by stabilizing RORα and up-regulating its transcriptional targets, p21 and BMAL1. While p21 has a minimal role, BMAL1 suppression attenuates MLN4924's antiproliferative effect, indicating that MLN4924-induced growth inhibition in osteosarcoma cells is mediated primarily by BMAL1. These findings underscore MLN4924 as a promising therapeutic for osteosarcoma treatment, implicating circadian rhythm components RORα and BMAL1 in its mechanism of action. In addition, Gul et al. [246]. identified a molecule, M47, that destabilizes CRY1, leading to an increase in circadian period length and enhanced apoptosis in certain cancer cells. M47 selectively enhances CRY1 degradation by increasing its ubiquitination, predominantly in the nucleus. M47-mediated CRY1 reduction enhances oxaliplatin-induced apoptosis in Ras-transformed p53-null fibroblast cells. Repeated M47 administration extends the median lifespan of p53−/− mice by about 25%, indicating its potential as a treatment for cancers dependent on p53 mutation. Mechanistically, this significant lifespan extension suggests that M47 might influence aging-related processes, particularly in the context of an organism predisposed to cancer due to a p53 mutation. The extension of lifespan by M47 appears to be linked to its ability to enhance apoptosis in response to genotoxic stress, which could reduce the accumulation of damaged or potentially cancerous cells [243,246]. However, further studies still need to confirm whether M47 directly affects aging-related processes. Furthermore, Balounová et al. [247]. found that aging disrupts the rhythmicity of cell cycle genes in the colon, while tumorigenesis mainly affects circadian rhythms without altering their coupling with the cell cycle, highlighting different impacts of aging and cancer on circadian–cell cycle coordination.
Genomic instability can manifest as DNA damage, chromosomal instability, microsatellite instability, telomere dysfunction, replication errors, epigenetic changes, and impaired DNA repair and so on [8,168,248]. This instability may arise from various factors including errors in DNA replication, defects in DNA damage repair mechanisms, exposure to environmental carcinogens, and genetic predispositions, among others [249]. It is closely associated with the occurrence and progression of many diseases such as cancer, aging, and certain genetic disorders, among others. In order to prevent the replication of damaged DNA, organisms have evolved a sophisticated signaling network known as the DNA damage response (DDR) in eukaryotes [250]. Nevertheless, despite these mechanisms, not all DNA damage can be fully repaired, and their efficiency tends to diminish with age. The relentless buildup of genomic damage within cells consequently increases susceptibility to cancer and other age-related diseases [251]. In addition, there is a close interplay existing between the DDR and the circadian rhythm machinery. Numerous genes involved in DDR exhibit circadian rhythms in both mRNA expression and protein levels [252]. Circadian rhythm disruption can lead to dysregulation of DDR genes, which contributes to the hallmarks of cancer [253]. Mechanistically, some circadian rhythm components can directly interact with components of the DDR pathway. For example, upon DNA damage, PER1 interacts with ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) protein and checkpoint kinase (Chk) 2, influencing ATM activity [254]. Reduced PER1 levels hinder Chk2 phosphorylation, affecting the response to DNA damage. Additionally, CRY1 and CRY2 regulate ATR activity by facilitating interactions with TIMELESS (TIM) and Chk 1, respectively [255].
Currently, there is limited direct evidence regarding the crosstalk between aging and circadian rhythms on the DDR pathway in tumor cells. Basic helix–loop–helix family member e40 (BHLHE40), also known as differentially expressed in chondrocytes 1 (DEC1) or stimulated by retinoic acid gene 13 protein(Stra13), may serve as a key molecular hub connecting these 3 entities [256,257]. On the one hand, BHLHE40 acts as a transcription factor to directly regulate the expression of core circadian rhythm genes. Similar to NR1D1, BHLHE40 is transactivated by CLOCK via E-box elements in their promoters. However, BHLHE40 represses its own transcription by binding directly to BMAL1 and competing with CLOCK for E-box occupancy [258260]. On the other hand, BHLHE40 is widely utilized as an indicator of cellular senescence in vivo, and its capacity to induce cellular senescence has been documented in vitro as well [261,262]. BHLHE40 expression can be induced by p53 and DNA damage, and its overexpression promotes premature senescence, indicating its role as a mediator downstream of p53 in this process [263265]. However, the role of BHLHE40 in tumors remains controversial, and its mechanisms may vary in different types of cancer. Several studies suggest that the expression level of BHLHE40 is closely associated with the occurrence and progression of various tumors. For instance, in certain types of cancer like gastric cancer [266], breast cancer [267], and colorectal cancer [268], the expression level of BHLHE40 is significantly increased. Additionally, BHLHE40 has been found to be correlated with tumor proliferation, invasion, and metastasis [266,269]. However, some studies also suggested that BHLHE40 may act as a protective factor in certain tumors. In esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, overexpressed BHLHE40 was found to be correlated with better survival and in vitro experiments demonstrated that overexpression of BHLHE40 induced cellular senescence and suppressed cell growth and colony formation in the esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell line EC9706 [265]. Considering DNA damage repair, Ming et al. [270]. found that BHLHE40 could activate the promoter of the clusterin (CLU) gene, leading to increased secretory CLU expression, while BHLHE40 knockdown decreased secretory CLU expression upon DNA damage. Conversely, secretory CLU knockdown enhanced DNA damage-induced cell death in breast cancer cells, suggesting that BHLHE40 promoted cell survival by up-regulating secretory CLU to reduce the apoptotic response to DNA damage, providing insights into their roles in breast cancer progression.
Additionally, cell cycle and apoptosis regulator 2 (CCAR2) plays a pivotal role in connecting aging, circadian rhythms, and genomic instability in tumors. CCAR2 also known as deleted in breast cancer 1 (DBC1), has emerged as a pivotal regulator of transcriptional processes and multiple cellular processes [271,272]. It assumes diverse roles in both physiology and pathophysiology, serving as a regulator of DNA repair, cellular senescence, circadian rhythms, metabolism, tumorigenesis, and so on [271]. The protein CCAR2 undergoes direct phosphorylation by ATM, the primary kinase responsible for recognizing DNA damage. This phosphorylation event empowers CCAR2 to actively engage in orchestrating the cellular response to DNA damage, including processes such as DNA repair and apoptosis [273,274]. In addition, CCAR2 suppresses carboxy-terminal interacting protein-mediated double-strand break (DSB) end resection and homologous recombination repair, while simultaneously facilitating the p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1)–Rap1-interacting factor (RIF1)–Shieldin pathway to stimulate nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) repair [275]. Moreover, CCAR2 was also found to be involved in DNA damage-induced cellular senescence. Specifically, when 3T3-L1 preadipocytes are treated with H2O2, there is a rapid increase in CCAR2 binding to and inhibition of HDAC3. This inhibition ultimately leads to the induction of expression of 2 important upstream elements of the senescence program, p16INK4a and p21waf1 [276]. Importantly, there were studies suggesting that CCAR2 played a role in modulating circadian rhythms by interacting with and enhancing the stability and repressive function of the NR1D1. CCAR2-mediated repression of BMAL1, a transcriptional activator, is also facilitated through NR1D1. Additionally, CCAR2 interacts with proteins within the PER complex, involved in circadian gene regulation, and modulates the expression of CLOCK and BMAL1 transcription factors, thereby influencing circadian oscillations [277,278]. These results highlight the multifaceted role of CCAR2 in regulating circadian rhythm, potentially through interactions with various protein complexes involved in circadian gene expression.
Cellular senescence is marked by permanent growth arrest in response to factors like telomere dysfunction, oncogene activation, and persistent DNA damage [279,280]. This process typically involves a decline in cellular metabolism, proliferation, and repair capabilities, as well as the deterioration of internal cellular structures and functions. Cellular senescence is an important aspect of organic aging and is influenced by various factors including genetics, environment, lifestyle, and intracellular biochemical processes [281,282]. Senescent cells exhibit morphological and metabolic alterations, chromatin remodeling, changes in gene expression, and develop a pro-inflammatory phenotype known as the SASP [279]. The biological effects of cellular senescence are multifaceted, with senescent cells demonstrating both protective and deleterious roles, largely contingent on the physiological milieu. Although senescence may have evolved as a mechanism to prevent the malignant transformation of damaged cells, its occurrence can contribute to various age-related pathologies, such as cancer, tissue degeneration, and inflammatory diseases [283,284]. A recent research suggests that pharmacological activation of circadian rhythms suppressors can impact the survival capability of cancer cells by inhibiting pathways that are aberrantly activated in cancer and lead to specific death of OIS cells [285]. Sulli et al. [285]. found that SR9009 and SR9011, which were 2 different agonists of NR1D, could selectively induce cell death in cancer cells and OIS cells without harming normal cells. These agonists exhibit anticancer effects across various oncogenic drivers, independent of p53 and under hypoxic conditions, by regulating autophagy and de novo lipogenesis. Importantly, NR1D agonists inhibit glioblastoma growth in vivo and improve survival in mice without causing significant toxicity, suggesting their potential as effective and safe anticancer agents with a broad therapeutic window [285]. In addition, circadian rhythm components appear to play unique roles in tumor drug resistance and therapy-induced senescence (TIS). TIS refers to the phenomenon that cancer cells undergo senescence in response to treatments such as ionizing radiation or chemotherapy [286]. Jia et al. [287]. found that bladder cancer cells resistant to cisplatin did not exhibit apparent senescence upon treatment with paclitaxel (PTX), unlike the nonresistant cells. Instead, the resistant cells entered a quiescent state characterized by prolonged circadian rhythms. This quiescent state was associated with the accumulation of the circadian protein CRY1. Knockdown of CRY1 restored PTX-induced senescence and mechanistically CRY1 prevented senescence by promoting degradation of the tumor suppressor protein p53, potentially through increased binding of p53 to its ubiquitin E3 ligase MDM2 proto-oncogene. Furthermore, immune cell senescence has also been found to be closely associated with the tumorigenesis and progression of tumors. Zeng et al. [288]. investigated the mechanism underlying the impairment of NK cell immunosurveillance induced by chronic circadian disruption. Mice exposed to light–dark reverse every 4 days for 12 weeks to disrupt normal circadian rhythm exhibited suppressed mRNA and protein levels of PER1 and PER2, along with increased expression of CLOCK, indicating successful generation of a circadian rhythm disruption model. Chronic circadian disruption led to NK cell aging, characterized by reduced expression of Ly49 family receptors. Additionally, chronic shift-lag inhibited NK cell secretion of granular CD107a and interferon gamma, impaired clearance of MHC-I-deficient tumor cells by NK cells, and promoted lung metastasis of B16F10 melanomas. These effects were attributed to reduced NK cell killing function, possibly mediated by decreased expression of the Eomes transcription factor, which, in turn, suppresses CD122 transcription. Overall, these findings suggested that chronic circadian disruption attenuated NK cell cytolytic activity by promoting NK cell senescence and down-regulating CD122 expression.
Disrupted nutrient sensing is widely recognized as a hallmark of aging as evidenced by existing research [7]. Additionally, the reprogramming of energy metabolism has been integrated into the established hallmarks of cancer [8]. In fact, there is a close relationship between the circadian rhythms and cellular metabolism. The circadian rhythm system can regulate the activity of many metabolic pathways within cells, leading to different metabolic characteristics at different times of the day [289,290]. However, the crosstalk and molecular mechanisms among aging, circadian rhythms, and deregulated cellular metabolism in cancer remain largely unknown. Some important molecules and pathways may serve as key mediators linking them together.
AMPK and Sirtuins: Sirtuins (SIRTs) are a family of 7 NAD+-dependent proteins involved in cellular processes such as gene regulation, DNA repair, metabolism, and aging [289,291]. SIRT1, the most studied sirtuin, requires NAD+ as a cofactor for its enzymatic activity. Both AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and SIRT1 are key regulators in cellular responses to low-energy states [2]. AMPK is a master regulator of cellular energy homeostasis. It becomes activated in response to an increase in the AMP:ATP ratio, signifying low energy levels within the cell. Upon activation, AMPK triggers several pathways to restore energy balance, such as promoting glucose uptake and fatty acid oxidation while inhibiting energy-consuming processes like protein synthesis [2,292]. SIRT1, on the other hand, is also influenced by cellular energy status, particularly through its dependence on the NAD+/NADH ratio [293]. The interaction between AMPK and SIRT1 forms a positive feedback loop. AMPK activation can increase the levels of NAD+ through its downstream effects, leading to the activation of SIRT1. Conversely, activated SIRT1 can deacetylate and activate proteins that directly or indirectly regulate AMPK, thus amplifying the cellular response to low-energy states [2,294]. Overall, AMPK and SIRTs have been associated with promoting healthy aging and protecting against carcinogenesis. Activation or up-regulation of these proteins has been shown to inhibit pathways involved in cancer cell growth and stemness maintenance. For instance, activated AMPK can phosphorylate and inhibit key components of pathways crucial for cancer cell proliferation and survival [2,292]. Moreover, SIRT1 expression is regulated by CLOCK/BMAL. SIRT1 interacts directly with CLOCK, impacting its acetylation status. Additionally, the interaction between SIRT1 and PER2 affects circadian rhythms through PER2 deacetylation [295297]. SIRT3 influences enzymes involved in the tricarboxylic acid cycle, potentially connecting mitochondrial metabolism with circadian rhythms. Moreover, SIRT6 governs the recruitment of Sterol-regulatory element binding protein 1, a key player in fatty acid metabolism, by the CLOCK/BMAL complex to circadian promoters, thus intertwining circadian rhythms with lipid synthesis and metabolism [297299].
mTOR: The mTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin) kinase is part of the multiprotein complexes mTORC1 and mTORC2, which serves as an intracellular nutrient sensor, indicating a high cellular energy state. Its expression is up-regulated during senescence, and increased mTOR activity is recognized as a characteristic of aging [300,301]. Genetically modified mice with reduced mTORC1 activity exhibit extended lifespan, indicating the role of mTOR in longevity regulation [302]. Increased mTOR activity in aging hypothalamic neurons contributes to age-related obesity, a significant cancer risk factor, while mTOR activation in cancer cells promotes tumor growth and metabolic reprogramming, highlighting its diverse roles in health and disease [7,303]. Given the circadian rhythms, mTOR activity has been observed to exhibit rhythmicity, aligning with patterns of food intake, and this phenomenon can occur independently from the light-dependent circadian mechanism [304]. In addition, BMAL1 is identified as a substrate of the mTOR effector kinase S6K1. Phosphorylation of BMAL1 by S6K1 is crucial for its interaction with the translation machinery, facilitating rhythmic protein synthesis [305]. Furthermore, PER2 acts as a scaffold protein to inhibit the activity of the mTORC1 complex. Loss of PER2 results in heightened protein synthesis and increased cell proliferation [306].
Insulin and IGF-1 signaling axis: The insulin/IGF-1 signaling (IIS) pathway serves as a mechanism through which cells sense glucose levels, making it the most evolutionarily conserved pathway for regulating aging processes [2,307]. Insulin/IGF1 bind to their respective receptors, activating the IIS signaling pathway and triggering a kinase cascade that activates AKT. AKT then phosphorylates FOXO, inhibiting its transcriptional activity and promoting cell survival, growth, and proliferation [308,309]. Additionally, the IIS signaling pathway interacts with pathways such as mTOR and AMPK, forming a complex regulatory network governing lifespan and aging [308,310]. The IIS pathway plays a vital role in regulating cellular processes and impacts both longevity and cancer susceptibility. FOXO transcription factors, downstream effectors of the IIS pathway, are implicated in mediating the beneficial effects of caloric restriction on aging and exert tumor-suppressive functions [311,312]. Modulating IIS activity through interventions such as inhibition of IGF1R extends lifespan and improves healthspan in animal models, while also enhancing anticancer immunosurveillance [2,313,314]. Targeting the IIS axis represents a promising avenue for antiaging and antitumor strategies, offering potential therapeutic interventions to promote healthy aging and combat cancer progression. Given the circadian rhythms, oxidative stress disrupts the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway by inhibiting PTEN function, leading to increased activation of AKT. This disruption activates BMAL1 in an mTOR-dependent manner, highlighting a complex interplay between oxidative stress, PTEN, PI3K/AKT signaling, BMAL1, and mTOR in cellular responses to oxidative stress and potentially in the regulation of circadian rhythms [315]. Figure 4 summarizes the common hallmarks and underlying mechanisms among cancer, circadian rhythms, and aging.
Circadian rhythm genes hold an upstream position in the gene regulatory network. They influence the expression of thousands of genes, including those involved in cellular senescence [2]. This regulation is mediated through the core TTFL and associated transcription factor networks [2,24]. These genes exhibit a 24-h expression cycle across different tissues and organs and are subject to epigenetic regulation and modulation by ncRNAs. Through these mechanisms, circadian rhythm genes coordinate the physiological functions of the organism, ensuring its adaptation to the external environmental day–night changes [9,316]. In the tumor state, circadian rhythm genes significantly influence cancer development and progression through various mechanisms, including the regulation of the cell cycle, DNA repair, metabolic pathways, immune function, oxidative stress response, and the tumor microenvironment [237]. Disruption or abnormal expression of these genes can lead to uncontrolled cell proliferation, accumulation of DNA damage, metabolic imbalances, and weakened immune surveillance, thereby increasing cancer risk and promoting tumor growth [237]. Therefore, due to the involvement of numerous mechanisms, the regulation of tumor development by circadian rhythm genes is multifaceted, with cellular senescence being just one aspect of this complex process. This suggests that even if 2 genes have potentially opposite effects on cellular senescence, it does not necessarily mean that they will have opposite oncological roles (tumor-suppressing or tumor-promoting) in a specific type of tumor. Specifically, for example, BMAL1 plays an important role in cellular senescence. Research indicates that BMAL1 helps maintain genomic stability, suppresses the activation of transposable elements like LINE1, and combats cellular senescence. The absence of BMAL1 can lead to genomic instability and increased oxidative stress, accelerating cellular senescence [229]. Additionally, BMAL1 influences the aging process by modulating the mTOR signaling pathway. Increased mTORC1 activity has been linked to BMAL1 deficiency, highlighting an important role of BMAL1 in regulating cellular metabolism and senescence [317]. Therefore, from the perspective of cellular senescence, reduced expression of BMAL1 in breast cancer may weaken antisenescence defense mechanisms, making cancer cells more prone to accumulating DNA damage and promoting cancer progression. However, there was also a study indicating that BMAL1 could promote breast cancer cell invasion and metastasis by up-regulating MMP9 expression through the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway [38]. Similarly, the role of CRY2 in cellular senescence is a complex and multifaceted topic. Although there is currently no direct research specifically exploring the connection between CRY2 and cellular senescence, some indirect evidence provides insights into its potential role. For instance, CRY2 can regulate the G1/S phase transition of the myoblast cell cycle by stabilizing Cyclin D1 mRNA. This regulation is essential for maintaining normal cell proliferation and differentiation. Cells lacking CRY2 tend to exit the cell cycle prematurely, leading to reduced cell proliferation efficiency [318]. In addition, research has found that in CRY2-deficient cells, the introduction of oncogenes leads to increased expression of ATF4 [226]. ATF4 is a potent suppressor of proteins associated with cellular senescence, such as p16INK4a and p19ARF [319,320]. The up-regulation of ATF4 inhibits the expression of these proteins, thereby preventing cellular senescence. Moreover, research suggests that certain CRY2 mutations could inhibit P53, thereby enhancing cell proliferation [321]. P53 responds to various cellular stress signals, such as DNA damage, telomere shortening, and oxidative stress, by activating downstream target genes like p21, leading to cell cycle arrest and the induction of cellular senescence [322]. From the perspective of cellular senescence, CRY2 may promote cellular senescence by inhibiting the up-regulation of ATF4, which could prevent carcinogenesis. Conversely, it might also suppress cellular senescence through inhibition of p53, potentially contributing to cancer progression. These findings suggest that CRY2's role could be context-dependent, with its effects varying depending on the biological environment and disease stage. However, direct experimental evidence supporting these dual roles of CRY2 in cellular senescence and cancer progression is still limited. Further studies are needed to clarify the underlying mechanisms and to confirm these potential pathways in different cellular contexts. In summary, these findings illustrate the complex regulatory network of circadian rhythms in controlling cellular senescence and tumorigenesis. They highlight the intrinsic potential of future anticancer therapies based on restoring circadian function. However, the lack of direct studies specifically connecting CRY2 to cellular senescence represents an important gap in our current understanding and warrants further investigation.
Additionally, circadian rhythms may serve as an important intermediary process or factor in the tumorigenesis and progression of cancer and aging. On the one hand, circadian rhythms, through the regulation of inflammatory factors like SASP or key hormones within the endocrine system, such as melatonin, cortisol, IGF-1, and growth hormone, may play a crucial bridging role in the interconnected processes of aging and tumorigenesis [323325]. As individuals age, disruptions in circadian rhythms can lead to altered secretion patterns of hormones, such as decreased melatonin, dysregulated cortisol rhythms, and impaired IGF-1 signaling pathways [325327]. These hormonal changes not only accelerate cellular aging and functional decline in tissues but also potentially trigger chronic inflammatory responses and weaken the immune system, thereby creating a favorable environment for tumor development and progression. For example, the reduction of melatonin in aging is associated with decreased immune function and increased oxidative stress, while its diminished antitumor effects may facilitate the growth and metastasis of cancer cells [328,329]. Similarly, abnormal elevations in cortisol may exacerbate neurodegenerative processes and immune system aging through chronic stress mechanisms, simultaneously promoting cancer cell proliferation and spread [324,330]. Therefore, the intricate relationship between circadian rhythms and the endocrine system forms a network of interactions influencing both aging and cancer development. Future research aimed at elucidating these mechanisms could facilitate the development of circadian rhythm-based interventions that not only delay the aging process but also reduce cancer incidence, offering new strategies for the health management of the elderly population.
Although many epidemiological studies have demonstrated correlations among circadian rhythms, aging and cancer, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain largely unclear. The majority of existing research has focused on cellular senescence, cellular metabolism and genomic instability. However, it has been reported that there are 14 hallmarks of cancer and 12 hallmarks of aging [7,8]. Numerous other important hallmarks have yet to receive attention. For example, tumor-promoting inflammation is an important hallmark of cancer. Chronic inflammation within the tumor microenvironment can fuel cancer progression by promoting cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and tissue remodeling. Inflammatory cells and cytokines play key roles in this process [331]. Clinically, targeting the inflammatory components within the tumor microenvironment has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach. The use of anti-inflammatory agents, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or selective COX-2 inhibitors, has shown potential in reducing tumor-associated inflammation and preventing tumorigenesis [332,333]. Furthermore, cytokine inhibitors, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) or tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) blockers, are being explored for their ability to disrupt the pro-tumorigenic signaling pathways driven by chronic inflammation. This strategy aims not only to slow down tumor growth but also to improve the efficacy of standard therapies like chemotherapy and immunotherapy by modulating the tumor microenvironment [334336]. Additionally, inflammation-related biomarkers, including C-reactive protein and serum cytokine levels, are under investigation for their potential to predict treatment responses and guide personalized treatment plans [337,338]. These approaches underscore the importance of inflammation as a therapeutic target in cancer treatment, with the goal of improving overall patient outcomes. With aging, the immune system undergoes changes, including a phenomenon called immunosenescence, where the immune response becomes less efficient and may result in chronic activation of inflammatory pathways. Moreover, the persistent presence of senescent cells contributes to chronic inflammation, exacerbating inflammaging by releasing an excess of pro-inflammatory cytokines typical of the SASP [339]. Notably, research related to circadian rhythms suggests that the immune system also exhibits noticeable rhythmicity. The activity of the immune system varies at different times of the day, which may affect the occurrence and severity of inflammation. For instance, studies indicate that inflammatory responses may vary throughout the day, with certain periods being more conducive to inflammation while others may be more attenuated. Additionally, the polymorphic microbiome has garnered more and more attention in recent years. The polymorphic microbiome refers to a microbial community that exhibits a high degree of diversity and variability in its composition and function [2,8,340]. This polymorphism can occur due to genetic variation among microbial species, differences in environmental factors, and host-specific factors such as diet, immune response, and overall health [341,342]. Some studies suggest that as individuals age, there are changes in the microbiome [343]. These changes may be associated with declining immune function, alterations in metabolism, and increased incidence of chronic diseases [344,345]. Compared to healthy young individuals, older adults exhibit greater microbial diversity and differences in microbial composition, possibly linked to the declining function of the immune and digestive systems during aging [346,347]. Circadian rhythms, like the sleep–wake cycle and meal patterns, profoundly influence the composition and function of the gut microbiota, while the gut microbiota reciprocally impacts circadian rhythms. Irregular eating habits or disrupted sleep patterns can alter gut microbial balance, potentially leading to health issues. Conversely, gut microbes produce metabolites and neurotransmitters that influence host circadian rhythms, emphasizing the bidirectional relationship [348,349]. Furthermore, the relationship between tumors and the microbiome is intricate. Changes in the microbiota have been associated with tumor initiation and progression. Microbes can influence tumorigenesis by modulating host immune responses, activating oncogenes, or producing carcinogenic substances. Additionally, the microbiome plays a crucial role in tumor therapy response, with specific microbial components influencing the efficacy of immunotherapy, suggesting the potential for microbiome-based interventions to enhance treatment outcomes [350,351]. For example, prostate cancer is typically considered a “cold” tumor, meaning that immune checkpoint inhibitors are generally less effective against it. A study showed that using patient-derived prostate-specific microbiome CP1 in combination with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy increased survival rates and reduced tumor burden [352,353]. In summary, the microbiome exerts complex effects on aging, circadian rhythms, and tumors, involving the regulation and development of various physiological and pathological processes. Future research will further elucidate the mechanisms by which the microbiome influences these processes, providing new insights and approaches for the prevention and treatment of related diseases.
In addition to the need to further explore the mechanism, translating existing research findings into clinical practice is also an area that requires considerable effort.
Chronotherapy, the strategic timing of medication administration in accordance with the body's circadian rhythms, holds promise for optimizing cancer treatment efficacy while minimizing side effects [20,354,355]. Cancer cells and normal cells exhibit significant differences in their circadian rhythms. Normal cells typically follow a more stable circadian rhythm, while cancer cells often display disrupted or aberrant rhythmic patterns. This discrepancy forms the basis of chronotherapy, as it allows for treatments to be scheduled at times when cancer cells are most vulnerable and normal cells are best able to repair and recover [20,316,356,357]. Specifically, the molecular mechanisms underlying chronotherapy are intricately linked to the circadian regulation of various cellular processes, including cell cycle progression, DNA repair, apoptosis, and metabolism. The circadian rhythms control the timing of the cell cycle, which is crucial for tumor growth and the effectiveness of chemotherapy. The expression of CDKs and their inhibitors is regulated by core clock genes, such as BMAL1, CLOCK, PERs, and CRYs. This regulation creates a temporal window during which tumor cells are more susceptible to DNA-damaging agents. For example, studies have shown that the administration of the chemotherapeutic agent oxaliplatin in sync with the peak expression of DNA repair genes can minimize damage to healthy tissues while maximizing toxicity to cancer cells [358,359]. This is due to the fact that DNA repair mechanisms are less active in tumor cells at specific times of the day, making them more vulnerable to treatment. In addition, the timing of treatment can also influence the apoptotic pathways and DNA repair mechanisms within cancer cells. The circadian rhythms regulate the expression of key proteins in these pathways, such as p53, BAX, BCL-2, and ATM, which are involved in the response to DNA damage induced by chemotherapy and radiotherapy. For instance, during radiation-induced DNA DSBs, PER1 binds to ATM to halt cell cycle progression and triggers p53-mediated apoptosis if the damage persists [360]. Ectopic expression of PER1 impairs malignant growth, and reduced levels of endogenous PER1 are found in human breast cancer [92]. Additionally, PER2 acts as a tumor suppressor and is essential in DDR. In murine models, it is required for radiation-induced up-regulation of clock gene proteins, enhancing tumor suppression and survival [361]. In human cells, both PER1 and PER2 facilitate apoptotic pathways driven by the tumor suppressor protein p53 [19,360,362]. This suggests that radiation efficacy could potentially be enhanced during periods of high PER levels, which could be predicted based on a patient's circadian phase or induced by manipulating environmental factors such as food intake. Moreover, the circadian rhythms also regulate the expression of enzymes involved in drug metabolism, such as cytochrome P450 enzymes, which are crucial for the activation and detoxification of chemotherapeutic agents. Disruptions in circadian rhythms can alter the pharmacokinetics of these drugs, leading to variations in their efficacy and toxicity. By carefully timing chemotherapy to coincide with these rhythms, chronotherapy can maximize the anticancer effects and reduce harm to healthy cells. Research has shown that this approach can significantly improve treatment responses and decrease side effects such as nausea, vomiting, hair loss, and bone marrow suppression [20,363,364].
Notably, in recent years, other related research of chronotherapy including chrono-radiotherapy, chrono-immunotherapy, and chrono-targeted therapy are also being gradually carried out [365369]. A recent study published in Cell in 2024 indicated that the quality and quantity of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, particularly CD8+ T cells, were circadian rhythm dependent. Researchers found that the number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes significantly varies at different times of the day, peaking at night. Based on this phenomenon, they further discovered that both chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cell therapy and anti-PD-1 therapy exhibit time dependency. Treatments administered at night are more effective than those given in the morning, highlighting the critical impact of treatment timing on the efficacy of immunotherapy [370]. Their results highlighted the functional significance of circadian dynamics in the tumor microenvironment and proposes that leveraging these rhythms can optimize immunotherapy effectiveness, paving the way for more personalized and effective cancer treatments. Similarly, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) also exhibit circadian rhythm dependency. Clock-regulated pro-inflammatory key cytokines modulate PD-L1-positive MDSCs, causing their numbers to fluctuate rhythmically in colorectal cancer. This rhythmic variation affects the efficacy of immunotherapy. By understanding these rhythmic changes and administering PD-L1 inhibitors when MDSCs are most abundant, optimal anticancer efficacy can be achieved [371]. Interestingly, sleep disorders disrupt circadian rhythms, leading to metabolic abnormalities that play a crucial role in promoting malignant tumor progression. Peng et al. [372] found that circadian rhythm disruption can affect the clock gene CLOCK, leading to its overactivation of long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase 1 (ACSL1), which catalyzes the synthesis of more palmitoyl-CoA (PA-CoA). PA-CoA, in turn, mediates the palmitoylation of the CLOCK gene, creating a positive feedback loop. This process prevents the degradation of CLOCK protein via the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway, thereby sustaining the enhanced stemness of cancer cells induced by circadian rhythm disruption, and continuously driving cancer development. Moreover, they found that the endogenous circadian rhythm-related hormone β-endorphin can mediate the down-regulation of CLOCK and ACSL1 expression. This effectively reverses the pro-cancer effects and enhanced stemness of cancer cells caused by sleep deprivation. Based on the sleep status of cancer patients, rhythmic supplementation of β-endorphin (similar to chronochemotherapy) may be an effective anticancer strategy. In summary, ongoing research efforts aim to further elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying circadian-based interventions and expand the application of chronotherapy to other age-related conditions, promoting the integration of circadian principles into clinical practice for improved patient outcomes [370,373]. Table 1 summarizes clinical studies on chronotherapy in oncology [365368,374382]. In the future, further elucidating the potential relationship between the expression patterns of circadian rhythm molecules and the outcomes of chronotherapy holds significant importance in cancer treatment. Understanding this connection could enhance the effectiveness of therapeutic strategies by optimizing treatment timing based on the biological rhythms of both the patient and the tumor. On the one hand, future research could focus on integrating multi-omics sequencing technologies, including single-cell sequencing, and in vivo imaging techniques with clinical treatment efficacy assessments to better investigate the intrinsic biological mechanisms underlying chronotherapy and circadian factors [383]. These advanced methodologies will enable a deeper understanding of these complex biological processes and offer new insights for the development of personalized therapeutic strategies. On the other hand, individual circadian rhythms vary from person to person, influenced by factors such as genetics, lifestyle, and environmental conditions. The degree and nature of circadian disruption in tumor cells can also differ among patients, depending on their specific circumstances. By investigating the expression patterns of circadian molecules, these disruptions can be identified and used as biomarkers for circadian rhythm disturbances within tumors. Therefore, personalized chronotherapy can be designed based on individual specific circadian rhythm profile. By monitoring the expression patterns of circadian rhythm molecules in a patient, it is possible to identify the optimal timing for drug administration or other therapeutic interventions. This approach aims to enhance the efficacy of treatments while minimizing potential side effects.
Moreover, in recent years, as our understanding of how aging affects tumorigenesis and tumor progression has deepened, leveraging and intervening in aging has emerged as a novel field in cancer therapy. Immunosenescence refers to the gradual deterioration of the immune system associated with aging. This process leads to increased susceptibility to infections, cancer, and autoimmune diseases in the elderly, as well as reduced efficacy of vaccines [384,385]. Two recent studies have highlighted the impact of age-related T cell dysregulation on tumor control and immunotherapy outcomes [386,387]. Chen et al. [386] found that in aged mice, tumors grow faster, tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells are fewer, and the number of ovalbumin-specific CD8+ T cells within tumors and tumor-draining lymph nodes is reduced. These data indicate that aging impairs tumor control and extensively alters the fate and function of CD8+ T cells. The results of Dahlquist et al. [387]. suggested that PD1 enhances the response of aged mice to normal microbial experience by increasing the cytotoxic capacity of CD8+ T cells, thereby improving immunosenescence and extending lifespan. Their results indicate that targeting and reversing immunosenescence may be an effective therapeutic strategy. In addition, in antiaging and anticancer therapies, senolytic drugs and senomorphic drugs are 2 key research directions. The primary function of senolytic drugs is to selectively clear senescent cells. These drugs achieve this by inducing apoptosis in senescent cells [388,389]. The main function of senomorphic drugs is to reduce the harmful effects of senescent cells by altering or modulating their phenotype, rather than necessarily eliminating these cells [390,391]. Table 2 summarizes the drugs targeting senescence in cancer therapy [392431]. In the future, combining antiaging drugs with chronotherapy to optimize cancer treatment may be a promising direction. On the one hand, conducting pharmacokinetic studies to determine the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion characteristics of senolytic and senomorphic drugs at different times of the day is important. Key parameters such as half-life, peak plasma concentrations, and clearance rates can vary over the course of a day due to circadian fluctuations in physiological processes. Understanding these variations is essential for optimizing dosing schedules and maximizing drug efficacy. In addition, the field of drug delivery through nanocarriers is gaining momentum as it enhances cancer treatment effectiveness while minimizing side effects [432434]. Combining chronotherapy with nanotechnology shows important promise for safer and more efficient cancer therapies [316,435,436]. Nanocarriers, such as nanoparticles, enable precise drug delivery that aligns with the body's circadian rhythms, optimizing therapeutic effects by releasing drugs at specific times based on stimuli like pH and temperature [437439]. On the other hand, biomarker monitoring involves tracking specific molecules or indicators in the body that are associated with aging and drug response. By monitoring these biomarkers, clinicians can determine the optimal times for drug administration. For instance, circadian rhythms of senescence markers such as p16 and p21, as well as inflammatory markers like IL-6 and TNF-α, can be tracked to assess their fluctuations throughout the day. These biomarkers provide valuable insights into the biological processes underlying aging and drug response, allowing clinicians to tailor treatment schedules to maximize efficacy and minimize adverse effects.
Recently, researches on the phenomenon of escape from senescence have gained increasing attention. Escape from senescence refers to the phenomenon where certain cells bypass the state of permanent cell cycle arrest through mechanisms such as genetic mutations, epigenetic alterations, telomerase reactivation, or the influence of the SASP [440444]. This process has complex implications in biology and pathology; it facilitates cancer initiation and progression, as escaped cells often exhibit genomic instability and unchecked proliferation; for instance, a study demonstrated that chemotherapy-induced senescence in malignant cells can enhance stemness, characterized by the up-regulation of stem cell signatures, activation of Wnt signaling, and acquisition of self-renewing properties. Critically, cells that escape from senescence exhibit increased clonogenic potential and tumor-initiating capacity, both in vitro and in vivo. These findings, corroborated by evidence from human cancer cell lines and primary samples, underscore the plasticity of cancer cells and reveal that senescence-associated stemness may contribute to tumor relapse and progression [441]. Another study [443] revealed that prolonged p21WAF1/Cip1 induction in p53-null models enables a subset of cells to escape senescence, leading to heightened genomic instability, aggressiveness, and chemoresistance. Mechanistically, p21WAF1/Cip1 disrupts replication licensing by saturating ubiquitin ligase complexes, triggering replication stress. Similarly, Zhang et al. [445] found that doxorubicin-induced senescent breast cancer cells promoted epithelial mesenchymal transition, migration, and invasion in adjacent nonsenescent cells through SASP in direct coculture. SASP also facilitated senescent cells to escape senescence, re-enter the cell cycle, and regain tumor characteristics. Mechanistically, Notch signaling was activated in both senescent and nonsenescent cells, driving epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and senescence escape. Inhibiting Notch signaling with N-[(3,5-difluorophenyl)acetyl]-l-alanyl-2-phenyl]glycine-1,1-dimethylethyl ester (DAPT) blocked EMT and reduced lung metastasis. In summary, understanding the molecular mechanisms behind this phenomenon is crucial for developing targeted cancer therapies and exploring interventions in age-related diseases.
Importantly, exosomes are small extracellular vesicles (sEVs), typically ranging from 30 to 150 nm in diameter, that are secreted by cells [446]. They are formed through the inward budding of the cell membrane and are released into the extracellular environment via a process known as exocytosis [447,448]. Exosomes contain various bioactive molecules, including proteins, lipids, and RNA (such as miRNA and mRNA), which allow them to facilitate intercellular communication and regulate various physiological and pathological processes. They have been implicated in the development and progression of various diseases, including cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, and cardiovascular diseases. Due to their ability to carry tumor markers and other biomarkers, exosomes hold important potential for disease diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy [449,450]. Notably, during the aging process, cells exhibit a significant increase in exosome secretion, particularly in OIS [451,452]. This may be related to the role of senescent cells in influencing the surrounding microenvironment through exosomes, transmitting aging signals, or enhancing exosomes secretion as a mechanism to maintain cellular homeostasis. Furthermore, senescent cells can play an important role in the tumor microenvironment by secreting exosomes containing the SASP. A recent study [451] showed that exosome-like sEVs are critical mediators of the pro-tumorigenic functions of senescent cells. Specifically, EphA2 protein, which is sorted into sEVs secreted by senescent cells, can bind to ephrin-A1, a ligand highly expressed in various cancer cells, thereby promoting cancer cell proliferation through EphA2/ephrin-A1 reverse signaling. Further research reveals that the enhanced phosphorylation of EphA2, due to oxidative inactivation of the PTP1B phosphatase in senescent cells, leads to its increased sorting into sEVs. This finding uncovers a novel mechanism where reactive oxygen species regulate cargo sorting into sEVs, which plays a crucial role in the potentially deleterious growth-promoting effects of the senescent cell secretome. This mechanism offers new insights into how the secretome of senescent cells influences cancer progression. Future research could focus on developing therapies that target exosomes released by senescent cells to block the spread of SASP factors. This approach may help inhibit tumor progression and reduce the risk of malignancies associated with aging. Drugs that can specifically inhibit exosome production, release, or uptake, or modify the exosomal cargo through genetic engineering, could become a crucial component of next-generation cancer therapies. In addition, since exosomes can be detected in bodily fluids (such as blood and urine) and their cargo reflects changes in the tumor microenvironment, characterizing SASP factors within exosomes could lead to new biomarkers for early cancer detection. This noninvasive diagnostic method could be more convenient and safer than traditional tissue biopsies.
However, current research also has limitations. Due to the diverse microenvironmental stimuli and physiological functions of different cell types, senescent cells exhibit spatiotemporal heterogeneity. This may be due to the diversity in factors such as age, gender, pathological states, tissue location, microenvironment, and accumulation dynamics. Therefore, it is especially important to gain a deeper understanding of the heterogeneity of senescent cells and to develop targeted therapeutic models and interventions. Although factors like p16 and p21, which regulate the cell cycle, are widely regarded as conserved markers of senescent cells, recent studies have found that these markers are not applicable to all human cells or tissues [234,453,454]. For example, research has found that some cells with high p16 expression, such as pancreatic β-cells, macrophages, and mesenchymal stem cells, do not exhibit senescent characteristics [455457]. Moreover, not all senescent cells show high levels of p16 [234]. Currently, with technological advancements, studying the heterogeneity of senescence through single-cell sequencing has become very common [234,458,459]. Additionally, single-nucleus RNA sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, multiplexed antibody imaging, multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization, flow cytometry imaging, and single-cell mass spectrometry are also being gradually applied to the study of senescence heterogeneity, demonstrating marked potential. In summary, a key issue that urgently needs addressing is the development of reliable, sensitive, and specific identification methods to accurately determine the location of senescent cells in tissues and quantify their abundance both in vitro and in vivo. In this respect, organic nanoprobes have demonstrated important potential in detecting senescent cells, leveraging their exceptional optical and chemical properties to accurately identify and label these cells [460,461]. This capability is critical for studying the mechanisms of cellular senescence and related diseases. A recent study [462] describes a biocompatible, injectable organic nanoprobe called NanoJagg. NanoJaggs are high-purity indocyanine green dimer nanostructures that can specifically detect senescent cells through fluorescence and photoacoustic imaging. Their simple synthesis and strong photoacoustic tomography signal make them promising for clinical applications. Monitoring in vivo senescence burden using NanoJaggs can provide crucial insights into tissue dysfunction and improve disease diagnosis and risk stratification, including for cancer. In addition, Magkouta et al. [463] developed and validated a novel fluorescent dye, GLF16, and its micelle vector for precise labeling and analysis of senescent cells in vivo and in vitro. GLF16, a fluorescent Sudan Black-B analog, efficiently detects senescent cells using fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry, while the micelle vector enhances the uptake of GLF16 by senescent cells in living organisms and cultures. This method significantly improves the isolation and real-time tracking of senescent cells, providing an innovative tool for in-depth exploration of aging-related mechanisms. Moreover, natural aging animal models are expensive and have long experimental cycles, while transgenic models do not fully mimic true aging processes. Therefore, studying cellular senescence in animal models has limitations, highlighting the need for new models and senescent cell culture systems that better represent human aging for deeper exploration.
In addition, it is important to identify novel circadian-related biomarkers for early detection, prognosis, and monitoring of aging-related diseases and cancer. By leveraging advanced technologies such as genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, researchers could discover novel biomarkers associated with circadian rhythms, aging, and tumorigenesis [464]. These biomarkers hold the potential to revolutionize clinical practice by enabling more accurate disease diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment response prediction. For instance, the expression profiles of circadian clock-related genes have been shown to have prognostic implications in non-small cell lung cancer, where a 10-gene signature could independently predict overall survival [465]. Similarly, circadian clock gene signatures have been used to identify high-risk early-stage lung adenocarcinoma patients, demonstrating their potential as prognostic biomarkers [466]. Moreover, the circadian rhythm pathway has been associated with prostate cancer progression, where genetic variants in circadian genes such as NPAS2 have been linked to disease progression [467]. This suggests that circadian genes could serve as biomarkers for monitoring cancer progression and potentially guiding treatment decisions.
Importantly, lifestyle interventions involve the adoption of behaviors and habits that align with circadian rhythms to promote health aging and prevent cancer. These interventions encompass practices such as maintaining regular sleep–wake cycles, incorporating physical activity into daily routines, and following balanced nutrition plans. By emphasizing the importance of circadian-friendly lifestyle choices, educational programs and public health initiatives seek to raise awareness and empower individuals to make informed decisions about their health. Through the implementation of lifestyle interventions, we aim to optimize circadian alignment, mitigate the adverse effects of circadian disruption, and promote overall well-being, ultimately reducing the risk of aging-related diseases and cancer and improving long-term health outcomes.
In this review, we initially outlined the physiological underpinnings of circadian rhythms and gave a general review of how these rhythms affect the genesis and spread of tumors. Next, we discussed the possible processes and relationships between aging and circadian rhythms. We then concentrated on the hallmarks that are shared by cancer and aging, such as cellular senescence, chronic inflammation, epigenetic changes, and genomic instability. Then, we conducted a thorough analysis of the common hallmarks and interactions between cancer, aging, and circadian rhythms. These interactions included carcinogenesis, apoptosis and tumor growth, genomic instability, cellular senescence, and cellular metabolism. Finally, we offered insights into translating current research findings into clinical practice, focusing on chronotherapy and antiaging treatments by integrating immunotherapy, senescent cell detection, and cutting-edge nanocarrier delivery systems.
The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
  • Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program(23QYCX0136)
1.
White MC, Holman DM, Boehm JE, Peipins LA, Grossman M, Jane HS. Age and cancer risk. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(3 Suppl 1):S7–S15.
2.
López-Otín C, Pietrocola F, Roiz-Valle D, Galluzzi L, Kroemer G. Meta-hallmarks of aging and cancer. Cell Metab. 2023;35(1):12–35.
3.
Yang Y, Gao Z, Gu J. Comments on National Health Commission guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer 2023 in China (English version). Chin J Cancer Res. 2023;35(5):431–432.
4.
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.
5.
Jahn JL, Giovannucci EL, Stampfer MJ. The high prevalence of undiagnosed prostate cancer at autopsy: Implications for epidemiology and treatment of prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen-era. Int J Cancer. 2015;137(12):2795–2802.
6.
Chen Y, Zhou Z, Zhou Y, Mai Z, Jin S, Liang Z, Shang Z, Zuo Y, Xiao Y, Wang W, et al. Updated prevalence of latent prostate cancer in Chinese population and comparison of biopsy results: An autopsy-based study. Innovations. 2024;5(1):100558.
7.
López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. Hallmarks of aging: An expanding universe. Cell. 2023;186(2):243–278.
8.
Hanahan D. Hallmarks of cancer: New dimensions. Cancer Discov. 2022;12(1):31–46.
9.
Allada R, Bass J. Circadian mechanisms in medicine. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(6):550–561.
10.
Masri S, Sassone-Corsi P. The emerging link between cancer, metabolism, and circadian rhythms. Nat Med. 2018;24(12):1795–1803.
11.
Zhu W-Z, He Q-Y, Feng D-C, Wei Q, Yang L. Circadian rhythm in prostate cancer: Time to take notice of the clock. Asian J Androl. 2023;25(2):184–191.
12.
Savvidis C, Koutsilieris M. Circadian rhythm disruption in cancer biology. Mol Med. 2012;18(1):1249–1260.
13.
Cai Y, Zhaoxiong Y, Zhu W, Wang H. Association between sleep duration, depression and breast cancer in the United States: A national health and nutrition examination survey analysis 2009–2018. Ann Med. 2024;56(1):2314235.
14.
Salamanca-Fernández E, Rodríguez-Barranco M, Guevara M, Ardanaz E, Olry de Labry Lima A, Sánchez MJ. Night-shift work and breast and prostate cancer risk: Updating the evidence from epidemiological studies. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2018;41(2):211–226.
15.
Cordina-Duverger E, Cénée S, Trétarre B, Rebillard X, Lamy P-J, Wendeu-Foyet G, Menegaux F. Sleep patterns and risk of prostate cancer: A population-based case control study in France (EPICAP). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022;31(11):2070–2078.
16.
Chiang P-L, Hao W-R, Hong H-J, Chen C-C, Chiu C-C, Fang Y-A, Yang TL, Lai YH, Chen MY, Hsu MH, et al. The effects of different types of sleep disorder on colorectal cancer: A nationwide population-based cohort study. Cancers. 2023;15(19):4728.
17.
Papantoniou K, Devore EE, Massa J, Strohmaier S, Vetter C, Yang L, Shi Y, Giovannucci E, Speizer F, Schernhammer ES. Rotating night shift work and colorectal cancer risk in the nurses' health studies. Int J Cancer. 2018;143(11):2709–2717.
18.
Wang S, Khan S, Nabi G, Li H-Y. Circadian rhythm as a key player in cancer progression as well as a therapeutic target in HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer treatment. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1240676.
19.
Straif K, Baan R, Grosse Y, Secretan B, Ghissassi FE, Bouvard V, Altieri A, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Cogliano V, WHO International Agency For Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group. Carcinogenicity of shift-work, painting, and fire-fighting. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(12):1065–1066.
20.
Sancar A, Van Gelder RN. Clocks, cancer, and chronochemotherapy. Science. 2021;371(6524):eabb0738.
21.
Ortega-Campos SM, Verdugo-Sivianes EM, Amiama-Roig A, Blanco JR, Carnero A. Interactions of circadian clock genes with the hallmarks of cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2023;1878(3):188900.
22.
Kettner NM, Katchy CA, Fu L. Circadian gene variants in cancer. Ann Med. 2014;46(4):208–220.
23.
Verma AK, Khan MI, Ashfaq F, Rizvi SI. Crosstalk between aging, circadian rhythm, and melatonin. Rejuvenation Res. 2023;26(6):229–241.
24.
Welz P-S, Benitah SA. Molecular connections between circadian clocks and aging. J Mol Biol. 2020;432(12):3661–3679.
25.
Cheung EC, Vousden KH. The role of ROS in tumour development and progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2022;22(5):280–297.
26.
Li, D., Yu, Q., Wu, R., Tuo, Z., Wang, J., Ye, L., Shao, F., Chaipanichkul, P., Yoo, K. H., Wei, W., Okoli, U. A., Deng, S., Ke, M., Cho, W. C., Heavey, S., & Feng, D. (2024). Interactions between oxidative stress and senescence in cancer: Mechanisms, therapeutic implications, and future perspectives. Redox Biology, 73, 103208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2024.103208
27.
Malhan D, Schoenrock B, Yalçin M, Blottner D, Relόgio A. Circadian regulation in aging: Implications for spaceflight and life on earth. Aging Cell. 2023;22(9):e13935.
28.
Li D, Yu Q, Wu R, Tuo Z, Wang J, Ye L, Shao F, Chaipanichkul P, Yoo KH, Wei W, et al. Interactions between oxidative stress and senescence in cancer: Mechanisms, therapeutic implications, and future perspectives. Redox Biol. 2024;73: Article 103208.
29.
Janjić K, Agis H. Chronodentistry: The role & potential of molecular clocks in oral medicine. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):32.
30.
Patke A, Young MW, Axelrod S. Molecular mechanisms and physiological importance of circadian rhythms. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(2):67–84.
31.
Lowrey PL, Takahashi JS. Genetics of circadian rhythms in mammalian model organisms. Adv Genet. 2011;74:175–230.
32.
Tsuchiya Y, Umemura Y, Yagita K. Circadian clock and cancer: From a viewpoint of cellular differentiation. Int J Urol. 2020;27(6):518–524.
33.
Guillaumond F, Dardente H, Giguère V, Cermakian N. Differential control of Bmal1 circadian transcription by REV-ERB and ROR nuclear receptors. J Biol Rhythm. 2005;20(5):391–403.
34.
Adlanmerini M, Lazar MA. The REV-ERB nuclear receptors: Timekeepers for the core clock period and metabolism. Endocrinology. 2023;164(6):bqad069.
35.
Ripperger JA. Mapping of binding regions for the circadian regulators BMAL1 and CLOCK within the mouse Rev-erbalpha gene. Chronobiol Int. 2006;23(1-2):135–142.
36.
Liu AC, Tran HG, Zhang EE, Priest AA, Welsh DK, Kay SA. Redundant function of REV-ERBalpha and beta and non-essential role for Bmal1 cycling in transcriptional regulation of intracellular circadian rhythms. PLOS Genet. 2008;4(2): Article e1000023.
37.
Preitner N, Damiola F, Lopez-Molina L, Zakany J, Duboule D, Albrecht U, Schibler U. The orphan nuclear receptor REV-ERBalpha controls circadian transcription within the positive limb of the mammalian circadian oscillator. Cell. 2002;110(2):251–260.
38.
Wang J, Li S, Li X, Li B, Li Y, Xia K, Yang Y, Aman S, Wang M, Wu H. Circadian protein BMAL1 promotes breast cancer cell invasion and metastasis by up-regulating matrix metalloproteinase9 expression. Cancer Cell Int. 2019;19:182.
39.
Sakamoto W, Takenoshita S. Overexpression of both clock and BMAL1 inhibits entry to s phase in human colon cancer cells. Fukushima J Med Sci. 2015;61(2):111–124.
40.
Yang Y, Yang T, Zhao Z, Zhang H, Yuan P, Wang G, Zhao Z, An J, Lyu Z, Xing J, et al. Down-regulation of BMAL1 by MiR-494-3p promotes hepatocellular carcinoma growth and metastasis by increasing GPAM-mediated lipid biosynthesis. Int J Biol Sci. 2022;18(16):6129–6144.
41.
Zhang X, Pant SM, Ritch CC, Tang HY, Shao H, Dweep H, Gong YY, Brooks R, Brafford P, Wolpaw AJ, et al. Cell state dependent effects of Bmal1 on melanoma immunity and tumorigenicity. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):633.
42.
Sun Y, Jin L, Sui YX, Han LL, Liu JH. Circadian gene CLOCK affects drug-resistant gene expression and cell proliferation in ovarian cancer SKOV3/DDP cell lines through autophagy. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2017;32(4):139–146.
43.
Yu H, Meng X, Wu J, Pan C, Ying X, Zhou Y, Liu R, Huang W. Cryptochrome 1 overexpression correlates with tumor progression and poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(4): Article e61679.
44.
Jarabo P, de Pablo C, González-Blanco A, Casas-Tintó S. Circadian gene cry controls tumorigenesis through modulation of Myc accumulation in glioblastoma cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(4):2043.
45.
Han GH, Kim J, Yun H, Cho H, Chung JY, Kim JH, Mewitt SM. CRY1 regulates chemoresistance in association with NANOG by inhibiting apoptosis via STAT3 pathway in patients with cervical cancer. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2021;18(6):699–713.
46.
Huang Q, Lv J, Dong T, Liu H, Xu L, Wu M. Cryptochrome 1 alleviates the antiproliferative effect of isoproterenol on human gastric cancer cells. Dose Response. 2020;18(3):1559325820939022.
47.
Relles D, Sendecki J, Chipitsyna G, Hyslop T, Yeo CJ, Arafat HA. Circadian gene expression and clinicopathologic correlates in pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(3):443–450.
48.
Zhou L, Yu Y, Sun S, Zhang T, Wang M. Cry 1 regulates the clock gene network and promotes proliferation and migration via the Akt/P53/P21 pathway in human osteosarcoma cells. J Cancer. 2018;9(14):2480–2491.
49.
Yang MY, Lin PM, Hsiao HH, Hsu JF, Lin HY, Hsu CM, Chen IY, Su SW, Liu YC, Lin SF. Up-regulation of PER3 expression is correlated with better clinical outcome in acute leukemia. Anticancer Res. 2015;35(12):6615–6622.
50.
Hoffman AE, Zheng T, Yi CH, Stevens RG, Ba Y, Zhang Y, Leaderer D, Holford T, Hansen J, Zhu Y. The core circadian gene cryptochrome 2 influences breast cancer risk, possibly by mediating hormone signaling. Cancer Prev Res. 2010;3(4):539–548.
51.
Lou X, Wang H, Tu Y, Tan W, Jiang C, Sun J, Bao Z. Alterations of sleep quality and circadian rhythm genes expression in elderly thyroid nodule patients and risks associated with thyroid malignancy. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):13682.
52.
Santoni M, Molina-Cerrillo J, Santoni G, Lam ET, Massari F, Mollica V, Mazzaschi G, Rapoport BL, Grande E, Buti S. Role of clock genes and circadian rhythm in renal cell carcinoma: Recent evidence and therapeutic consequences. Cancers. 2023;15(2):408.
53.
Wang L, Chen B, Wang Y, Sun N, Lu C, Qian R, Hua L. hClock gene expression in human colorectal carcinoma. Mol Med Rep. 2013;8(4):1017–1022.
54.
Xu H, Wang Z, Mo G, Chen H. Association between circadian gene CLOCK and cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer cells: A preliminary study. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(6):8945–8950.
55.
Zheng H, Wu T, Lin Z, Wang D, Zhang J, Zeng T, Liu L, Shen J, Zhao M, Li JD, et al. Targeting BMAL1 reverses drug resistance of acute myeloid leukemia cells and promotes ferroptosis through HMGB1-GPX4 signaling pathway. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024;150(5):231.
56.
Wang F, Li C, Han F, Chen L, Zhu L. BMAL1 may be involved in angiogenesis and peritumoral cerebral edema of human glioma by regulating VEGF and ANG2. Aging. 2021;13(22):24675–24685.
57.
Jung CH, Kim EM, Park JK, Hwang SG, Moon SK, Kim WJ, Um HD. Bmal1 suppresses cancer cell invasion by blocking the phosphoinositide 3-kinase-Akt-MMP-2 signaling pathway. Oncol Rep. 2013;29(6):2109–2113.
58.
Ramos CA, Ouyang C, Qi Y, Chung Y, Cheng CT, LaBarge MA, Seewaldt VL, Ann DK. A non-canonical function of BMAL1 metabolically limits obesity-promoted triple-negative breast cancer. iScience. 2020;23(2): Article 100839.
59.
Peng H, Zhang J, Zhang PP, Chen L, Tang LL, Yang XJ, He QM, Wen X, Sun Y, Liu N, et al. ARNTL hypermethylation promotes tumorigenesis and inhibits cisplatin sensitivity by activating CDK5 transcription in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):11.
60.
Zhang Y, Chen Y, Huang W, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Fu K, Zhuang W. NPAS2 dampens chemo-sensitivity of lung adenocarcinoma cells by enhancing DNA damage repair. Cell Death Dis. 2024;15(1):101.
61.
Ma S, Chen Y, Quan P, Zhang J, Han S, Wang G, Qi R, Zhang X, Wang F, Yuan J, et al. NPAS2 promotes aerobic glycolysis and tumor growth in prostate cancer through HIF-1A signaling. BMC Cancer. 2023;23(1):280.
62.
Cao XM, Kang WD, Xia TH, Yuan SB, Guo CA, Wang WJ, Liu HB. High expression of the circadian clock gene NPAS2 is associated with progression and poor prognosis of gastric cancer: A single-center study. World J Gastroenterol. 2023;29(23):3645–3657.
63.
Zheng X, Lv X, Zhu L, Xu K, Shi C, Cui L, Ding H. The circadian gene NPAS2 act as a putative tumor stimulative factor for uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma. Cancer Manag Res. 2021;13:9329–9343.
64.
Yuan P, Li J, Zhou F, Huang Q, Zhang J, Guo X, Lyu Z, Zhang H, Xing J. NPAS2 promotes cell survival of hepatocellular carcinoma by transactivating CDC25A. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8(3): Article e2704.
65.
Song B, Chen Y, Liu Y, Wan C, Zhang L, Zhang W. NPAS2 regulates proliferation of acute myeloid leukemia cells via CDC25A-mediated cell cycle progression and apoptosis. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120(5):8731–8741.
66.
Xue X, Liu F, Han Y, Li P, Yuan B, Wang X, Chen Y, Kuang Y, Zhi Q, Zhao H. Silencing NPAS2 promotes cell growth and invasion in DLD-1 cells and correlated with poor prognosis of colorectal cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;450(2):1058–1062.
67.
Liu D, Wei B, Liang L, Sheng Y, Sun S, Sun X, Li M, Li H, Yang C, Peng Y, et al. The circadian clock component RORA increases Immunosurveillance in melanoma by inhibiting PD-L1 expression. Cancer Res. 2024;84(14):2265–2281.
68.
El Mashad SN, Kandil MAEH, Talab TAE-H, Saied Abd El Naby AEN, Sultan MM, Sohaib A, Hemida AS. Gastric carcinoma with low ROR alpha, low E-cadherin and high LAPTM4B Immunohistochemical profile; is associated with unfavorable prognosis in Egyptian patients. J Immunoassay Immunochem. 2024;45(1):50–72.
69.
Xian H, Li Y, Zou B, Chen Y, Yin H, Li X, Pan Y. Identification of TIMELESS and RORA as key clock molecules of non-small cell lung cancer and the comprehensive analysis. BMC Cancer. 2022;22(1):107.
70.
Zhao J, Jiang Y, Chen L, Ma Y, Zhang H, Zhou J, Li H, Jing Z. The EIF4A3/CASC2/RORA feedback loop regulates the aggressive phenotype in glioblastomas. Front Oncol. 2021;11: Article 699933.
71.
Zhang G, Yan G, Fu Z, Wu Y, Wu F, Zheng Z, Fang S, Gao Y, Bao X, Liu Y, et al. Loss of retinoic acid receptor-related receptor alpha (Roralpha) promotes the progression of UV-induced cSCC. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(3):247.
72.
van der Watt PJ, Roden LC, Davis KT, Parker MI, Leaner VD. Circadian oscillations persist in cervical and esophageal cancer cells displaying decreased expression of tumor-suppressing circadian clock genes. Mol Cancer Res. 2020;18(9):1340–1353.
73.
Jiang Y, Zhou J, Zhao J, Hou D, Zhang H, Li L, Zou D, Hu J, Zhang Y, Jing Z. MiR-18a-downregulated RORA inhibits the proliferation and tumorigenesis of glioma using the TNF-α-mediated NF-κB signaling pathway. EBioMedicine. 2020;52: Article 102651.
74.
Kottorou AE, Antonacopoulou AG, Dimitrakopoulos FI, Tsamandas AC, Scopa CD, Petsas T, Kalofonos HP. Altered expression of NFY-C and RORA in colorectal adenocarcinomas. Acta Histochem. 2012;114(6):553–561.
75.
Fu RD, Qiu CH, Chen HA, Zhang ZG, Lu MQ. Retinoic acid receptor-related receptor alpha (RORalpha) is a prognostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(8):7603–7610.
76.
Xiong G, Wang C, Evers BM, Zhou BP, Xu R. RORα suppresses breast tumor invasion by inducing SEMA3F expression. Cancer Res. 2012;72(7):1728–1739.
77.
Chen Y, Han Z, Zhang L, Gao C, Wei J, Yang X, Han Y, Li Y, Zhang C, Wei Y, et al. TIMELESS promotes reprogramming of glucose metabolism in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Transl Med. 2024;22(1):21.
78.
Zhao S, Wen S, Liu H, Zhou Z, Liu Y, Zhong J, Xie J. High expression of TIMELESS predicts poor prognosis: A potential therapeutic target for skin cutaneous melanoma. Front Surg. 2022;9: Article 917776.
79.
Xing X, Gu F, Hua L, Cui X, Li D, Wu Z, Zhang R. TIMELESS promotes tumor progression by enhancing macrophages recruitment in ovarian cancer. Front Oncol. 2021;11: Article 732058.
80.
Cao M, Wang Y, Xiao Y, Zheng D, Zhi C, Xia X, Yuan X. Activation of the clock gene TIMELESS by H3k27 acetylation promotes colorectal cancer tumorigenesis by binding to Myosin-9. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021;40(1):162.
81.
Zhang S, Huang P, Dai H, Li Q, Hu L, Peng J, Jiang S, Xu Y, Wu Z, Nie H, et al. TIMELESS regulates sphingolipid metabolism and tumor cell growth through Sp1/ACER2/S1P axis in ER-positive breast cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(10):892.
82.
Zhang JS, Yuan P, Yan ZY, Lu R, Li B, Geng XE, Mu J, Zhang HX. Timeless promotes the proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma cell by reprogramming of glucose metabolism. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2018;40(7):499–505.
83.
Zhang W, He W, Shi Y, Zhao J, Liu S, Zhang F, Yang J, Xie C, Zhang Y. Aberrant TIMELESS expression is associated with poor clinical survival and lymph node metastasis in early-stage cervical carcinoma. Int J Oncol. 2017;50(1):173–184.
84.
Liu SL, Lin HX, Lin CY, Sun XQ, Ye LP, Qiu F, Wen W, Hua X, Wu XQ, Li J, et al. TIMELESS confers cisplatin resistance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and promoting the epithelial mesenchymal transition. Cancer Lett. 2017;402:117–130.
85.
Ding J, Sun J, Ma RQ, Zheng K, Han YN. Low expression of NR1D1 and NR2E3 is associated with advanced features of retinoblastoma. Int Ophthalmol. 2024;44(1):133.
86.
Zhang H, Shu R, Liu X, Zhang X, Sun D. Downregulation of REV-ERBα is associated with the progression of lung adenocarcinoma. Ann Transl Med. 2022;10(2):56.
87.
Wang X, Jia R, Chen K, Wang J, Jiang K, Wang Z. RORα and REV-ERBα are associated with clinicopathological parameters and are independent biomarkers of prognosis in gastric cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2021;20:15330338211039670.
88.
Wang H, Fu Y. NR1D1 suppressed the growth of ovarian cancer by abrogating the JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):871.
89.
Gong X, Tang H, Yang K. PER1 suppresses glycolysis and cell proliferation in oral squamous cell carcinoma via the PER1/RACK1/PI3K signaling complex. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(3):276.
90.
Li YY, Jin F, Zhou JJ, Yu F, Duan XF, He XY, Wang R, Wu WL, Long JH, Luo XL. Downregulation of the circadian period family genes is positively correlated with poor head and neck squamous cell carcinoma prognosis. Chronobiol Int. 2019;36(12):1723–1732.
91.
Orhan T, Nielsen PB, Hviid TVF, Rosen AW, Gögenür I. Expression of circadian clock genes in human colorectal cancer tissues using droplet digital PCR. Cancer Invest. 2019;37(2):90–98.
92.
Liu Y, Hao J, Yuan G, Wei M, Bu Y, Jin T, Ma L. PER1 as a tumor suppressor attenuated in the malignant phenotypes of breast cancer cells. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:7077–7087.
93.
Angelousi A, Kassi E, Ansari-Nasiri N, Randeva H, Kaltsas G, Chrousos G. Clock genes and cancer development in particular in endocrine tissues. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2019;26(6):R305–R317.
94.
Guo F, Tang Q, Chen G, Sun J, Zhu J, Jia Y, Zhang W. Aberrant expression and subcellular localization of PER2 promote the progression of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:8587458.
95.
Rahman S, Kraljević Pavelić S, Markova-Car E. Circadian (De)regulation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(11):2662.
96.
Jiang H, Yang X, Mi M, Wei X, Wu H, Xin Y, Sun C. PER2: A potential molecular marker for hematological malignancies. Mol Biol Rep. 2021;48(11):7587–7595.
97.
Wang Q, Liu H, Wang Z, Chen Y, Zhou S, Hu X, Xu Y, Zhang X, Wang Y, Gao Y, et al. Circadian gene Per3 promotes astroblastoma progression through the P53/BCL2/BAX signalling pathway. Gene. 2024;895: Article 147978.
98.
Tang W, Peng W, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Li B, Duan C. Period 3, a tumor suppressor in non-small cell lung cancer, is silenced by hypermethylation. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2018;11(1):120–128.
99.
Liu Y, Wu Z, Li Y, Zhang J, Gao Y, Yuan G, Han M. PER3 plays anticancer roles in the oncogenesis and progression of breast cancer via regulating MEK/ERK signaling pathway. J Chin Med Assoc. 2022;85(11):1051–1060.
100.
Wang X, Yan D, Teng M, Fan J, Zhou C, Li D, Qiu G, Sun X, Li T, Xing T, et al. Reduced expression of PER3 is associated with incidence and development of colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(9):3081–3088.
101.
Cai DW, Chen D, Sun SP, Liu ZJ, Liu F, Xian SZ, Wu PS, Kong GQ. Overexpression of PER3 reverses paclitaxel resistance of prostate cancer cells by inhibiting the notch pathway. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018;22(9):2572–2579.
102.
Zhang Z, Ma F, Zhou F, Chen Y, Wang X, Zhang H, Zhu Y, Bi J, Zhang Y. Functional polymorphisms of circadian negative feedback regulation genes are associated with clinical outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving radical resection. Med Oncol. 2014;31(12):179.
103.
Lesicka M, Jabłońska E, Wieczorek E, Pepłońska B, Gromadzińska J, Seroczyńska B, Kalinowski L, Skokowski J, Reszka E. Circadian gene polymorphisms associated with breast cancer susceptibility. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(22):5704.
104.
Hoffman AE, Zheng T, Stevens RG, Ba Y, Zhang Y, Leaderer D, Yi C, Holford TR, Zhu Y. Clock-cancer connection in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: A genetic association study and pathway analysis of the circadian gene cryptochrome 2. Cancer Res. 2009;69(8):3605–3613.
105.
Chu LW, Zhu Y, Yu K, Zheng T, Yu H, Zhang Y, Sesterhenn I, Chokkalingam AP, Danforth KN, Shen MC, et al. Variants in circadian genes and prostate cancer risk: A population-based study in China. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2008;11(4):342–348.
106.
Zhu Y, Stevens RG, Hoffman AE, Fitzgerald LM, Kwon EM, Ostrander EA, Davis S, Zheng T, Stanford JL. Testing the circadian gene hypothesis in prostate cancer: A population-based case-control study. Cancer Res. 2009;69(24):9315–9322.
107.
Rabstein S, Harth V, Justenhoven C, Pesch B, Plöttner S, Heinze E, Lotz A, Baisch C, Schiffermann M, Brauch H, et al. Polymorphisms in circadian genes, night work and breast cancer: Results from the GENICA study. Chronobiol Int. 2014;31(10):1115–1122.
108.
Chen Y, Wang D, Song Y, Zhang X, Jiao Z, Dong J, L, Zou Z, Du W, Qu F. Functional polymorphisms in circadian positive feedback loop genes predict postsurgical prognosis of gastric cancer. Cancer Med. 2019;8(4):1919–1929.
109.
Truong T, Liquet B, Menegaux F, Plancoulaine S, Laurent-Puig P, Mulot C, Cordina-Duverger E, Sanchez M, Arveux P, Kerbrat P, et al. Breast cancer risk, nightwork, and circadian clock gene polymorphisms. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2014;21(4):629–638.
110.
Zhou F, He X, Liu H, Zhu Y, Jin T, Chen C, Qu F, Li Y, Bao G, Chen Z, et al. Functional polymorphisms of circadian positive feedback regulation genes and clinical outcome of Chinese patients with resected colorectal cancer. Cancer. 2012;118(4):937–946.
111.
Zienolddiny S, Haugen A, Lie JA, Kjuus H, Anmarkrud KH, Kjærheim K. Analysis of polymorphisms in the circadian-related genes and breast cancer risk in Norwegian nurses working night shifts. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15(4):R53.
112.
Couto P, Miranda D, Vieira R, Vilhena A, De Marco L, Bastos-Rodrigues L. Association between CLOCK, PER3 and CCRN4L with non-small cell lung cancer in Brazilian patients. Mol Med Rep. 2014;10(1):435–440.
113.
Grundy A, Schuetz JM, Lai AS, Janoo-Gilani R, Leach S, Burstyn I, Richardson H, Brooks-Wilson A, Spinelli JJ, Aronson KJ. Shift work, circadian gene variants and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. 2013;37(5):606–612.
114.
Benna C, Helfrich-Förster C, Rajendran S, Monticelli H, Pilati P, Nitti D, Mocellin S. Genetic variation of clock genes and cancer risk: A field synopsis and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(14):23978–23995.
115.
Yuan P, Wang S, Zhou F, Wan S, Yang Y, Huang X, Zhang Z, Zhu Y, Zhang H, Xing J. Functional polymorphisms in the NPAS2 gene are associated with overall survival in transcatheter arterial chemoembolization-treated hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Cancer Sci. 2014;105(7):825–832.
116.
Zhu Y, Leaderer D, Guss C, Brown HN, Zhang Y, Boyle P, Stevens RG, Hoffman A, Qin Q, Han X, et al. Ala394Thr polymorphism in the clock gene NPAS2: A circadian modifier for the risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Int J Cancer. 2007;120(2):432–435.
117.
Benna C, Rajendran S, Spiro G, Tropea S, Fiore PD, Rossi CR, Mocellin S. Associations of clock genes polymorphisms with soft tissue sarcoma susceptibility and prognosis. J Transl Med. 2018;16(1):338.
118.
Benna C, Rajendran S, Spiro G, Menin C, Dall'Olmo L, Rossi CR, Mocellin S. Gender-specific associations between polymorphisms of the circadian gene RORA and cutaneous melanoma susceptibility. J Transl Med. 2021;19(1):57.
119.
Li B, Wang Y, Xu Y, Liu H, Bloomer W, Zhu D, Amos CI, Fang S, Lee JE, Li X, et al. Genetic variants in RORA and DNMT1 associated with cutaneous melanoma survival. Int J Cancer. 2018;142(11):2303–2312.
120.
Gu D, Li S, Ben S, Du M, Chu H, Zhang Z, Wang M, Zhang Z-F, Chen J. Circadian clock pathway genes associated with colorectal cancer risk and prognosis. Arch Toxicol. 2018;92(8):2681–2689.
121.
Fu A, Leaderer D, Zheng T, Hoffman AE, Stevens RG, Zhu Y. Genetic and epigenetic associations of circadian gene TIMELESS and breast cancer risk. Mol Carcinog. 2012;51(12):923–929.
122.
Gutiérrez-Monreal MA, Villela L, Baltazar S, Perfecto-Avalos Y, Cardineau GA, Scott SP. A PER3 polymorphism is associated with better overall survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in Mexican population. Cancer Biomark. 2015;15(5):699–705.
123.
Qu M, Zhang G, Qu H, Vu A, Wu R, Tsukamoto H, Jia Z, Huang W, Lenz HJ, Rich JN, et al. Circadian regulator BMAL1::CLOCK promotes cell proliferation in hepatocellular carcinoma by controlling apoptosis and cell cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2023;120(2): Article e2214829120.
124.
Zhang C, Chen L, Sun L, Jin H, Ren K, Liu S, Qian Y, Li S, Li F, Zhu C, et al. BMAL1 collaborates with CLOCK to directly promote DNA double-strand break repair and tumor chemoresistance. Oncogene. 2023;42(13):967–979.
125.
Li H, Li M, Chen K, Li Y, Yang Z, Zhou Z. The circadian clock gene ARNTL overexpression suppresses oral cancer progression by inducing apoptosis via activating autophagy. Med Oncol. 2022;39(12):244.
126.
Pang L, Dunterman M, Xuan W, Gonzalez A, Lin Y, Hsu WH, Khan F, Hagan RS, Muller WA, Heimberger AB, et al. Circadian regulator CLOCK promotes tumor angiogenesis in glioblastoma. Cell Rep. 2023;42(2): Article 112127.
127.
Lee Y, Lahens NF, Zhang S, Bedont J, Field JM, Sehgal A. G1/S cell cycle regulators mediate effects of circadian dysregulation on tumor growth and provide targets for timed anticancer treatment. PLOS Biol. 2019;17(4): Article e3000228.
128.
Gaucher J, Montellier E, Sassone-Corsi P. Molecular cogs: Interplay between circadian clock and cell cycle. Trends Cell Biol. 2018;28(5):368–379.
129.
Soták M, Sumová A, Pácha J. Cross-talk between the circadian clock and the cell cycle in cancer. Ann Med. 2014;46(4):221–232.
130.
Wang Z, Strasser A, Kelly GL. Should mutant TP53 be targeted for cancer therapy? Cell Death Differ. 2022;29(5):911–920.
131.
Chen SJ, Huang Y, Yu F, Feng X, Zheng YY, Li Q, Niu Q, Jiang YH, Zhao LQ, Wang M, et al. BMAL1/p53 mediating bronchial epithelial cell autophagy contributes to PM2.5-aggravated asthma. Cell Commun Signal. 2023;21(1):39.
132.
Gu X, Xing L, Shi G, Liu Z, Wang X, Qu Z, Wu X, Dong Z, Gao X, Liu G, et al. The circadian mutation PER2(S662G) is linked to cell cycle progression and tumorigenesis. Cell Death Differ. 2012;19(3):397–405.
133.
Mullenders J, Fabius AW, Madiredjo M, Bernards R, Beijersbergen RL. A large scale shRNA barcode screen identifies the circadian clock component ARNTL as putative regulator of the p53 tumor suppressor pathway. PLOS ONE. 2009;4(3): Article e4798.
134.
Haupt Y, Maya R, Kazaz A, Oren M. Mdm2 promotes the rapid degradation of p53. Nature. 1997;387(6630):296–299.
135.
Zou X, Kim DW, Gotoh T, Liu J, Kim JK, Finkielstein CV. A systems biology approach identifies hidden regulatory connections between the circadian and cell-cycle checkpoints. Front Physiol. 2020;11:327.
136.
Xiong H, Yang Y, Yang K, Zhao D, Tang H, Ran X. Loss of the clock gene PER2 is associated with cancer development and altered expression of important tumor-related genes in oral cancer. Int J Oncol. 2018;52(1):279–287.
137.
Miki T, Matsumoto T, Zhao Z, Lee CC. p53 regulates Period2 expression and the circadian clock. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2444.
138.
Morgan MN, Dvuchbabny S, Martinez CA, Kerr B, Cistulli PA, Cook KM. The cancer clock is (not) ticking: Links between circadian rhythms and cancer. Clocks Sleep. 2019;1(4):435–458.
139.
Kang TH. Circadian rhythm of NER and ATR pathways. Biomol Ther. 2021;11(5):715.
140.
Kang TH, Reardon JT, Kemp M, Sancar A. Circadian oscillation of nucleotide excision repair in mammalian brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(8):2864–2867.
141.
Gaddameedhi S, Reardon JT, Ye R, Ozturk N, Sancar A. Effect of circadian clock mutations on DNA damage response in mammalian cells. Cell Cycle. 2012;11(18):3481–3491.
142.
Liu C, Zhang Y, Gao J, Zhang Q, Sun L, Ma Q, Qiao X, Li X, Liu J, Bu J, et al. A highly potent small-molecule antagonist of exportin-1 selectively eliminates CD44+CD24- enriched breast cancer stem-like cells. Drug Resist Updat. 2023;66: Article 100903.
143.
Chu X, Tian W, Ning J, Xiao G, Zhou Y, Wang Z, Zhai Z, Tanzhu G, Yang J, Zhou R. Cancer stem cells: Advances in knowledge and implications for cancer therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024;9(1):170.
144.
Xuan W, Hsu WH, Khan F, Dunterman M, Pang L, Wainwright DA, Ahmed AU, Heimberger AB, Lesniak MS, Chen P. Circadian regulator CLOCK drives immunosuppression in glioblastoma. Cancer Immunol Res. 2022;10(6):770–784.
145.
Li Q, Xia D, Wang Z, Liu B, Zhang J, Peng P, Tang Q, Dong J, Guo J, Kuang D, et al. Circadian rhythm gene PER3 negatively regulates stemness of prostate cancer stem cells via WNT/β-catenin signaling in tumor microenvironment. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9: Article 656981.
146.
Ogino T, Matsunaga N, Tanaka T, Tanihara T, Terajima H, Yoshitane H, Fukada Y, Tsuruta A, Koyanagi S, Ohdo S. Post-transcriptional repression of circadian component CLOCK regulates cancer-stemness in murine breast cancer cells. eLife. 2021;10:e66155.
147.
Dong Z, Zhang G, Qu M, Gimple RC, Wu Q, Qiu Z, Prager BC, Wang X, Kim LJY, Morton AR, et al. Targeting glioblastoma stem cells through disruption of the circadian clock. Cancer Discov. 2019;9(11):1556–1573.
148.
Ma D, Hou L, Xia H, Li H, Fan H, Jia X, Niu Z. PER2 inhibits proliferation and stemness of glioma stem cells via the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Oncol Rep. 2020;44(2):533–542.
149.
Ruggiero L, Allen CN, Brown RL, Robinson DW. Mice with early retinal degeneration show differences in neuropeptide expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Behav Brain Funct. 2010;6:36.
150.
Verma AK, Singh S, Rizvi SI. Aging, circadian disruption and neurodegeneration: Interesting interplay. Exp Gerontol. 2023;172:112076.
151.
Roenneberg T, Merrow M. The circadian clock and human health. Curr Biol. 2016;26(10):R432–R443.
152.
Druiven SJM, Riese H, Kamphuis J, Haarman BCM, Antypa N, Penninx B, Schoevers RA, Meesters Y. Chronotype changes with age; seven-year follow-up from the Netherlands study of depression and anxiety cohort. J Affect Disord. 2021;295:1118–1121.
153.
Huang YL, Liu RY, Wang QS, Van Someren EJ, Xu H, Zhou JN. Age-associated difference in circadian sleep-wake and rest-activity rhythms. Physiol Behav. 2002;76(4-5):597–603.
154.
Paulose JK, Cassone CV, Cassone VM. Aging, melatonin biosynthesis, and circadian clockworks in the gastrointestinal system of the laboratory mouse. Physiol Genomics. 2019;51(1):1–9.
155.
Olbrich D, Dittmar M. The cortisol awakening response is related with PERIOD1 clock gene expression in older women. Exp Gerontol. 2012;47(7):527–533.
156.
Cardinali DP. Melatonin and healthy aging. Vitam Horm. 2021;115:67–88.
157.
Stern N, Sowers JR, McGinty D, Beahm E, Littner M, Catania R, Eggena P. Circadian rhythm of plasma renin activity in older normal and essential hypertensive men: Relation with inactive renin, aldosterone, cortisol and REM sleep. J Hypertens. 1986;4(5):543–550.
158.
Kumar A, Vaca-Dempere M, Mortimer T, Deryagin O, Smith JG, Petrus P, Koronowski KB, Greco CM, Segalés J, Andrés E, et al. Brain-muscle communication prevents muscle aging by maintaining daily physiology. Science. 2024;384(6695):563–572.
159.
Mortimer T, Zinna VM, Atalay M, Laudanna C, Deryagin O, Posas G, Smith JG, García-Lara E, Vaca-Dempere M, Monteiro de Assis LV, et al. The epidermal circadian clock integrates and subverts brain signals to guarantee skin homeostasis. Cell Stem Cell. 2024;31(6):834–849.e4.
160.
Montégut L, López-Otín C, Kroemer G. Aging and cancer. Mol Cancer. 2024;23(1):106.
161.
Anisimov VN. The relationship between aging and carcinogenesis: A critical appraisal. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003;45(3):277–304.
162.
Peterson BA, Kennedy BJ. Aging and cancer management. Part I: Clinical observations. CA Cancer J Clin. 1979;29(6):322–332.
163.
Bahrami H, Tafrihi M. Global trends of cancer: The role of diet, lifestyle, and environmental factors. Cancer Innov. 2023;2(4):290–301.
164.
Smith BD, Smith GL, Hurria A, Hortobagyi GN, Buchholz TA. Future of cancer incidence in the United States: Burdens upon an aging, changing nation. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(17):2758–2765.
165.
Edwards BK, Brown ML, Wingo PA, Howe HL, Ward E, Ries LA, Schrag D, Jamison PM, Jemal A, Wu XC, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(19):1407–1427.
166.
Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature. 1998;396(6712):643–649.
167.
Yoshioka KI, Kusumoto-Matsuo R, Matsuno Y, Ishiai M. Genomic instability and cancer risk associated with erroneous DNA repair. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(22):12254.
168.
Schumacher B, Pothof J, Vijg J, Hoeijmakers JHJ. The central role of DNA damage in the ageing process. Nature. 2021;592(7856):695–703.
169.
Bona MD, Chen Y, Agustinus AS, Mazzagatti A, Duran MA, Deyell M, Bronder D, Hickling J, Hong C, Scipioni L, et al. Micronuclear collapse from oxidative damage. Science. 2024;385(6712):eadj8691.
170.
Stead ER, Bjedov I. Balancing DNA repair to prevent ageing and cancer. Exp Cell Res. 2021;405(2): Article 112679.
171.
Shalabi SF, Miyano M, Sayaman RW, Lopez JC, Jokela TA, Todhunter ME, Hinz S, Garbe JC, Stampfer MR, Kessenbrock K, et al. Evidence for accelerated aging in mammary epithelia of women carrying germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Nat Aging. 2021;1(9):838–849.
172.
Jaiswal S, Natarajan P, Silver AJ, Gibson CJ, Bick AG, Shvartz E, McConkey M, Gupta N, Gabriel S, Ardissino D, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis and risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(2):111–121.
173.
Halazonetis TD, Gorgoulis VG, Bartek J. An oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development. Science. 2008;319(5868):1352–1355.
174.
Takasugi M, Yoshida Y, Hara E, Ohtani N. The role of cellular senescence and SASP in tumour microenvironment. FEBS J. 2023;290(5):1348–1361.
175.
Hibino S, Kawazoe T, Kasahara H, Itoh S, Ishimoto T, Sakata-Yanagimoto M, Taniguchi K. Inflammation-induced tumorigenesis and metastasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(11):5421.
176.
Seale K, Horvath S, Teschendorff A, Eynon N, Voisin S. Making sense of the ageing methylome. Nat Rev Genet. 2022;23(10):585–605.
177.
Horvath S, Raj K. DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the epigenetic clock theory of ageing. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19(6):371–384.
178.
Swer PB, Sharma R. ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers in ageing and age-related disorders. Biogerontology. 2021;22(1):1–17.
179.
Monterde B, Varela I. Role of SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling genes in lung cancer development. Biochem Soc Trans. 2022;50(3):1143–1150.
180.
Leng X, Zhang M, Xu Y, Wang J, Ding N, Yu Y, Sun S, Dai W, Xue X, Li N, et al. Non-coding RNAs as therapeutic targets in cancer and its clinical application. J Pharm Anal. 2024;14(7): Article 100947.
181.
Du J, Su Y, Gao J, Tai Y. The expression and function of long noncoding RNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Innov. 2023;2(6):488–499.
182.
Jusic A, Thomas PB, Wettinger SB, Dogan S, Farrugia R, Gaetano C, Tuna BG, Pinet F, Robinson EL, Tual-Chalot S, et al. Noncoding RNAs in age-related cardiovascular diseases. Ageing Res Rev. 2022;77: Article 101610.
183.
Slack FJ, Chinnaiyan AM. The role of non-coding RNAs in oncology. Cell. 2019;179(5):1033–1055.
184.
Aging and metabolism: Two sides of the same coin. EBioMedicine. 2017;21:1–2.
185.
Oka SI, Titus AS, Zablocki D, Sadoshima J. Molecular properties and regulation of NAD+ kinase (NADK). Redox Biol. 2023;59: Article 102561.
186.
Garrido A, Djouder N. NAD+ deficits in age-related diseases and cancer. Trends Cancer. 2017;3(8):593–610.
187.
Katsyuba E, Mottis A, Zietak M, De Franco F, van der Velpen V, Gariani K, Ryu D, Cialabrini L, Matilainen O, Liscio P, et al. De novo NAD+ synthesis enhances mitochondrial function and improves health. Nature. 2018;563(7731):354–359.
188.
Sharma A, Smith HJ, Yao P, Mair WB. Causal roles of mitochondrial dynamics in longevity and healthy aging. EMBO Rep. 2019;20(12): Article e48395.
189.
Ju HQ, Zhuang ZN, Li H, Tian T, Lu YX, Fan XQ, Zhou HJ, Mo HY, Sheng H, Chiao PJ, et al. Regulation of the Nampt-mediated NAD salvage pathway and its therapeutic implications in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Lett. 2016;379(1):1–11.
190.
Han Y, Kim B, Cho U, Park IS, Kim SI, Dhanasekaran DN, Tsang BK, Song YS. Mitochondrial fission causes cisplatin resistance under hypoxic conditions via ROS in ovarian cancer cells. Oncogene. 2019;38(45):7089–7105.
191.
Schöpf B, Weissensteiner H, Schäfer G, Fazzini F, Charoentong P, Naschberger A, Rupp B, Fendt L, Bukur V, Giese I, et al. OXPHOS remodeling in high-grade prostate cancer involves mtDNA mutations and increased succinate oxidation. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1487.
192.
Vyas S, Zaganjor E, Haigis MC. Mitochondria and cancer. Cell. 2016;166(3):555–566.
193.
Scheid AD, Beadnell TC, Welch DR. Roles of mitochondria in the hallmarks of metastasis. Br J Cancer. 2021;124(1):124–135.
194.
Li P, Zhao M, Parris AB, Feng X, Yang X. p53 is required for metformin-induced growth inhibition, senescence and apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;464(4):1267–1274.
195.
Campisi J. Senescent cells, tumor suppression, and organismal aging: Good citizens, bad neighbors. Cell. 2005;120(4):513–522.
196.
Pérez-Mancera PA, Young AR, Narita M. Inside and out: The activities of senescence in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(8):547–558.
197.
Dankort D, Curley DP, Cartlidge RA, Nelson B, Karnezis AN, Damsky WE Jr, et al. Braf(V600E) cooperates with Pten loss to induce metastatic melanoma. Nat Genet. 2009;41(5):544–552.
198.
Chen Z, Trotman LC, Shaffer D, Lin HK, Dotan ZA, Niki M, Koutcher JA, Scher HI, Ludwig T, Gerald W, et al. Crucial role of p53-dependent cellular senescence in suppression of Pten-deficient tumorigenesis. Nature. 2005;436(7051):725–730.
199.
Cichowski K, Jacks T. NF1 tumor suppressor gene function: Narrowing the GAP. Cell. 2001;104(4):593–604.
200.
Young AP, Schlisio S, Minamishima YA, Zhang Q, Li L, Grisanzio C, Signoretti S, Kaelin WG Jr. VHL loss actuates a HIF-independent senescence programme mediated by Rb and p400. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10(3):361–369.
201.
Shamma A, Takegami Y, Miki T, Kitajima S, Noda M, Obara T, Okamoto T, Takahashi C. Rb regulates DNA damage response and cellular senescence through E2F-dependent suppression of N-ras isoprenylation. Cancer Cell. 2009;15(4):255–269.
202.
Berger AH, Knudson AG, Pandolfi PP. A continuum model for tumour suppression. Nature. 2011;476(7359):163–169.
203.
Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–674.
204.
Weiderpass E, Meo M, Vainio H. Risk factors for breast cancer, including occupational exposures. Saf Health Work. 2011;2(1):1–8.
205.
Lie JAS, Kjuus H, Zienolddiny S, Haugen A, Stevens RG, Kjaerheim K. Night work and breast cancer risk among Norwegian nurses: Assessment by different exposure metrics. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(11):1272–1279.
206.
Hansen J, Stevens RG. Case–control study of shift-work and breast cancer risk in Danish nurses: Impact of shift systems. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(11):1722–1729.
207.
Wei F, Chen W, Lin X. Night-shift work, breast cancer incidence, and all-cause mortality: An updated meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Sleep Breath. 2021;26(4):1509–1526.
208.
Chakravarti D, LaBella KA, DePinho RA. Telomeres: History, health, and hallmarks of aging. Cell. 2021;184(2):306–322.
209.
Gomez DE, Armando RG, Farina HG, Menna PL, Cerrudo CS, Ghiringhelli PD, Alonso DF. Telomere structure and telomerase in health and disease. Int J Oncol. 2012;41(5):1561–1569.
210.
Vina J, Liang G, Schernhammer E, Qi L, Gao X, Vivo D I, Han J. Associations between rotating night shifts, sleep duration, and telomere length in women. PLOS ONE. 2011;6(8): Article e23462.
211.
Parks CG, DeRoo LA, Miller DB, McCanlies EC, Cawthon RM, Sandler DP. Employment and work schedule are related to telomere length in women. Occup Environ Med. 2011;68(8):582–589.
212.
Samulin Erdem J, Notø , Skare Ø, Lie JAS, Petersen-Øverleir M, Reszka E, Pepłońska B, Zienolddiny S. Mechanisms of breast cancer risk in shift workers: Association of telomere shortening with the duration and intensity of night work. Cancer Med. 2017;6(8):1988–1997.
213.
Anisimov VN, Vinogradova IA, Panchenko AV, Popovich IG, Zabezhinski MA. Light-at-night-induced circadian disruption, cancer and aging. Curr Aging Science. 2013;5(3):170–177.
214.
Vinogradova IA, Anisimov VN, Bukalev AV, Ilyukha VA, Khizhkin EA, Lotosh TA, Semenchenko AV, Zabezhinski MA. Circadian disruption induced by light-at-night accelerates aging and promotes tumorigenesis in young but not in old rats. Aging. 2010;2(2):82–92.
215.
Vinogradova IA, Bukalev AV, Zabezhinskii MA, Semenchenko AV, Anisimov VN. Effect of light regimens and melatonin on the homeostasis, life span and development of spontaneous tumors in female rats. Adv Gerontol. 2007;20(4):40–47.
216.
Vinogradova IA, Bukalev AV, Zabezhinski MA, Semenchenko AV, Khavinson VK, Anisimov VN. Effect of Ala-Glu-Asp-Gly peptide on life span and development of spontaneous tumors in female rats exposed to different illumination regimes. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2007;144(6):825–830.
217.
Vinogradova IA, Anisimov VN, Bukalev AV, Semenchenko AV, Zabezhinski MA. Circadian disruption induced by light-at-night accelerates aging and promotes tumorigenesis in rats. Aging. 2009;1(10):855–865.
218.
Anisimov VN, Baturin DA, Popovich IG, Zabezhinski MA, Manton KG, Semenchenko AV, Yashin AI. Effect of exposure to light-at-night on life span and spontaneous carcinogenesis in female CBA mice. Int J Cancer. 2004;111(4):475–479.
219.
Li JC, Xu F. Influences of light-dark shifting on the immune system, tumor growth and life span of rats, mice and fruit flies as well as on the counteraction of melatonin. Neurosignals. 1997;6(2):77–89.
220.
Bartsch C. Light-at-night, cancer and aging. Aging. 2010;2(2):76–77.
221.
Nizami ZN, Aburawi HE, Semlali A, Muhammad K, Iratni R. Oxidative stress inducers in cancer therapy: Preclinical and clinical evidence. Antioxidants. 2023;12(6):1159.
222.
Arfin S, Jha NK, Jha SK, Kesari KK, Ruokolainen J, Roychoudhury S, Rathi B, Kumar D. Oxidative stress in cancer cell metabolism. Antioxidants. 2021;10(5):642.
223.
Chio IIC, Tuveson DA. ROS in cancer: The burning question. Trends Mol Med. 2017;23(5):411–429.
224.
Sies H, Jones DP. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) as pleiotropic physiological signalling agents. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(7):363–383.
225.
Jomova K, Raptova R, Alomar SY, Alwasel SH, Nepovimova E, Kuca K, Valko M. Reactive oxygen species, toxicity, oxidative stress, and antioxidants: Chronic diseases and aging. Arch Toxicol. 2023;97(10):2499–2574.
226.
Katamune C, Koyanagi S, Shiromizu S, Matsunaga N, Shimba S, Shibata S, Ohdo S. Different roles of negative and positive components of the circadian clock in oncogene-induced neoplastic transformation. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(20):10541–10550.
227.
Hashikawa K-i, Katamune C, Kusunose N, Matsunaga N, Koyanagi S, Ohdo S. Dysfunction of the circadian transcriptional factor CLOCK in mice resists chemical carcinogen-induced tumorigenesis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):9995.
228.
Antoch MP, Gorbacheva VY, Vykhovanets O, Toshkov IA, Kondratov RV, Kondratova AA, Lee C, Nikitin AY. Disruption of the circadian clock due to the Clock mutation has discrete effects on aging and carcinogenesis. Cell Cycle. 2014;7(9):1197–1204.
229.
Zheng Y, Pan L, Wang F, Yan J, Wang T, Xia Y, Yao L, Deng K, Zheng Y, Xia X, et al. Neural function of Bmal1: An overview. Cell Biosci. 2023;13(1):1.
230.
Kelleher FC, Rao A, Maguire A. Circadian molecular clocks and cancer. Cancer Lett. 2014;342(1):9–18.
231.
Wang Y, Guo H, He F. Circadian disruption: From mouse models to molecular mechanisms and cancer therapeutic targets. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2023;42(1):297–322.
232.
Huang C, Zhang C, Cao Y, Li J, Bi F. Major roles of the circadian clock in cancer. Cancer Biol Med. 2023;20(1):1–24.
233.
Adams JM, Cory S. The Bcl-2 apoptotic switch in cancer development and therapy. Oncogene. 2007;26(9):1324–1337.
234.
Cohn RL, Gasek NS, Kuchel GA, Xu M. The heterogeneity of cellular senescence: Insights at the single-cell level. Trends Cell Biol. 2023;33(1):9–17.
235.
Matsuo T, Yamaguchi S, Mitsui S, Emi A, Shimoda F, Okamura H. Control mechanism of the circadian clock for timing of cell division in vivo. Science. 2003;302(5643):255–259.
236.
Bjarnason GA, Jordan R. Circadian variation of cell proliferation and cell cycle protein expression in man: Clinical implications. Prog Cell Cycle Res. 2000;4:193–206.
237.
Sulli G, Lam MTY, Panda S. Interplay between circadian clock and cancer: New frontiers for cancer treatment. Trends Cancer. 2019;5(8):475–494.
238.
Rodríguez-Santana C, Florido J, Martínez-Ruiz L, López-Rodríguez A, Acuña-Castroviejo D, Escames G. Role of melatonin in cancer: Effect on clock genes. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(3):1919.
239.
Zeman M, Okuliarova M, Rumanova VS. Disturbances of hormonal circadian rhythms by light pollution. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(8):7255.
240.
Mannic T, Meyer P, Triponez F, Pusztaszeri M, Le Martelot G, Mariani O, Schmitter D, Sage D, Philippe J, Dibner C, et al. Circadian clock characteristics are altered in human thyroid malignant nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 2013;98(11):4446–4456.
241.
Hosseinzadeh A, Alinaghian N, Sheibani M, Seirafianpour F, Naeini AJ, Mehrzadi S. Current evidence on protective and therapeutic roles in gynecological diseases. Life Sci. 2024;344:122557.
242.
Luo X, Wang J, Chen Y, Zhou X, Shao Z, Liu K, Shang Z. Melatonin inhibits the stemness of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by modulating HA synthesis via the FOSL1/HAS3 axis. J Pineal Res. 2024;76(2):e12940.
243.
Ozturk N, Lee JH, Gaddameedhi S, Sancar A. Loss of cryptochrome reduces cancer risk in p53 mutant mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(8):2841–2846.
244.
Matsunaga N, Kohno Y, Kakimoto K, Hayashi A, Koyanagi S, Ohdo S. Influence of CLOCK on cytotoxicity induced by diethylnitrosamine in mouse primary hepatocytes. Toxicology. 2011;280(3):144–151.
245.
Zhang S, Zhang J, Deng Z, Liu H, Mao W, Jiang F, Xia Z, Li JD. Circadian clock components RORα and Bmal1 mediate the anti-proliferative effect of MLN4924 in osteosarcoma cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7(40):66087–66099.
246.
Gul S, Akyel YK, Gul ZM, Isin S, Ozcan O, Korkmaz T, Selvi S, Danis I, Ipek OS, Aygenli F, et al. Discovery of a small molecule that selectively destabilizes cryptochrome 1 and enhances life span in p53 knockout mice. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):6742.
247.
Balounová K, Soták M, Ergang P, Vodička M, Vagnerová K, Pácha J. Effects of aging and tumorigenesis on coupling between the circadian clock and cell cycle in colonic mucosa. Mech Ageing Dev. 2020;190:111317.
248.
Vijg J, Dong X. Pathogenic mechanisms of somatic mutation and genome mosaicism in aging. Cell. 2020;182(1):12–23.
249.
Negrini S, Gorgoulis VG, Halazonetis TD. Genomic instability—An evolving hallmark of cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11(3):220–228.
250.
Zhu Z, Li S, Yin X, Sun K, Song J, Ren W, Gao L, Zhi K. Review: Protein O-GlcNAcylation regulates DNA damage response: A novel target for cancer therapy. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;264(Pt.1):130351.
251.
Miller KN, Victorelli SG, Salmonowicz H, Dasgupta N, Liu T, Passos JF, Adams PD. Cytoplasmic DNA: Sources, sensing, and role in aging and disease. Cell. 2021;184(22):5506–5526.
252.
Wang J, Mauvoisin D, Martin E, Atger F, Galindo AN, Dayon L, Sizzano F, Palini A, Kussmann M, Waridel P, et al. Nuclear proteomics uncovers diurnal regulatory landscapes in mouse liver. Cell Metab. 2017;25(1):102–117.
253.
Chaves I, Pokorny R, Byrdin M, Hoang N, Ritz T, Brettel K, Essen LO, van der Horst GTJ, Batschauer A, Ahmad M. The cryptochromes: Blue light photoreceptors in plants and animals. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2011;62:335–364.
254.
Gery S, Komatsu N, Baldjyan L, Yu A, Koo D, Koeffler HP. The circadian gene per1 plays an important role in cell growth and DNA damage control in human cancer cells. Mol Cell. 2006;22(3):375–382.
255.
Kang TH, Leem SH. Modulation of ATR-mediated DNA damage checkpoint response by cryptochrome 1. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(7):4427–4434.
256.
Shao, F, Wang, Z, Ye, L, Wu, R, Wang, J, Yu, Q-X, Wusiman, D, Tuo, Z, Yoo, KH, Shu, Z, Wei, W, Li, D, Cho, WC, Liu, Z, Feng, D (2025). Basic helix–loop–helix ARNT like 1 regulates the function of immune cells and participates in the development of immune-related diseases. Burns & Trauma, 13. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkae075
257.
Yuan N-L, Liu Y, Zhang D. Role of differentiated embryo-chondrocyte expressed gene 1 (DEC1) in immunity. Int Immunopharmacol. 2022;102:339–372.
258.
Sato F, Kawamoto T, Fujimoto K, Noshiro M, Honda KK, Honma S, Honma KI, Kato Y. Functional analysis of the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor DEC1 in circadian regulation. Eur J Biochem. 2004;271(22):4409–4419.
259.
Kawamoto T, Noshiro M, Sato F, Maemura K, Takeda N, Nagai R, Iwata T, Fujimoto K, Furukawa M, Miyazaki K, et al. A novel autofeedback loop of Dec1 transcription involved in circadian rhythm regulation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;313(1):117–124.
260.
Sato F, Kohsaka A, Bhawal UK, Muragaki Y. Potential roles of Dec and Bmal1 genes in interconnecting circadian clock and energy metabolism. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(3):781.
261.
Yoshida K, Wang X, Bhawal UK. Dec1 deficiency restores the age-related dysfunctions of submandibular glands. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2021;72(4): doi: 10.26402/jpp.2021.4.09.
262.
Collado M, Serrano M. The power and the promise of oncogene-induced senescence markers. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(6):472–476.
263.
Qian Y, Zhang J, Yan B, Chen X. DEC1, a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor and a novel target gene of the p53 family, mediates p53-dependent premature senescence. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(5):2896–2905.
264.
Zhu Y, Xu L, Zhang J, Hu X, Liu Y, Yin H, Lv T, Zhang H, Liu L, An H, et al. Sunitinib induces cellular senescence via p53/Dec1 activation in renal cell carcinoma cells. Cancer Sci. 2013;104(8):1052–1061.
265.
Xu Q, Ma P, Hu C, Chen L, Xue L, Wang Z, Liu M, Zhu H, Xu N, Lu N. Overexpression of the DEC1 protein induces senescence in vitro and is related to better survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. PLOS ONE. 2012;7(7):e41862.
266.
Jia Y, Liu Y, Zhu J, Liu L, Ma X, Liu D, Han S, Zhang L, Ling ZQ, Wang Y. DEC1 promotes progression of helicobacter pylori-positive gastric cancer by regulating Akt/NF-κB pathway. J Cell Mol Med. 2022;26(7):1943–1954.
267.
Liu Y, Miao Y, Wang J, Lin X, Wang L, Xu H-T, Wang E-H. DEC1 is positively associated with the malignant phenotype of invasive breast cancers and negatively correlated with the expression of claudin-1. Int J Mol Med. 2013;31(4):855–860.
268.
Shan E, Huo Y, Wang H, Zhang Z, Hu J, Wang G, Liu W, Yan B, Hiroaki H, Yang J. Differentiated embryonic chondrocyte expressed gene-1 (DEC1) enhances the development of colorectal cancer with an involvement of the STAT3 signaling. Neoplasia. 2022;27:100783.
269.
Yi Y, Liao B, Zheng Z, Yang X, Yang Y, Zhou Y, Tan B, Yang X. Downregulation of DEC1 inhibits proliferation, migration and invasion, and induces apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells via regulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Exp Ther Med. 2021;21(4):372.
270.
Ming X, Bao C, Hong T, Yang Y, Chen X, Jung Y-S, Qian Y. Clusterin, a novel DEC1 target, modulates DNA damage–mediated cell death. Mol Cancer Res. 2018;16(11):1641–1651.
271.
Magni M, Buscemi G, Zannini L. Cell cycle and apoptosis regulator 2 at the interface between DNA damage response and cell physiology. Mutat Res Rev Mut Res. 2018;776:1–9.
272.
Kim HJ, Moon SJ, Kim JH. Mechanistic insights into the dual role of CCAR2/DBC1 in cancer. Exp Mol Med. 2023;55(8):1691–1701.
273.
Zannini L, Buscemi G, Kim J-E, Fontanella E, Delia D. DBC1 phosphorylation by ATM/ATR inhibits SIRT1 deacetylase in response to DNA damage. J Mol Cell Biol. 2012;4(5):294–303.
274.
Lugano D, Barrett L, Westerheide SD, Kee Y. Multifaceted roles of CCAR family proteins in the DNA damage response and cancer. Exp Mol Med. 2024;56(1):59–65.
275.
López-Saavedra A, Gómez-Cabello D, Domínguez-Sánchez MS, Mejías-Navarro F, Fernández-Ávila MJ, Dinant C, Martínez-Macías MI, Bartek J, Huertas P. A genome-wide screening uncovers the role of CCAR2 as an antagonist of DNA end resection. Nat Commun. 2016;7(1):59–65.
276.
Escande C, Nin V, Pirtskhalava T, Chini CC, Thereza Barbosa M, Mathison A, Urrutia R, Tchkonia T, Kirkland JL, Chini EN. Deleted in breast cancer 1 regulates cellular senescence during obesity. Aging Cell. 2014;13(5):951–953.
277.
Giguère SSB, Guise AJ, Jean Beltran PM, Joshi PM, Greco TM, Quach OL, Kong J, Cristea IM. The proteomic profile of deleted in breast cancer 1 (DBC1) interactions points to a multifaceted regulation of gene expression. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2016;15(3):791–809.
278.
Chini Claudia CS, Escande C, Nin V, Chini EN. DBC1 (deleted in breast cancer 1) modulates the stability and function of the nuclear receptor Rev-erbα. Biochem J. 2013;451(3):453–461.
279.
Gorgoulis V, Adams PD, Alimonti A, Bennett DC, Bischof O, Bishop C, Campisi J, Collado M, Evangelou K, Ferbeyre G, et al. Cellular senescence: Defining a path forward. Cell. 2019;179(4):813–827.
280.
Di Micco R, Krizhanovsky V, Baker D, d'Adda di Fagagna F. Cellular senescence in ageing: From mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;22(2):75–95.
281.
Zingoni A, Antonangeli F, Sozzani S, Santoni A, Cippitelli M, Soriani A. The senescence journey in cancer immunoediting. Mol Cancer. 2024;23(1):68.
282.
Birch J, Gil J. Senescence and the SASP: Many therapeutic avenues. Genes Dev. 2020;34(23-24):1565–1576.
283.
Qiu Y, Zhang S, Man C, Gong D, Xu Y, Wang X, Zhang W. Advances on senescence-associated secretory phenotype regulated by circular RNAs in tumors. Ageing Res Rev. 2024;97:102287.
284.
Ahmed R, Reza HM, Shinohara K, Nakahata Y. Cellular senescence and its impact on the circadian clock. J Biochem. 2022;171(5):493–500.
285.
Sulli G, Rommel A, Wang X, Kolar MJ, Puca F, Saghatelian A, Plikus MV, Verma IM, Panda S. Pharmacological activation of REV-ERBs is lethal in cancer and oncogene-induced senescence. Nature. 2018;553(7688):351–355.
286.
Lee S, Lee J-S. Cellular senescence: A promising strategy for cancer therapy. BMB Rep. 2019;52(1):35–41.
287.
Jia M, Su B, Mo L, Qiu W, Ying J, Lin P, Yang B, Li D, Wang D, Xu L, et al. Circadian clock protein CRY1 prevents paclitaxel-induced senescence of bladder cancer cells by promoting p53 degradation. Oncol Rep. 2020;45(3):1033–1043.
288.
Zeng X, Liang C, Yao J. Chronic shift-lag promotes NK cell ageing and impairs immunosurveillance in mice by decreasing the expression of CD122. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24(24):14583–14595.
289.
Wang R-H, Cao Y. Associations among metabolism, circadian rhythm and age-associated diseases. Aging Dis. 2017;8(3):314–333.
290.
Verlande A, Masri S. Circadian clocks and cancer: Timekeeping governs cellular metabolism. Trends Endocrinol Metabol. 2019;30(7):445–458.
291.
Fraga CG, Oteiza PI, Hid EJ, Galleano M. (Poly)phenols and the regulation of NADPH oxidases. Redox Biol. 2023;67: Article 102927.
292.
Uprety B, Abrahamse H. Targeting breast cancer and their stem cell population through AMPK activation: Novel insights. Cells. 2022;11(3):576.
293.
Frye RA. Evolution of Sirtuins from archaea to vertebrates. In: Histone deacetylases. Humana Press; 2006, p. 183–202.
294.
Price Nathan L, Gomes Ana P, Ling Alvin JY, Duarte Filipe V, Martin-Montalvo A, North Brian J, Price NL, Gomes AP, AJY L, Duarte FV, et al. SIRT1 is required for AMPK activation and the beneficial effects of resveratrol on mitochondrial function. Cell Metab. 2012;15(5):675–690.
295.
Bellet MM, Masri S, Astarita G, Sassone-Corsi P, Della Fazia MA, Servillo G. Histone deacetylase SIRT1 controls proliferation, circadian rhythm, and lipid metabolism during liver regeneration in mice. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(44):23318–23329.
296.
Bellet MM, Nakahata Y, Boudjelal M, Watts E, Mossakowska DE, Edwards KA, Cervantes M, Astarita G, Loh C, Ellis JL, et al. Pharmacological modulation of circadian rhythms by synthetic activators of the deacetylase SIRT1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(9):3333–3338.
297.
Shafi AA, Knudsen KE. Cancer and the circadian clock. Cancer Res. 2019;79(15):3806–3814.
298.
Masri S, Rigor P, Cervantes M, Ceglia N, Sebastian C, Xiao C, Roqueta-Rivera M, Deng C, Osborne TF, Mostoslavsky R, et al. Partitioning circadian transcription by SIRT6 leads to segregated control of cellular metabolism. Cell. 2014;158(3):659–672.
299.
Peek CB, Affinati AH, Ramsey KM, Kuo HY, Yu W, Sena LA, Ilkayeva O, Marcheva B, Kobayashi Y, Omura C, et al. Circadian clock NAD+ cycle drives mitochondrial oxidative metabolism in mice. Science. 2013;342(6158):1243417.
300.
Nacarelli T, Sell C. Targeting metabolism in cellular senescence, a role for intervention. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2017;455:83–92.
301.
Liu GY, Sabatini DM. mTOR at the nexus of nutrition, growth, ageing and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(4):183–203.
302.
Selman C, Tullet JMA, Wieser D, Irvine E, Lingard SJ, Choudhury AI, Claret M, al-Qassab H, Carmignac D, Ramadani F, et al. Ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 signaling regulates mammalian life span. Science. 2009;326(5949):140–144.
303.
Yang S-B, Tien A-C, Boddupalli G, Xu Allison W, Jan Yuh N, Jan LY. Rapamycin ameliorates age-dependent obesity associated with increased mTOR signaling in hypothalamic POMC neurons. Neuron. 2012;75(3):425–436.
304.
Khapre RV, Patel SA, Kondratova AA, Chaudhary A, Velingkaar N, Antoch MP, Kondratov RV. Metabolic clock generates nutrient anticipation rhythms in mTOR signaling. Aging (Albany NY). 2014;6(8):675–689.
305.
Lipton JO, Yuan ED, Boyle LM, Ebrahimi-Fakhari D, Kwiatkowski E, Nathan A, Güttler T, Davis F, Asara JM, Sahin M. The circadian protein BMAL1 regulates translation in response to S6K1-mediated phosphorylation. Cell. 2015;161(5):1138–1151.
306.
Wu R, Dang F, Li P, Wang P, Xu Q, Liu Z, Li Y, Wu Y, Chen Y, Liu Y. The circadian protein Period2 suppresses mTORC1 activity via recruiting Tsc1 to mTORC1 complex. Cell Metab. 2019;29(3):653–667 e6.
307.
Fontana L, Partridge L, Longo VD. Extending healthy life span—From yeast to humans. Science. 2010;328(5976):321–326.
308.
Slack C, Tullet J. Signal transduction pathways in ageing. In: Biochemistry and cell biology of ageing: Part I biomedical science. Subcellular Biochemistry. Springer; 2018, p. 323–350.
309.
Hua H, Kong Q, Yin J, Zhang J, Jiang Y. Insulin-like growth factor receptor signaling in tumorigenesis and drug resistance: A challenge for cancer therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13(1).
310.
Johnson SC. Nutrient sensing, signaling and ageing: The role of IGF-1 and mTOR in ageing and age-related disease. In: Biochemistry and cell biology of ageing: Part I biomedical science. Subcellular Biochemistry. Springer; 2018, p. 49–97.
311.
Mattison JA, Colman RJ, Beasley TM, Allison DB, Kemnitz JW, Roth GS, Ingram DK, Weindruch R, de Cabo R, Anderson RM. Caloric restriction improves health and survival of rhesus monkeys. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):14063.
312.
Kim S-E, Mori R, Shimokawa I. Does calorie restriction modulate inflammaging via FoxO transcription factors? Nutrients. 2020;12(7):1959.
313.
Wu Q, Tian A-L, Li B, Leduc M, Forveille S, Hamley P, Galloway W, Xie W, Liu P, Zhao L, et al. IGF1 receptor inhibition amplifies the effects of cancer drugs by autophagy and immune-dependent mechanisms. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(6): Article e002722.
314.
Mao K, Quipildor GF, Tabrizian T, Novaj A, Guan F, Walters RO, Delahaye F, Hubbard GB, Ikeno Y, Ejima K, et al. Late-life targeting of the IGF-1 receptor improves healthspan and lifespan in female mice. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2394.
315.
Matsumoto CS, Almeida LO, Guimaraes DM, Martins MD, Papagerakis P, Papagerakis S, Leopoldino AM, Castilho RM, Squarize CH. PI3K-PTEN dysregulation leads to mTOR-driven upregulation of the core clock gene BMAL1 in normal and malignant epithelial cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7(27):42393–42407.
316.
Zhou L, Zhang Z, Nice E, Huang C, Zhang W, Tang Y. Circadian rhythms and cancers: The intrinsic links and therapeutic potentials. J Hematol Oncol. 2022;15(1):21.
317.
Khapre RV, Kondratova AA, Patel S, Dubrovsky Y, Wrobel M, Antoch MP, Kondratov RV. BMAL1-dependent regulation of the mTOR signaling pathway delays aging. Aging. 2014;6(1):48–57.
318.
Lowe M, Lage J, Paatela E, Munson D, Hostager R, Yuan C, Katoku-Kikyo N, Ruiz-Estevez M, Asakura Y, Staats J, et al. Cry2 is critical for circadian regulation of myogenic differentiation by Bclaf1-mediated mRNA stabilization of cyclin D1 and Tmem176b. Cell Rep. 2018;22(8):2118–2132.
319.
Sun Y, Lin X, Liu B, Zhang Y, Li W, Zhang S, He F, Tian H, Zhu X, Liu X, et al. Loss of ATF4 leads to functional aging-like attrition of adult hematopoietic stem cells. Sci Adv. 2021;7(52):10541–10550.
320.
Horiguchi M, Koyanagi S, Okamoto A, Suzuki SO, Matsunaga N, Ohdo S. Stress-regulated transcription factor ATF4 promotes neoplastic transformation by suppressing expression of the INK4a/ARF cell senescence factors. Cancer Res. 2012;72(2):395–401.
321.
Chan AB, Parico GCG, Fribourgh JL, Ibrahim LH, Bollong MJ, Partch CL, Lamia KA. CRY2 missense mutations suppress P53 and enhance cell growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118(27): Article e2101416118.
322.
Ou HL, Schumacher B. DNA damage responses and p53 in the aging process. Blood. 2018;131(5):488–495.
323.
Pandi-Perumal SR, Srinivasan V, Maestroni GJ, Cardinali DP, Poeggeler B, Hardeland R. Melatonin: Nature's most versatile biological signal? FEBS J. 2006;273(13):2813–2838.
324.
Sephton SE, Sapolsky RM, Kraemer HC, Spiegel D. Diurnal cortisol rhythm as a predictor of breast cancer survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(12):994–1000.
325.
Karasek M. Melatonin, human aging, and age-related diseases. Exp Gerontol. 2004;39(11-12):1723–1729.
326.
Gupta D, Morley JE. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and aging. Compr Physiol. 2014;4(4):1495–1510.
327.
Milman S, Huffman DM, Barzilai N. The somatotropic axis in human aging: Framework for the current state of knowledge and future research. Cell Metab. 2016;23(6):980–989.
328.
Tan DX, Manchester LC, Esteban-Zubero E, Zhou Z, Reiter RJ. Melatonin as a potent and inducible endogenous antioxidant: Synthesis and metabolism. Molecules. 2015;20(10):18886–18906.
329.
Jung-Hynes B, Reiter RJ, Ahmad N. Sirtuins, melatonin and circadian rhythms: Building a bridge between aging and cancer. J Pineal Res. 2010;48(1):9–19.
330.
Zhang J, Shi Y, Xue X, Bu W, Li Y, Yang T, Cao L, Fang J, Li P, Chen Y, et al. Targeting the glucocorticoid receptor-CCR8 axis mediated bone marrow T cell sequestration enhances infiltration of anti-tumor T cells in intracranial cancers. Cell Mol Immunol. 2024;21(10):1145–1157.
331.
Colotta F, Allavena P, Sica A, Garlanda C, Mantovani A. Cancer-related inflammation, the seventh hallmark of cancer: Links to genetic instability. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30(7):1073–1081.
332.
Ye SY, Li JY, Li TH, Song YX, Sun JX, Chen XW, Zhao JH, Li Y, Wu ZH, Gao P, et al. The efficacy and safety of celecoxib in addition to standard cancer therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Curr Oncol. 2022;29(9):6137–6153.
333.
Wang M, Chen S, He X, Yuan Y, Wei X. Targeting inflammation as cancer therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2024;17(1):13.
334.
Lu ZY, Brochier J, Wijdenes J, Brailly H, Bataille R, Klein B. High amounts of circulating interleukin (IL)-6 in the form of monomeric immune complexes during anti-IL-6 therapy. Towards a new methodology for measuring overall cytokine production in human in vivo. Eur J Immunol. 1992;22(11):2819–2824.
335.
Dijkgraaf EM, Santegoets SJ, Reyners AK, Goedemans R, Wouters MC, Kenter GG, van Erkel AR, van Poelgeest MIE, Nijman HW, van der Hoeven JJM, et al. A phase I trial combining carboplatin/doxorubicin with tocilizumab, an anti-IL-6R monoclonal antibody, and interferon-alpha2b in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(10):2141–2149.
336.
Torrey H, Butterworth J, Mera T, Okubo Y, Wang L, Baum D, Defusco A, Plager S, Warden S, Huang D, et al. Targeting TNFR2 with antagonistic antibodies inhibits proliferation of ovarian cancer cells and tumor-associated Tregs. Sci Signal. 2017;10(462): Article eaaf8608.
337.
Rizo-Tellez SA, Sekheri M, Filep JG. C-reactive protein: A target for therapy to reduce inflammation. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1237729.
338.
Allin KH, Nordestgaard BG. Elevated C-reactive protein in the diagnosis, prognosis, and cause of cancer. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2011;48(4):155–170.
339.
Hirata T, Arai Y, Yuasa S, Abe Y, Takayama M, Sasaki T, Kunitomi A, Inagaki H, Endo M, Morinaga J, et al. Associations of cardiovascular biomarkers and plasma albumin with exceptional survival to the highest ages. Nature. Communications. 2020;11(1):3820.
340.
Balakrishnan R, Kang SI, Lee JY, Rho YK, Kim BK, Choi DK. Gut microbiota-immune system interactions in health and neurodegenerative diseases: Insights into molecular mechanisms and therapeutic applications. Aging Dis. 2024; doi: 10.14336/AD.2024.1362.
341.
Gao X, Zhao J, Chen W, Zhai Q. Food and drug design for gut microbiota-directed regulation: Current experimental landscape and future innovation. Pharmacol Res. 2023;194: Article 106867.
342.
Chen K, Wang H, Yang X, Tang C, Hu G, Gao Z. Targeting gut microbiota as a therapeutic target in T2DM: A review of multi-target interactions of probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics, and synbiotics with the intestinal barrier. Pharmacol Res. 2024;210: Article 107483.
343.
Ren Y, Chen M, Wang Z, Han J-DJ. Oral microbiota in aging and diseases. Life Medicine. 2024;3(3): Article lnae024.
344.
Feng D, Xiao Y, Wang J, et al. Unraveling links between aging, circadian rhythm and cancer: Insights from evidence-based analysis. Chin J Cancer Res. 2024;36(3):341-350.
345.
Chen H, Zhang L, Li Y, Meng X, Chi Y, Liu M. Gut microbiota and its metabolites: The emerging bridge between coronary artery disease and anxiety and depression? Aging Dis. 2024; doi: 10.14336/AD.2024.0538.
346.
Bana B, Cabreiro F. The microbiome and aging. Annu Rev Genet. 2019;53(1):239–261.
347.
Ling Z, Liu X, Cheng Y, Yan X, Wu S. Gut microbiota and aging. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2020;62(13):3509–3534.
348.
Frazier K, Chang EB. Intersection of the gut microbiome and circadian rhythms in metabolism. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2020;31(1):25–36.
349.
Choi H, Rao MC, Chang EB. Gut microbiota as a transducer of dietary cues to regulate host circadian rhythms and metabolism. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;18(10):679–689.
350.
Helmink BA, Khan MAW, Hermann A, Gopalakrishnan V, Wargo JA. The microbiome, cancer, and cancer therapy. Nat Med. 2019;25(3):377–388.
351.
Sepich-Poore GD, Zitvogel L, Straussman R, Hasty J, Wargo JA, Knight R. The microbiome and human cancer. Science. 2021;371(6536): Article eabc4552.
352.
Anker JF, Naseem AF, Mok H, Schaeffer AJ, Abdulkadir SA, Thumbikat P. Multi-faceted immunomodulatory and tissue-tropic clinical bacterial isolate potentiates prostate cancer immunotherapy. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1591.
353.
Feng D, Wang J, Wu R, Li D. Re: Immune system and intestinal microbiota determine efficacy of androgen deprivation therapy against prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2024;85(5):498–499.
354.
Amiama-Roig A, Verdugo-Sivianes EM, Carnero A, Blanco J-R. Chronotherapy: Circadian rhythms and their influence in cancer therapy. Cancers. 2022;14(20):5071.
355.
Li, D, Yu, Q, Wu, R, Tuo, Z, Zhu, W, Wang, J, Shao, F, Ye, L, Ye, X, Yoo, KH, Ke, M., Yang, Y, Wei, W, & Feng, D (2024). Chronobiology of the tumor microenvironment: Implications for therapeutic strategies and circadian-based interventions. Aging and Disease, 0. https://doi.org/10.14336/ad.2024.0327
356.
Lévi F. Circadian chronotherapy for human cancers. Lancet Oncol. 2001;2(5):307–315.
357.
Innominato PF, Lévi FA, Bjarnason GA. Chronotherapy and the molecular clock: Clinical implications in oncology. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2010;62(9-10):979–1001.
358.
Qvortrup C, Jensen BV, Fokstuen T, Nielsen SE, Keldsen N, Glimelius B, Bjerregaard B, Mejer J, Larsen FO, Pfeiffer P. A randomized study comparing short-time infusion of oxaliplatin in combination with capecitabine XELOX(30) and chronomodulated XELOX(30) as first-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(1):87–91.
359.
Lévi F, Okyar A, Dulong S, Innominato PF, Clairambault J. Circadian timing in cancer treatments. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2010;50(1):377–421.
360.
Nelson N, Lombardo J, Matlack L, Smith A, Hines K, Shi W, Simone NL. Chronoradiobiology of breast cancer: The time is now to link circadian rhythm and radiation biology. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(3):1331.
361.
Fu L, Pelicano H, Liu J, Huang P, Lee CC. The circadian gene Period2 plays an important role in tumor suppression and DNA damage response in vivo. Cell. 2002;111(1):41–50.
362.
Abdollahi H. Radiotherapy dose painting by circadian rhythm based radiomics. Med Hypotheses. 2019;133:109415.
363.
Ballesta A, Innominato PF, Dallmann R, Rand DA, Lévi FA, Watts SW. Systems chronotherapeutics. Pharmacol Rev. 2017;69(2):161–199.
364.
Lévi FA, Okyar A, Hadadi E, Innominato PF, Ballesta A. Circadian regulation of drug responses: Toward sex-specific and personalized chronotherapy. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2024;64(1):89–114.
365.
Goyal M, Shukla P, Gupta D, Bisht SS, Dhawan A, Gupta S, Pant MC, Verma NS. Oral mucositis in morning vs. evening irradiated patients: A randomised prospective study. Int J Radiat Biol. 2009;85(6):504–509.
366.
Shukla P, Gupta D, Bisht SS, Pant MC, Bhatt ML, Gupta R, Srivastava K, Gupta S, Dhawan A, Mishra D, et al. Circadian variation in radiation-induced intestinal mucositis in patients with cervical carcinoma. Cancer. 2010;116(8):2031–2035.
367.
Escudier B, Roigas J, Gillessen S, Harmenberg U, Srinivas S, Mulder SF, Fountzilas G, Peschel C, Flodgren P, Maneval EC, et al. Phase II study of sunitinib administered in a continuous once-daily dosing regimen in patients with cytokine-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(25):4068–4075.
368.
George S, Blay JY, Casali PG, Cesne AL, Stephenson P, Deprimo SE, Harmon CS, CNJ L, Morgan JA, Ray-Coquard I, et al. Clinical evaluation of continuous daily dosing of sunitinib malate in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after imatinib failure. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(11):1959–1968.
369.
Landré T, Karaboué A, Buchwald ZS, Innominato PF, Qian DC, Assié JB, Chouaïd C, Lévi F, Duchemann B. Effect of immunotherapy-infusion time of day on survival of patients with advanced cancers: A study-level meta-analysis. ESMO Open. 2024;9(2):102220.
370.
Wang C, Zeng Q, Gül ZM, Wang S, Pick R, Cheng P, Bill R, Wu Y, Naulaerts S, Barnoud C, et al. Circadian tumor infiltration and function of CD8+ T cells dictate immunotherapy efficacy. Cell. 2024;187(11):2690–2702.e7.
371.
Fortin BM, Pfeiffer SM, Insua-Rodríguez J, Alshetaiwi H, Moshensky A, Song WA, Mahieu AL, Chun SK, Lewis AN, Hsu A, et al. Circadian control of tumor immunosuppression affects efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade. Nat Immunol. 2024;25(7):1257–1269.
372.
Peng F, Lu J, Su K, Liu X, Luo H, He B, Wang C, Zhang X, An F, Lv D, et al. Oncogenic fatty acid oxidation senses circadian disruption in sleep-deficiency-enhanced tumorigenesis. Cell Metab. 2024;36(7):1598–1618.e11.
373.
Eckle T, Bertazzo J, Khatua TN, Fatemi Tabatabaei SR, Moori Bakhtiari N, Walker LA, Martino TA. Circadian influences on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury and heart failure. Circ Res. 2024;134(6):675–694.
374.
Bjarnason GA, MacKenzie RG, Nabid A, Hodson ID, El-Sayed S, Grimard L, Brundage M, Wright J, Hay J, Ganguly P, et al. Comparison of toxicity associated with early morning versus late afternoon radiotherapy in patients with head-and-neck cancer: A prospective randomized trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada clinical trials group (HN3). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73(1):166–172.
375.
Zhang PX, Jin F, Li ZL, Wu WL, Li YY, Long JH, Chen GY, Chen XX, Gan JY, Gong XY, et al. A randomized phase II trial of induction chemotherapy followed by cisplatin chronotherapy versus constant rate delivery combined with radiotherapy. Chronobiol Int. 2017;35(2):240–248.
376.
Jin F, Gou X-X, Wu W-L, Long J-H, Li Y-Y, Gong X-Y, et al. Induction chronomodulated chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A phase II prospective randomized study. J Cancer Res Ther. 2018;14(7):1613–1619.
377.
Lin H-X, Hua Y-J, Chen Q-Y, Luo D-H, Sun R, Qiu F, Mo HY, Mai HQ, Guo X, Xian LJ, et al. Randomized study of sinusoidal chronomodulated versus flat intermittent induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil followed by traditional radiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Chin J Cancer. 2013;32(9):502–511.
378.
Lévi FA, Zidani R, Vannetzel J-M, Perpoint B, Focan C, Faggiuolo R, Chollet P, Garufi C, Itzhaki M, Dogliotti L, et al. Chronomodulated versus fixed-infusion—Rate delivery of ambulatory chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinic acid (leucovorin) in patients with colorectal cancer metastases: A randomized multi-institutional trial. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86(21):1608–1617.
379.
Giacchetti S, Bjarnason G, Garufi C, Genet D, Iacobelli S, Tampellini M, Smaaland R, Focan C, Coudert B, Humblet Y, et al. Phase III trial comparing 4-day chronomodulated therapy versus 2-day conventional delivery of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Chronotherapy Group. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(22):3562–3569.
380.
Chang L, Li L, Li W, Jiang M, Jv Y, Wang L, Hou Y, Long Q, Yu S. Research on radiotherapy at different times of the day for inoperable cervical cancer. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016;54(11):856–864.
381.
Li J, Chen R, Ji M, Zou S-l, Zhu L-n. Cisplatin-based chronotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: A randomized controlled study and its pharmacokinetics analysis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2015;76(3):651–655.
382.
von Roemeling R, Hrushesky WJ. Circadian patterning of continuous floxuridine infusion reduces toxicity and allows higher dose intensity in patients with widespread cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1989;7(11):1710–1719.
383.
Feng D-C, Zhu W-Z, Wang J, Li D-X, Shi X, Xiong Q, You J, Han P, Qiu S, Wei Q, et al. The implications of single-cell RNA-seq analysis in prostate cancer: Unraveling tumor heterogeneity, therapeutic implications and pathways towards personalized therapy. Mil Med Res. 2024;11(1):21.
384.
Accardi G, Caruso C. Immune-inflammatory responses in the elderly: An update. Immun Ageing. 2018;15(1).
385.
Liu Z, Liang Q, Ren Y, Guo C, Ge X, Wang L, Cheng Q, Luo P, Zhang Y, Han X. Immunosenescence: Molecular mechanisms and diseases. Signal Transduct Targeted Ther. 2023;8(1).
386.
Chen ACY, Jaiswal S, Martinez D, Yerinde C, Ji K, Miranda V, Fung ME, Weiss SA, Zschummel M, Taguchi K, et al. The aged tumor microenvironment limits T cell control of cancer. Nat Immunol. 2024;25(6):1033–1045.
387.
Dahlquist KJV, Huggins MA, Yousefzadeh MJ, Soto-Palma C, Cholensky SH, Pierson M, Smith DM, Hamilton SE, Camell CD. PD1 blockade improves survival and CD8+ cytotoxic capacity, without increasing inflammation, during normal microbial experience in old mice. Nat Aging. 2024;4(7):915–925.
388.
Sánchez-Díaz L, Espinosa-Sánchez A, Blanco J-R, Carnero A. Senotherapeutics in cancer and HIV. Cells. 2022;11(7):1222.
389.
Gasek NS, Kuchel GA, Kirkland JL, Xu M. Strategies for targeting senescent cells in human disease. Nat Aging. 2021;1(10):870–879.
390.
Wyld L, Bellantuono I, Tchkonia T, Morgan J, Turner O, Foss F, George J, Danson S, Kirkland JL. Senescence and cancer: A review of clinical implications of senescence and Senotherapies. Cancers. 2020;12(8):2134.
391.
Martel J, Ojcius DM, Wu CY, Peng HH, Voisin L, Perfettini JL, Ko YF, Young JD. Emerging use of senolytics and senomorphics against aging and chronic diseases. Med Res Rev. 2020;40(6):2114–2131.
392.
Yu Y, Xu L, Qi L, Wang C, Xu N, Liu S, Li S, Tian H, Liu W, Xu Y, et al. ABT737 induces mitochondrial pathway apoptosis and mitophagy by regulating DRP1-dependent mitochondrial fission in human ovarian cancer cells. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;96:22–29.
393.
Hann CL, Daniel VC, Sugar EA, Dobromilskaya I, Murphy SC, Cope L, Lin X, Hierman JS, Wilburn DL, Watkins DN, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of ABT-737, a selective inhibitor of BCL-2, in small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2008;68(7):2321–2328.
394.
Touzeau C, Dousset C, Bodet L, Gomez-Bougie P, Bonnaud S, Moreau A, Moreau P, Pellat-Deceunynck C, Amiot M, le Gouill S. ABT-737 induces apoptosis in mantle cell lymphoma cells with a Bcl-2high/mcl-1low profile and synergizes with other antineoplastic agents. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(18):5973–5981.
395.
Beurlet S, Omidvar N, Gorombei P, Krief P, Le Pogam C, Setterblad N, de la Grange P, Leboeuf C, Janin A, Noguera M-E, et al. BCL-2 inhibition with ABT-737 prolongs survival in an NRAS/BCL-2 mouse model of AML by targeting primitive LSK and progenitor cells. Blood. 2013;122(16):2864–2876.
396.
Zhu Y, Tchkonia T, Fuhrmann-Stroissnigg H, Dai HM, Ling YY, Stout MB, Pirtskhalava T, Giorgadze N, Johnson KO, Giles CB, et al. Identification of a novel senolytic agent, navitoclax, targeting the Bcl-2 family of anti-apoptotic factors. Aging Cell. 2016;15(3):428–435.
397.
Nakajima W, Sharma K, Hicks MA, Le N, Brown R, Krystal GW, Harada H. Combination with vorinostat overcomes ABT-263 (navitoclax) resistance of small cell lung cancer. Cancer Biol Ther. 2016;17(1):27–35.
398.
Ackler S, Mitten MJ, Chen J, Clarin J, Foster K, Jin S, Phillips DC, Schlessinger S, Wang B, Leverson JD, et al. Navitoclax (ABT-263) and bendamustine ± rituximab induce enhanced killing of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma tumours in vivo. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;167(4):881–891.
399.
Paez-Ribes M, Gonzalez-Gualda E, Doherty GJ, Munoz-Espin D. Targeting senescent cells in translational medicine. EMBO Mol Med. 2019;11(12): Article e10234.
400.
Puglisi M, Molife LR, de Jonge MJ, Khan KH, Doorn LV, Forster MD, Blanco M, Gutierrez M, Franklin C, Busman T, et al. A phase I study of the safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of navitoclax plus docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors. Future Oncol. 2021;17(21):2747–2758.
401.
Cleary JM, Lima CM, Hurwitz HI, Montero AJ, Franklin C, Yang J, Graham A, Busman T, Mabry M, Holen K, et al. A phase I clinical trial of navitoclax, a targeted high-affinity Bcl-2 family inhibitor, in combination with gemcitabine in patients with solid tumors. Investig New Drugs. 2014;32(5):937–945.
402.
Joly F, Fabbro M, Follana P, Lequesne J, Medioni J, Lesoin A, Frenel JS, Abadie-Lacourtoisie S, Floquet A, Gladieff L, et al. A phase II study of Navitoclax (ABT-263) as single agent in women heavily pretreated for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: The MONAVI-GINECO study. Gynecol Oncol. 2022;165(1):30–39.
403.
Gonzalez-Gualda E, Paez-Ribes M, Lozano-Torres B, Macias D, Wilson JR 3rd, Gonzalez-Lopez C, Ou H-L, Mirón-Barroso S, Zhang Z, Lérida-Viso A, et al. Galacto-conjugation of Navitoclax as an efficient strategy to increase senolytic specificity and reduce platelet toxicity. Aging Cell. 2020;19(4): Article e13142.
404.
Li F, Huangyang P, Burrows M, Guo K, Riscal R, Godfrey J, Lee KE, Lin N, Lee P, Blair IA, et al. FBP1 loss disrupts liver metabolism and promotes tumorigenesis through a hepatic stellate cell senescence secretome. Nat Cell Biol. 2020;22(6):728–739.
405.
Wang L, Xiong B, Lu W, Cheng Y, Zhu J, Ai G, Zhang X, Liu X, Cheng Z. Senolytic drugs dasatinib and quercetin combined with Carboplatin or Olaparib reduced the peritoneal and adipose tissue metastasis of ovarian cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2024;174: Article 116474.
406.
Wu S, Jiang Y, Hong Y, Chu X, Zhang Z, Tao Y, Fan Z, Bai Z, Li X, Chen Y, et al. BRD4 PROTAC degrader ARV-825 inhibits T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia by targeting 'Undruggable' Myc-pathway genes. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21(1):230.
407.
He L, Chen C, Gao G, Xu K, Ma Z. ARV-825-induced BRD4 protein degradation as a therapy for thyroid carcinoma. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(5):4547–4557.
408.
Liao X, Qian X, Zhang Z, Tao Y, Li Z, Zhang Q, Liang H, Li X, Xie Y, Zhuo R, et al. ARV-825 demonstrates antitumor activity in gastric cancer via MYC-targets and G2M-checkpoint signaling pathways. Front Oncol. 2021;11: Article 753119.
409.
Wakita M, Takahashi A, Sano O, Loo TM, Imai Y, Narukawa M, Iwata H, Matsudaira T, Kawamoto S, Ohtani N, et al. A BET family protein degrader provokes senolysis by targeting NHEJ and autophagy in senescent cells. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1935.
410.
Guerrero A, Herranz N, Sun B, Wagner V, Gallage S, Guiho R, Wolter K, Pombo J, Irvine EE, Innes AJ, et al. Cardiac glycosides are broad-spectrum senolytics. Nat Metab. 2019;1(11):1074–1088.
411.
Triana-Martinez F, Picallos-Rabina P, Da Silva-Alvarez S, Pietrocola F, Llanos S, Rodilla V, Soprano E, Pedrosa P, Ferreirós A, Barradas M, et al. Identification and characterization of cardiac glycosides as senolytic compounds. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):4731.
412.
Khan S, Kellish P, Connis N, Thummuri D, Wiegand J, Zhang P, Zhang X, Budamagunta V, Hua N, Yang Y, et al. Co-targeting BCL-X(L) and MCL-1 with DT2216 and AZD8055 synergistically inhibit small-cell lung cancer growth without causing on-target toxicities in mice. Cell Death Discov. 2023;9(1):1.
413.
Chen SM, Guo CL, Shi JJ, Xu YC, Chen Y, Shen YY, Su Y, Ding J, Meng LH. HSP90 inhibitor AUY922 abrogates up-regulation of RTKs by mTOR inhibitor AZD8055 and potentiates its antiproliferative activity in human breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2014;135(10):2462–2474.
414.
Jee HY, Lee YG, Lee S, Elvira R, Seo HE, Lee JY, Han J, Lee K. Activation of ERK and p38 reduces AZD8055-mediated inhibition of protein synthesis in hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cell line. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(21):11824.
415.
Jia S, Xu X, Zhou S, Chen Y, Ding G, Cao L. Fisetin induces autophagy in pancreatic cancer cells via endoplasmic reticulum stress- and mitochondrial stress-dependent pathways. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(2):142.
416.
Pandey A, Trigun SK. Fisetin induces apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells by suppressing autophagy and down-regulating nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2). J Cell Biochem. 2023;124(9):1289–1308.
417.
Zhang L, Pitcher LE, Prahalad V, Niedernhofer LJ, Robbins PD. Targeting cellular senescence with senotherapeutics: Senolytics and senomorphics. FEBS J. 2023;290(5):1362–1383.
418.
Anisimov VN. Metformin for aging and cancer prevention. Aging (Albany NY). 2010;2(11):760–774.
419.
Sarkaria JN, Schwingler P, Schild SE, Grogan PT, Mladek AC, Mandrekar SJ, Tan AD, Kobayashi T, Marks RS, Kita H, et al. Phase I trial of sirolimus combined with radiation and cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2(8):751–757.
420.
Zhang H, Chen GG, Zhang Z, Chun S, Leung BC, Lai PB. Induction of autophagy in hepatocellular carcinoma cells by SB203580 requires activation of AMPK and DAPK but not p38 MAPK. Apoptosis. 2012;17(4):325–334.
421.
Han X, Chen H, Zhou J, Steed H, Postovit LM, Fu Y. Pharmacological inhibition of p38 MAPK by SB203580 increases resistance to carboplatin in A2780cp cells and promotes growth in primary ovarian cancer cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(8):2184.
422.
Park JC, Yoo HG, Kim HS, Jung MA, Kim MH, Han SW, Chay KO, Shin BA, Ahn BW, Jung YD. SB203580, a P38 MAPK inhibitor, blocks in vitro invasion by human gastric SNU-638 cells. Cancer Res Treat. 2002;34(6):426–431.
423.
Guo YW, Zhu L, Duan YT, Hu YQ, Li LB, Fan WJ, Song FH, Cai YF, Liu YY, Zheng GW, et al. Ruxolitinib induces apoptosis and pyroptosis of anaplastic thyroid cancer via the transcriptional inhibition of DRP1-mediated mitochondrial fission. Cell Death Dis. 2024;15(2):125.
424.
Hu Y, Hong Y, Xu Y, Liu P, Guo DH, Chen Y. Inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway with ruxolitinib overcomes cisplatin resistance in non-small-cell lung cancer NSCLC. Apoptosis. 2014;19(11):1627–1636.
425.
Lynce F, Stevens LE, Li Z, Brock JE, Gulvady A, Huang Y, Nakhlis F, Patel A, Force JM, Haddad TC, et al. TBCRC 039: A phase II study of preoperative ruxolitinib with or without paclitaxel for triple-negative inflammatory breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2024;26(1):20.
426.
Song L, Smith MA, Doshi P, Sasser K, Fulp W, Altiok S, Haura EB. Antitumor efficacy of the anti-interleukin-6 (IL-6) antibody siltuximab in mouse xenograft models of lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2014;9(7):974–982.
427.
San-Miguel J, Blade J, Shpilberg O, Grosicki S, Maloisel F, Min CK, Zarzuela MP, Robak T, Prasrad SVSS, Goh YT, et al. Phase 2 randomized study of bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone with or without siltuximab (anti-IL-6) in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2014;123(26):4136–4142.
428.
Shah JJ, Feng L, Thomas SK, Berkova Z, Weber DM, Wang M, Qazilbash MH, Champlin RE, Mendoza TR, Cleeland C, et al. Siltuximab (CNTO 328) with lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone in newly-diagnosed, previously untreated multiple myeloma: An open-label phase I trial. Blood Cancer J. 2016;6(2): Article e396.
429.
Lythgoe MP, Prasad V. Repositioning canakinumab for non-small cell lung cancer-important lessons for drug repurposing in oncology. Br J Cancer. 2022;127(5):785–787.
430.
Tan DSW, Felip E, de Castro G, Solomon BJ, Greystoke A, Cho BC, Cobo M, Kim TM, Ganguly S, Carcereny E, et al. Canakinumab versus placebo in combination with first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Results from the CANOPY-1 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(2):192–204.
431.
Garon EB, Lu S, Goto Y, De Marchi P, Paz-Ares L, Spigel DR, Thomas T, Yang JC-H, Ardizzoni A, Barlesi F, et al. Canakinumab as adjuvant therapy in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer: Results from the CANOPY—A double-blind, randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(2):180–191.
432.
Deng Y, Wang D, Zhao W, Qiu G, Zhu X, Wang Q, Qin T, Tang J, Jiang J, Lin N, et al. A multifunctional nanocatalytic metal-organic framework as a ferroptosis amplifier for mild hyperthermia photothermal therapy. Research. 2024;7:0397.
433.
Li J, Duan J, Hua C, Pan S, Li G, Feng Q, Liu D, Liu Z. Nanomedicine embraces the treatment and prevention of acute kidney injury to chronic kidney disease transition: Evidence, challenges, and opportunities. Burns Trauma. 2024;12:tkae044.
434.
Xiao Y, Zhong L, Liu J, Chen L, Wu Y, Li G. Progress and application of intelligent nanomedicine in urinary system tumors. J Pharm Anal. 2024;14(12): Article 100964.
435.
Maqbool I, Akhtar M, Ahmad R, Sadaquat H, Noreen S, Batool A, Khan SU. Novel multiparticulate pH triggered delayed release chronotherapeutic drug delivery of celecoxib-β-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes by using box-Behnken design. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2020;146:105254.
436.
Dumpa NR, Sarabu S, Bandari S, Zhang F, Repka MA. Chronotherapeutic drug delivery of ketoprofen and ibuprofen for improved treatment of early morning stiffness in arthritis using hot-melt extrusion technology. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2018;19(6):2700–2709.
437.
Qiu C, Xia F, Zhang J, Shi Q, Meng Y, Wang C, Pang H, Gu L, Xu C, Guo Q, et al. Advanced strategies for overcoming endosomal/lysosomal barrier in nanodrug delivery. Research. 2023;6:0148.
438.
Yuan M, Han Z, Liang Y, Sun Y, He B, Chen W, Li F. mRNA nanodelivery systems: Targeting strategies and administration routes. Biomater Res. 2023;27(1):90.
439.
Zetrini AE, Lip H, Abbasi AZ, Alradwan I, Ahmed T, He C, Henderson JT, Rauth AM, Wu XY. Remodeling tumor immune microenvironment by using polymer-lipid-manganese dioxide nanoparticles with radiation therapy to boost immune response of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Research. 2023;6:0247.
440.
Medema JP. Escape from senescence boosts tumour growth. Nature. 2018;553(7686):37–38.
441.
Milanovic M, Fan DNY, Belenki D, Dabritz JHM, Zhao Z, Yu Y, Dorr JR, Dimitrova L, Lenze D, Barbosa IAM, et al. Senescence-associated reprogramming promotes cancer stemness. Nature. 2018;553(7686):96–100.
442.
Zampetidis CP, Galanos P, Angelopoulou A, Zhu Y, Polyzou A, Karamitros T, Kotsinas A, Lagopati N, Mourkioti I, Mirzazadeh R, et al. A recurrent chromosomal inversion suffices for driving escape from oncogene-induced senescence via subTAD reorganization. Mol Cell. 2021;81(23):4907–23 e8.
443.
Galanos P, Vougas K, Walter D, Polyzos A, Maya-Mendoza A, Haagensen EJ, Kokkalis A, Roumelioti FM, Gagos S, Tzetis M, et al. Chronic p53-independent p21 expression causes genomic instability by deregulating replication licensing. Nat Cell Biol. 2016;18(7):777–789.
444.
Evangelou K, Belogiannis K, Papaspyropoulos A, Petty R, Gorgoulis VG. Escape from senescence: Molecular basis and therapeutic ramifications. J Pathol. 2023;260(5):649–665.
445.
Zhang N, Ji J, Zhou D, Liu X, Zhang X, Liu Y, Xiang W, Wang M, Zhang L, Wang G, et al. The interaction of the senescent and adjacent breast cancer cells promotes the metastasis of heterogeneous breast cancer cells through notch signaling. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(2):849.
446.
Cheng HY, Su GL, Wu YX, Chen G, Yu ZL. Extracellular vesicles in anti-tumor drug resistance: Mechanisms and therapeutic prospects. J Pharm Anal. 2024;14(7): Article 100920.
447.
Asao T, Tobias GC, Lucotti S, Jones DR, Matei I, Lyden D. Extracellular vesicles and particles as mediators of long-range communication in cancer: Connecting biological function to clinical applications. Extracell Vesicles Circ Nucl Acids. 2023;4(3):461–485.
448.
Raposo G, Stahl PD. Extracellular vesicles—On the cusp of a new language in the biological sciences. Extracell Vesicles Circ Nucl Acids. 2023;4(2):240–254.
449.
Zhang M, Hu S, Liu L, Dang P, Liu Y, Sun Z, Qiao B, Wang C. Engineered exosomes from different sources for cancer-targeted therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):124.
450.
Nam GH, Choi Y, Kim GB, Kim S, Kim SA, Kim IS. Emerging prospects of exosomes for cancer treatment: From conventional therapy to immunotherapy. Adv Mater. 2020;32(51): Article e2002440.
451.
Takasugi M, Okada R, Takahashi A, Virya Chen D, Watanabe S, Hara E. Small extracellular vesicles secreted from senescent cells promote cancer cell proliferation through EphA2. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):15729.
452.
Takahashi A, Okada R, Nagao K, Kawamata Y, Hanyu A, Yoshimoto S, Takasugi M, Watanabe S, Kanemaki MT, Obuse C, et al. Exosomes maintain cellular homeostasis by excreting harmful DNA from cells. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15287.
453.
Idda ML, McClusky WG, Lodde V, Munk R, Abdelmohsen K, Rossi M, Gorospe M. Survey of senescent cell markers with age in human tissues. Aging. 2020;12(5):4052–4066.
454.
Kumar P, Hassan M, Tacke F, Engelmann C. Delineating the heterogeneity of senescence-induced-functional alterations in hepatocytes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2024;81(1):200.
455.
Helman A, Klochendler A, Azazmeh N, Gabai Y, Horwitz E, Anzi S, Swisa A, Condiotti R, Granit RZ, Nevo Y, et al. p16(Ink4a)-induced senescence of pancreatic beta cells enhances insulin secretion. Nat Med. 2016;22(4):412–420.
456.
Hall BM, Balan V, Gleiberman AS, Strom E, Krasnov P, Virtuoso LP, Rydkina E, Vujcic S, Balan K, Gitlin II, et al. p16(Ink4a) and senescence-associated beta-galactosidase can be induced in macrophages as part of a reversible response to physiological stimuli. Aging (Albany NY). 2017;9(8):1867–1884.
457.
Frescas D, Hall BM, Strom E, Virtuoso LP, Gupta M, Gleiberman AS, Rydkina E, Balan V, Vujcic S, Chernova OB, et al. Murine mesenchymal cells that express elevated levels of the CDK inhibitor p16(Ink4a) in vivo are not necessarily senescent. Cell Cycle. 2017;16(16):1526–1533.
458.
Di Micco R, Krizhanovsky V, Baker D, d'Adda di Fagagna F. Cellular senescence in ageing: From mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22(2):75–95.
459.
Zhang X, Zhu R, Yu D, Wang J, Yan Y, Xu K. Single-cell RNA sequencing to explore cancer-associated fibroblasts heterogeneity: "single" vision for "heterogeneous" environment. Cell Prolif. 2024;57(5): Article e13592.
460.
Zhang P, Li W, Liu C, Qin F, Lu Y, Qin M, Hou Y. Molecular imaging of tumour-associated pathological biomarkers with smart nanoprobe: From “seeing” to “measuring”. Exploration. 2023;3(6):20230070.
461.
van Duijnhoven SMJ, Robillard MS, Langereis S, Grüll H. Bioresponsive probes for molecular imaging: Concepts and in vivo applications. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2015;10(4):282–308.
462.
Baker AG, Hartono M, Ou HL, Popov AB, Brown EL, Joseph J, Golinska M, González-Gualda E, Macias D, Ge J, et al. An indocyanine green-based nanoprobe for in vivo detection of cellular senescence. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2024;63(25):e202404885.
463.
Magkouta S, Veroutis D, Pousias A, Papaspyropoulos A, Pippa N, Lougiakis N, Kambas K, Lagopati N, Polyzou A, Georgiou M, et al. A fluorophore-conjugated reagent enabling rapid detection, isolation and live tracking of senescent cells. Mol Cell. 2023;83(19):3558–3573 e7.
464.
An Z, Liu W, Li W, Wei M, An C. Application of single-cell RNA sequencing in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Chin J Cancer Res. 2023;35(4):331–342.
465.
Li M, Chen Z, Jiang T, Yang X, Du Y, Liang J, Wang L, Xi J, Lin M, Feng M. Circadian rhythm-associated clinical relevance and tumor microenvironment of non-small cell lung cancer. J Cancer. 2021;12(9):2582–2597.
466.
Wang ZH, Zhang P, Du YH, Wei XS, Ye LL, Niu YR, Xiang X, Peng WB, Su Y, Zhou Q. High-risk early-stage lung adenocarcinoma patients are identified by an immune-related circadian clock gene signature. J Thorac Dis. 2022;14(10):3748–3761.
467.
Yu CC, Chen LC, Chiou CY, Chang YJ, Lin VC, Huang CY, Lin IL, Chang TY, Lu TL, Lee CH, et al. Genetic variants in the circadian rhythm pathway as indicators of prostate cancer progression. Cancer Cell Int. 2019;19:87.
Year 2025 volume 8 Issue 3
PDF
177
99
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.0612
  • Receive Date:2024-11-24
  • Online Date:2025-07-23
  • Published:2025-03-05
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-11-24
  • Revised:2025-01-14
  • Accepted:2025-01-24
Funding
Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program(23QYCX0136)
Affiliations
    1 Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
    2 Department of Rehabilitation, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.
    3 Department of Pathology, Ningbo Clinical Pathology Diagnosis Center, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, China.
    4 Department of Pathology, Ningbo Medical Centre Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315040, China.
    5 Department of Public Research Platform, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai, China.
    6Department of Comparative Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
    7Purdue Institute for Cancer Research, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA.
    8 Department of Urological Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical Center of PLA, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
    9 Department of Urology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
    10 Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
    11 Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London W1W 7TS, UK.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to: (WR.W.); (DC.F.)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.0612
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT