收藏切换
Differences in Soil Fertility under Different Evaluation Methods - A Case Study of Nanchong, Sichuan, China
收藏切换
PDF
Chengwei PU1, Li ZHOU1, Ji ZHANG1, Shangling ZHOU1, Fa HE1, Pinwen CHEN1, Guichuan YANG1, Xiaoqiu DU1, Qianchao LIAO2, *
Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops | 2025, 46(2) : 460 - 473
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops | 2025, 46(2): 460-473
Agricultural Ecology & Environmental Protection
Differences in Soil Fertility under Different Evaluation Methods - A Case Study of Nanchong, Sichuan, China
Full
Chengwei PU1, Li ZHOU1, Ji ZHANG1, Shangling ZHOU1, Fa HE1, Pinwen CHEN1, Guichuan YANG1, Xiaoqiu DU1, Qianchao LIAO2, *
Affiliations
  • 1.Nanchong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanchong, Sichuan 637000, China
  • 2.Nanchong Soil and Fertilizer Station, Nanchong, Sichuan 637000, China
Published: 2025-02-25 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2025.02.021
Outline
收藏切换

The soil nutrient status and comprehensive fertility of agricultural fields in Nanchong were scientifically and objectively evaluated based on 12 nutrient indicators of 872 soil samples, through comprehensive fertility index method, factor analysis method, entropy coefficient method and coefficient of variation method. The soil in Nanchong was alkaline, with low content of organic matter, rich content of phosphorus and iron, high content of copper and zinc, suitable content of potassium and manganese, low content of nitrogen, boron and molybdenum. In the comprehensive fertility index method, the comprehensive fertility index value was 0.75, which was in the third grade, and the overall soil fertility was poor. Only the comprehensive soil fertility of Peng’an County reached the second grade, which was 0.96. In the factor analysis method, the proportion of grade 4 samples was 42.09%, that of grade 3 samples was 34.52%, that of grade 2 samples was close to that of grade 5 samples, that of grade 1-3 samples accounted for 46.68%, that of grade 4-6 samples accounted for 53.52%, and the overall soil fertility was slightly low. In the entropy coefficient method, the comprehensive fertility of soil was 0.082 96, which was between the second and third grade, and the overall fertility of soil was medium. The comprehensive soil fertility value of the coefficient of variation method was 34.09, which was between the first and second grade, and the overall soil fertility was high. Among the four evaluation methods, the coefficient of variation method had the highest soil fertility level, followed by entropy coefficient method and factor analysis method. The comprehensive fertility index method had the lowest fertility level. Through comparative analysis, the result of the factor analysis was more in line with the actual situation of Nanchong. The comprehensive fertility of farmland soil in Nanchong was slightly low. To improve the comprehensive fertility of agricultural land, it is necessary to reduce soil alkalinity, increase organic matter content, and pay attention to the supplementation of fertilizers such as nitrogen, boron, and molybdenum.

Nanchong  /  agricultural land  /  nutrient content  /  comprehensive fertility  /  evaluation methods
Chengwei PU, Li ZHOU, Ji ZHANG, Shangling ZHOU, Fa HE, Pinwen CHEN, Guichuan YANG, Xiaoqiu DU, Qianchao LIAO. Differences in Soil Fertility under Different Evaluation Methods - A Case Study of Nanchong, Sichuan, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2025 , 46 (2) : 460 -473 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2025.02.021
Year 2025 volume 46 Issue 2
PDF
91
50
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2025.02.021
  • Receive Date:2024-08-30
  • Online Date:2026-06-23
  • Published:2025-02-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-08-30
  • Revised:2024-10-03
Funding
Affiliations
    1.Nanchong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanchong, Sichuan 637000, China
    2.Nanchong Soil and Fertilizer Station, Nanchong, Sichuan 637000, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/rdzwxb/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2025.02.021
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT