Electric Vehicles (EVs) are more prone to inducing motion sickness compared to traditional vehicles. To investigate the factors contributing to motion sickness in EVs and their differences from traditional vehicles, and to propose effective mitigation and treatment methods, process and mechanism of motion sickness induction in EVs is explored by analyzing factors such as EVs’ structural characteristics, power output, and regenerative braking systems. Mitigation methods, including medical medications, structural optimization, and aroma regulation are also considered. Meanwhile, subjective questionnaires and objective physiological data are compared as methods for testing motion sickness. The research results indicate that EVs are more likely to induce motion sickness due to their robust power output characteristics and the repeated pulling sensation caused by the regenerative braking system. Existing mitigation methods have shown varying degrees of effectiveness across different individuals. Additionally, the study offers insights and prospects for future research on managing motion sickness in EVs, contributing to more effective solutions.
| 科 Family | 属数 Number of genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) | 属 Genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae | 2 | 11 | 5.26 | 鹅膏菌属 Amanita | 10 | 4.78 |
| 小菇科 Mycenaceae | 2 | 12 | 5.74 | 丝盖伞属 Inocybe | 5 | 2.39 |
| 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae | 8 | 14 | 6.70 | 蜡蘑属 Laccaria | 5 | 2.39 |
| 红菇科 Russulaceae | 3 | 23 | 11.00 | 小皮伞属 Marasmius | 6 | 2.87 |
| 小菇属 Mycena | 11 | 5.26 | ||||
| 光柄菇属 Pluteus | 5 | 2.39 | ||||
| 红菇属 Russula | 17 | 8.13 | ||||
| 栓菌属 Trametes | 5 | 2.39 |