The forward development of vehicle integration indicates the R&D capabilities of the automobile industry. Therefore the paper studied the evaluation and comparison of the forward development of vehicle integration among different automobile companies. According to the work content of forward development, a Vshaped development process was adopted and revised. An model involving 9 firstlevel indicators and 33 secondlevel indicators was built to evaluate the forward development of vehicle integration of seven Chinesebranded vehicle companies. It is found that the maximum value of the weight coefficient of product planning leads to the largest value of the forward development capability. The Company J with the best comprehensive performance has clear advantages in product planning, project management, vehicle function definition and vehicle performance integration without any unfavorable indicators. The evaluation scores of other companies are affected by their unfavorable indicators.
| 科 Family | 属数 Number of genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) | 属 Genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae | 2 | 11 | 5.26 | 鹅膏菌属 Amanita | 10 | 4.78 |
| 小菇科 Mycenaceae | 2 | 12 | 5.74 | 丝盖伞属 Inocybe | 5 | 2.39 |
| 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae | 8 | 14 | 6.70 | 蜡蘑属 Laccaria | 5 | 2.39 |
| 红菇科 Russulaceae | 3 | 23 | 11.00 | 小皮伞属 Marasmius | 6 | 2.87 |
| 小菇属 Mycena | 11 | 5.26 | ||||
| 光柄菇属 Pluteus | 5 | 2.39 | ||||
| 红菇属 Russula | 17 | 8.13 | ||||
| 栓菌属 Trametes | 5 | 2.39 |