收藏切换
Investigation on Gas Diffusion Mechanism and Risk Control in Jacking Construction Caused by Gas Pipeline Leakage
收藏切换
PDF
Wei-hua LIU1, Feng WANG2, 3, *, Ji-ri ZHOU1, Hao ZHOU2, 3, Li LUO1, Yang-yu ZHANG2, 3
Science Technology and Engineering | 2025, 25(22) : 9514 - 9522
Less
收藏切换
Science Technology and Engineering | 2025, 25(22): 9514-9522
Papers·Architectural Science
Investigation on Gas Diffusion Mechanism and Risk Control in Jacking Construction Caused by Gas Pipeline Leakage
Full
Wei-hua LIU1, Feng WANG2, 3, *, Ji-ri ZHOU1, Hao ZHOU2, 3, Li LUO1, Yang-yu ZHANG2, 3
Affiliations
  • 1 China MCC5 Group Ltd., Chengdu 610063, China
  • 2 Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering of Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
  • 3 School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
Published: 2025-08-08 doi: 10.12404/j.issn.1671-1815.2407489
Outline
收藏切换

The soil covering of urban pipe jacking is shallow, and the surrounding pipelines are densely distributed and close to pipe jacking. In the process of pipe jacking construction, various factors may lead to gas pipeline fracture and gas leakage, resulting in gas, mainly gas, spreading in the soil and entering the pipe jacking, which brings potential great harm to the safety of pipe jacking construction. Based on the main-pipeline project of Maojiawan sewage treatment plant, the diffusion mechanism of gas in soil and pipe jacking and the construction ventilation technology were studied by theoretical analysis and numerical calculation. The results show as follows. With the increase of time, the diffusion flux of gas in soil first increases and then becomes stable. The farther away the pipe jacking is from the leakage hole, the lower the gas emission amount on the face, and the longer the time required for gas diffusion to the pipe jacking. The gas concentration on the opposite side of the air duct near the face of the pipe jacking is relatively high, and the gas is easy to gather. With the increase of air supply volume in the air duct, strong air flow is generated near the face, and the gas concentration near the face continues to decrease, but the rate of gas concentration reduction decreases. When the air supply volume in the air duct is 131 m3/min, the highest gas concentration in the pipe jacking is 4.57%, which is lower than the lower limit of gas explosion. With the increase of the distance between the air duct tuyere and the face, the maximum gas concentration in the pipe jacking first decreases and then increases. When the distance between the air duct tuyere and the face is 4 m, the maximum gas concentration in the pipe jacking reaches the minimum value of 4.41%. Based on this, a more reasonable ventilation parameter for pipe jacking construction is proposed.

pipe jacking  /  gas leakage  /  gas  /  theoretical analysis  /  numerical calculation
Wei-hua LIU, Feng WANG, Ji-ri ZHOU, Hao ZHOU, Li LUO, Yang-yu ZHANG. Investigation on Gas Diffusion Mechanism and Risk Control in Jacking Construction Caused by Gas Pipeline Leakage[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2025 , 25 (22) : 9514 -9522 . DOI: 10.12404/j.issn.1671-1815.2407489
Year 2025 volume 25 Issue 22
PDF
162
77
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.12404/j.issn.1671-1815.2407489
  • Receive Date:2024-10-10
  • Online Date:2026-02-11
  • Published:2025-08-08
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-10-10
  • Revised:2025-05-14
Funding
Affiliations
    1 China MCC5 Group Ltd., Chengdu 610063, China
    2 Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering of Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
    3 School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/kxjsygc/EN/10.12404/j.issn.1671-1815.2407489
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT