In order to explore the efficient heat transfer characteristics of medium-deep coaxial buried pipe heat exchangers, a heat transfer model was constructed between the medium-deep coaxial buried pipe heat exchanger and surrounding rock and soil based on the fluid flow heat transfer equation. COMSOL software was used for numerical analysis and calculation of heat transfer, and the nominal heat transfer of the model was studied under different burial depths, inner pipe thermal conductivity, circulating water flow rate, and cementing material thermal conductivity conditions. The research results indicate that the thermal conductivity of the inner pipe, the flow rate of circulating water, and the thermal conductivity of the cementing material have a significant impact on the nominal heat extraction. The thermal conductivity of the inner tube decreases from${0.5}\mathrm{\;W}/\left({\mathrm{m}\cdot \mathrm{K}}\right)$to${0.002}\mathrm{\;W}/\left({\mathrm{m}\cdot \mathrm{K}}\right)$, with a nominal increase in nominal heat extraction of${289.4}\%$. The circulating water flow rate from${20}{\mathrm{\;m}}^{2}/\mathrm{h}$rises to${45}{\mathrm{\;m}}^{2}/\mathrm{h}$, with a nominal increase in nominal heat extraction of${124}\%$. The thermal conductivity of cementing materials increases from${0.8}\mathrm{\;W}/\left({\mathrm{m}\cdot \mathrm{K}}\right)$to${1.8}\mathrm{\;W}/\left({\mathrm{m}\cdot \mathrm{K}}\right)$, with a nominal increase in heat extraction of$2\%$. Finally, relying on a Pilot Demonstration Project of Medium and Deep Geothermal Energy for Building Heating at CCTEG Xi’an Research Institute (Group) Co., Ltd., differential analysis was conducted on experimental and simulation data under continuous operation for${168}\mathrm{\;h}$of the project. The research results have certain guiding significance for the optimization design of medium-deep coaxial buried pipe heat exchangers and the efficient development and utilization of medium-deep geothermal wells.
| 科 Family | 属数 Number of genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) | 属 Genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae | 2 | 11 | 5.26 | 鹅膏菌属 Amanita | 10 | 4.78 |
| 小菇科 Mycenaceae | 2 | 12 | 5.74 | 丝盖伞属 Inocybe | 5 | 2.39 |
| 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae | 8 | 14 | 6.70 | 蜡蘑属 Laccaria | 5 | 2.39 |
| 红菇科 Russulaceae | 3 | 23 | 11.00 | 小皮伞属 Marasmius | 6 | 2.87 |
| 小菇属 Mycena | 11 | 5.26 | ||||
| 光柄菇属 Pluteus | 5 | 2.39 | ||||
| 红菇属 Russula | 17 | 8.13 | ||||
| 栓菌属 Trametes | 5 | 2.39 |