收藏切换
Optimization of Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Method Coupling Mathematical Statistics and Machine Learning Models
收藏切换
PDF
Shan-dong LIU1, Jun LI2, Xing-yuan JIANG1, 3, *, Yi YANG1, 3, Rong-qian ZHAO3
Science Technology and Engineering | 2025, 25(5) : 1827 - 1839
Less
收藏切换
Science Technology and Engineering | 2025, 25(5): 1827-1839
Papers·Astronomy and Geosciences
Optimization of Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Method Coupling Mathematical Statistics and Machine Learning Models
Full
Shan-dong LIU1, Jun LI2, Xing-yuan JIANG1, 3, *, Yi YANG1, 3, Rong-qian ZHAO3
Affiliations
  • 1 Key Laboratory of Karst Georesources and Environment (Guizhou University), Ministry of Education, Guiyang 550025, China
  • 2 114 Geological Brigade, Guizhou Geological and Mining Bureau, Zunyi 563000, China
  • 3 College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
Published: 2025-02-18 doi: 10.12404/j.issn.1671-1815.2402758
Outline
收藏切换

Landslide geological hazard susceptibility assessment is an important means of hazard prevention and reduction. The selection and optimization of susceptibility assessment model is very important. Sinan County was selected as the study area, and 16 assessment factors such as elevation, slope, curvature, lithology, land use, and average annual precipitation were selected. Frequency ratio (FR) model was coupled with support vector machine (SVM) model and random forest (RF) model. Grid search method was introduced to obtain the optimal parameter combination of SVM model, RF model and their coupling model for model training. Finally, SVM, RF, FR-SVM and FR-RF models were constructed to predict landslide susceptibility in the whole study area, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was performed verification. The results show that compared with the single machine learning model, the coupled machine learning model has more landslide hazard samples fall in the high zone and the very high zone, and has higher accuracy. In the single model, more landslide hazard samples in the RF model fall in the high zone and the extremely high zone. In the coupled model, more landslide hazard samples in the FR-RF model fall in the high zone and the very high zone, and no hazard samples points in the FR model and the FR-RF model fall in the very low zone, indicating that no matter the single model or the coupled model, The performance of RF model is better than that of SVM model. The AUC values of ROC prediction curves of the four models are 0.831 6, 0.843 9, 0.864 4 and 0.910 4, indicating that the coupling model combined with FR model and RF model has a higher accuracy, and this model is more suitable for the assessment of landslide susceptibility in Sinan County. The assessment results can provide some reference for hazard prevention and reduction of local landslide geological hazards.

landslide susceptibility assessment  /  frequency ratio model  /  machine learning models  /  coupled model  /  receiver operating characteristic curve  /  Sinan County
Shan-dong LIU, Jun LI, Xing-yuan JIANG, Yi YANG, Rong-qian ZHAO. Optimization of Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Method Coupling Mathematical Statistics and Machine Learning Models[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2025 , 25 (5) : 1827 -1839 . DOI: 10.12404/j.issn.1671-1815.2402758
Year 2025 volume 25 Issue 5
PDF
283
106
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.12404/j.issn.1671-1815.2402758
  • Receive Date:2024-04-16
  • Online Date:2025-07-29
  • Published:2025-02-18
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-04-16
  • Revised:2024-11-20
Funding
Affiliations
    1 Key Laboratory of Karst Georesources and Environment (Guizhou University), Ministry of Education, Guiyang 550025, China
    2 114 Geological Brigade, Guizhou Geological and Mining Bureau, Zunyi 563000, China
    3 College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/kxjsygc/EN/10.12404/j.issn.1671-1815.2402758
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT