收藏切换
Structural Safety and Support Parameters of Advanced Tunnel in Double-arch Tunnel without Middle Drift
收藏切换
PDF
Feng WANG1, 2, Ya-biao FANG1, 2, Teng-gen XIONG1, 2, Yang-yu ZHANG1, 2, Song YUAN1, 2, 3
Science Technology and Engineering | 2025, 25(6) : 2554 - 2563
Less
收藏切换
Science Technology and Engineering | 2025, 25(6): 2554-2563
Papers·Traffics and Transportations
Structural Safety and Support Parameters of Advanced Tunnel in Double-arch Tunnel without Middle Drift
Full
Feng WANG1, 2, Ya-biao FANG1, 2, Teng-gen XIONG1, 2, Yang-yu ZHANG1, 2, Song YUAN1, 2, 3
Affiliations
  • 1 Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering of Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
  • 2 School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
  • 3 Sichuan Communicati on Surveying & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610017, China
Published: 2025-02-28 doi: 10.12404/j.issn.1671-1815.2308918
Outline
收藏切换

In response to the common problem of secondary lining cracking in double-arch tunnel without middle drift, how to improve its mechanical characteristics to ensure the safety of tunnel construction and operation is the focus of this study. Based on the arch section of Yijin Expressway Huangjiaoping Tunnel Project, numerical simulation method was adopted, the influence of support parameters such as the thickness of the initial support, the spacing of the steel frame, and the thickness of the secondary lining of the advanced tunnel on the displacement of surrounding rock, the mechanics characteristics of the initial support and the secondary lining of the advanced tunnel were deeply studied, and reasonable and optimized support parameters were proposed. The results show that as the thickness of the initial support increases or the spacing of the steel frame decreases, the displacement of the surrounding rock of the advanced tunnel and the principal stress of the secondary lining continue to decrease, and the principal stress of the initial support continues to increase. Among them, the maximum tensile stress of the secondary lining decreases significantly. When the thickness of the initial support is 0.28 m or the spacing of the steel frame is 0.5 m, the maximum tensile stress decreases by about 15% compared with the most unfavorable condition. As the thickness of the secondary lining increases, the displacement of surrounding rock, the principal stress of the initial support and the secondary lining of the advanced tunnel decrease significantly. Compared with the thickness of the secondary lining of 0.7 m and the thickness of the secondary lining of 0.5 m, the maximum tensile stress of the secondary lining is reduced by 23.8%. Therefore, moderately increasing the thickness of the initial support or decreasing the spacing of the steel frame or increasing the thickness of the secondary lining can effectively improve the stress of the secondary lining. It is suggested that the thickness of the initial support of the advanced tunnel should be 0.28 m, the spacing of the steel frame should be 0.5 m, the corresponding steel frame type is I22b, and the thickness of the secondary lining should be 0.7 m under the shallow buried state of V-class surrounding rock.

tunnel construction without middle drift  /  double-arch tunnel  /  structural safety  /  support parameter  /  numerical calculation
Feng WANG, Ya-biao FANG, Teng-gen XIONG, Yang-yu ZHANG, Song YUAN. Structural Safety and Support Parameters of Advanced Tunnel in Double-arch Tunnel without Middle Drift[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2025 , 25 (6) : 2554 -2563 . DOI: 10.12404/j.issn.1671-1815.2308918
Year 2025 volume 25 Issue 6
PDF
375
144
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.12404/j.issn.1671-1815.2308918
  • Receive Date:2023-11-14
  • Online Date:2025-07-27
  • Published:2025-02-28
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2023-11-14
  • Revised:2024-11-27
Affiliations
    1 Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering of Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
    2 School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
    3 Sichuan Communicati on Surveying & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610017, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/kxjsygc/EN/10.12404/j.issn.1671-1815.2308918
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT