收藏切换
Effects of Different Types of Tight Gas Sweet Spots on Horizontal Well Fracturing Productivity
收藏切换
PDF
Mao JIANG1, Jian-shu WU1, Cheng-yong PENG1, 2, Wei-yun MA3, Yu-hu BAI1, Fan YANG3
Science Technology and Engineering | 2025, 25(11) : 4515 - 4525
Less
收藏切换
Science Technology and Engineering | 2025, 25(11): 4515-4525
Papers·Petroleum and Natural Gas Industry
Effects of Different Types of Tight Gas Sweet Spots on Horizontal Well Fracturing Productivity
Full
Mao JIANG1, Jian-shu WU1, Cheng-yong PENG1, 2, Wei-yun MA3, Yu-hu BAI1, Fan YANG3
Affiliations
  • 1 CNOOC Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100028, China
  • 2 State Key Laboratory of Offshore Oil and Gas Exploitation, Beijing 102209, China
  • 3 China United Coal Bed Methane Co., Ltd., Beijing 100011, China
Published: 2025-04-18 doi: 10.12404/j.issn.1671-1815.2404203
Outline
收藏切换

The small pore throat radius, high starting pressure gradient, poor formation physical property and large gas production difference of horizontal wells after fracturing in tight sandstone reservoirs seriously affect the increase of tight gas reserves and production. In view of the above problems, the production dynamics of gas wells under different levels of sweet spots in the eastern Ordos Basin were analyzed, and a new tight gas fracturing method based on sweet spot distribution was proposed. Based on the evaluation of rock mechanics parameters, energy storage coefficient and argillaceous content parameters, the evaluation model of geological sweet spot and engineering sweet spot was established, and the reservoir quality of tight sandstone gas reservoir was divided by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. According to different sweet spot types, the production characteristics and sweet spot distribution characteristics of Class I, II and III horizontal wells were summarized, and three fracturing modes based on geological sweet spot and engineering sweet spot were formed. The results show that when the horizontal well is drilled in Class I geological sweet spot and Class I engineering sweet spot, the cumulative gas production is higher than expected (Class I well), and a larger fracturing scale and displacement can be adopted to maximize the economic benefit (Model 1). When the horizontal well is drilled in Class I geological sweet spot and Class II engineering sweet spot combination, the cumulative gas production is lower than Class I well (Class II well), and the fracturing scale should be reduced appropriately to pursue a certain production capacity and economic benefit (Model 2). When horizontal wells are drilled in geological sweet spots below Class II and combinations of Class I/II engineering sweet spots, the production effect is the worst (Class III wells), and the fracturing scale should be controlled by reducing displacement to avoid the fracture from entering the risk layer and obtain a certain production rate (Model 3). The above new fracturing method was applied to a newly drilled horizontal well in a tight gas reservoir, and the open flow and gas production of the horizontal well after fracturing reached the expectation, which has certain guiding significance for the development of tight sandstone gas reservoir.

tight gas  /  geological sweet spot  /  engineering sweet spot  /  cumulative gas production  /  completion segment clustering optimization  /  fracturing scale optimization
Mao JIANG, Jian-shu WU, Cheng-yong PENG, Wei-yun MA, Yu-hu BAI, Fan YANG. Effects of Different Types of Tight Gas Sweet Spots on Horizontal Well Fracturing Productivity[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2025 , 25 (11) : 4515 -4525 . DOI: 10.12404/j.issn.1671-1815.2404203
Year 2025 volume 25 Issue 11
PDF
359
140
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.12404/j.issn.1671-1815.2404203
  • Receive Date:2024-06-05
  • Online Date:2025-07-09
  • Published:2025-04-18
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-06-05
  • Revised:2024-09-25
Funding
Affiliations
    1 CNOOC Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100028, China
    2 State Key Laboratory of Offshore Oil and Gas Exploitation, Beijing 102209, China
    3 China United Coal Bed Methane Co., Ltd., Beijing 100011, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/kxjsygc/EN/10.12404/j.issn.1671-1815.2404203
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT