收藏切换
Response of Thermospheric Winds at Mid-latitudes in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres to the Geomagnetic Storm on 18 March 2018
收藏切换
PDF
Xinmiao XIA1, 2, Guoying JIANG1, 3, 4, NEL Amoré Elsje5, Yajun ZHU1, 3, 4, Jiyao XU1, Wei YUAN1, 4
Chinese Journal of Space Science | 2026, 46(2) : 281 - 289
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of Space Science | 2026, 46(2): 281-289
Research Article
Response of Thermospheric Winds at Mid-latitudes in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres to the Geomagnetic Storm on 18 March 2018
Full
Xinmiao XIA1, 2, Guoying JIANG1, 3, 4, NEL Amoré Elsje5, Yajun ZHU1, 3, 4, Jiyao XU1, Wei YUAN1, 4
Affiliations
  • 1National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190
  • 2College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
  • 3School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
  • 4Hainan National Field Science Observation and Research Observatory for Space Weather, Danzhou 571734
  • 5South African National Space Agency, Hermanus 7200
Published: 2026-03-15 doi: 10.11728/cjss2026.02.2025-0039
Outline
收藏切换

The responses of thermospheric winds at middle latitudes to the moderate geomagnetic storm of 18-19 March 2018, are examined using two ground-based Fabry-Perot Interferometer (FPI) observations from the Xinglong (XLON, 40.2°N, 117.6°E; magnetic latitude 35°N) and the Sutherland Astronomical Observatory (SAAO, 32.2°S, 20.48°E; magnetic latitude 40.7°S), combined with simulations from the Thermosphere-Ionosphere-Electrodynamics General Circulation Model (TIEGCM). The storm reached a maximum Kp index of 6, classifying it as a moderate storm. Ground-based FPI measurements provided high-resolution wind data at both stations, capturing the temporal evolution of zonal (east-west) and meridional (north-south) wind components. Meanwhile, the TIEGCM simulations offered a theoretical framework to interpret the observed disturbances and assess the model’s capability in reproducing storm-induced thermospheric dynamics. The results reveal that the response of thermospheric winds to the geomagnetic storm is more pronounced in the southern hemisphere than that in the northern hemisphere. Significant enhancements in equatorward and westward winds are observed at the SAAO station, with maximum meridional wind speeds reaching 128.4 m·s–1 (equatorward) and maximum zonal wind speeds reaching –165.6 m·s–1 (westward). Comparative analysis with TIEGCM simulations indicates that the model can reasonably reproduce the disturbance trends in observations, particularly in the variations of meridional winds at SAAO and zonal winds at XLON. The model successfully captured the transition from quiet-time wind patterns to storm-driven disturbances, including the shift toward westward and equatorward. However, certain quantitative discrepancies remain in the model’s predictions: the model underestimates the eastward zonal winds at SAAO and overestimates the equatorward meridional winds at XLON. Future studies could consider using multiple ground-based stations and a variety of observations, such as temperature, density, chemical composition for the study. Furthermore, investigating the role of seasonal and local time effects in modulating hemispheric asymmetries could provide deeper insights into thermospheric storm responses. Overall, this study contributes to a better understanding of the storm impacts on thermospheric winds and hemispheric differences, as well as their potential physical causes.

Thermospheric winds  /  Geomagnetic storm  /  Northern and southern hemispheres  /  Mid-latitudes  /  Fabry-Perot Interferometer  /  TIEGCM model
Xinmiao XIA, Guoying JIANG, NEL Amoré Elsje, Yajun ZHU, Jiyao XU, Wei YUAN. Response of Thermospheric Winds at Mid-latitudes in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres to the Geomagnetic Storm on 18 March 2018[J]. Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2026 , 46 (2) : 281 -289 . DOI: 10.11728/cjss2026.02.2025-0039
Year 2026 volume 46 Issue 2
PDF
110
47
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.11728/cjss2026.02.2025-0039
  • Receive Date:2025-03-14
  • Online Date:2026-07-08
  • Published:2026-03-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-03-14
  • Revised:2025-05-22
Affiliations
    1National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190
    2College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
    3School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
    4Hainan National Field Science Observation and Research Observatory for Space Weather, Danzhou 571734
    5South African National Space Agency, Hermanus 7200
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/kjkxxb/EN/10.11728/cjss2026.02.2025-0039
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT