收藏切换
Efficacy evaluation and prognostic factors analysis of retinoblastoma based on propensity score inverse probability weighting method
收藏切换
PDF
Li-Juan Shi1, 2, Li Li1, 2, Fu-Yan Shi3, Xi-Bin Zhou2, Zhi-Hong Wu2, *
Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Liberation Army | 2024, 49(3) : 302 - 307
Less
收藏切换
Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Liberation Army | 2024, 49(3): 302-307
Clinical Research
Efficacy evaluation and prognostic factors analysis of retinoblastoma based on propensity score inverse probability weighting method
Full
Li-Juan Shi1, 2, Li Li1, 2, Fu-Yan Shi3, Xi-Bin Zhou2, Zhi-Hong Wu2, *
Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, School of Clinical Medicine, School of Public Health, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China
  • 2Senior Department of Ophthalmology, the Third Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
  • 3Department of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China
Published: 2024-03-28 doi: 10.11855/j.issn.0577-7402.2030.2023.0630
Outline
收藏切换

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of surgery, chemotherapy and surgery combined chemotherapy for retinoblastoma (RB), and analyze the prognostic factors of RB patients. Methods Clinical data of 1188 RB patients registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from January 2000 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The baseline characteristics of patients treated with surgery, chemotherapy or surgery combined with chemotherapy were balanced by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Log-rank test analysis was used to compare the survival probability of patients in the 3 groups, and Cox regression models were used to analyse the factors influencing the prognosis of RB patients. Results A total of 1188 RB cases were included in this study, including 426 cases in surgery group, 200 cases in chemotherapy group and 562 cases in surgery combined with chemotherapy group. After IPTW weighting, baseline data such as age, sex and race were balanced (P>0.05). Log-rank test results showed that the survival curves of the three groups were significantly different before and after weighting (P<0.05). After weighted, the survival of patients in surgery group was significantly better than that in chemotherapy group and surgery combined chemotherapy group (P<0.05), and there was no statistical significance between chemotherapy group and surgery combined chemotherapy group (P>0.05).The weighted patient survival probability at 1st, 3rd and 5th years were 99.7%, 98.9% and 98.6% in surgery group; 97.4%, 95.8% and 95.8% in chemotherapy group; and 97.9%, 95.8% and 95.0% in surgery combined chemotherapy group. Cox regression analysis showed that compared with surgery group, the specific risk ratio of death was 1.367 (95%CI 1.100-1.700) in chemotherapy group and 1.132 (95%CI 0.963-1.330) in combined chemotherapy group. Compared with patients with 1 RB lesion, the patient-specific mortality risk ratio for patients with 2 or more RB lesions was 0.399 (95%CI 0.268-0.594). Conclusions Patients with RB have higher survival rates probability after treatment. After controlling the influence of age, sex and other factors, the effect of surgery was better among the three treatment methods. Multifocality may be an independent prognostic factor in RB patients.

retinoblastoma  /  inverse probability of treatment weighting  /  efficacy  /  survival analysis
Li-Juan Shi, Li Li, Fu-Yan Shi, Xi-Bin Zhou, Zhi-Hong Wu. Efficacy evaluation and prognostic factors analysis of retinoblastoma based on propensity score inverse probability weighting method[J]. Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Liberation Army, 2024 , 49 (3) : 302 -307 . DOI: 10.11855/j.issn.0577-7402.2030.2023.0630
Year 2024 volume 49 Issue 3
PDF
189
77
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.11855/j.issn.0577-7402.2030.2023.0630
  • Receive Date:2022-09-28
  • Online Date:2025-11-23
  • Published:2024-03-28
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2022-09-28
  • Accepted:2022-11-27
Affiliations
    1Department of Ophthalmology, School of Clinical Medicine, School of Public Health, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China
    2Senior Department of Ophthalmology, the Third Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
    3Department of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China

Corresponding:

References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/jfjyxzz/EN/10.11855/j.issn.0577-7402.2030.2023.0630
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT