The four widely used methods to measure the high-pressure dynamic yield strength of solids, including Asay-Chhabildas (AC) method, lateral stress gauge (LSG) method, pressure-shear (PS) meathod, and X-ray diffraction (XRD) method, were analyzed in the present work. According to the difference of instant strain rate, the yield strengths defined by different methods hereinbefore are divided into two types: one is with high strain-rate, including the data from PS, XRD, as well as Y=2τc from AC method; the another is with zero strain-rate, including the data from LSG, and Y=2τH from AC method. The yield strengths of various aluminium and its alloys from publications were compared. Results show that the data from PS, XRD, and Y=2τc from AC method are approximately consistent, the data from LSG method, however, are obviously higher than the Y=2τH from AC method, and even higher than the data with high instant strain-rate. Further work is needed to determine the cause of the abnormal data from LSG method. Results also show that the Steinberg-Cochran-Guinan (SCG) model is strongly affected by the initial yield strength of materials, and a modified model is needed to describe the behavior of yield strength under high pressure or stress.
| 科 Family | 属数 Number of genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) | 属 Genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae | 2 | 11 | 5.26 | 鹅膏菌属 Amanita | 10 | 4.78 |
| 小菇科 Mycenaceae | 2 | 12 | 5.74 | 丝盖伞属 Inocybe | 5 | 2.39 |
| 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae | 8 | 14 | 6.70 | 蜡蘑属 Laccaria | 5 | 2.39 |
| 红菇科 Russulaceae | 3 | 23 | 11.00 | 小皮伞属 Marasmius | 6 | 2.87 |
| 小菇属 Mycena | 11 | 5.26 | ||||
| 光柄菇属 Pluteus | 5 | 2.39 | ||||
| 红菇属 Russula | 17 | 8.13 | ||||
| 栓菌属 Trametes | 5 | 2.39 |