收藏切换
Comparison of Methods for High-Pressure Dynamic Yield Strength Measurement
收藏切换
Yu-Ying YU, Hua TAN, Cheng-Da DAI, Jian-Xiang PENG, Xue-Mei LI, Chang-Ming HU, Ye TAN
Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics | 2013, 27(6) : 821 - 827
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics | 2013, 27(6): 821-827
Comparison of Methods for High-Pressure Dynamic Yield Strength Measurement
Full
Yu-Ying YU, Hua TAN, Cheng-Da DAI, Jian-Xiang PENG, Xue-Mei LI, Chang-Ming HU, Ye TAN
Affiliations
  • National Key Laboratory of Shock Wave and Detonation Physics, Institute of Fluid Physics, CAEP, Mianyang 621999, China
Published: 2013-12-15
Outline
收藏切换

The four widely used methods to measure the high-pressure dynamic yield strength of solids, including Asay-Chhabildas (AC) method, lateral stress gauge (LSG) method, pressure-shear (PS) meathod, and X-ray diffraction (XRD) method, were analyzed in the present work. According to the difference of instant strain rate, the yield strengths defined by different methods hereinbefore are divided into two types: one is with high strain-rate, including the data from PS, XRD, as well as Y=2τc from AC method; the another is with zero strain-rate, including the data from LSG, and Y=2τH from AC method. The yield strengths of various aluminium and its alloys from publications were compared. Results show that the data from PS, XRD, and Y=2τc from AC method are approximately consistent, the data from LSG method, however, are obviously higher than the Y=2τH from AC method, and even higher than the data with high instant strain-rate. Further work is needed to determine the cause of the abnormal data from LSG method. Results also show that the Steinberg-Cochran-Guinan (SCG) model is strongly affected by the initial yield strength of materials, and a modified model is needed to describe the behavior of yield strength under high pressure or stress.

high-pressure yield strength  /  Asay-Chhabildas (AC) method  /  lateral stress gauges method  /  pressure-shear meathod  /  X-ray diffraction (XRD) method  /  Steinberg-Cochran-Guinan (SCG) model
俞宇颖, 谭华, 戴诚达, 彭建祥, 李雪梅, 胡昌明, 谭叶. 高压屈服强度测量方法比较研究. 高压物理学报, 2013 , 27 (6) : 821 -827 .
Yu-Ying YU, Hua TAN, Cheng-Da DAI, Jian-Xiang PENG, Xue-Mei LI, Chang-Ming HU, Ye TAN. Comparison of Methods for High-Pressure Dynamic Yield Strength Measurement[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2013 , 27 (6) : 821 -827 .
Year 2013 volume 27 Issue 6
3
0
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
  • Receive Date:2012-12-03
  • Online Date:2026-11-05
  • Published:2013-12-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2012-12-03
  • Revised:2013-01-21
Funding
Affiliations
    National Key Laboratory of Shock Wave and Detonation Physics, Institute of Fluid Physics, CAEP, Mianyang 621999, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/gywlxb/EN/
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT