Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Prediction of Superconducting RbBSi Compounds under Pressure
收藏切换
PDF
Jinyu LIU1, Xiangyue CUI2, Ailing LIU1, Xiaoran CHENG1, Xingyu WANG1, Yujia WANG1, Miao ZHANG1, *
Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics | 2024, 38(2) : 020107-1 - 020107-7
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics | 2024, 38(2): 020107-1-020107-7
• Topics on High Pressure Superconductivity •
Prediction of Superconducting RbBSi Compounds under Pressure
Full
Jinyu LIU1, Xiangyue CUI2, Ailing LIU1, Xiaoran CHENG1, Xingyu WANG1, Yujia WANG1, Miao ZHANG1, *
Affiliations
  • 1Department of Physics, School of Sciences, Beihua University, Jilin 132013, Jilin, China
  • 2Joint Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Applied Physics and Materials Engineering, University of Macau, Taipa 999078, Macau, China

    • Liu Jinyu (2000－), female, postgraduate, mainly focuses on the materials science at extreme condition. E-mail:

    Cui Xiangyue (1995－), female, doctoral student, mainly focuses on the materials science at extreme condition. E-mail:

About Author:

Liu Jinyu (2000－), female, postgraduate, mainly focuses on the materials science at extreme condition. E-mail:

Cui Xiangyue (1995－), female, doctoral student, mainly focuses on the materials science at extreme condition. E-mail:

Published: 2024-04-05 doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20230765
Outline
收藏切换

In this work, we have performed extensive swarm-intelligence structures searching simulations on the RbBSi compounds within the pressure range from 0 to 100 GPa. We have proposed three different phases of RbBSi, of which the stability, the electronic structure and the potential superconductivity were calculated by first-principles calculations. All predicted phases are thermodynamically and dynamically stable within the studied pressure range. The bands of the three phases crossing the Fermi level indicate the structures are all metallic. In addition, P4/nmm-RbBSi is a superconductor with Tc of 14.4 K at ambient pressure. This work extends the understanding and potential application of alkali metal boron-silicide compounds in the field of superconductor.

first-principles calculations  /  high-pressure  /  alkali-metal boron-silicide  /  crystal structure prediction
刘金禹, 崔湘粤, 刘爱玲, 程潇冉, 王星宇, 王雨佳, 张淼. 压力下超导RbBSi化合物的预测. 高压物理学报, 2024 , 38 (2) : 020107-1 -020107-7 . DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.20230765
Jinyu LIU, Xiangyue CUI, Ailing LIU, Xiaoran CHENG, Xingyu WANG, Yujia WANG, Miao ZHANG. Prediction of Superconducting RbBSi Compounds under Pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2024 , 38 (2) : 020107-1 -020107-7 . DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.20230765
Full Text
Less
The development of superconductors at high temperatures or even ambient temperature has been a long-standing goal in the scientific community since 1911[1]. Superconductors have great applications in various fields, such as power transmission, magnetic resonance imaging, and quantum computing[2–4]. In recent years, there has been a major breakthrough in the field of new phonon-mediated superconductor, specifically in the study of clathrate hydrides. Clathrate hydrides attract attention due to their unique crystal structure and high superconducting critical temperatures above 200 K under high pressure[5–8]. One noteworthy discovery is CaH6, and this hydride exhibits a superconducting critical temperature (Tc) of 215 K at 172 GPa[9–10]. This is followed by the discovery of LaH10, and it has Tc of 260 K at about 170 GPa[11–13]. While these high-Tc hydrides show promising superconducting properties, they require comparable high pressures to synthesize and are typically unrecoverable at ambient pressure, limiting their practical applications. Researchers continue to explore novel materials and mechanisms that can exhibit superconductivity at more accessible conditions. Such advancements would greatly enhance the feasibility and utilization of superconductors in various technological applications.
Encouragingly, some non-hydrogen clathrates, in particular the sp3 bonded ones with light elements, have been suggested to be superconducting at moderate or even ambient pressure. Many doped albite structures, such as XC6[14–15], X(BN)6[16], XB3C3[17], and XB3Si3[18], where X represents different doping elements, as well as FC34[19], has been predicted to be good superconductors at ambient pressure. For example, Tc calculated for NaC6 is 116–127 K at ambient pressure. It is noteworthy that with the guiding from particle-swarm structure prediction method, Zhu et al.[17] successfully synthesized a thermodynamically stable carbon-boron sp3 bonded clathrate at high pressures near 50 GPa, namely SrB3C3. The calculations further suggested that SrB3C3 is a superconductor, with the superconducting transition temperature of 40 K[20–22]. Carbon and silicon are elements of group-14 in the periodic table of elements[23]. They have four valence electrons, allowing them to form covalent bonds with other elements by sharing electrons. Moreover, they have certain similarities in atomic structure and chemical properties[24–25]. In the silicon analogues, RbB3Si3 is theoretically proposed to be thermodynamically stable between 7 and 35 GPa, and to be metastable at 1 atmospheric pressure, with Tc estimated to be 14 K[18]. Therefore, it is of great interest to explore whether the RbBSi compounds have the potential for superconductivity under ambient pressures.
In this work, we employed CALYPSO (crystal structure analysis by particle swarm optimization) method to predict the stable structure of RbBSi within the pressure range from zero to 100 GPa, and studied their physical properties by first-principles calculations.
1 Methods
Less
We explored the properties of RbBSi in the pressure range of 0−100 GPa using CALYPSO code[26–29], which has been developed specifically to explore the potential energy surfaces of chemical systems and find the global minima. The structural relaxations and electronic properties were calculated using density functional theory with the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof generalized gradient approximation as implemented in the VASP code[30–31]. We used projector augmented wave (PAW) potentials[32] in which the valence electrons for the Rb, B and Si atoms were represented as 4s24p65s1, 2s22p1, and 3s23p2. In order to ensure the enthalpy convergence, the cutoff energy was adopted 500 eV. The Monkhorst-Pack k-point meshes are 8×8×2 for P63/mmc-RbBSi, 3×8×2 for C2/m-RbBSi, and 8×8×3 for P4/nmm-RbBSi, respectively. The phonon dispersion curves were used to verify the dynamic stability of RbBSi via a supercell approach as implemented in PHONOPY package[33]. The electron-phonon coupling constant was obtained from first-principles density-functional perturbation theory as implemented in QUANTUM ESPRESSO package[34].
2 Results and Discussion
Less
The RbBSi crystal structure prediction was successfully conducted in the pressure range of 0－100 GPa, and three phases (P63/mmc, C2/m and P4/nmm) were discovered. As shown in Fig. 1(a), P63/mmc-RbBSi at standard atmospheric pressure has a layered hexagonal structure that consists of alternate B-Si honeycomb layers separated by a layer of interstitial Rb atoms. The bond length between boron and silicon is 2.049 Å, forming a stable hexagonal structure. In the pressure range of 17 GPa to 33 GPa, the C2/m phase was found to be more stable (see Fig. 1(b)). In the C2/m-RbBSi structure, there are six membered rings and four membered rings composed of folded B-Si layers. The layers in these structures are separated by Rb atoms in the gap between the two layers. The lengthes of the boron-silicon bond in the four-membered ring and in the six-membered ring are 2.095 and 2.115 Å, respectively, and the length of the boron-boron bond is 1.678 Å. As the pressure increases, the P4/nmm-RbBSi phase becomes more stable above 33 GPa (see Fig. 1(c)). Different from C2/m-RbBSi, the space group of P4/nmm-RbBSi changes from monoclinic to tetragonal, and the folded B-Si layer for P4/nmm-RbBSi is only composed of four-membered rings. The bond length of the boron-silicon bond is 2.098 Å. The detailed lattice parameters and atomic positions of the structures are given in Table 1.
We also calculated the formation enthalpy (see Fig. 2), and systematically studied the stability of the three phases of RbBSi compounds. The formation enthalpy for RbBSi were defined as: ΔH = H(RbBSi) − H(Rb) − H(B) − H(Si). For Rb, we used the enthalpy from bcc → fcc → I41/amd → Cmca structure transitions, with the phase transitions occurring at 8.2, 15.1 and 41.0 GPa, respectively[35]. For B, we used the enthalpy from $R\overline 3 m $ → Pnnm (γ-B) → Cmca (α-Ga) structure transitions, with the phase transitions occurring at 17.7 and 91.3 GPa, respectively[36]. For Si, we used the enthalpies from $Fd\overline 3m $ (dia-Si) → Imma → P63/mmc (hcp) → $Fm\overline 3m $ structure transitions, with the phase transitions occurring at 8.9, 40.0 and 83.9 GPa, respectively[37]. It can be seen from Fig. 2 that as the pressure increases, the crystal structure phase changes from the P63/mmc phase to the C2/m phase at 17 GPa . Once the pressure reaches 33 GPa, the crystal structure phase with the lowest energy is the P4/nmm phase.
The phonon calculation is a reliable measure to confirm the dynamic stability of studied materials. Therefore, we calculated phonon dispersion curves for P63/mmc at 0 and 10 GPa, for C2/m at 0 and 20 GPa, and for P4/nmm at 0 and 40 GPa, as shown in Fig. 3. Our phonon calculations showed that all the three phases are dynamically stable because of the absence of any imaginary frequency vibrations in the whole Brillouin zone.
We next explored the electronic properties of the predicted RbBSi compounds via electronic band structures and densities of electronic states (DOS). As shown in Fig. 4, it can be observed that there is a significant consistency between the band structures and DOS. As shown in Fig. 4(a)−Fig.4(c), the bands cross over the Fermi level, indicating that these phases are metallic, which agrees well with the results of DOS (see Fig. 4(d)−Fig. 4(f)). In addition, the major contribution of metallicity comes from the B-p state and the Si-p state.
Turning to the phonon and electron-phonon coupling in P4/nmm-RbBSi, the calculated phonon dispersion results are shown in Fig. 5. No imaginary phonon modes are present in the entire Brillouin zone, indicating the dynamic stability of this crystal structure. We then computed the Eliashberg spectral function α2F(ω), where α represents the electron-phonon interaction strength and ω represents the frequency. The overall isotropic electron-phonon coupling parameter λ can be obtained via a simple integration in the frequency domain. λ is 0.84, which is quite large for phonon-mediated superconductors. These calculations suggest that P4/nmm-RbBSi is a superconductor with Tc of 14.4 K at standard atmospheric pressures. The superconducting transition temperature is reduced to 0 K at 40 GPa.
In addition, it was found that P63/mmc-RbBSi also exhibits superconducting properties, and the superconducting transition temperature under standard atmospheric pressure is 5.2 K. Its λ is 0.50. However, its superconducting transition temperature is reduced to 3.3 K at 10 GPa, and the corresponding λ is 0.44.
3 Conclusions
Less
In summary, we have extensively explored the RbBSi within the pressure range of 0−100 GPa using CALYPSO method. It is found that RbBSi has three thermodynamically stable phases, denoted as P63/mmc-, C2/m-, P4/nmm-RbBSi. All the phases studied are dynamically stable in the pressure ranges of 0−10 GPa, 0−20 GPa and 0−40 GPa, respectively. Based on our calculations of formation enthalpy and density of electronic states, it is shown that these structures exhibit metallic properties. Electron-phonon calculations predicted that P4/nmm-RbBSi would be a superconductor with Tc of 14.4 K at standard atmospheric pressures. Our current findings predict a superconductor with synthetic potential, which provides a driving force for further research and development of superconducting materials.
References
Less
1
LARBALESTIER D, CANFIELD P C. Superconductivity at 100—where we’ve been and where we’re going [J]. MRS Bulletin, 2011, 36(8): 590–593.
2
ANLAGE S M. The physics and applications of superconducting metamaterials [J]. Journal of Optics, 2011, 13(2): 024001.
3
HASSENZAHL W V, HAZELTON D W, JOHNSON B K, et al. Electric power applications of superconductivity [J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2004, 92(10): 1655–1674.
4
GREENBERG Y S. Application of superconducting quantum interference devices to nuclear magnetic resonance [J]. Reviews of Modern Physics, 1998, 70(1): 175–222.
5
MA L, WANG K, XIE Y, et al. High-temperature superconducting phase in clathrate calcium hydride CaH6 up to 215 K at a pressure of 172 GPa [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2022, 128(16): 167001.
6
JEON H, WANG C Z, LIU S Y, et al. Electron-phonon coupling and superconductivity in an alkaline earth hydride CaH6 at high pressures [J]. New Journal of Physics, 2022, 24(8): 083048.
7
QIAN S F, SHENG X W, YAN X Z, et al. Theoretical study of stability and superconductivity of ScHn (n=4–8) at high pressure [J]. Physical Review B, 2017, 96(9): 094513.
8
TROYAN I A, SEMENOK D V, KVASHNIN A G, et al. Anomalous high-temperature superconductivity in YH6 [J]. Advanced Materials, 2021, 33(15): 2006832.
9
MA L, WANG K, XIE Y, et al. High-Tc superconductivity in clathrate calcium hydride CaH6 [EB/OL]. arXiv: 2103.16282, (2021-11-04)[2023-10-24]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.16282.
10
WANG H, TSE J S, TANAKA K, et al. Superconductive sodalite-like clathrate calcium hydride at high pressures [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109(17): 6463–6466.
11
DROZDOV A P, KONG P P, MINKOV V S, et al. Superconductivity at 250 K in lanthanum hydride under high pressures [J]. Nature, 2019, 569(7757): 528–531.
12
SOMAYAZULU M, AHART M, MISHRA A K, et al. Evidence for superconductivity above 260 K in lanthanum superhydride at megabar pressures [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2019, 122(2): 027001.
13
LIU H Y, NAUMOV I I, GEBALLE Z M, et al. Dynamics and superconductivity in compressed lanthanum superhydride [J]. Physical Review B, 2018, 98(10): 100102.
14
LU S Y, LIU H Y, NAUMOV I I, et al. Superconductivity in dense carbon-based materials [J]. Physical Review B, 2016, 93(10): 104509.
15
SANO K, MASUDA Y, ITO H. Superconductivity of carbon compounds with sodalite structure [J]. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 2022, 91(8): 083703.
16
LI X, YONG X, WU M, et al. Hard BN clathrate superconductors [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2019, 10(10): 2554–2560.
17
ZHU L, STROBEL T A, COHEN R E. Prediction of an extended ferroelectric clathrate [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2020, 125(12): 127601.
18
CUI X Y, HILLEKE K P, WANG X Y, et al. RbB3Si3: an alkali metal borosilicide that is metastable and superconducting at 1 atm [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2020, 124(27): 14826–14831.
19
ZIPOLI F, BERNASCONI M, BENEDEK G. Electron-phonon coupling in halogen-doped carbon clathrates from first principles [J]. Physical Review B, 2006, 74(20): 205408.
20
ZHU L, BORSTAD G M, LIU H Y, et al. Carbon-boron clathrates as a new class of sp3-bonded framework materials [J]. Science Advances, 2020, 6(2): eaay8361.
21
ZHANG P Y, LI X, YANG X, et al. Path to high-Tc superconductivity via Rb substitution of guest metal atoms in the SrB3C3 clathrate [J]. Physical Review B, 2022, 105(9): 094503.
22
WANG J N, YAN X W, GAO M. High-temperature superconductivity in SrB3C3 and BaB3C3 predicted from first-principles anisotropic Migdal-Eliashberg theory [J]. Physical Review B, 2021, 103(14): 144515.
23
KIEFER F, KARTTUNEN A J, DÖBLINGER M, et al. Bulk synthesis and structure of a microcrystalline allotrope of germanium (m-allo-Ge) [J]. Chemistry of Materials, 2011, 23(20): 4578–4586.
24
ZHANG H J, REN J D, WU L L, et al. Predicted semiconductor to metal transition from LiBSi2 to RbBSi2 by first-principles calculations [J]. Computational Materials Science, 2016, 124: 267–272.
25
KARTTUNEN A J, FÄSSLER T F, LINNOLAHTI M, et al. Structural principles of semiconducting group 14 clathrate frameworks [J]. Inorganic Chemistry, 2011, 50(5): 1733–1742.
26
YAN H Y, CHEN L, WEI Z T, et al. Superhard high-pressure structures of beryllium diborocarbides [J]. Vacuum, 2020, 180: 109617.
27
LAZICKI A, YOO C S, CYNN H, et al. Search for superconductivity in LiBC at high pressure: diamond anvil cell experiments and first-principles calculations [J]. Physical Review B, 2007, 75(5): 054507.
28
WANG Y C, LV J, ZHU L, et al. Crystal structure prediction via particle-swarm optimization [J]. Physical Review B, 2010, 82(9): 094116.
29
WANG Y C, LV J, ZHU L, et al. CALYPSO: a method for crystal structure prediction [J]. Computer Physics Communications, 2012, 183(10): 2063–2070.
30
KRESSE G, FURTHMÜLLER J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set [J]. Physical Review B, 1996, 54(16): 11169–11186.
31
PERDEW J P, CHEVARY J A, VOSKO S H, et al. Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation [J]. Physical Review B, 1992, 46(11): 6671–6687.
32
KRESSE G, JOUBERT D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method [J]. Physical Review B, 1999, 59(3): 1758–1775.
33
TOGO A, OBA F, TANAKA I. First-principles calculations of the ferroelastic transition between rutile-type and CaCl2-type SiO2 at high pressures [J]. Physical Review B, 2008, 78(13): 134106.
34
GIANNOZZI P, BARONI S, BONINI N, et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials [J]. Journal of Physics:Condensed Matter, 2009, 21(39): 395502.
35
DEGTYAREVA O. Crystal structure of simple metals at high pressures [J]. High Pressure Research, 2010, 30(3): 343–371.
36
OGANOV A R, SOLOZHENKO V L, GATTI C, et al. The high-pressure phase of boron, γ-B28: disputes and conclusions of 5 years after discovery [J]. Journal of Superhard Materials, 2011, 33(6): 363–379.
37
CUI X Y, ZHANG M, GAO L L. Exploration of AB3Si3 (A=Na/K/Rb/Cs) compounds under moderate pressure [J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2023, 25(35): 23847–23854.
Appendix
Less
Year 2024 volume 38 Issue 2
PDF
4
2
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20230765
  • Receive Date：2023-10-24
  • Online Date：2026-11-06
  • Published：2024-04-05
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2023-10-24
  • Revised：2024-01-22
  • Accepted：2024-01-22
Affiliations
    1Department of Physics, School of Sciences, Beihua University, Jilin 132013, Jilin, China
    2Joint Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Applied Physics and Materials Engineering, University of Macau, Taipa 999078, Macau, China

Corresponding:

Zhang Miao (1981－), female, professor, mainly focuses on the computational design of novel functional materials and materials science at extreme condition. E-mail:
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/gywlxb/EN/10.11858/gywlxb.20230765
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62662699(Operation and Technical Support)
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House