收藏切换
Review on Crystal Structure Generative Models
收藏切换
Wei WEI1, 2, Zhuang YAN1, 3, 4, Zhiyong TANG1, 2
Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society | 2026, 54(1) : 106 - 121
Less
收藏切换
Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society | 2026, 54(1): 106-121
• Special Issue on AI for Materials—Review •
Review on Crystal Structure Generative Models
Full
Wei WEI1, 2, Zhuang YAN1, 3, 4, Zhiyong TANG1, 2
Affiliations
  • 1.Cas Key Laboratory of Nano System and Hierarchical Fabrication, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing 100190
  • 2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
  • 3.Center for Machine Learning Research, Peking University, Beijing 100871
  • 4.AI for Science Institute, Beijing 100084
  • WEI Wei (1990-), male, Doctoral candidate. E-mail:

About Author:

WEI Wei (1990-), male, Doctoral candidate. E-mail:

Published: 2026-01-20 doi: 10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20250875
Outline
收藏切换

Generative models for crystalline materials have emerged as a transformative paradigm in computational materials science, offering new possibilities for crystal structure prediction (CSP), inverse structural design, and functional materials discovery. Compared with traditional search-based CSP frameworks that depend on iterative global optimization and handcrafted physical constraints, generative approaches learn the statistical distribution of atomic arrangements directly from data, thereby enabling efficient sampling of chemically valid and symmetry-consistent structures. Recent advances in geometric deep learning, equivariant neural networks, variational autoencoders, and diffusion-based modeling have substantially enhanced both the fidelity and scalability of generative crystal models. However, despite the rapid development, a comprehensive and systematic review that integrates representations, generative mechanisms, and practical applications of these models is still sparse.

This review first analyzes the major classes of crystal representations. According to the level of geometric completeness and symmetry preservation, representations can be categorized into reciprocal-space encodings (e.g., diffraction-based descriptors), symmetry-aware Wyckoff-position formalisms, voxelized three-dimensional grids, point-cloud coordinate systems, and graph-based multirelational structures. The specific characteristics of each representation are summarized, including their capabilities for handling periodicity, long-range interactions, spatial boundary conditions, and compatibility with equivariant neural networks. Hybrid schemes—such as the point-cloud/graph combined formulations used in DiffCSP, MatterGen, and GNOME—provide balanced expressiveness and geometric accuracy, enabling efficient modeling of complex crystalline systems.

The generative mechanisms of crystal models are more intricate than those of molecular generative models. According to their learning paradigm, recent models may be divided into four categories. Multimodal-aligned models (e.g., Chemeleon) employ contrastive learning to align textual descriptions with crystal structures, enabling text-conditioned generation across complex chemical spaces. Experiment-driven models (e.g., XtalNet) directly map PXRD spectra to crystal structures via integrated pretraining and conditional generation, circumventing traditional database matching. Twin-model collaborative frameworks (e.g., DAO) combine generative modules with high-precision property predictors, achieving concurrent optimization of structural stability and targeted properties. Dynamics-informed models incorporate nonlinear kinetic effects such as impurity-induced frustration and non-equilibrium crystallization into sampling strategies. These mechanisms collectively provide diverse pathways for addressing the unique challenges posed by crystalline systems.

The applications of generative crystal models are further examined across pharmaceuticals, quantum materials, and energy-related functional materials. In pharmaceutical solid-state chemistry, pocket-conditioned molecular generative models provide insights into integrating solid-form considerations with molecular design. In quantum materials research, constraint-embedded generators such as SCIGEN enable large-scale exploration of lattice-specific structures—including Archimedean and Lieb lattices—yielding candidates for quantum spin liquids, flat-band materials, and exotic magnetic phases. In energy materials, the DAO framework demonstrates the potential of "generation-prediction" coupling by successfully designing superconductors and high-capacity layered cathodes, showing strong coherence between computational predictions and experimental verification.

Summary and prospects

Although notable progress has been made in generative crystal models, significant challenges remain in both scientific understanding and practical deployment. Existing datasets are limited in structural diversity, physical fidelity, and multimodal coverage, making it necessary to construct large-scale, high-quality datasets integrating experimental observations, first-principles calculations, and model-generated structures. The physical interpretability and reliability of generated structures, particularly in multicomponent and nonequilibrium systems, require systematic investigation. Establishing closed-loop platforms that integrate model generation, autonomous synthesis, high-throughput characterization, and iterative retraining remains a key step toward practical materials discovery. Physics-aware constraints, uncertainty quantification, and robust generation under sparse data conditions are essential for improving model reliability. Furthermore, industrial applications demand models capable of handling large unit cells, defect chemistry, compositional tunability, and synthesis feasibility. With the development of large materials models, automated laboratories, and data-centric infrastructures, generative crystalline modeling is expected to become a core driver in building an intelligent, automated, and industrialized materials innovation ecosystem.

crystal structure prediction  /  generative models  /  artificial intelligence for science  /  crystalline material design
魏巍, 严壮, 唐智勇. 晶体结构生成式模型研究进展. 硅酸盐学报, 2026 , 54 (1) : 106 -121 . DOI: 10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20250875
Wei WEI, Zhuang YAN, Zhiyong TANG. Review on Crystal Structure Generative Models[J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2026 , 54 (1) : 106 -121 . DOI: 10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20250875
Year 2026 volume 54 Issue 1
60
9
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20250875
  • Receive Date:2025-12-01
  • Online Date:2026-10-27
  • Published:2026-01-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-12-01
  • Revised:2025-12-25
Funding
Affiliations
    1.Cas Key Laboratory of Nano System and Hierarchical Fabrication, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing 100190
    2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
    3.Center for Machine Learning Research, Peking University, Beijing 100871
    4.AI for Science Institute, Beijing 100084

Corresponding:

TANG Zhiyong (1971-), male, Ph.D., Professor. E-mail:
YAN Zhuang (1998-), male, Ph.D., Assistant Research Fellow. E-mail:
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/gsyxb/EN/10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20250875
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT