收藏切换
Recycling of Spent Graphite Anode Materials from Lithium-Ion Batteries
收藏切换
Rongjie ZHE1, 2, 3, Shuohang ZHENG1, 2, Kaiyang ZHANG1, 2, Xiaotong WANG1, 2, Xinglong WU1, 2
Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society | 2025, 53(8) : 2194 - 2209
Less
收藏切换
Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society | 2025, 53(8): 2194-2209
• Review •
Recycling of Spent Graphite Anode Materials from Lithium-Ion Batteries
Full
Rongjie ZHE1, 2, 3, Shuohang ZHENG1, 2, Kaiyang ZHANG1, 2, Xiaotong WANG1, 2, Xinglong WU1, 2
Affiliations
  • 1.Northeast Normal University School of Physics, Changchun 130024, China
  • 2.MOE Key Laboratory for UV Light Emitting Materials and Technology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
  • 3.Faculty of Chemistry, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
  • ZHE Rongjie (1998-), male, Doctoral candidate. E-mail:

About Author:

ZHE Rongjie (1998-), male, Doctoral candidate. E-mail:

Published: 2025-08-20 doi: 10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20250081
Outline
收藏切换

The global transition toward renewable energy and electric vehicles has triggered exponential growth in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), resulting in a surge of retired batteries. As the predominant anode material in LIBs, graphite accounts for a significant mass proportion of batteries. However, improper disposal of spent graphite (S-Gr) through incineration or landfilling poses severe environmental risks, including particulate emissions and toxic residue release. Recycling S-Gr is critical to alleviating resource shortages, reducing production costs of high-purity graphite (which requires energy-intensive graphitization processes at 2500-3000 ℃), and achieving sustainable development goals. This review focuses on the failure mechanisms, recycling strategies, and reuse pathways of S-Gr, providing key insights for advancing closed-loop battery ecosystems.

The degradation of graphite anodes during LIB cycling originates from multiscale failure mechanisms. Deterioration of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) caused by chemical decomposition, mechanical stress, and thermal instability leads to irreversible lithium loss and capacity fade. Concurrently, lithium dendrite growth on graphite surfaces increases internal short-circuit risks, while repeated Li+ intercalation/deintercalation induces microcracks and structural collapse of graphite layers. These coupled mechanisms initiate a vicious cycle of performance degradation, highlighting the necessity for tailored recycling approaches.

Current recycling technologies focus on efficient separation and purification of S-Gr. Physical methods (e.g., flotation and sieving) achieve preliminary separation but suffer from impurity retention (purity <73.56%). Innovative techniques such as Fenton reagent-assisted flotation and pyrolysis-ultrasonic synergy enhance recovery efficiency, but face scalability challenges. Hydrometallurgical processes utilizing HCl, H2SO4, or organic acids (e.g., citric acid) effectively leach impurities like Li, Al, and Fe but generate corrosive waste. Pyrometallurgical approaches (e.g., inert atmosphere calcination and catalytic graphitization) restore graphite crystallinity but demand high energy consumption (>2600 ℃) and emit hazardous gases. Hybrid strategies combining hydrometallurgical treatment with high-temperature annealing emerge as promising solutions.

Regenerated S-Gr demonstrates versatility in energy storage and functional applications. For secondary batteries, carbon-modified S-Gr via rapid thermal shock or phenolic resin coating exhibits superior performance in LIBs. In sodium/potassium-ion batteries, defect-engineered S-Gr shows enhanced kinetics and stability. Beyond energy storage, S-Gr can be transformed into high-value materials. Advanced applications include graphene production through lithium-intercalation exfoliation and catalytic composites for environmental remediation.

Summary and prospects

Despite progress, critical challenges persist. The heterogeneity of S-Gr sources (natural, synthetic, or composite graphite) complicates standardized recycling. High costs, toxic emissions (e.g., fluorine), and intensive energy-consuming steps hinder process scalability. Future directions should prioritize intelligent sorting systems, AI-driven process optimization, and green alternatives like bioleaching. Integrating ultrasound, microwave, or electrochemical technologies could streamline processes and reduce energy consumption. Expanding S-Gr applications (e.g., flexible electronics, CO2 capture, and defect-engineered catalysts) requires interdisciplinary innovation. Addressing these issues will accelerate commercialization of S-Gr recycling technologies, promote sustainable battery ecosystems, and advance global carbon neutrality goals.

lithium-ion batteries  /  spent graphite  /  anode recycling  /  regeneration  /  failure mechanisms
者荣杰, 郑硕航, 张凯洋, 王晓彤, 吴兴隆. 废旧锂离子电池石墨负极材料的回收. 硅酸盐学报, 2025 , 53 (8) : 2194 -2209 . DOI: 10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20250081
Rongjie ZHE, Shuohang ZHENG, Kaiyang ZHANG, Xiaotong WANG, Xinglong WU. Recycling of Spent Graphite Anode Materials from Lithium-Ion Batteries[J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2025 , 53 (8) : 2194 -2209 . DOI: 10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20250081
Year 2025 volume 53 Issue 8
22
4
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20250081
  • Receive Date:2025-02-10
  • Online Date:2026-10-21
  • Published:2025-08-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-02-10
  • Revised:2025-03-09
Funding
Affiliations
    1.Northeast Normal University School of Physics, Changchun 130024, China
    2.MOE Key Laboratory for UV Light Emitting Materials and Technology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    3.Faculty of Chemistry, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China

Corresponding:

WU Xinglong (1982-), male, PhD., Professor. E-mail:
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/gsyxb/EN/10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20250081
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT