收藏切换
Experimental study on the effect of reinforcement on the seismic performance of silt subgrade
收藏切换
PDF
Ze LIU1, Jiaye LUO1, Wenqin YAN1, 2, Zhenhua HUANG1
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics | 2025, 45(4) : 116 - 125
Less
收藏切换
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics | 2025, 45(4): 116-125
Experimental study on the effect of reinforcement on the seismic performance of silt subgrade
Full
Ze LIU1, Jiaye LUO1, Wenqin YAN1, 2, Zhenhua HUANG1
Affiliations
  • 1.School of Civil Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, China
  • 2.School of Geosciences and Info-physics, Central South University, Changsha 410012, China
Published: 2025-08-22 doi: 10.13197/j.eeed.2025.0412
Outline
收藏切换

In order to investigate the effectiveness of treatment measures for silt subgrade in high seismic fortification areas, vibration table model tests were conducted on pure silt subgrade and reinforced silt subgrade. Based on a comparative analysis of the failure characteristics and dynamic response laws of the two models, the influence mechanism of reinforcement on the seismic performance of silt subgrade was explored. The experiment shows that after the peak acceleration of seismic load reaches 0.25 g, the experimental pure silt subgrade gradually experiences cracking, fragmentation, and sinking failure. After adding four layers of geogrids on the slope side of the subgrade, the seismic resistance of the silt subgrade can be effectively improved. When the peak acceleration of the seismic load is loaded to 0.35 g, although cracks also appear on the reinforced silt subgrade, the subgrade can still maintain good integrity. Under seismic loads, reinforced silt subgrade and pure silt subgrade have basically the same acceleration and dynamic soil pressure response rules. The acceleration amplification factor increases nonlinearly with the increase of subgrade height, and decreases with the increase of seismic load. Under the same load, the amplification factor on the slope side of the subgrade is larger than that on the centerline side, but the difference between reinforced silt subgrade is smaller. The dynamic soil pressure of both models shows a pattern of “larger on both sides and smaller in the middle” in the height direction of the subgrade. In the direction of the subgrade cross-section, the dynamic soil pressure on the centerline side of the subgrade is greater than that on the slope side. Due to the influence of subgrade structure, the potential fracture surface of reinforced silt subgrade under seismic loads will form at the end of the reinforced body and within the low pressure compaction zone. Reinforcement is an effective measure to improve the seismic performance of silt subgrades. In practical engineering applications, the length of the reinforcement should not be less than 0.65H, and there should also be sufficient anchoring length.

silt subgrade  /  reinforcement  /  shaking table test  /  dynamic response characteristics  /  potential fracture surface
Ze LIU, Jiaye LUO, Wenqin YAN, Zhenhua HUANG. Experimental study on the effect of reinforcement on the seismic performance of silt subgrade[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2025 , 45 (4) : 116 -125 . DOI: 10.13197/j.eeed.2025.0412
Year 2025 volume 45 Issue 4
PDF
59
29
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.13197/j.eeed.2025.0412
  • Receive Date:2024-02-11
  • Online Date:2026-03-20
  • Published:2025-08-22
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-02-11
  • Revised:2024-04-14
Funding
Affiliations
    1.School of Civil Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, China
    2.School of Geosciences and Info-physics, Central South University, Changsha 410012, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/dzgcygczd/EN/10.13197/j.eeed.2025.0412
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT