Progressive collapse is a nonlinear dynamic behavior of structural systems. In order to study the progressive collapse resistance laws of reinforced concrete planar frame structures after failure of important members, an important member identification method based on strain energy of members was proposed. The effectiveness of the method was verified by taking a four-bay and eight-story reinforced concrete frame structure as the target. It was found that the method identifies important members with high effectiveness. On this basis, eight reinforced concrete frame structures with different beam spans or total number of floors were designed in accordance with code. Firstly, important members were identified based on the above method and the adverse structural member removal scenarios were formulated. Then, impacts of different total number of floors and structural span on progressive collapse resistance capacity of reinforced concrete planar frame structures were analyzed by adopting the nonlinear dynamic alternate path method. Finally, the approximate functional curve of reinforced concrete planar frame structures between proportions of columns removed from ground floor and degrees of structural collapse was fitted. The results indicate that after removal of center column at ground floor, structures are mainly carrying vertical loads by ground floor frame beams, and frame beams of remaining floors cooperate with ground floor frame beams to support loads. The decrease in total number of floors and the decrease in span can increase redundant load carrying capacity of structures, which has a positive effect on resistance capacity of frame structures to progressive collapse. Frame beam span has a significant effect on degree of structural collapse and total number of floors has a limited effect on degree of structural collapse. The relationship between proportions of columns removed from ground floor and degrees of structural collapse of reinforced concrete plane frame structures can be approximated by a logistic function.
| 科 Family | 属数 Number of genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) | 属 Genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae | 2 | 11 | 5.26 | 鹅膏菌属 Amanita | 10 | 4.78 |
| 小菇科 Mycenaceae | 2 | 12 | 5.74 | 丝盖伞属 Inocybe | 5 | 2.39 |
| 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae | 8 | 14 | 6.70 | 蜡蘑属 Laccaria | 5 | 2.39 |
| 红菇科 Russulaceae | 3 | 23 | 11.00 | 小皮伞属 Marasmius | 6 | 2.87 |
| 小菇属 Mycena | 11 | 5.26 | ||||
| 光柄菇属 Pluteus | 5 | 2.39 | ||||
| 红菇属 Russula | 17 | 8.13 | ||||
| 栓菌属 Trametes | 5 | 2.39 |