Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Direct observation of intramolecular coplanarity regulated polymorph emission of a tetraphenylethene derivative
收藏切换
PDF
Qingkai Qia, b, c, **, Shan Jianga, Qinglong Qiaob, Jinbei Weia, Bin Xua, Xiaocun Luc, *, Zhaochao Xub, *, Wenjing Tiana, *
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2020, 31(11) : 2985 - 2987
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2020, 31(11): 2985-2987
• Communication •
Direct observation of intramolecular coplanarity regulated polymorph emission of a tetraphenylethene derivative
Full
Qingkai Qia, b, c, **, Shan Jianga, Qinglong Qiaob, Jinbei Weia, Bin Xua, Xiaocun Luc, *, Zhaochao Xub, *, Wenjing Tiana, *
Affiliations
  • a State Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
  • b CAS Key Laboratory of Separation Science for Analytical Chemistry, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China
  • c Department of Chemistry & Biomolecular Science, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699, United States
Published: 2020-11-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.05.044
Outline
收藏切换

Polymorphism makes it possible to clarify the relationship between emission property and crystal structure. However, based on the exact molecular conformation in tetraphenylethene polymorphisms, it is still challenging to evaluate the difference of intramolecular coplanarity without the support of calculation because of the complex combination of four different torsion angles between four peripheral benzenes and the central ethylene plane. Here, by using a di-formyl-functionalized tetraphenylethene derivative, two ideal polymorphisms with a consistent trend of the corresponding torsion angles have been obtained. For the first time, we explicitly demonstrated that intramolecular coplanarity is the underlying cause of the polymorphism-dependent emission of tetraphenylethene derivatives.

Tetraphenylethene  /  Polymorphism  /  Intramolecular coplanarity  /  Intermolecular stacking  /  Photophysical property
Qingkai Qi, Shan Jiang, Qinglong Qiao, Jinbei Wei, Bin Xu, Xiaocun Lu, Zhaochao Xu, Wenjing Tian. Direct observation of intramolecular coplanarity regulated polymorph emission of a tetraphenylethene derivative[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2020 , 31 (11) : 2985 -2987 . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.05.044
Full Text
Less
Natural propeller-shaped tetraphenylethene (TPE), as one of the most well-known molecules with aggregation-induced emission (AIE) character, has received extensive attention during the past two decades [1-7]. The excellent AIE properties and high solidstate emission efficiency of TPE derivatives have enabled their wide usage in multiple fields, such as chemical sensors [8-14], organic light-emitting devices [15-18], biological labels [19-24], etc. For a long time, the structure-emission relationship of TPE has received broad research interests [25, 26]. Synergetic effect of both the flexible molecular skeleton and hindered molecular rotation of the TPE unit makes it possible to exhibit multicolor emissions in solid state.
Recently, both our group and some other research groups have reported polymorphism-dependent emission of some TPE derivatives [27-32]. The structural analysis of polymorphisms provides an accessible way to reveal the relationship between photophysical property and crystal structure [33-37]. In general, the threedimensional propeller-shaped TPE moiety can effectively avoid intermolecular π-π stacking and largely reduce its impact on the different polymorphic emission. Thus the intramolecular coplanarity becomes the main factor of different emission of TPE polymorphisms.
However, based on the precise molecular conformation of TPE polymorphisms, it is still challenging to evaluate the difference of molecular coplanarity without the support of calculation because of the complex combination of four different torsion angles between four peripheral benzenes and and the central ethylene plane (Fig. 1). We conducted data-mining in the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center (CCDC) to measure all the four torsion angles in the reported polymorphisms of TPE derivatives with comprehensive statistical analysis (Table S1 in Supporting information). However, it was difficult to identify an ideal example in which all the torsion angles measured in polymorphic A are smaller (or larger) than polymorph B as shown in Fig. 1. In our previous works, we have to introduce bond length alternation (BLA), a key parameter determining the bandgap and degree of π-conjugation, to compare the coplanarity difference in both methoxy- and dimethylamino-substituted TPE polymorphisms [27, 28]. So far there is no direct observation to confirm that the different intramolecular coplanarity is the profound reason for the polymorphism-dependent emission of TPE derivates.
In this work, by using a di-formyl-functionalized TPE derivative, (E)-TPE-2CHO, two ideal polymorphisms with a consistent trend of the corresponding torsion angles have been obtained. For the first time, we explicitly demonstrated that intramolecular coplanarity is responsible for their different emissions of polymorphisms.
Detailed synthesis and characterization of (E)-TPE-2CHO have been included in Supporting information. Two different polymorphs of (E)-TPE-2CHO were obtained at the same time by slow evaporation of their ethyl acetate/n-hexane solutions at room temperature, which enables further confirmation of the molecular structure by the crystallographic analysis (Table S2 in Supporting information). Their ORTEP drawings are shown in Figs. 2a and b. As shown in Figs. 2c and d, the two polymorphs showed totally different emission colors under a 365 nm UV light. Photoluminescence spectra of the two polymorphs revealed that one crystal emitted a cyan emission peaked at 478 nm and another emitted a green emission peaked at 503 nm (Fig. 2e); the emission peak difference between the two polymorphs was about 25 nm. The two polymorphic crystals were named as (E)-TPE- 2CHO-Cyan and (E)-TPE-2CHO-Green according to their molecular structure and emission colors respectively. Then, the UV–vis reflection spectra of the two polymorphs were used to explore their emission difference (Fig. 2f). Comparing with the absorption of (E)-TPE-2CHO-Cyan, (E)-TPE-2CHO-Green showed an emerging red-shifted absorption band centered at about 406 nm, which indicated that (E)-TPE-2CHO-Green may have a more extended p-conjugation. Additionally, the other photophysical parameters of two polymorphs including the fluorescence quantum yield (ΦF) and average lifetime (<τ>, Fig. S1 in Supporting information) were measured, from which the radiative transition rate and non-radiative transition rate constant can be easily calculated (Table 1). Unlike their quite different emission and UV–vis reflection spectra, all these parameters of the two polymorphs make little difference.
We further did a structural analysis of the two polymorphs to establish the relationship between crystal structures and optical spectra. Each unit cell consisted of four and two independent molecules for (E)-TPE-2CHO-cyan and (E)-TPE-2CHO-green respectively (Figs. 3a and b). No intermolecular π-π interaction between the adjacent molecules was found in the two polymorphs, which was due in part to the steric hindrance resulted from the highly twisted TPE configuration. Indeed, there were many weak supramolecular interactions such as C–H···O and C–H···π in the two crystals, and their detailed distances and angles are summarized in Figs. 3c and d. The network of weak supramolecular interactions together contributed to the formation of two single crystals. Besides, we further measured the corresponding dihedral angles between the four peripheral benzenes and ethylene planes, as well as benzenes and the aldehyde groups. As shown in Figs. 3e and f, all the measured dihedral angles between the four benzene rings and central ethylene plane in (E)-TPE-2CHO-Cyan (48.39°, 49.95°, 63.26°, 54.44°) are larger than the corresponding dihedral angles of (E)-TPE-2CHO-Green (44.53°, 49.29°, 47.66°, 50.71°). It is worth mentioning that this is the first experimental proof to illustrate intramolecular coplanarity-directed bathochromic shift in TPE polymorphisms.
Furthermore, the DSC curves of the two polymorphisms were measured (Fig. S2 in Supporting information), and the melting point of (E)-TPE-2CHO-Green (174.7 ℃) was slightly lower than that of (E)-TPE-2CHO-Cyan (178.0 ℃), indicating that the green crystal has less crystal lattice energy. The bandgaps of the single (E)-TPE-2CHO molecule were calculated based on the exact molecular configurations in the two polymorphisms without geometry optimizations using B3LYP/6-31 G(d, p) by Gaussian 09 [38], and the results are given in Fig. 4. The calculated bandgap of the single molecule in the cyan crystal (3.97 eV) is larger than the green crystal (3.68 eV), which is consistent with the bathochromic shift of the UV–vis reflection and emission spectra of the two polymorphisms (Figs. 2e and f).
In summary, we obtained two polymorphic crystals of a diformyl-functionalized TPE derivative ((E)-TPE-2CHO) with a feature of intramolecular coplanarity-directed emission colors. All the photophysical parameters of the two polymorphic crystals were measured and comparatively studied. After comprehensive analysis of the intermolecular stacking and intramolecular conformation of the two crystals, we clearly illustrated that the polymorph-dependent emission difference of (E)-TPE-2CHO is merely due to the twisted degree difference of the central TPE core. Herein, we obtained direct observation that the intramolecular coplanarity difference of the central TPE unit results in the different emission of polymorphisms. This work will enhance the fundamental understanding of the relationship between crystal structures and photophysical properties for various AIE luminogens.
Declaration of competing interest
Less
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
Less
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21708039, 21878286, 21908216, 21835001, 21875085, 51773080, 21674041), and the Program for Changbaishan Scholars of Jilin Province.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Less
Supplementary material related to this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.05.044.
References
Less
[1]
Z. Li, Y. Huo, X. Yang, et al., Chin. J. Org. Chem. 36(2016) 2317-2332.
[2]
M. Wang, G. Zhang, D. Zhang, et al., J. Mater. Chem. 20(2010) 1858-1867.
[3]
Y.G. He, S.Y. Shi, N. Liu, et al., Macromolecules 49(2016) 48-58.
[4]
X. Zhang, K. Wang, M. Liu, et al., Nanoscale 7(2015) 11486-11508.
[5]
J. Yu, C. Tang, X. Gu, et al., Chem. Commun. 56(2020) 3911-3914.
[6]
X. Han, B. Zhang, J. Chen, et al., J. Mater. Chem. B 5(2017) 5096-5100.
[7]
X. Han, D. Li, X. Ma, et al., New J. Chem. 42(2018) 6609-6612.
[8]
C. Zhang, Y. Li, X. Xue, et al., Chem. Commun. 51(2015) 4168-4171.
[9]
X.G. Liu, H. Wang, B. Chen, et al., Chem. Commun. 51(2015) 1677-1680.
[10]
H. Zhou, F. Liu, X. Wang, et al., J. Mater. Chem. C 3(2015) 5490-5498.
[11]
Y. Xie, Z. Li, Chem. Asian J. 14(2019) 2524-2541.
[12]
N. Jiang, Y. Wang, A. Qin, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 30(2019) 143-148.
[13]
L. Ma, C. Li, Q. Yan, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 31(2020) 361-364.
[14]
N. Liu, L. Shi, X. Han, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 31(2020) 386-390.
[15]
L. Chen, Y. Jiang, H. Nie, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interface 6(2014) 17215-17225.
[16]
Z. Zhao, J.W.Y. Lam, B.Z. Tang, J. Mater. Chem. 22(2012) 23726-23740.
[17]
H. Zhang, J. Zhou, G.G. Shan, et al., Chem. Commun. 55(2019) 12328-12331.
[18]
Z. Lu, Y. Cheng, W. Fan, et al., Chem. Commun. 55(2019) 8474-8477.
[19]
Z. Wang, T.Y. Yong, J. Wan, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interface 7(2015) 3420-3425.
[20]
W. Zhang, R.T.K. Kwok, Y. Chen, et al., Chem. Commun. 51(2015) 9022-9025.
[21]
H. Wang, G. Liu, H. Gao, et al., Polym. Chem. 6(2015) 4715-4718.
[22]
W. Shen, J. Yu, J. Ge, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interface 8(2016) 927-935.
[23]
S. Li, Y. Shang, E. Zhao, et al., J. Mater. Chem. C 3(2015) 3445-3451.
[24]
Z. Zhao, B. Chen, J. Geng, et al., Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 31(2014) 481-491.
[25]
J. Shi, N. Chang, C. Li, et al., Chem. Commun. 48(2012) 10675-10677.
[26]
J. Mei, Y. Hong, J.W.Y. Lam, et al., Adv. Mater. 26(2014) 5429-5479.
[27]
Q. Qi, Y. Liu, X. Fang, et al., RSC Adv. 3(2013) 7996-8002.
[28]
Q. Qi, J. Zhang, B. Xu, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 117(2013) 24997-25003.
[29]
S. Jiang, J. Wang, Q. Qi, et al., Chem. Commun. 55(2019) 3749-3752.
[30]
N. Zhao, Z. Yang, J.W.Y. Lam, et al., Chem. Commun. 48(2012) 8637-8639.
[31]
M. Khorloo, Y. Cheng, H. Zhang, et al., Chem. Sci. 11(2020) 997-1005.
[32]
Q. Yang, D. Li, W. Chi, et al., J. Mater. Chem. C 7(2019) 8244-8249.
[33]
H.Y. Zhang, Z.L. Zhang, K.Q. Ye, et al., Adv. Mater. 18(2006) 2369-2372.
[34]
T. Mutai, H. Tomoda, T. Ohkawa, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47(2008) 9522-9524.
[35]
M. Brinkmann, G. Gadret, M. Muccini, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc.122(2000) 5147-5157.
[36]
K. Wang, H. Zhang, S. Chen, et al., Adv. Mater. 26(2014) 6168-6173.
[37]
Q. Zhu, Y. Zhang, H. Nie, et al., Chem. Sci. 6(2015) 4690-4697.
[38]
M.J. Frisch, G.W. Trucks, H.B. Schlegel, et al., Gaussian 09, Revision D.01, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT, 2013.
Appendix
Less
Year 2020 volume 31 Issue 11
PDF
48
26
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.05.044
  • Receive Date：2020-05-06
  • Online Date：2026-01-31
  • Published：2020-11-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2020-05-06
  • Revised：2020-05-26
  • Accepted：2020-05-30
Affiliations
    a State Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
    b CAS Key Laboratory of Separation Science for Analytical Chemistry, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China
    c Department of Chemistry & Biomolecular Science, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699, United States
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.05.044
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House