收藏切换
Identification of immune reconstitution and hematopoiesis restoration by scRNA-seq in bone marrow of multiple myeloma patients treated with high-dose melphalan following auto-HSCT
收藏切换
PDF
Qian Li1, 2, Yaling Wang3, Hongfeng Yuan3, Qiaomei Cai3, Lina Zhao2, 3, Li Lin2, Shuang Gao2, Lin Chen2, Zhiying Zhang2, Jing Ma2, Su Liu2, Zeng Cao1, Haifeng Zhao1, Yufei Wang3, Shihui Li3, Pan Lv3, Huihui Zhang3, Guowen Wang4, Guang Yang3, Xiaodong Zhang3, Yafei Wang1, 2
Cancer Biology & Medicine | 2026, 23(2) : 247 - 251
Less
收藏切换
Cancer Biology & Medicine | 2026, 23(2): 247-251
• Letter •
Identification of immune reconstitution and hematopoiesis restoration by scRNA-seq in bone marrow of multiple myeloma patients treated with high-dose melphalan following auto-HSCT
Full
Qian Li1, 2, Yaling Wang3, Hongfeng Yuan3, Qiaomei Cai3, Lina Zhao2, 3, Li Lin2, Shuang Gao2, Lin Chen2, Zhiying Zhang2, Jing Ma2, Su Liu2, Zeng Cao1, Haifeng Zhao1, Yufei Wang3, Shihui Li3, Pan Lv3, Huihui Zhang3, Guowen Wang4, Guang Yang3, Xiaodong Zhang3, Yafei Wang1, 2
Affiliations
  • 1Department of Hematology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • 2Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, Tianjin 300308, China
  • 3State Key Laboratory of Druggability Evaluation and Systematic Translational Medicine, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Department of Gastrointestinal Cancer Biology, Tianjin Cancer Institute, Liver Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
  • 4National Key Laboratory of Druggability Evaluation and Systematic Translational Medicine, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
About Author:

Author contributions

Conceived and designed the analysis: Guowen Wang, Guang Yang, Xiaodong Zhang, Yafei Wang.

Collected the data: Qian Li, Yaling Wang, Hongfeng Yuan, Qiaomei Cai, Lina Zhao, Li Lin.

Contributed data or analysis tools: Shuang Gao, Lin Chen, Zhiying Zhang, Jing Ma, Su Liu, Zeng Cao, Haifeng Zhao.

Performed the analysis: Qian Li, Yaling Wang, Hongfeng Yuan, Qiaomei Cai, Yufei Wang, Shihui Li, Pan Lv, Huihui Zhang.

Wrote the paper: Qian Li, Yaling Wang, Hongfeng Yuan, Qiaomei Cai.

Published: 2026-02-15 doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0585
Outline
收藏切换
Qian Li, Yaling Wang, Hongfeng Yuan, Qiaomei Cai, Lina Zhao, Li Lin, Shuang Gao, Lin Chen, Zhiying Zhang, Jing Ma, Su Liu, Zeng Cao, Haifeng Zhao, Yufei Wang, Shihui Li, Pan Lv, Huihui Zhang, Guowen Wang, Guang Yang, Xiaodong Zhang, Yafei Wang. Identification of immune reconstitution and hematopoiesis restoration by scRNA-seq in bone marrow of multiple myeloma patients treated with high-dose melphalan following auto-HSCT[J]. Cancer Biology & Medicine, 2026 , 23 (2) : 247 -251 . DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0585
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a clonal plasma cell malignancy that arises within the bone marrow (BM), leading to disruptions in normal hematopoiesis, immune dysfunction, osteolytic bone lesions, anemia, and renal impairment1. Despite the significant advances in treatment, such as proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, monoclonal antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies, MM remains largely incurable with most patients eventually relapsing2.
Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) serves as a cornerstone of MM treatment, significantly prolonging progression-free and overall survival in eligible patients3. High-dose chemotherapy following auto-HSCT eliminates both malignant and normal hematopoietic cells, facilitating timely immune reconstitution from infused autologous stem cells4. Although previous studies have evaluated immune reconstitution following the therapy, most have relied on standard clinical assays, which lack the resolution to capture cellular heterogeneity and dynamic transcriptional changes5–7. Sudha et al.8 recently reported the distinct immune microenvironment features of MM. A major challenge in MM management is the persistence of minimal residual disease (MRD)-subclinical populations of malignant plasma cells that can evade therapy and trigger relapses. MM cells exhibit heightened endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and an activated unfolded protein response (UPR) in the pre-transplant setting, driven by excessive immunoglobulin production9. However, these stress pathways persist or resolve high-dose melphalan following auto-HSCT remain unclear, which may provide key insights into MRD biology.
In this study single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) was used to generate a comprehensive atlas of the BM microenvironment in MM patients before and after treatment with high-dose melphalan following auto-HSCT. Small residual malignant plasma cells in BM identified by scRNA-seq might be a potential risk factor for MM recurrence and treatment with high-dose melphalan following auto-HSCT contributed to reconstitution of pre-B cells, T cells, NK cells, and hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) in the BM of MM patients. The findings herein provide new insight and a comprehensive understanding for the single-cell atlas of the BM in MM patients with therapy.
Bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMCs) from healthy donors [HD] (n = 3, GSE120221), untreated MM patients (n = 3, GSE189460), and MM patients treated with high-dose melphalan following auto-HSCT MM patients (n = 3) were analyzed to explore plasma cell remodeling, immune reconstitution, and HSC recovery after high-dose melphalan following auto-HSCT. Patient information is listed in Tables S1–4. The overall workflow is displayed in Figure 1A. The uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) identified 22 clusters and 11 major cell types (Figure 1B–F) after stringent quality control (Figure S1). Cell type proportions differed notably among the three groups, including pre-B cells, B cells, monocyte cells, and T cells. HSPCs were significantly reduced in the BM of MM patients but substantially restored after therapy, while plasma and proliferating cells were markedly enriched in the BM of MM patients but decreased in patients treated with high-dose melphalan following auto-HSCT (Figure 1G, H).
A hallmark of MM is clonal expansion of malignant plasma cells in the BM, which disrupts hematopoiesis and driving disease progression. Controlling these cells is key to therapeutic success and long-term remission. Traditional assessments reveal residual disease but overlook transcriptional and clonal dynamics in MM patients receiving high-dose melphalan following auto-HSCT. To address this issue, single-cell transcriptomics was used to characterize plasma cell abundance, pseudotime trajectory, and molecular programs before and after transplantation.
Quantitative comparison revealed a dramatic difference in the relative proportion of cells among the three groups (Figures 1G, 1Ha,b, and S2A,B). Plasma cells made up 1.31% of BMMCs in HD but expanded to 48.01% in MM patients, of which the relative proportion of malignant cells was 22.03%, reflecting clonal infiltration. Plasma cells dropped to 0.21% in MM patients receiving high-dose melphalan following auto-HSCT, of which the relative proportion of malignant cells was 0.09%, indicating an effective elimination of malignant cells. In this study the small sample size limited the generalizability and statistical robustness of the findings, which will be validated in more samples.
Pseudotime trajectory analysis was performed using Monocle 2 to assess plasma cell differentiation and transcriptomic dynamics. Plasma cells from HD and MM patients treated with high-dose melphalan following auto-HSCT predominantly clustered in early pseudotime branches, indicating an immature state, while the MM group exhibited a greater distribution, indicating transcriptional remodeling and altered differentiation (Figure S3A). Gene expression and the trajectory were examined next and six distinct clusters of the top 50 differential gene expression (DEG) were identified (Figure S3B). These results indicated that the plasma cells from auto-HSCT samples share an identical developmental trajectory and functions as the plasma cells from HD.
Pairwise DEGs analysis was performed to assess the transcriptomic changes in plasma cells. MM plasma cells exhibited 3247 upregulated and 235 downregulated genes compared to HD controls (Figure S3C). Auto-HSCT samples demonstrated 1993 upregulated and 748 downregulated genes compared to the MM group (Figure S3D). Functional enrichment of upregulated DEGs in MM revealed a strong association with ER stress pathways, including response to ER stress and protein processing in ER (Figure S4A–C), reflecting a high immunoglobulin load. In contrast, these ER stress-related pathways were significantly downregulated after transplantation (Figure S4D–F), demonstrating the reduced proteotoxic stress and clearance of malignant clones. Gene Ontology (GO) and HALLMARK enrichment analyses revealed that the response to ER stress and unfolded protein response were enriched in MM (Figure S3E, F), while diminished in MM patients receiving high-dose melphalan following auto-HSCT (Figure S3G, H), indicating suppression of the UPR following effective disease control.
MM vs. HD upregulated genes and auto-HSCT vs. MM downregulated genes were intersected to pinpoint the potential molecular targets of residual disease clearance, yielding 640 overlapping genes (Figure S5A) with 515 genes normalized to a healthy level in MM patients treated with high-dose melphalan following auto-HSCT (Figure S5B). Among these genes, 25 were ER stress-related (among 258 annotated ER stress-related genes, such as HSPA5, ATF3, CREBZF, and MANF; Figure S5C) and 14 were linked to the UPR among 113 UPR-related genes, such as ATF3, ATF6, EIF4E, and WFS1 (Figure S3I), showing the potential roles in MM pathogenesis and potential markers for MRD. In addition, 77 genes were downregulated in MM but restored in MM patients treated with high-dose melphalan following auto-HSCT (Figure S5D), including 41 normalized to healthy levels (Figure S5E). The overlap with UPR genes highlighted RPS14, a ribosomal biogenesis gene, selectively re-expressed in MM patients treated with high-dose melphalan following auto-HSCT (Figure S3J). Taken together, the findings indicated that these gene sets (HSPA5, ATF3, ATF6, WFS1, and RPS14) reflect stress adaptation in MM plasma cells and the reversal after treatment, offering potential biomarkers for MRD monitoring and therapy. The B cell receptor (BCR) spectrum in patients after auto-HSCT was analyzed. The histogram plot showed the frequency of use of the top 20 groups in IGHV (Figure S3K) and IGHJ (Figure S3L). Sudha et al. recently reported the distinct immune microenvironment features of MM using scRNA-seq8. However, we focused on the identification of the immune reconstitution and hematopoiesis restoration in the system.
In summary, the significance of using scRNA-seq was investigated in a visual abstract. We conclude that the small residual malignant plasma cells were identified by scRNA-seq in the BM of MM patients, which might be a potential risk factor for MM recurrence. The reconstitution of pre-B cells, T cells, NK cells, and HSPCs in BM was demonstrated in the BM of MM patients treated with high-dose melphalan following auto-HSCT. The findings herein provide new insights into the single-cell atlas in the BM of treated MM patients.
  • This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 82270208 to Ya-fei Wang and 82372818 to Xiao-dong Zhang) and was supported by the “Clinical-Basic” Co-Pl Program (Grant No. 20250206) of Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital. This work was funded by Tianjin Key Medical Discipline Construction Project (Grant No. TJYXZDXK-3-003A).
1.
Lopes R,Queirós AC,Lourenço D,Acúrcio RC,Bogen B,Serre K, et al.Characterizing the multiple myeloma bone marrow microenvironment at the single-cell level in a preclinical model.Blood. 2024; 144: 4664.
2.
Dimopoulos MA,Moreau P,Terpos E,Mateos MV,Zweegman S,Cook G, et al.Multiple myeloma: EHA-ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.HemaSphere. 2021; 5: e528.
3.
da Silva-Diz V,Cao B,Lancho O,Chiles E,Alasadi A,Aleksandrova M, et al.A novel and highly effective mitochondrial uncoupling drug in T-cell leukemia.Blood. 2021; 138: 1317–30.
4.
Santagostino E,Negrier C,Klamroth R,Tiede A,Pabinger-Fasching I,Voigt C, et al.Safety and pharmacokinetics of a novel recombinant fusion protein linking coagulation factor IX with albumin (rIX-FP) in hemophilia B patients.Blood. 2012; 120: 2405–11.
5.
Talekar MK,Olson T.Immune reconstitution after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.In:Brown VI, editor.Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the pediatric hematologist/oncologist.Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 371–83.
6.
Zhou G,Zhan Q,Huang L,Dou X,Cui J,Xiang L, et al.The dynamics of B-cell reconstitution post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a real-world study.J Intern Med. 2024; 295: 634–50.
7.
Shahzad M,Shah AY,Zafar MU,Tariq E,Hamid A,Serwat A, et al.Impact of natural killer cells reconstitution on outcomes after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Blood. 2021; 138: 4880.
8.
Sudha P,Johnson TS,Hamidi H,Yang K,Liu E,Smith B, et al.Identification of the distinct immune microenvironment features associated with progression following high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplant in multiple myeloma.Cancer Immunol Res. 2025; 13: 1070–9.
9.
Vdovin A,Jelinek T,Zihala D,Sevcikova T,Durech M,Sahinbegovic H, et al.The deubiquitinase OTUD1 regulates immunoglobulin production and proteasome inhibitor sensitivity in multiple myeloma.Nat Commun. 2022; 13: 6820.
Year 2026 volume 23 Issue 2
PDF
7
4
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0585
  • Receive Date:2025-11-10
  • Online Date:2026-11-07
  • Published:2026-02-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-11-10
  • Accepted:2026-01-08
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 82270208 to Ya-fei Wang and 82372818 to Xiao-dong Zhang) and was supported by the “Clinical-Basic” Co-Pl Program (Grant No. 20250206) of Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital. This work was funded by Tianjin Key Medical Discipline Construction Project (Grant No. TJYXZDXK-3-003A).
Affiliations
    1Department of Hematology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
    2Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, Tianjin 300308, China
    3State Key Laboratory of Druggability Evaluation and Systematic Translational Medicine, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Department of Gastrointestinal Cancer Biology, Tianjin Cancer Institute, Liver Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
    4National Key Laboratory of Druggability Evaluation and Systematic Translational Medicine, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China

Corresponding:

Correspondence to: Guowen Wang, Guang Yang, Xiaodong Zhang and Yafei Wang, E-mail: , , and
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/cbm/EN/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0585
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT