收藏切换
CDH17-targeting CAR-NK cells synergize with CD47 blockade for potent suppression of gastrointestinal cancers
收藏切换
PDF
Liuhai Zhenga, b, Youbing Dinga, c, Xiaolong Xua, b, Huifang Wanga, b, Guangwei Shid, Yang Lia, Yuanqiao Hee, f, Yue Gonga, Xiaodong Zhangc, Jinxi Weia, Zhiyu Donga, Jiexuan Lia, Shanchao Zhaog, h, i, *, Rui Houa, *, Wei Zhanga, j, *, Jigang Wanga, j, k, l, m, n, *, Zhijie Lia, *
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B | 2025, 15(5) : 2559 - 2574
Less
收藏切换
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B | 2025, 15(5): 2559-2574
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
CDH17-targeting CAR-NK cells synergize with CD47 blockade for potent suppression of gastrointestinal cancers
Full
Liuhai Zhenga, b, Youbing Dinga, c, Xiaolong Xua, b, Huifang Wanga, b, Guangwei Shid, Yang Lia, Yuanqiao Hee, f, Yue Gonga, Xiaodong Zhangc, Jinxi Weia, Zhiyu Donga, Jiexuan Lia, Shanchao Zhaog, h, i, *, Rui Houa, *, Wei Zhanga, j, *, Jigang Wanga, j, k, l, m, n, *, Zhijie Lia, *
Affiliations
  • aDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, Shenzhen Clinical Research Centre for Geriatrics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shenzhen People's Hospital (the First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology, the Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University), Shenzhen 518020, China
  • bIntegrated Chinese and Western Medicine Postdoctoral Research Station, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
  • cDepartment of Medical Imaging, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (Academy of Orthopedics Guangdong Province), Guangzhou 510630, China
  • dDepartment of Neurosurgery & Medical Research Center, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University (the First People's Hospital of Shunde Foshan), Guangzhou 510515, China
  • eCenter of Laboratory Animal Science, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China
  • fKey Laboratory of New Drug Evaluation and Transformation of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang 330031, China
  • gDepartment of Urology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510900, China
  • hDepartment of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • iDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
  • jCenter for Drug Research and Development, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Pharmaceutical Preparations, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510006, China
  • kState Key Laboratory for Quality Ensurance and Sustainable Use of Dao-di Herbs, Artemisinin Research Center, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China
  • lDepartment of Oncology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China
  • mDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine and School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
  • nState Key Laboratory of Antiviral Drugs, School of Pharmacy, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
About Author:

E-mail addresses: (Zhijie Li),

(Jigang Wang),

(Shanchao Zhao),

These authors made equal contributions to this work.

Author contributions

Shanchao Zhao, Rui Hou, Wei Zhang, Zhijie Li and Jigang Wang designed research and revised the manuscript. Liuhai Zheng, Youbing Ding, Xiaolong Xu, Huifang Wang, Guangwei Shi, Yang Li, Yuanqiao He, Yue Gong, Xiaodong Zhang, Jinxi Wei, Zhiyu Dong and Jiexuan Li performed experiments. Liuhai Zheng, Youbing Ding, Xiaolong Xu and Huifang Wang analyzed data. Liuhai Zheng, Youbing Ding and Xiaolong Xu wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.03.039
Outline
收藏切换

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are a leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite advances in treatment, cancer relapse remains a significant challenge, necessitating novel therapeutic strategies. In this study, we engineered nanobody-based chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) natural killer (NK) cells targeting cadherin 17 (CDH17) for the treatment of GI tumors. In addition, to enhance the efficacy of CAR-NK cells, we also incorporated CV1, a CD47–SIRPα axis inhibitor, to evaluate the anti-tumor effect of this combination. We found that CDH17-CAR-NK cells effectively eliminated GI cancers cells in a CDH17-dependent manner. CDH17-CAR-NK cells also exhibit potent in vivo anti-tumor effects in cancer cell-derived xenograft and patient-derived xenograft mouse models. Additionally, the anti-tumor activity of CDH17-CAR-NK cells is synergistically enhanced by CD47–signal regulatory protein α (SIRPα) axis inhibitor CV1, likely through augmented macrophages activation and an increase in M1-phenotype macrophages in the tumor microenvironment. Collectively, our findings suggest that CDH17-targeting CAR-NK cells are a promising strategy for GI cancers. The combination of CDH17-CAR-NK cells with CV1 emerges as a potential combinatorial approach to overcome the limitations of CAR-NK therapy. Further investigations are warranted to speed up the clinical translation of these findings.

Gastrointestinal cancers  /  CDH17  /  Nanobody  /  CAR-NK  /  CD47–SIRPα checkpoint  /  CV1  /  Macrophage activation  /  M1-phenotype macrophages
Liuhai Zheng, Youbing Ding, Xiaolong Xu, Huifang Wang, Guangwei Shi, Yang Li, Yuanqiao He, Yue Gong, Xiaodong Zhang, Jinxi Wei, Zhiyu Dong, Jiexuan Li, Shanchao Zhao, Rui Hou, Wei Zhang, Jigang Wang, Zhijie Li. CDH17-targeting CAR-NK cells synergize with CD47 blockade for potent suppression of gastrointestinal cancers[J]. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, 2025 , 15 (5) : 2559 -2574 . DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.03.039
Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC), gastric cancer (GC), liver cancer, pancreatic cancer (PC), and esophageal cancer, are a leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality worldwide1. Conventional therapies for GI cancers, such as chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation, alone or in combination, have not yielded sufficient overall survival rates1. Recently, various immunotherapies for GI cancers have been developed, including but not limited to checkpoint inhibitors, cytokines, vaccines, and adoptive T cell transfer therapies2. For example, PD1 blockades have shown significant efficacy in esophageal cancers characterized by a high burden of somatic mutations3. Checkpoint inhibitors have also demonstrated robust anti-tumor effects in clinical trials for hepatocellular carcinoma4. Despite progress in immunotherapy, the options for effectively treating patients with advanced disease remain limited, and surgical resection remains the primary intervention for patients5. PD1 blockades were effective in only a small subset of patients with PDAC6. The combination of the two most promising vaccines, GVAX and CRS-207, for the treatment of PDAC also had a low clinical response7. Hence, there is an urgent need for innovative therapeutic strategies to improve the survival of patients with GI cancers.
Chimeric antigen receptor-engineered natural killer (CAR-NK) cells provide a new opportunity for the treatment of GI cancers. NK cells, as natural immune cells, can eliminate malignantly transformed cells without major histocompatibility complex (MHC) restriction8. Unlike CAR-T cell therapy, CAR-NK cell therapy has not been associated with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), irrespective of the use of autologous or allogeneic NK cells9. One possible reason for these advantages could be that NK cells do not proliferate and secrete cytokines as efficiently as T cells do in vivo10. Furthermore, the relatively short lifespan of CAR-NK cells leads to their rapid depletion post-tumor cell eradication, obviating the need for suicide vectors11. These cells can be efficiently mass-produced in vitro, making allogeneic transplantation feasible and reducing costs. Several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of genetically modified fresh NK cells or the NK92MI cell lines with CARs specific to tumor antigens in various cancer models12,13. Though these recent breakthroughs present an intriguing opportunity for targeting and eradicating GI cancers using CAR-NK cells, the development of such therapies for GI cancers has yet to materialize. This is primarily due to the limited availability of appropriate cell surface antigens specific to GI cancers and the corresponding antibodies necessary for CAR construction.
Cadherin 17 (CDH17), also known as liver intestine (LI)-cadherin, is a calcium-dependent transmembrane glycoprotein that plays a crucial role in intercellular adhesion and maintaining tissue integrity through the regulation of the intercellular cleft in a Ca2+-dependent manner14. Under physiological conditions, CDH17 expression is primarily confined to epithelial cells in the small intestine and colon, sparing vital organs15. However, its expression becomes upregulated in GC16, CRC17, hepatocarcinoma (HCC)18, and PC15. Elevated CDH17 expression has been linked to tumor progression, invasion, metastasis, and poor prognosis in GC patients19. Consequently, various therapeutic formats targeting CDH17 have shown favorable outcomes in pre-clinical settings, including CDH17 antibodies coupled with toxins such as saporin20 and TRAIL17, as well as CDH17 CAR T cells17. Additionally, our previous studies have also shown that CDH17 targeting nanobody-engineered extracellular vesicles or the toxin PE38 exhibits a robust antitumor effect on GI cancers21,22. Thus, CDH17 is a promising target for the treatment of GI cancers. However, it remains unclear whether targeting CDH17 through CAR-NK can confer benefits with GI cancers.
CD47, recognized as a transmembrane protein, is highly expressed on both normal and cancer cells. It engages with signal regulatory protein α (SIRPα) on macrophages, which inhibits their phagocytosis of normal cells and, in turn, aids tumor cells in evading the immune system23. Blocking CD47 with agents such as CV1 can enhance macrophage function to engulf tumor cells, making it a promising strategy for cancer therapy23. However, CD47-targeted monotherapy has shown limited efficacy against solid tumors, prompting the development of combination therapies with other immunotherapies to enhance antitumor effects24,25. CV1, a high-affinity CD47 blocker, demonstrates minimal therapeutic effects when used alone but exhibits potential when combined with treatments like therapeutic antibodies, chemotherapy, and adoptive cell transfer, such as CAR-T cells23,26. This combination approach has been shown to exert significant antitumor activity, suggesting that the synergistic activation of immune cells may be key to overcoming the immunosuppressive tumor environment. However, the potential of combining CAR-NK cell therapy with CD47 blockade has not yet been extensively explored.
Herein, we developed CDH17 Nb-engineered CAR-NK cells. CDH17 Nb was identified through screening a naïve nanobody phage display library against domains 1–3 of the human CDH17 protein, exhibiting high binding affinity to both human and mouse CDH17 in our laboratory (Patent number: ZL202111648151.4 and ZL202111305763.3). Our findings demonstrate that CDH17-targeting CAR-NK cells effectively eliminate multiple GI cancers in both in vitro cell models and in vivo tumor models, including cell-derived xenograft (CDX) and patient-derived xenograft (PDX). To augment the anti-tumor function of CAR-NK cells, we combine a high-affinity CD47 blocker, CV123, with CDH17-targeting CAR-NK cells. This combination has previously shown a significant enhancement in the anti-tumor effect of CAR-T cells25. Our results demonstrate that CV1 can significantly improve the anti-tumor effects of CDH17-targeting CAR-NK cells. Additionally, we explore the possible mechanisms underlying the synergistic effect of CDH17-targeting CAR-NK cells with CV1. Specifically, CV1 was found to enhance the activation of macrophages and increase the M1-phenotype macrophages in the tumor microenvironment, likely representing one of the key mechanisms. Our study provides a compelling strategy to amplify the therapeutic potential of CDH17-targeting CAR-NK cells through the combination with CV1 for clinical applications in GI cancer therapy.
CDH17 (#A5286) was purchased from Abclonal (Wuhan, China). HA tag Rabbit mAb (#3724) was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (CST, Danvers, MA, USA). Alexa Fluor® 647-IgG H&L (#ab150075) was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). Anti-Camelid VHH Cocktail-iFluor 647 (A02019) was purchased from Kingsray Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). Fetal bovine serum (#10270106) and horse serum (#26050088) were purchased from Gibco BRL (Grand Island, NY, USA). Luria–Bertani (LB) broth (#L8291) was purchased from Solarbio Life Sciences Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Inositol (#I7508-50G) and folic acid (#F8758-5G) were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). LDH-Cytox Assay Kit (#426401) was purchased from BioLegend (San Diego, CA, USA). Lenti-X Concentrator (#631231) was purchased from Clontech (Tokyo, Japan). The granzyme B (#1118502) and TNFα ELISA kit (#1117202) were purchased from Dakewe Biotech (Shenzhen, China). IFNγ ELISA kit (#EK0373) was purchased from Boster Biological Technology (Wuhan, China). For immunofluorescence assays, primary antibodies were utilized at a dilution of 1:100, while secondary antibodies were applied at a dilution of 1:1000 unless stated otherwise.
ASPC1, MKN45, IM95, NK92, and 293T/17 were procured from Procell Life (Wuhan, China). MKN45 and ASPC1 cells were cultured in RPMI1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mmol/L L-glutamine, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. 293T/17 and IM95 were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mmol/L L-glutamine, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. NK92 cells were cultured in alpha MEM supplemented with 0.1 mmol/L 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.02 mmol/L folic acid, 0.2 mmol/L inositol, and 100 U/mL recombinant IL-2, adjusting to a final concentration of 12.5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 12.5% horse serum. All cell lines were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator.
An analysis of CDH17 gene expression between cancerous and non-tumor tissues was carried out using the gene expression profiling interactive analysis 2 (GEPIA2) website (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/). GEPIA2 offers data visualization tools for analyzing RNA-Seq expression data sourced from the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) and the genotype-tissue expression (GTEx) projects. The data screening conditions included matching normal data from TCGA and GTEx, selecting mRNA as the data type, and employing the LIMMA method for differential analysis. The |Log2FC| Cutoff and q-value Cutoff were set at 1 and 0.01, respectively.
We first downloaded 10X scRNA-seq data of PDAC samples from the GSE15640527, GC samples from the GSE16355828, and CRC samples from the GSE18871129 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). These three datasets were processed separately using a Python-based toolkit, Scanpy (version 1.8.2)30. The expression matrix was normalized using raw UMI counts, which were first adjusted for total counts per cell (library size) and then scaled and transformed logarithmically. The analysis focused on selecting the top 2000 genes exhibiting high variability for subsequent examination.
Dimensionality reduction and unsupervised clustering were conducted following the standard workflow implemented in Scanpy. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was applied to the top 2000 highly variable genes to mitigate noise. Then, the Harmony algorithm was used to correct the potential batch effects, and the top 20 principal components were used for graph construction. A k-nearest neighbor (KNN) graph was created using BBKNN31, utilizing Euclidean distance within the harmony-corrected PCA space. The edge weights between cells were further adjusted based on the degree of shared overlap within their local neighborhoods. Leiden algorithm32 was applied to the resulting KNN graph to detect cellular clusters. The Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) was generated for visualization by utilizing the top 20 principal components for non-linear dimension reduction. Cell clusters were annotated based on well-known cell markers reported in the original literature for each dataset27-29. To identify malignant cells, we assessed CNV profiles in each dataset based on the reasoning that epithelial cells with a high degree of CNVs are likely to be malignant. We used a sliding window approach executed in the infercnvpy package (https://github.com/broadinstitute/inferCNV) to obtain CNV profiles of all cells33. Once all the cell clusters were annotated, we could examine the gene expression patterns of CDH17 across different cell types in each dataset.
For the surface detection of CDH17, cells underwent twice PBS washes, followed by fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde for 5 min. Subsequently, cells were treated with 4% donkey serum solution for 1 h at room temperature. The primary antibody, appropriately diluted in cold blocking buffer, was then applied to incubate for 1 h at room temperature. After with 3 times PBS washes, cells were incubated with a secondary antibody. To detect CAR expression on the NK92 cell surface, the anti-VHH AF 647-conjugated secondary antibody (diluted 1/1000) was applied in cold blocking buffer for 30 min. Following a 20-min fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde, cells were stained with DAPI in PBS for 20 min and mounted on slides. All staining procedures were examined and captured using a Leica SP8 laser scanning confocal microscope.
The second-generation CARs, incorporating a CD8 signal peptide, VHH nanobody, CD8 hinge, CD28 transmembrane domain, CD28 co-stimulatory domain, and CD3ζ domain, were inserted into the pCD513B-CopGFP lentiviral vector by GENEWIZ (Suzhou, China). This bicistronic vector was connected to the transduction marker CopGFP through the “self-cleaving” T2A peptide. Lentivirus production involved co-transfecting HEK293T/17 cells with pMD2.G, psPAX2, and the relevant plasmids (CDH17-CAR, C9-CAR). Viral supernatants were harvested at 48 and 72 h and then concentrated using the Lenti-X Concentrator. The concentration steps followed the manufacturer's instructions in detail.
NK92 cells were transfected with CDH17-CAR or C9-CAR lentivirus. Following 48 h, the cell culture medium received supplementation with the selection antibiotic puromycin (2.5 μg/mL), and a 10-day selection period with puromycin ensued. To confirm the expression of CAR on the surface of NK92 cells, cells were stained with anti-VHH-AF647 antibody and analyzed using flow cytometry. CAR-expressing NK92 cells were sorted by FACS using the SH800ZBP sorter. Post-sorting, the collected positive cells were rinsed with prewarmed medium and then cultured for subsequent use.
CAR-modified NK92 cells were incubated with anti-VHH-AF647 antibody in FACS staining buffer (PBS with 2% FBS) on ice for 30 min for staining. Following this, cells were washed with PBS and analyzed on a DxFLEX flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL, USA). For the analysis of tumor-infiltrating immune cells, ASPC1-bearing mice were treated according to the schedule and euthanized on Day 16. Tumors were harvested, mechanically minced, and then digested (tissue enzymatic digestion kit, RWD Life Science Co., Ltd., Sugar Land, TX, America) in an incubator for 45 min at 37 °C. Samples were filtered, washed, lysed in ACK buffer, and counted for flow cytometry analysis. A 100 μL single-cell suspension (∼1 × 106 cells) was incubated with anti-mouse CD16/CD32 antibody (Bioxcell, clone 2.4G2, BE0307), followed by incubation with the following fluorochrome-labeled antibodies at 4 °C for 30 min: CD45-PECF594 (BD Biosciences, 562420), Gr1-PE (Biolegend, 108408), F4/80-APC (Biolegend, 123116), CD69-Brilliant Violet 421 (Biolegend, 104528), CD86-APC-Cy7 (Biolegend, 105030). After washing, the antibody-stained cells were further stained with ViaDye Red to identify dead cells. Finally, the cells were detected using Cytek Aurora spectral flow cytometry. Flow data were then analyzed using FlowJo 10 (Tree star Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).
To assess the cytotoxic activity of CAR-NK cells, the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release assay was employed. Briefly, 2 × 105 target cells (IM95 and ASPC1) were co-incubated with CAR-NK cells for 4 h at 3 different Effector: Target (E:T) ratio. The release of LDH in the supernatants was assessed following the manufacturer's instructions. The levels of granzyme B, IFN-γ, and TNF-α were assessed with a commercial ELISA kit. The percentage of cytotoxicity was calculated as Eq. (1):
Percentage of cytotoxicity (%)=(CAR-NK treatment releaseSpontaneous release)/(Positive lysate releaseSpontaneous release) × 100
Immunohistochemistry was performed to analyze and assess the expression level of CDH17 in both PDX tumor tissues and clinical samples. The PDX tissue was derived from an individual diagnosed with stage III C gastric adenocarcinoma. Clinical specimens were generously provided by Dr. Yuanqiao He. Patient consent was obtained, and all procedures involving human samples were ethically approved by the medical ethics committees (The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University). The tissue sections underwent deparaffinization and were followed by antigen retrieval in Tris–EDTA buffer (pH 9.0) at 100 °C for 15 min. Following blocking (5% BSA and 0.05% Tween-20 in PBS) for 1 h at room temperature, the sections were subjected to overnight incubation with the primary mouse anti-CDH17 antibody at 4 °C. CDH17 detection was conducted using a biotin-conjugated secondary antibody and an ABC kit. Images were captured using a 3DHISTECH scanner (Sysmex, Milton Keynes, UK). The staining scoring of samples was automated using the IHC Profiler plugin in Image J.
CAR-NK cells were cultured with Ac4ManNAz at a final concentration of 20 μmol/L for 48 h at 37 °C. Following the incubation, the cells were thoroughly washed 3 times with PBS to eliminate any unbound Ac4ManNAz, ensuring that only the incorporated label remained within the cells. The cells were then resuspended in a fresh culture medium and incubated with ICG-DBCO, a fluorescent dye conjugated to a bio-orthogonal reactive group, at a final concentration of 40 μmol/L for 1 h at 37 °C. After the labeling process, the cells were washed twice with PBS to remove any unreacted ICG-DBCO and then counted for further use.
All animal experiments were carried out with the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Shenzhen People's Hospital and in accordance with the guidelines (approval No. AUP-220101-LZJ-0600-01). Six-week-old male NCG mice (PrkdcIl2rg) were obtained from GemPharmatech (Guangdong, China) and maintained under standard conditions, including a room temperature of approximately 25 °C and a 12-h light–dark cycle. To establish IM95 and ASPC1 xenograft model, NCG mice were injected subcutaneously with 5 × 106 for IM95 cells and 3 × 106 for ASPC1 cells in 100 μL PBS. When the tumor volume reached around 50 mm3, mice were randomly divided into six groups (five mice per group for IM95 and six mice per group for ASPC1). CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells or C9-CAR-NK92 cells (1 × 107 cells) were given once every 4 days through the tail vein, for a total of 4 injections. In the PDX model, the PDX tissue was swiftly dissected into fragments on ice and then implanted subcutaneously into the right forelimbs of NCG mice. When tumor volume reached around 50 mm3, mice were randomly divided into three groups (4–5 mice per group). CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells or C9-CAR-NK92 (1 × 107 cells) were given once every 4 days through the tail vein, for a total of 4 injections. Animal weight and tumor volume were collected every 2 days. The tumor size was calculated as Eq. (2):
Tumor size (mm3) = Length × Width2/2
When the tumor burden reached 2000 mm3 or the animal's weight was reduced by ≥ 15%, mice were euthanized with carbon dioxide narcosis. The carbon dioxide flow rate was initially set at 1.2 L/min, corresponding to approximately 30% of the chamber volume exchange rate per minute, and was gradually increased to 2.8 L/min, achieving a 70% volume exchange rate per minute. This approach aligns with recommended euthanasia guidelines to minimize distress. Alternatively, some mice were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane before cervical dislocation, depending on procedural requirements for different experiments. Post-mortem examinations, including histopathological assessments with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, were performed on animals euthanized by both carbon dioxide asphyxiation and deep anesthesia followed by cervical dislocation to evaluate potential pulmonary hemorrhage. The findings, presented in Supporting Information Fig. S1, revealed no significant evidence of pulmonary hemorrhage or other signs of compromised animal welfare. Survival data for the animals were recorded concurrently. Additionally, efforts were made to ensure humane endpoints were strictly followed in compliance with institutional and regulatory ethical guidelines for animal research.
All data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 8 software. The results were presented as mean ± standard error (SEM). Group differences were assessed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test or unpaired t-test analysis, as appropriate. Statistical significance was defined as ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001.
To ascertain the suitability of CDH17 for CAR-NK therapy targeting PDAC, GC, and CRC, we first performed single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) data analysis using three different datasets (GSE156405, GSE163558, and GSE188711) and annotated all cells based on the original studies (Fig. 1A–C, and E). As expected, CDH17 expression was predominantly observed in malignant cells across all datasets of these three GI cancer types (Fig. 1B–D, and F). These results suggest CDH17 is a common marker of the malignant cells in GI cancers. Additionally, we confirmed CDH17 expression on the cell surface of stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD-IM95 and MKN45) and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD-ASPC1) cell lines (Fig. 1G–I). We also performed mouse colon CDH17 immunostaining and confirmed robust expression of CDH17, predominantly localized to the lateral side of the epithelial cells in the mouse small intestine, rather than the apical or basal side34 (Fig. 1J and K). This lateral localization may pose challenges for CAR-NK cells in reaching or binding to CDH17 at the tight junction between intestinal epithelial cells. Additionally, we performed immunofluorescence staining for CDH17 in the subcutaneous tumors of mice bearing ASPC1 cells (a human pancreatic cancer cell line), and the results showed substantial CDH17 protein expression around the tumor cells (Fig. 1L and M) We also analyzed the expression level of CDH17 between normal tissues (N) and tumor samples (T) across multiple GI cancer types by GEPIA2 website35. As shown in Supporting Information Fig. S2, a significant upregulation of CDH17 is observed in tumor tissues across PDAC, GC, and CRC. Collectively, our findings support CDH17 as a promising target for CAR-NK therapy in PDAC, GC, and CRC.
To target CDH17 cell surface expression cells, CDH17-CAR-NK cells were constructed using the CDH17 target nanobody with high binding affinity to both human and mouse CDH17 protein (Supporting Information Fig. S3). An irrelevant nanobody (NbC9)was used to construct negative control CAR NK cells. The CAR backbone consisted of a CD8 hinge and a transmembrane region (CD28), followed by the intracellular domains of co-stimulatory CD28 and the intracellular domain of CD3ζ activation domain. The CARs were cloned into the upstream of a T2A sequence and CopGFP in a lentiviral vector (Fig. 2A and B). After transduction, C9-CAR-NK92 cells and CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells were selected in vitro for 10 days in medium containing puromycin (2.5 μg/mL), obtaining stable C9-CAR and CDH17-CAR molecule expression. After sorting by flow cytometry with anti-VHH antibody, the percentage of C9-CAR and CDH17-CAR positive NK92 cells were 85.7% and 91.4% respectively (Fig. 2C). The high level of CARs expression was also confirmed by immunofluorescence analysis with VHH antibody (Fig. 2D). Meanwhile, the CDH17 level on the cell surface of CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells was analyzed by immunofluorescence staining, and no obvious fluorescence signal was detected, indicating no potential fratricide effect among CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells (data not shown).
We next evaluated the capacity of CDH17 targeted CAR-NK92 cells to eradicate CDH17 positive cell lines (IM95 and ASPC1) at 3 different E:T (effector-to-target) ratios. The results showed that CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells showed significant killing activity against both ASPC1 and IM95 cells at E:T cell ratios of 10:1 compared to C9-CAR-NK92 cells (Fig. 2E and F). In addition, there was no difference in the killing ability of C9-CAR-NK92 cells and CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells against the CDH17 surface-negative cancer cell line PC3, suggesting that CDH17-CAR-NK92 kill tumor cells by specifically targeting CDH17 (Fig. 2G). Consistently, CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells also released more granzyme B, IFNγ, and TNFα than C9-CAR-NK92 cells when co-cultured with ASPC1 (Fig. 2H–J). Collectively, these results demonstrate that targeting CDH17-CAR-NK cells is successfully established and exhibits prominent in vitro anti-tumor performance.
To further assess the in vivo anti-tumor efficacy of CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells in GC tumors expressing CDH17, IM95 cells were engrafted into NCG mice (Day −10). Starting from Day 0, CAR-NK92 cells (1 × 107 cells) were administered via the tail vein every 4 days for a total of 4 injections. This dosing schedule is well supported by a substantial body of prior research (Fig. 3A)12,36-39. Tumor volume and body weight were monitored every 2 days (Fig. 3B and C). Notably, CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells significantly inhibited tumor growth in mice compared to C9-CAR-NK92 cells (Fig. 3D and E). These results demonstrate that CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells effectively suppress the progression of solid tumors expressing CDH17 on the cell surface. Additionally, the infiltration of CAR-NK92 cells in the tumor was examined using an antibody against CopGFP, which was stably expressed in engineered CAR NK cells. As shown in Fig. 3F and G and Supporting Information Fig. S4, there was an increased presence of CopGFP-expressing cells in tumor tissues treated with CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells compared to the C9-CAR-NK92 cells group. Next, we assessed the infiltration and impact of CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells on the mouse colon and stomach, which typically express CDH17. Our results demonstrated that CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells were not detectable in the colon or stomach of tumor-bearing mice, despite the robust expression of CDH17 in these tissues (Fig. 3H and I). The in vivo imaging results with CAR-NK cells labeled with bio-orthogonal reagents azide (–N3) and DBCO-ICG40,41 demonstrated that both CDH17-CAR-NK92 and C9-CAR-NK92 cells rapidly reached the tumor site by 24 h post injection, peaking at 48 h post injection (Supporting Information Fig. S5). Strikingly, CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells exhibited markedly higher tumor accumulation at 48 and 72 h, underscoring their targeted localization advantage. However, by 96 and 120 h, while CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells still showed higher accumulation, the difference was no longer significant, highlighting the short persistence of NK cells in tumors and the necessity for multiple administrations to enhance therapeutic efficacy42,43 (Fig. S5B–S5D). Ex vivo tumor imaging at 120 h aligned with our in vivo observations (Fig. S5E). Although CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells maintained a higher accumulation level, the distinction between the 2 groups had diminished, reinforcing the need for repeated CAR-NK cell transfusions. Additionally, ex vivo organ imaging revealed a predominant accumulation of both CAR-NK92 cell types in the tumor, liver, and spleen, with minimal presence in other organs. The non-tumor accumulation of CAR-NK cells is indeed consistent with the natural homing and trafficking patterns of NK cells, which are known to reside in the liver and spleen42. These organs play a crucial role in NK cell biology, serving as key sites for their surveillance and immune response42,44. H&E staining further revealed that the heart, liver, spleen, lungs, kidneys, and colon were intact, and no obvious structural damage was observed (Supporting Information Fig. S6). Moreover, there was no significant observed toxicity following CAR-NK92 cell treatment, as indicated by whole blood routine test and serum biochemical test (Supporting Information Figs. S7 and S8), supporting the safety of CDH17 as a therapeutic target. Taken together, these findings suggest that CDH17-targeting CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells can efficiently suppress the progression of GC solid tumors in vivo.
Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models have garnered considerable attention in tumor studies due to their high similarity to human tumors in components and heterogeneity45. Given that CDH17-targeting CDH17-CAR-NK92 therapy showed excellent anti-tumor activity in the CDX model, we next investigated whether CDH17-CAR-NK92 therapy could obtain similar results in a PDX model. A gastric cancer tissue-derived PDX model (5th passage) was utilized to assess therapeutic effects. The expression level of CDH17 on tumor tissues from this PDX model was initially determined by IHC, revealing high surface expression of CDH17 in PDX samples (Fig. 4A). In vivo anti-tumor effects of CAR-NK92 in the PDX model were then conducted according to the experimental schedule shown in Fig. 4B. NCG mice were subcutaneously implanted with GC PDX samples (Day −27). On Day 0, mice were randomly grouped when the tumor volume reached ∼50 mm3. CAR-NK92 cells (1 × 107 cells) were administered once every 4 days via the tail vein for a total of 4 injections. The results demonstrated that CDH17-targeting CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells significantly impeded tumor growth and extended mouse survival compared to the C9-CAR-NK92 cells (Fig. 4C and D, Supporting Information Fig. S9). Moreover, there was no noticeable weight loss observed in any of the mice throughout the entire treatment process (Fig. 4E). Overall, these findings indicate that CDH17-targeting CAR-NK cells hold significant potential for clinical translation.
PC presents a clinical challenge due to the absence of symptoms in early-stage disease and a unique tumor microenvironment characterized by dense desmoplasia, high infiltration of fibroblasts, and immunosuppressive cells46. Investigating novel therapeutic approaches for the treatment of PC holds great significance. To assess the efficacy of CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells in expressing CDH17 PC tumors in vivo, CDH17-positive ASPC1 cells were engrafted into NCG mice (Day −14). Starting from Day 0, CAR- NK92 cells (1 × 107 cells) were administered via the tail vein every 4 days for a total of 4 injections (Fig. 5A). Tumor volume and body weight were monitored every 2 days (Fig. 5B and C). Surprisingly, CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells significantly inhibited ASPC1 tumor burden in mice compared to C9-CAR-NK92 cells, which did not exhibit any tumor inhibition (Fig. 5B, Supporting Information Fig. S10). These data illustrate that CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells can also suppress the growth of CDH17-positive PC solid tumors. No significant toxicity was observed after CAR-NK92 cell treatment, as evidenced by stable body weight, whole blood routine test, serum biochemical test, and histological analysis of vital organs (Fig. 5C, Supporting Information Figs. S11 and S12). Finally, the infiltration of CAR-NK92 cells in the tumor was analyzed. As shown in Fig. 5D and E, the number of cells expressing CopGFP was increased in tumor tissues treated with CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells compared to the C9-CAR-NK92 cell groups. Taken together, these results indicate that CDH17-targeted CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells are also effective in impeding the progression of formidable PC solid tumors in vivo.
Inspired by the facts that disrupting the CD47-SIRPα signaling axis with CV1 enhances the anti-tumor efficacy of CAR-T cells25, and that CD47 blockades can improve the activation and recruitment of NK cells47, we further wonder whether CV1 could augment the effectiveness of CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells (Fig. 6A). NCG mice were subcutaneous injected with ASPC1 cells at Day −14 (Fig. 6B). Starting from Day 0, CAR- NK92 cells (1 × 107 cells) were given via tail vein every 4 days for a total of 4 injections (Fig. 6B). Starting from Day 2, CV1 was administered via intraperitoneal injection at 200 μg every 2 Days for a total of 7 injections (Supporting Information Fig. S13). The tumor volume and body weight were monitored every 2 days (Fig. 6C, Supporting Information Fig. S14). No significant toxicity was observed after CV1 treatment alone or in combination with CAR-NK92 cells based on body weight loss and histological analysis of vital organs (Fig. 6E, Supporting Information Fig. S15). While CV1 alone did not markedly reduce tumor size compared to the PBS control, its addition significantly enhanced the anti-tumor effects and improved mouse survival of CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells compared with CDH17-CAR-NK92 or CV1 monotherapy (Fig. 6C and D). To explore the possible mechanism by which CV1 promotes the anti-tumor effect of CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells, we performed flow cytometry analysis for macrophages in the tumor microenvironment after treatment (Fig. 6F and G, Supporting Information Fig. S16). The results demonstrated a significant increase in the number of activated macrophages (CD45+Gr1F4/80+CD69+) in the group treated with a combination of CV1 and CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells (Fig. 6F). In contrast, the groups treated with either CV1 or CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells alone showed a slight, though not statistically significant, elevation in the number of CD69+ macrophages compared to the PBS group (Fig. 6F). The CV1 monotherapy group showed no impact on M1-phenotype macrophages (CD45+Gr1F4/80+CD86+) compared to the PBS group (Fig. 6G). Additionally, CV1 had no significant effect on the number of CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells in the tumors (Supporting Information Fig. S17). Surprisingly, the group treated with CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells alone exhibited a significant reduction in the number of M1-phenotype macrophages compared to the PBS group (Fig. 6G). Nevertheless, CV1 treatment was able to effectively reverse the decrease in the number of M1-phenotype macrophages caused by the CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells treatment, and this ameliorative effect was significant even when compared with the CV1 monotherapy group (Fig. 6G). Taken together, these findings suggest that CV1 may enhance the anti-tumor effect of CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells by increasing the number of M1-phenotype macrophages and enhancing overall macrophage activation in the tumors.
Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, encompassing malignant neoplasms in the GI tract and digestive organs, represent a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide48. Despite advances in treatment, the overall survival rates remain unsatisfactory, and new therapeutics are needed. Here, we demonstrate that CDH17 is expressed on the cell surface of multiple GI cancers, making CDH17 an attractive target for CAR-NK cell therapy. Our results indicate a predominant localization of CDH17 on the lateral side rather than the luminal or basal side of the colon. This unique distribution may confer protection to the colon from circulating CAR-NK cells, which exhibit limited penetration through tight junctions. Our investigation demonstrates the potent anti-tumor activity of CDH17-CAR-NK cells against CDX and PDX mouse models. We also disclose that CV1 could significantly enhance the anti-tumor effect of CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells, with one plausible mechanism being the enhancement of macrophage activation.
Adoptive immune cell transfer (ACT) has emerged as a promising approach in cancer immunotherapy, involving the use of genetically modified immune cells such as T cells and NK cells. Among these, CAR-T cell therapy has been a notable success, gaining clinical application across various cancer types49-51. However, CAR-T therapy still has a few limitations, including the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and the high associated production costs52,53. Furthermore, the isolation and utilization of autologous T cells present substantial challenges in this approach. To address these limitations, exploring alternative tumoricidal agents may provide a solution to the aforementioned drawbacks.
In contrast to T cell therapy, NK cell-based ACT has shown no association with CRS or ICANS, irrespective of the use of autologous or allogeneic NK cells9,54. One possible reason for this outcome could be that NK cells do not proliferate and secrete cytokines as efficiently as T cells in vivo10. Furthermore, the diverse sources of NK cells, including induced pluripotent stem cells, umbilical cord blood, peripheral blood, and various NK cell lines, contribute to the feasibility of developing and clinically utilizing CAR-NK cells9. Thus, NK cells might be superior to T cells in this context. Numerous studies have explored the application of CAR-NK cells in treating solid tumors, confirming the potential effectiveness and safety of CAR-modified NK-92 cells as immunotherapy for solid malignancies12,13,55. In this study, we evaluated the partial safety of CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells by examining parameters such as body weight loss, histological analysis, whole blood routine, and serum biochemical tests in the tail vein blood of NOD/SCID mice. Notably, no significant toxicity was observed based on these evaluations. Furthermore, although substantial numbers of CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells successfully infiltrated into tumors, no such infiltration was observed in the stomach and colon, where CDH17 is highly expressed. This may be related to the expression pattern of CDH17. We have shown that CDH17 is predominantly localized on the lateral side of the colonic epithelium, in contrast to the luminal or basal sides (Fig. 1J and K). Conversely, in the subcutaneous tumors of mice bearing ASPC1 cells, CDH17 expression is notably distributed around the tumor cells (Fig. 1L and M). This distinct distribution likely restricts the access of circulating CDH17-CAR-NK cells to normal colon tissue, as it limits their contact with CDH17 proteins on healthy cells, which is consistent with a previous study34. Furthermore, our in vivo imaging data (Fig. S5) demonstrate that both CDH17-CAR-NK and C9-CAR-NK cells primarily accumulate in the liver, spleen, and tumors, with no significant accumulation observed in CDH17-expressing organs such as the colon and stomach (Fig. S5E). This selective targeting is further supported by the fact that CAR-NK cells do not accumulate in CDH17-expressing organs where the pattern of CDH17 expression is different from tumor cells. Furthermore, NK92 cells have already been demonstrated to be a safe and effective antitumor therapy and have received FDA approval56. Hence, the use of CDH17-targeted CAR-NK92 cells appears to be a safe therapeutic approach to treat GI cancers.
A crucial issue of CAR-NK cell therapy is the establishment of stable CAR expression on the surface of NK cells. Currently, single-chain variable fragment (scFv) is widely used for CAR construction57. In fact, scFv-based CAR has some unavoidable drawbacks. The deletion of the constant region in scFv may lead to auto-aggregation due to high hydrophobicity and loss of targeting58. Furthermore, CAR aggregation could result in excessive cytotoxic signaling independent of tumor antigens, potentially inducing premature T cell anergy59. In light of these considerations, we opted to employ nanobodies (Nbs) for CAR construction in this study. Nbs are distinctive antibody fragments derived from heavy-chain antibodies discovered in camelids and chondrichthyes, consisting of only 2 heavy chains60. This unique structure equips Nbs with several advantages over scFv when serving as CAR molecules. The longer CDR3 sequence in Nbs provides flexibility in conformational expansion, enabling them to reach epitopes typically inaccessible to conventional antibodies61. Additionally, the gene sequence of Nbs exhibits high homology with the human VH gene family III sequence, resulting in low immunogenicity and strong compatibility with humans62. Finally, Nbs rarely display auto-aggregation due to high hydrophobicity, a common phenomenon observed with scFv63. Previously, our group screened for CDH17 targeting Nbs using a VHH phage display library comprising ∼2 × 109 independent clones and found that Nb CDH17 had a high binding affinity to both human and mouse CDH17. The ability of Nb CDH17 to bind to both human and mouse CDH17 allowed for a more comprehensive evaluation of its safety. Consequently, Nb CDH17 was selected for the construction of CDH17-targeting CAR-NK cells. Following numerous generations of culturing, the surface expression of the CAR on CAR-NK92 cells remained unchanged and maintained the same killing ability, indicating that the CAR molecule constructed by Nb CDH17 was stable (data not shown).
Despite the remarkable success of CAR-NK cell therapy, the immunosuppressive microenvironment remains a barrier to therapeutic efficacy. To overcome this, the integration of CAR-NK cells with immune checkpoint inhibitors is under investigation in numerous studies, indicating better therapeutic effects compared with single therapy in clinical applications64,65. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to combine a checkpoint inhibitor against the CD47–SIRPα axis that has not been previously utilized in combination with CAR-NK therapy to enhance the anti-tumor efficacy of CDH17-targeted CAR-NK cells. CD47 blockade in various contexts of tumor therapies has shown promising outcomes but with complicated mechanisms involving the interaction of different immune cells in TME, such as NK cells, T cells, and even DCs47,66,67. A previous study demonstrated that the combination of CAR-T cell therapy with the CD47–SIRPα axis blocker CV1 can potentiate anti-tumor effects25. However, the potential synergistic effects of CV1 with CAR-NK therapy have not been explored to date. Therefore, this study conducted an assessment of the combined therapeutic effects of CDH17-targeted CAR-NK with CV1. As expected, CV1 significantly improved the anti-tumor effects of CDH17-CAR-NK92 cells against the ASPC1 tumor model. Although CV1 has shown some antitumor effects in certain studies23,68, other research has demonstrated that CV1 monotherapy does not yield significant antitumor outcomes26, and it is essential to combine it with other treatments such as therapeutic antibodies, chemotherapy, or CAR-T therapy23,24,26,69, which is consistent with our findings. Additionally, pancreatic cancer is notoriously resistant to a wide range of treatments. This discrepancy about CV1 monotherapy may be due to differences in tumor models and treatment schedules. Further investigations revealed that CV1 can stimulate the activation of macrophages in the tumor microenvironment, leading to an increase in M1-phenotype macrophages. This finding is consistent with previous results that anti-CD47 treatment can induce the transformation of M2-like TAMs into the M1-phenotype macrophages70, and reprogramming macrophage differentiation into M1-phenotype can enhance the effectiveness of T cell immunotherapy71. Specifically, reactivating TAMs and MDSCs using a folate-targeted Toll-like receptor 7 agonist (FA-TLR7-1A) can also markedly enhance the effectiveness of CAR T cell therapy72. Additionally, blockade of this pathway with CV1 and other anti-CD47 agents has been demonstrated to improve macrophage and dendritic cell (DC) cross-priming of CD8+ T cells for antitumor responses23,66,68,73. Our study also found that treatment with CV1 in combination with CDH17-CAR-NK92 led to an increase in CD69+ and CD86+ macrophages, potently implicating the enhanced antitumor activity of tumor-associated macrophages. The precise mechanisms driving this enhancement require further exploration, particularly using immunocompetent mice, to fully understand the interplay between CAR-NK cells, macrophages, and other immune cells in the tumor microenvironment.
Our studies have indicated a modest reduction in F4/80 CD86 macrophages following treatment with CDH17-CAR-NK cells. However, the precise mechanism behind this phenomenon remains elusive, and we acknowledge this as a limitation in our current study. The complex interplay between CAR-NK cells and macrophages in the tumor microenvironment (TME) has been a subject of increasing interest. Recent studies have shed light on several potential mechanisms, which might explain the observed reduction in F4/80+CD86+ macrophages, including but not limited to CAR-NK secreted cytokine-mediated effects74, competition for survival factors for both NK cells and macrophages75,76, direct cytotoxicity of CAR-NK cells to TAM77, alteration of CAR-NK-induced chemokine profiles in TME78, etc. Our findings, contextualized within recent literature, suggest that the interplay between CAR-NK cells and macrophages in the TME is complex and multifaceted. The modest reduction in F4/80+CD86+ macrophages observed with CDH17-CAR-NK cell treatment may result from a combination of the mechanisms described above. The enhanced efficacy observed with the addition of CD47 blockade (CV1) aligns with recent findings in the field23,26. CD47 acts as a “don't eat me” signal, and its blockade enhances macrophage activation (CD69+) and phagocytosis against tumor cells79. The increase in F4/80+CD86+ and F4/80+CD69+ macrophages with CV1 treatment may represent an influx of newly recruited and activated macrophages or a repolarization of existing macrophages towards a more anti-tumoral phenotype. Furthermore, these observations underscore the importance of considering the entire immune landscape when developing cellular immunotherapies. The synergistic effect observed with the combination of CAR-NK cells and CD47 blockade highlights the potential of targeting multiple aspects of the TME to enhance therapeutic efficacy. Thus, the combination of CAR-NK therapy with TME modulators such as antibodies against PD-1, CTLA4, or CD47, and agonists to the STING pathway or Toll-like receptors (TLR7/8/9)80,81, may be an effective strategy to enhance the antitumor performance of CAR-NK therapy. This approach aligns with emerging strategies in the field that aim to engineer more comprehensive anti-tumor responses by modulating both adaptive and innate immune components. For our study, to gain a deeper understanding of how CDH17-CAR-NK cells reduce F4/80+ CD86+ macrophages and how CD47 blockade (CV1) enhances the therapeutic effect of CDH17-CAR-NK cells, further studies using immunocompetent or humanized mice are warranted. These studies will provide a more comprehensive view of the complex interactions between CAR-NK cells, macrophages, and other immune components in the TME, leading to more effective therapeutic strategies. In summary, these findings indicate that strategies aimed at activating tumor-associated myeloid cells could significantly augment the potencies of adoptive cell therapies.
In conclusion, CDH17-targeting CAR-NK92 cells exhibit robust anti-tumor activity in multiple GI cancers, as demonstrated in both CDX and PDX models. Furthermore, our findings highlight the potential of combining CDH17-targeting CAR-NK92 cells with CD47 blocker CV1 to augment the anti-tumor effects. Of note, we have to acknowledge that deep exploration is needed to decipher the detailed mechanisms of how CD47 blockade influences the behaviors of CAR NK cells in TME, and syngeneic tumor models in component or humanized mice are possibly better to analyze the interaction networks of various immune cells after the administration of CAR NK cells. Overall, our work demonstrates that CDH17-targeting CAR-NK92 cells is a safe and effective therapeutic approach to treat GI cancers. Our research also offers an alternative option for the combination therapy with CAR-NK cells.
1.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209—49.
2.
Dahiya DS, Kichloo A, Singh J, Albosta M, Lekkala M. Current immunotherapy in gastrointestinal malignancies a review. J Investig Med 2021;69:689—96.
3.
Rizvi NA, Hellmann MD, Snyder A, Kvistborg P, Makarov V, Havel JJ, et al. Cancer immunology. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer. Science 2015;348:124—8.
4.
Dine J, Gordon R, Shames Y, Kasler MK, Barton-Burke M. Immune checkpoint inhibitors: an innovation in immunotherapy for the treatment and management of patients with cancer. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2017;4:127—35.
5.
Sexton RE, Al Hallak MN, Diab M, Azmi AS. Gastric cancer: a comprehensive review of current and future treatment strategies. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2020;39:1179—203.
6.
Hilmi M, Bartholin L, Neuzillet C. Immune therapies in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: where are we now?. World J Gastroenterol 2018;24:2137—51.
7.
Le DT, Wang-Gillam A, Picozzi V, Greten TF, Crocenzi T, Springett G, et al. Safety and survival with GVAX pancreas prime and listeria monocytogenes-expressing mesothelin (CRS-207) boost vaccines for metastatic pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:1325—33.
8.
Yu J, Freud AG, Caligiuri MA. Location and cellular stages of natural killer cell development. Trends Immunol 2013;34:573—82.
9.
Zhang C, Hu Y, Xiao W, Tian Z. Chimeric antigen receptor- and natural killer cell receptor-engineered innate killer cells in cancer immunotherapy. Cell Mol Immunol 2021;18:2083—100.
10.
Lupo KB, Matosevic S. Natural killer cells as allogeneic effectors in adoptive cancer immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2019;11:769.
11.
Glienke W, Esser R, Priesner C, Suerth JD, Schambach A, Wels WS, et al. Advantages and applications of CAR-expressing natural killer cells. Front Pharmacol 2015;6:21.
12.
Wu L, Liu F, Yin L, Wang F, Shi H, Zhao Q, et al. The establishment of polypeptide PSMA-targeted chimeric antigen receptor-engineered natural killer cells for castration-resistant prostate cancer and the induction of ferroptosis-related cell death. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2022;42:768—83.
13.
Teng KY, Mansour AG, Zhu Z, Li Z, Tian L, Ma S, et al. Off-the-shelf prostate stem cell antigen-directed chimeric antigen receptor natural killer cell therapy to treat pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology 2022;162:1319—33.
14.
Casal JI, Bartolome RA. Beyond N-cadherin, relevance of cadherins 5,6 and 17 in cancer progression and metastasis. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20:3373.
15.
Liu X, Huang Y, Yuan H, Qi X, Manjunath Y, Avella D, et al. Disruption of oncogenic liver-intestine cadherin (CDH17) drives apoptotic pancreatic cancer death. Cancer Lett 2019;454:204—14.
16.
Lopes N, Bergsland C, Bruun J, Bjornslett M, Vieira AF, Mesquita P, et al. A panel of intestinal differentiation markers (CDX2, GPA33, and LI-cadherin) identifies gastric cancer patients with favourable prognosis. Gastric Cancer 2020;23:811—23.
17.
Garcia-Martinez JM, Wang S, Weishaeupl C, Wernitznig A, Chetta P, Pinto C, et al. Selective tumor cell apoptosis and tumor regression in CDH17-positive colorectal cancer models using BI 905711, a novel liver-sparing TRAILR2 agonist. Mol Cancer Ther 2021;20:96—108.
18.
Liu LX, Lee NP, Chan VW, Xue W, Zender L, Zhang C, et al. Targeting cadherin-17 inactivates Wnt signaling and inhibits tumor growth in liver carcinoma. Hepatology 2009;50:1453—63.
19.
Liu Y, Zhi X, Yang M, Zhang J, Lin L, Zhao X, et al. Tumor-triggered drug release from calcium carbonate-encapsulated gold nanostars for near-infrared photodynamic/photothermal combination antitumor therapy. Theranostics 2017;7:1650—62.
20.
Kusano-Arai O, Iwanari H, Kudo S, Kikuchi C, Yui A, Akiba H, et al. Synergistic cytotoxic effect on gastric cancer cells of an immunotoxin cocktail in which antibodies recognize different epitopes on CDH17. Monoclon Antib Immunodiagn Immunother 2018;37:1—11.
21.
Xia P, Yuan H, Tian M, Zhong T, Hou R, Xu X, et al. Surface-engineered extracellular vesicles with CDH17 nanobodies to efficiently deliver imaging probes and chemo-photothermal drugs for gastric cancer theragnostic. Adv Funct Mater 2023;33:2209393.
22.
Ma J, Xu X, Fu C, Xia P, Tian M, Zheng L, et al. CDH17 nanobodies facilitate rapid imaging of gastric cancer and efficient delivery of immunotoxin. Biomater Res 2022;26:64.
23.
Weiskopf K, Ring AM, Ho CC, Volkmer JP, Levin AM, Volkmer AK, et al. Engineered SIRPα variants as immunotherapeutic adjuvants to anticancer antibodies. Science 2013;341:88—91.
24.
Chen H, Yang Y, Deng Y, Wei F, Zhao Q, Liu Y, et al. Delivery of CD47 blocker SIRPα-Fc by CAR-T cells enhances antitumor efficacy. J Immunother Cancer 2022;10:e003737.
25.
Dacek MM, Kurtz KG, Wallisch P, Pierre SA, Khayat S, Bourne CM, et al. Potentiating antibody-dependent killing of cancers with CART cells secreting CD47—SIRPα checkpoint blocker. Blood 2023;141:2003—15.
26.
Theruvath J, Menard M, Smith BAH, Linde MH, Coles GL, Dalton GN, et al. Anti-GD2 synergizes with CD47 blockade to mediate tumor eradication. Nat Med 2022;28:333—44.
27.
Lee JJ, Bernard V, Semaan A, Monberg ME, Huang J, Stephens BM, et al. Elucidation of tumor-stromal heterogeneity and the ligand-receptor interactome by single-cell transcriptomics in real-world pancreatic cancer biopsies. Clin Cancer Res 2021;27:5912—21.
28.
Jiang H, Yu D, Yang P, Guo R, Kong M, Gao Y, et al. Revealing the transcriptional heterogeneity of organ-specific metastasis in human gastric cancer using single-cell RNA sequencing. Clin Transl Med 2022;12:e730.
29.
Guo W, Zhang C, Wang X, Dou D, Chen D, Li J. Resolving the difference between left-sided and right-sided colorectal cancer by single-cell sequencing. JCI Insight 2022;7:e152616.
30.
Wolf FA, Angerer P, Theis FJ. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol 2018;19:15.
31.
Polanski K, Young MD, Miao Z, Meyer KB, Teichmann SA, Park JE. BBKNN: fast batch alignment of single cell transcriptomes. Bioinformatics 2020;36:964—5.
32.
Traag VA, Waltman L, van Eck NJ. From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities. Sci Rep 2019;9:5233.
33.
Patel AP, Tirosh I, Trombetta JJ, Shalek AK, Gillespie SM, Wakimoto H, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma. Science 2014;344:1396—401.
34.
Feng Z, He X, Zhang X, Wu Y, Xing B, Knowles A, et al. Potent suppression of neuroendocrine tumors and gastrointestinal cancers by CDH17CART cells without toxicity to normal tissues. Nat Cancer 2022;3:581—94.
35.
Tang Z, Kang B, Li C, Chen T, Zhang Z. GEPIA2: an enhanced web server for large-scale expression profiling and interactive analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2019;47:W556—60.
36.
Yu M, Luo H, Fan M, Wu X, Shi B, Di S, et al. Development of GPC3-specific chimeric antigen receptor-engineered natural killer cells for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Ther 2018;26:366—78.
37.
Montagner IM, Penna A, Fracasso G, Carpanese D, Dalla Pieta A, Barbieri V, et al. Anti-PSMA CAR-engineered NK-92 cells: an off-the-shelf cell therapy for prostate cancer. Cells 2020;9:1382.
38.
You F, Wang Y, Jiang L, Zhu X, Chen D, Yuan L, et al. A novel CD7 chimeric antigen receptor-modified NK-92MI cell line targeting T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Am J Cancer Res 2019;9:64—78.
39.
Zheng L, Wang H, Zhou J, Shi G, Ma J, Jiang Y, et al. Off-the-shelf CAR-NK cells targeting immunogenic cell death marker ERp57 execute robust antitumor activity and have a synergistic effect with ICD inducer oxaliplatin. J Immunother Cancer 2024;12:e008888.
40.
Pan H, Li W, Chen Z, Luo Y, He W, Wang M, et al. Click CAR-T cell engineering for robustly boosting cell immunotherapy in blood and subcutaneous xenograft tumor. Bioact Mater 2021;6:951—62.
41.
Li W, Pan H, He H, Meng X, Ren Q, Gong P, et al. Bio-orthogonal T cell targeting strategy for robustly enhancing cytotoxicity against tumor cells. Small 2019;15:e1804383.
42.
Ran GH, Lin YQ, Tian L, Zhang T, Yan DM, Yu JH, et al. Natural killer cell homing and trafficking in tissues and tumors: from biology to application. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2022;7:205.
43.
Page A, Chuvin N, Valladeau-Guilemond J, Depil S. Development of NK cell-based cancer immunotherapies through receptor engineering. Cell Mol Immunol 2024;21:315—31.
44.
Peng L, Sferruzza G, Yang L, Zhou L, Chen S. CAR-T and CAR-NK as cellular cancer immunotherapy for solid tumors. Cell Mol Immunol 2024;21:1089—108.
45.
Yoshida GJ. Applications of patient-derived tumor xenograft models and tumor organoids. J Hematol Oncol 2020;13:4.
46.
Mota Reyes C, Teller S, Muckenhuber A, Konukiewitz B, Safak O, Weichert W, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy remodels the pancreatic cancer microenvironment via depletion of protumorigenic immune cells. Clin Cancer Res 2020;26:220—31.
47.
Nath PR, Pal-Nath D, Mandal A, Cam MC, Schwartz AL, Roberts DD. Natural killer cell recruitment and activation are regulated by CD47 expression in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Immunol Res 2019;7:1547—61.
48.
Murphy N, Jenab M, Gunter MJ. Adiposity and gastrointestinal cancers: epidemiology, mechanisms and future directions. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;15:659—70.
49.
Lu J, Jiang G. The journey of CAR-T therapy in hematological malignancies. Mol Cancer 2022;21:194.
50.
Flugel CL, Majzner RG, Krenciute G, Dotti G, Riddell SR, Wagner DL, et al. Overcoming on-target, off-tumour toxicity of CART cell therapy for solid tumours. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2023;20:49—62.
51.
Liu Y, Duan W, Huang X, Lu J. A first case report of using chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapy to treat high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma. J Transl Int Med 2023;11:294—6.
52.
Yu JX, Upadhaya S, Tatake R, Barkalow F, Hubbard-Lucey VM. Cancer cell therapies: the clinical trial landscape. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2020;19:583—4.
53.
Xu Z, Mo X, Kong Y, Wen Q, Han T, Lyu M, et al. Mini-dose methotrexate combined with methylprednisolone as a first-line treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease: a phase 2 trial. J Transl Int Med 2023;11:255—64.
54.
Olson JA, Leveson-Gower DB, Gill S, Baker J, Beilhack A, Negrin RS. NK cells mediate reduction of GVHD by inhibiting activated, alloreactive T cells while retaining GVT effects. Blood 2010;115:4293—301.
55.
Nowakowska P, Romanski A, Miller N, Odendahl M, Bonig H, Zhang C, et al. Clinical grade manufacturing of genetically modified, CAR-expressing NK-92 cells for the treatment of ErbB2-positive malignancies. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2018;67:25—38.
56.
Kloess S, Oberschmidt O, Dahlke J, Vu XK, Neudoerfl C, Kloos A, et al. Preclinical assessment of suitable natural killer cell sources for chimeric antigen receptor natural killer-based “off-the-shelf” acute myeloid leukemia immunotherapies. Hum Gene Ther 2019;30:381—401.
57.
Strohl WR, Naso M. Bispecific T-cell redirection versus chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells as approaches to kill cancer cells. Antibodies 2019;8:41.
58.
Sun W, Xie J, Lin H, Mi S, Li Z, Hua F, et al. A combined strategy improves the solubility of aggregation-prone single-chain variable fragment antibodies. Protein Expr Purif 2012;83:21—9.
59.
Jayaraman J, Mellody MP, Hou AJ, Desai RP, Zhao W. CAR-T design: elements and their synergistic function. EBioMedicine 2020;58:102931.
60.
Nguyen VK, Hamers R, Wyns L, Muyldermans S. Camel heavy-chain antibodies: diverse germline VHH and specific mechanisms enlarge the antigen-binding repertoire. EMBO J 2000;19:921—30.
61.
Peter B, Julia H, Friedrich KN. Nanobodies and nanobody-based human heavy chain antibodies as antitumor therapeutics. Front Immunol 2017;8:1603.
62.
Nanobodies Muyldermans S. Natural single-domain antibodies. Annu Rev Biochem 2013;82:775—97.
63.
Nieba L, Honegger A, Krebber C, Plückthun A. Disrupting the hydrophobic patches at the antibody variable/constant domain interface: improved in vivo folding and physical characterization of an engineered scFv fragment. Protein Eng 1997;10:435—44.
64.
Yang K, Zhao Y, Sun G, Zhang X, Cao J, Shao M, et al. Clinical application and prospect of immune checkpoint inhibitors for CAR-NK cell in tumor immunotherapy. Front Immunol 2022;13:1081546.
65.
Strecker MI, Wlotzka K, Strassheimer F, Roller B, Ludmirski G, Konig S, et al. AAV-mediated gene transfer of a checkpoint inhibitor in combination with HER2-targeted CAR-NK cells as experimental therapy for glioblastoma. Oncoimmunology 2022;11:2127508.
66.
Liu X, Pu Y, Cron K, Deng L, Kline J, Frazier WA, et al. CD47 blockade triggers T cell-mediated destruction of immunogenic tumors. Nat Med 2015;21:1209—15.
67.
Lee S, Kim TD. Breakthroughs in cancer immunotherapy: an overview of T cell, NK cell, Mφ, and DC-based treatments. Int J Mol Sci 2023;24:17634.
68.
Mathias MD, Sockolosky JT, Chang AY, Tan KS, Liu C, Garcia KC, et al. CD47 blockade enhances therapeutic activity of TCR mimic antibodies to ultra-low density cancer epitopes. Leukemia 2017;31:2254—7.
69.
Cao A, Yi J, Tang X, Szeto CW, Wu R, Wan B, et al. CD47-blocking antibody ZL-1201 promotes tumor-associated macrophage phagocytic activity and enhances the efficacy of the therapeutic antibodies and chemotherapy. Cancer Res Commun 2022;2:1404—17.
70.
Zhang M, Hutter G, Kahn SA, Azad TD, Gholamin S, Xu CY, et al. Anti-CD47 treatment stimulates phagocytosis of glioblastoma by M1 and M2 polarized macrophages and promotes M1 polarized macrophages in vivo. PLoS One 2016;11:e0153550.
71.
Klug F, Prakash H, Huber PE, Seibel T, Bender N, Halama N, et al. Low-dose irradiation programs macrophage differentiation to an iNOS+/M1 phenotype that orchestrates effective T cell immunotherapy. Cancer Cell 2013;24:589—602.
72.
Luo W, Napoleon JV, Zhang F, Lee YG, Wang B, Putt KS, et al. Repolarization of tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells for augmentation of CART cell therapies. Front Immunol 2022;13:816761.
73.
Xu MM, Pu Y, Han D, Shi Y, Cao X, Liang H, et al. Dendritic cells but not macrophages sense tumor mitochondrial DNA for cross-priming through signal regulatory protein alpha signaling. Immunity 2017;47.363—73.e5.
74.
Xu Y, Liu Q, Zhong M, Wang Z, Chen Z, Zhang Y, et al. 2B4 costimulatory domain enhancing cytotoxic ability of anti-CD5 chimeric antigen receptor engineered natural killer cells against T cell malignancies. J Hematol Oncol 2019;12:49.
75.
Kegyes D, Milea PA, Mazga AI, Tigu AB, Nistor M, Cenariu D, et al. Looking ahead to targeting macrophages by CART- or NK-cells in blood cancers. Expert Opin Ther Targets 2024;28:779—87.
76.
Singha AK, Sarkar C, Majumder D, Debnath R, Saha M, Maiti D. IL-15 and GM-CSF stimulated macrophages enhances phagocytic activity in ENU induced leukemic mice. Immunobiology 2020;225:151894.
77.
Bellora F, Castriconi R, Dondero A, Carrega P, Mantovani A, Ferlazzo G, et al. Human NK cells and NK receptors. Immunol Lett 2014;161:168—73.
78.
Dos Santos PV, de Toledo DNM, de Souza DMS, Menezes TP, Perucci LO, Silva ZM, et al. The imbalance in the relationship between inflammatory and regulatory cytokines during gestational toxoplasmosis can be harmful to fetuses: a systematic review. Front Immunol 2023;14:1074760.
79.
Feng C, Chen R, Fang W, Gao X, Ying H, Zheng X, et al. Synergistic effect of CD47 blockade in combination with cordycepin treatment against cancer. Front Pharmacol 2023;14:1144330.
80.
Abdoli Shadbad M, Hemmat N, Khaze Shahgoli V, Derakhshani A, Baradaran F, Brunetti O, et al. A systematic review on PD-1 blockade and PD-1 gene-editing of CAR-T cells for glioma therapy: from deciphering to personalized medicine. Front Immunol 2021;12:788211.
81.
Uslu U, Sun L, Castelli S, Finck AV, Assenmacher CA, Young RM, et al. The STING agonist IMSA101 enhances chimeric antigen receptor T cell function by inducing IL-18 secretion. Nat Commun 2024;15:3933.
Year 2025 volume 15 Issue 5
PDF
10
7
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.03.039
  • Receive Date:2024-05-16
  • Online Date:2026-09-17
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-05-16
  • Revised:2024-11-13
  • Accepted:2024-12-20
Affiliations
    aDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, Shenzhen Clinical Research Centre for Geriatrics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shenzhen People's Hospital (the First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology, the Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University), Shenzhen 518020, China
    bIntegrated Chinese and Western Medicine Postdoctoral Research Station, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
    cDepartment of Medical Imaging, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (Academy of Orthopedics Guangdong Province), Guangzhou 510630, China
    dDepartment of Neurosurgery & Medical Research Center, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University (the First People's Hospital of Shunde Foshan), Guangzhou 510515, China
    eCenter of Laboratory Animal Science, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China
    fKey Laboratory of New Drug Evaluation and Transformation of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang 330031, China
    gDepartment of Urology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510900, China
    hDepartment of Urology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, China
    iDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
    jCenter for Drug Research and Development, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Pharmaceutical Preparations, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510006, China
    kState Key Laboratory for Quality Ensurance and Sustainable Use of Dao-di Herbs, Artemisinin Research Center, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China
    lDepartment of Oncology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China
    mDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine and School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
    nState Key Laboratory of Antiviral Drugs, School of Pharmacy, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China

Corresponding:

* Corresponding authors.
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/apsb/EN/10.1016/j.apsb.2025.03.039
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT