收藏切换
Numerical investigation of solitary wave run-up attenuation by patchy vegetation
收藏切换
PDF
Chuyan Zhao1, Yan Zhang1, Jun Tang1, *, Yongming Shen1, 2
Acta Oceanologica Sinica | 2020, 39(5) : 105 - 114
Less
收藏切换
Acta Oceanologica Sinica | 2020, 39(5): 105-114
Ocean Engineering
Numerical investigation of solitary wave run-up attenuation by patchy vegetation
Full
Chuyan Zhao1, Yan Zhang1, Jun Tang1, *, Yongming Shen1, 2
Affiliations
  • 1 State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
  • 2 Institute of Environmental and Ecological Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
Published: 2020-05-25 doi: 10.1007/s13131-020-1572-6
Outline
收藏切换

Coastal vegetation is capable of decreasing wave run-up. However, because of regrowth, decay or man-made damage, coastal vegetation is always distributed in patches, and its internal distribution is often non-uniform. This study investigates the effects of patchy vegetation on solitary wave run-up by using a numerical simulation. A numerical model based on fully nonlinear Boussinesq equations is established to simulate the wave propagation on a slope with patchy vegetation. By using the model, the process of solitary wave run-up attenuation due to patchy vegetation is numerically analysed. The numerical results reveal that patchy vegetation can considerably attenuate the wave run-up in an effective manner. In addition, high-density patched vegetation can attenuate the solitary wave run-up more effectively than low-density patched vegetation can. For the same density, patchy vegetation with a uniform distribution has a better attenuation effect on wave run-up compared to that of patchy vegetation with a non-uniform distribution.

solitary wave  /  run-up  /  patchy vegetation  /  Boussinesq equation
Chuyan Zhao, Yan Zhang, Jun Tang, Yongming Shen. Numerical investigation of solitary wave run-up attenuation by patchy vegetation[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2020 , 39 (5) : 105 -114 . DOI: 10.1007/s13131-020-1572-6
Tsunami run-ups are associated with massive destructive power and can cause extensive damage to life and property. In 2004, the 9.0 magnitude earthquake that occurred in Sumatra initiated a tsunami which killed over 283 000 people and incurred enormous financial losses (Tanaka, 2009). In 2011, a 9.0 magnitude earthquake occurred in the north of Japan and generated the third-largest tsunami in the past ten years; the tsunami submerged 400 square kilometres of land and killed over 20 000 people (Mori et al., 2011). Hence, it is necessary to determine effective methods to decrease tsunami run-up. A traditional and direct method to protect coastal regions from wave run-up is the construction of hard structures, such as seawalls and break-waters; however, this approach is expensive and harmful to the environment. Therefore, research regarding the mitigation of damage due to tsunami run-ups by using structures with low environmental impact has become quite prevalent. Coastal vegetation can realize reasonable wave run-up dissipation with less environmental disruption than that associated with artificial engineering (Zhang et al., 2010, 2013; Duarte et al., 2013; Temmerman et al., 2013). However, in nature, coastal vegetation is rarely distributed uniformly and continuously; instead, it tends to be distributed in patches owing to regrowth, decay and man-made damage. Tsunamis are always simulated by a solitary wave; thus, it is necessary to investigate the attenuation of a solitary wave run-up by patchy vegetation to analyse the influence of patchy vegetation on the tsunami run-up.
In recent years, several researchers have investigated the effect of vegetation on wave run-up attenuation. Irtem et al. (2009) found that wave run-up was reduced by approximately 45% on a vegetated slope compared to that on a landscape without trees. Tang et al. (2013) investigated the sensitivity of solitary wave run-up to plant height, diameter and stem density by comparing the numerical results pertaining to different patterns of vegetation. Tang et al. (2017) studied the effects of vegetation on long-period wave run-up via a numerical simulation by using the nonlinear shallow water equations, and the results indicated that the attenuation of long-period wave run-up due to vegetation is sensitive to the variation of the incident wave period; in addition, the attenuation of wave run-up did not increase or decrease monotonically with the incident wave period. Tsai et al. (2017) studied the damping effect of solitary wave propagation on moving emergent vegetation by using a numerical model based on the general Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations; the results indicated that the effect of moving vegetation on the damping of the wave height was notably less than the corresponding effect of stationary vegetation. Yao et al. (2018), on the basis of a modified Boussinesq equation, investigated the effects of beach slope, forest density and tree distribution on the solitary wave drag coefficient. Thuy et al. (2018) proposed a numerical model based on 1D nonlinear longwave equations, and the model was applied to investigate the effects of forest width, tree density, incident tsunami period and height on the height of wave run-up. The existing have focused mainly on the effect of continuous and uniform vegetation on solitary run-up. In nature, coastal vegetation is always distributed in patches due to regrowth, decay or man-made damage, and its internal distribution is often non-uniform (Maza et al., 2016); however, only a few studies have focused on patchy vegetation. Fonseca and Koehl (2006) and Vandenbruwaene et al. (2011) studied the effects of patch sizes and inter-patch distance on currents. Irish et al. (2014) evaluated the reduction in the intensity of a tsunami via patchy vegetation by conducting a series of experiments. Maza et al. (2016) proposed a new parameter termed the equivalent length, which can take the effect of patchiness of vegetation into analysis. Using this parameter, the authors investigated the effect of the submergence ratio and the field characteristic of circular vegetation patches on wave attenuation. Yang et al. (2017) investigated the behaviour of a tsunami when coming ashore through patchy vegetation and the variation of this behaviour with the roughness level, patch spacing and patch size. Zainali et al. (2018) performed numerical simulations of long waves interacting with arrays of emergent cylinders inside regularly spaced patches. The abovementioned studies revealed the effects of uniform or patched vegetation on the attenuation of solitary wave run-up. However, the effects of density and internal distribution of vegetation patches on solitary wave run-up remain yet unclarified.
In this study, the effect of patchy vegetation on the attenuation of solitary wave run-up was investigated by using a wave-vegetation numerical model based on COULWAVE (which is based on nonlinear Boussinesq equations). The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 presents the governing equations for wave propagation in vegetation zones, which are based on the Boussinesq model. Section 3 describes the analysis of the accuracy of the numerical model by comparing the numerical results with the laboratory data pertaining to wave propagation with continuous vegetation on a flat bottom surface and patched vegetation on a slope; this section also describes the investigation pertaining to the sensitivity of solitary wave run-up to the distribution of patchy vegetation. Section 4 presents the conclusions derived from this study and the limitations.
Boussinesq equations have been widely used for modelling coastal waves (Liu and Fang, 2016, 2019; Liu et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2018). The governing equations of COULWAVE are high-order nonlinear Boussinesq equations. In this study, the governing equations based on COULWAVE, including the vegetation term can be described as follows (Lynett et al., 2002; Kim et al., 2009):
$\frac{{\partial H}}{{\partial t}} + \frac{{\partial H{U_\alpha }}}{{\partial x}} + \frac{{\partial H{V_\alpha }}}{{\partial y}} + {D_c} = 0,$
$\frac{{\partial H{U_\alpha }}}{{\partial t}} + \frac{{\partial HU_\alpha ^2}}{{\partial x}} + \frac{{\partial H{U_\alpha }{V_\alpha }}}{{\partial y}} + gH\frac{{\partial \varsigma }}{{\partial x}} + gH{D_x} + {U_\alpha }{D_c} + {f_{x{\rm{veg}}}}H = 0,$
$\frac{{\partial H{V_\alpha }}}{{\partial t}} + \frac{{\partial H{U_\alpha }{V_\alpha }}}{{\partial x}} + \frac{{\partial HV_\alpha ^2}}{{\partial y}} + gH\frac{{\partial \varsigma }}{{\partial y}} + gH{D_y} + {V_\alpha }{D_c} + {f_{y{\rm{veg}}}}H = 0,$
where ζ is the wave elevation; H=ζ+h is the total water depth, where h is the still water depth; g is the gravity acceleration; Uα and Vα respectively represent the horizontal velocity in the x and y directions at any horizontal plane; Dx and Dy respectively refer to the second-order term of the horizontal momentum equation in the x and y directions of average depth; and fveg is the force acting on the vegetation.
In this study, the plants are represented by cylinders, and the Morison equation is adopted to indicate the force acting on the vegetation. The inertial term is ignored, as the diameter of vegetation is considerably small compared to the wavelength. The force acting on vegetation can be expressed as
${f_{{\rm{veg}}}} = \frac{1}{2}{C_d}{N_v}{b_v}{{\mathop u\limits^ \rightharpoonup} _p}\left| {{{{\mathop u\limits^ \rightharpoonup} }_p}} \right|,$
where Cd is the drag coefficient, Nv is the vegetation density, bv is the vegetation diameter, and ${{\mathop u\limits^ \rightharpoonup} _p}$ is the horizontal velocity in the vegetation region. The relationship between ${{\mathop u\limits^ \rightharpoonup} _p}$ and ${{\mathop u\limits^ \rightharpoonup}}$ can be expressed as ${{\mathop u\limits^ \rightharpoonup} _p} = {\mathop u\limits^ \rightharpoonup} /(1 - \phi)$, where $\phi$ is the vegetation volume fraction, $\phi = {V_s}/V$, Vs is the vegetation volume and V is the control volume.
In the governing equation, the vegetation drag coefficient is the most important parameter for simulating the vegetation drag force, and its magnitude depends on the characteristics of the fluid and vegetation. In this study, the equation derived by Kobayashi et al. (1997) is employed:
${C_d} = 1.8\xi {R_d}^{ - 3/50}\left[ {1 + 0.45\ln \left({1 + 100\phi } \right)} \right] \times \left({0.8 + 0.2F - 0.15{F^2}} \right),$
where Rd=|uc|bv/γ, F=|uc|/(gd)1/2, γ=1.01×10-6 m2/s is the hydrodynamic viscosity, ξ=0.8, uc is the maximal velocity in the vegetation region (Stone and Shen, 2002), Rd is the Reynolds number and F is the Froude number.
When simulating wave propagation, the existence of offshore structures and the change in submarine topographies can influence the process of wave propagation, and some of these aspects can even cause wave breaking. Hence, it is vital to simulate the bottom fraction, wave breaking and boundary conditions accurately. The wave breaking term and bottom fraction term were introduced in the momentum equation:
$\frac{{\partial u}}{{\partial t}} + \ldots + {R_f} - {R_b} = 0,$
where Rf is the bottom fraction term, and Rb is the wave breaking term.
For the bottom fraction term, Rf can be expressed as:
${R_f} = \frac{f}{H}{{\mathop u\limits^ \rightharpoonup} _b}\left| {{{{\mathop u\limits^ \rightharpoonup}} _b}} \right|,$
where f is the bottom fraction coefficient, H is the total water depth and ${{\mathop u\limits^ \rightharpoonup} _b}$ is the bottom horizontal water velocity. The bottom fraction coefficient f is related to Chezy’s coefficient, f=g/C2; when the seabed is rough, C<10, and when the seabed is typical, 20<C<60.
For the wave breaking term, Rb can be expressed as:
${R_b} = {R_{bx}}i + {R_{by}}j,$
where
${R_{bx}} = \frac{1}{H}\left\{ {{{\left[ {\upsilon {{\left({H{u_1}} \right)}_x}} \right]}_x} + \frac{1}{2}{{\left[ {\upsilon {{\left({H{u_1}} \right)}_y} + \upsilon {{\left({H{v_1}} \right)}_x}} \right]}_y}} \right\},$
${R_{by}} = \frac{1}{H}\left\{ {{{\left[ {\upsilon {{\left({H{u_1}} \right)}_y}} \right]}_y} + \frac{1}{2}{{\left[ {\upsilon {{\left({H{v_1}} \right)}_x} + \upsilon {{\left({H{u_1}} \right)}_y}} \right]}_x}} \right\},$
where υ is the motion viscosity coefficient, and υ=BHζt. The value of variable B can be determined as follows:
$\begin{split}& B = \text{δ},\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;2\zeta _t^b \leqslant {\zeta _t},\\& B = \text{δ} \left({{\zeta _t}/\zeta _t^b - 1} \right),\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\zeta _t^b \leqslant {\zeta _t} \leqslant 2\zeta _t^b,\\& B = 0,\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;{\zeta _t} \leqslant \zeta _t^b,\end{split}$
where δ is an amplification factor, and ζt is defined as:
$\begin{split}& \zeta _t^b = \zeta _t^{\left(F \right)},\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;{T^b} \leqslant t - {t_0},\\& \zeta _t^b = \zeta _t^{\left(I \right)} + \frac{{t - {t_0}}}{{{T^b}}}\left({\zeta _t^{\left(F \right)} - \zeta _t^{\left(I \right)}} \right),\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;0 \leqslant t - {t_0} \leqslant {T^b},\end{split}$
where ζt(I) is the initial displacement when wave breaking occurs, ζt(F) is the minimum displacement to maintain wave breaking, t0 is the time when wave breaking is initiated, and Tb is the instantaneous time. In terms of contrast with the laboratory data (Hansen and Svendsen, 1979), the parameters above can be verified as:
$\begin{split}\text{δ} & = 6.5,\;\;\zeta _t^{\left(I \right)} = 0.65\sqrt {gH},\;\;\zeta _t^{\left(F \right)} = 0.08\sqrt {gH} \;\;{\rm{and}}\;\;{T^b} \\& = 8.0\sqrt {H/g}.\end{split}$
First, the accuracy of the model is validated by simulating a solitary wave run-up on patchy vegetation on flat bottom and continuous vegetation on slope. Second, the model is used to study the effect of patchy vegetation on wave run-up on a slope by performing a simulation of wave propagation in the presence of different internal distributions.
The numerical model is validated in considering the laboratory data for solitary wave propagation with patchy vegetation, which were obtained by Maza et al. (2016), and the data for solitary wave propagation with emergent continuous vegetation on a slope bottom, which were obtained by Yao et al. (2015).
Maza et al. (2016) performed experiments in a wave basin with a width, length, and depth of 8.6 m, 24.1 m and 1.0 m, respectively. The three different cylinder configurations considered in these experiments were built using wood cylinders, and their locations and distributions are shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2. The platform was located at the centre of the wave basin, 4.3 m from the vertical walls. The cylinders had a diameter of 3 cm and height of 50 cm, and they were uniformly distributed with a separation of 9 cm between centres. The experimental results for C2 were used to test the accuracy of the numerical model for the simulation of solitary wave propagation in the presence of patchy vegetation on a flat bottom. The numerical model was performed for a region with a length and width of 36 m and 8.6 m, respectively; a uniform spatial grid system was employed in which the spatial steps ∆x=∆y=0.04 m, and the total simulation time was 20 s, with time steps ∆t=0.008 s. The simulation water depth was set as 0.3 m. The solitary wave was generated at a distance of 6 m from the left side, and the incident wave height was 0.1 m. Sponge layers were set on both the left and right sides. The results of the comparison between the model and the experimental data are shown in Fig. 3. This figure shows that the predictions of the model are in agreement with the experimental data, and the model can satisfactorily simulate the wave propagation corresponding to patchy vegetation on a flat bottom.
Yao et al. (2015) conducted experiments in a wave basin with a width, length, and depth of 0.5 m, 32 m and 0.6 m, respectively. The rigid vegetation was simulated by using PVC cylinders with a diameter of 0.01 m. The length of the emergent vegetation was 0.5 m. Three different distributions were considered. In this study, a comparison was performed with case A, for which the volume portion was 0.175. The distribution for case A and experimental setup are shown in Fig. 4. The numerical model was run in a region with a length of 20 m and width of 0.5 m with a uniform spatial grid system, for which the spatial steps ∆x=∆y=0.019 9 m, and the total simulation time was 25 s, with time steps ∆t=0.016 s. The simulation water depth was set as 0.15 m. The solitary wave was generated at 6 m from the left side, and the incident wave height was 0.038 m. The results of the comparison between the measured results and simulation results are shown in Fig. 5. The figures indicate that the predictions of the model are in agreement with the experimental data, and that the proposed model is valid for simulating wave propagation on a slope with continuous vegetation.
After the validation of the present numerical model, the model was used to perform several numerical tests to investigate the effects of patchy vegetation on solitary wave run-up on a slope. In the tests, the numerical region is 30 m long and 3 m wide, and the detailed arrangement is shown in Fig. 6. The still water depth is 0.15 m, and the incident solitary wave height is 0.038 m. The wave maker is set at 6 m from the left side in the x direction, and a sponge layer is set on the left side.
The numerical model was run on a uniform spatial grid system with spatial steps ∆x=∆y=0.049 m and time step ∆t=0.01 s. Six internal distributions for the vegetation patch were considered, specifically, non-vegetation, uniform low density, uniform medium density, uniform high density and non-uniform medium density (“low-high density” and “high-low density”). The arrangement region for these six distributions was 2 m long and 1 m wide, and the details are presented in Table 1 and Fig. 7. The arrangement of the six wave gauges is described in Table 2.
Figures 8 and 9 show the solitary wave run-up results for the six cases listed in Table 1 at y=0.3 m (vegetation region) and y=2.85 m (channel); the specific figures are presented in Table 3 and Table 4. The wave run-up heights for cases A and B are 0.05 m and 0.036 m, respectively; these values indicate that patchy vegetation has a considerable attenuation effect on solitary wave run-up.
For uniform distributions, the solitary wave run-up locations for Cases B, C and D are, respectively, 19.88, 19.60 and 19.40 m; these values indicate that a larger density corresponds to a smaller solitary wave run-up. For non-uniform distributions, the solitary wave run-up location for Case E is 19.69 m, while that for Case F is 19.79 m. These values are considerably larger than those for Case C, for which the density was the same as that for Cases E and F; however, the internal distribution is uniform. This finding indicates that the wave run-up is different for vegetation with the same density but different internal distributions. A uniform distribution exhibits a better wave run-up attenuation effect than a non-uniform distribution does.
However, vegetation patches did not exert a notable influence on solitary wave run-up in the channel. For all Cases except Case B, the run-up locations are 20.46 m. The wave run-up location of Case B is 20.51 m, which is higher than that of Case A, possibly because the diffraction of a high-density vegetation patch is more significant.
In this study, the effects of patchy vegetation on solitary wave run-up were investigated by using a numerical simulation. The numerical model is based on an implementation of Morison's formulation for rigid-structure-induced drag stresses in the COULWAVE model. The accuracy of the model was examined by conducting laboratory experiments pertaining to solitary wave propagation through patchy vegetation on a flat bottom and continuous vegetation on a slope. Subsequently, the model was applied to an investigation of the solitary wave run-up through a patchy vegetation slope. The simulation results indicated that patchy vegetation could lead to a considerable reduction in the wave run-up. Patchy vegetation can reduce the wave run-up to approximately 60% when compared to condition without vegetation. Furthermore, it was noted that the internal distribution can influence the attenuation effect of the solitary wave run-up, and high-density patched vegetation can attenuate the solitary wave run-up more effectively than low-density patched vegetation can. For vegetation patches with the same density, patched vegetation with uniform distribution has a better effect on the attenuation wave run-up when compared to the effect of a non-uniform distribution.
It should be noted that in the present study, the vegetation is represented by rigid sticks, which is a simplification compared to real vegetation. Natural vegetation is more complex due to the presence of plant branches and leaves, the obvious non-rigidity of the plants, and the spatial or seasonal variations in plant properties. In future work, laboratory data using real vegetation or field data may be used to further validate the proposed model and to confirm the validity of our findings under naturally vegetated coastal environments.
  • The National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract Nos 51579036 and 51779039; the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China under contract No. DUT19LAB13.
Duarte C M, Losada I J, Hendriks I E, et al. 2013. The role of coastal plant communities for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 3(11): 961–968, doi: 10.1038/nclimate1970
Fonseca M S, Koehl M A R. 2006. Flow in seagrass canopies: The influence of patch width. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 67(1–2): 1–9, doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2005.09.018
Hansen J B, Svendsen I A. 1979. Regular waves in shoaling water: Experimental data. Series Paper 21, ISVA. Denmark: Technical University of Denmark
Irish J L, Weiss R, Yang Yongqian, et al. 2014. Laboratory experiments of tsunami run-up and withdrawal in patchy coastal forest on a steep beach. Natural Hazards, 74(3): 1933–1949, doi: 10.1007/s11069-014-1286-1
Irtem E, Gedik N, Kabdasli M S, et al. 2009. Coastal forest effects on tsunami run-up heights. Ocean Engineering, 36(3–4): 313–320, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2008.11.007
Kim D H, Lynett P J, Socolofsky S A. 2009. A depth-integrated model for weakly dispersive, turbulent, and rotational fluid flows. Ocean Modelling, 27(3–4): 198–214, doi: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2009.01.005
Kobayashi N, Karjadi E A, Johnson B D. 1997. Dispersion effects on longshore currents in surf zones. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 123(5): 240–248, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1997)123:5(240
Liu Zhongbo, Fang Kezhao. 2016. A new two-layer Boussinesq model for coastal waves from deep to shallow water: Derivation and analysis. Wave Motion, 67: 1–14, doi: 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2016.07.002
Liu Zhongbo, Fang Kezhao. 2019. Numerical verification of a two-layer Boussinesq-type model for surface gravity wave evolution. Wave Motion, 85: 98–113, doi: 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2018.11.007
Liu Zhongbo, Fang Kezhao, Cheng Y Z. 2018. A new multi-layer irrotational Boussinesq-type model for highly nonlinear and dispersive surface waves over a mildly sloping seabed. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 842: 323–353, doi: 10.1017/jfm.2018.99
Lynett P J, Wu T R, Liu P L F. 2002. Modeling wave runup with depth-integrated equations. Coastal Engineering, 46(2): 89–107, doi: 10.1016/S0378-3839(02)00043-1
Maza M, Lara J L, Losada I J. 2016. Solitary wave attenuation by vegetation patches. Advances in Water Resources, 98: 159–172, doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.10.021
Mori N, Takahashi T, Yasuda T, et al. 2011. Survey of 2011 Tohoku earthquake tsunami inundation and run-up. Geophysical research letters, 38(7): L00G14
Stone B M, Shen H T. 2002. Hydraulic resistance of flow in channels with cylindrical roughness. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 128(5): 500–506, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:5(500
Tanaka N. 2009. Vegetation bioshields for tsunami mitigation: Review of effectiveness, limitations, construction, and sustainable management. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 5(1): 71–79, doi: 10.1007/s11355-008-0058-z
Tang Jun, Causon D, Mingham C, et al. 2013. Numerical study of vegetation damping effects on solitary wave run-up using the nonlinear shallow water equations. Coastal Engineering, 75: 21–28, doi: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2013.01.002
Tang Jun, Shen Yongming, Causon D M, et al. 2017. Numerical study of periodic long wave run-up on a rigid vegetation sloping beach. Coastal Engineering, 121: 158–166, doi: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2016.12.004
Temmerman S, Meire P, Bouma T J, et al. 2013. Ecosystem-based coastal defence in the face of global change. Nature, 504(7478): 79–83, doi: 10.1038/nature12859
Thuy N B, Nandasena N A K, Dang V H, et al. 2018. Simplified formulae for designing coastal forest against tsunami run-up: one-dimensional approach. Natural Hazards, 92(1): 327–346, doi: 10.1007/s11069-018-3197-z
Tsai C P, Chen Y C, Sihombing T O, et al. 2017. Simulations of moving effect of coastal vegetation on tsunami damping. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 17(5): 693–702, doi: 10.5194/nhess-17-693-2017
Vandenbruwaene W, Temmerman S, Bouma T J, et al. 2011. Flow interaction with dynamic vegetation patches: Implications for biogeomorphic evolution of a tidal landscape. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 116(F1): F01008
Yang Yongqian, Irish J L, Weiss R. 2017. Impact of patchy vegetation on tsunami dynamics. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 143(4): 04017005, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000380
Yang Zhiyong, Tang Jun, Shen Yongming. 2018. Numerical study for vegetation effects on coastal wave propagation by using nonlinear Boussinesq model. Applied Ocean Research, 70: 32–40, doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2017.09.001
Yao Yu, Du Ruichao, Jiang Changbo, et al. 2015. Experimental study of reduction of solitary wave run-up by emergent rigid vegetation on a beach. Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami, 9(5): 1540003, doi: 10.1142/S1793431115400035
Yao Yu, Tang Zhengjiang, Jiang Changbo, et al. 2018. Boussinesq modeling of solitary wave run-up reduction by emergent vegetation on a sloping beach. Journal of Hydro-environment Research, 19: 78–87, doi: 10.1016/j.jher.2018.03.001
Zainali A, Marivela R, Weiss R, et al. 2018. Numerical simulation of nonlinear long waves in the presence of discontinuous coastal vegetation. Marine Geology, 396: 142–149, doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2017.08.001
Zhang Mingliang, Li C W, Shen Yongming. 2010. A 3D non-linear k-ε turbulent model for prediction of flow and mass transport in channel with vegetation. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34(4): 1021–1031, doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2009.07.010
Zhang Mingliang, Li C W, Shen Yongming. 2013. Depth-averaged modeling of free surface flows in open channels with emerged and submerged vegetation. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(1–2): 540–553, doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2012.02.049
Year 2020 volume 39 Issue 5
PDF
56
30
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1007/s13131-020-1572-6
  • Receive Date:2019-03-28
  • Online Date:2026-03-31
  • Published:2020-05-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2019-03-28
  • Accepted:2019-06-11
Funding
The National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract Nos 51579036 and 51779039; the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China under contract No. DUT19LAB13.
Affiliations
    1 State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
    2 Institute of Environmental and Ecological Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China

Corresponding:

References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/aos/EN/10.1007/s13131-020-1572-6
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT