收藏切换
Compatibility and comfort assessment of school desks and chairs in three cities in China
收藏切换
Tao XU1, Chunyan LUO2, Zhonghui LIU3, Yan WANG4, Dongling YANG2, Shuangxiao QU2, Wenjuan QI2, Shenglei HUANG2, Keyang ZHENG*, 2, Fengyun ZHANG*, 2
Chinese Journal of School Health | 2025, 46(3) : 321 - 324
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of School Health | 2025, 46(3): 321-324
• School Desks and Chairs Configuration Column •
Compatibility and comfort assessment of school desks and chairs in three cities in China
Full
Tao XU1, Chunyan LUO2, Zhonghui LIU3, Yan WANG4, Dongling YANG2, Shuangxiao QU2, Wenjuan QI2, Shenglei HUANG2, Keyang ZHENG*, 2, Fengyun ZHANG*, 2
Affiliations
  • 1Educational Technology Equipment Center of Shanghai Education Committee, Shanghai(200070)
Published: 2025-03-25 doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025073
Outline
收藏切换
Objective

To understand the subjective and objective comfort evaluations of students from different age groups on desks and chairs, so as to provide reference for standardized allocation and use of desks and chairs.

Methods

From January to April 2024, a total of 2 446 students were selected from 26 schools in 13 districts (counties/cities) in Shanghai, Tianjin, and Wuxi from Jiangsu Province by using cluster random method, including students in kindergartens, primary schools, junior high schools, senior high schools, colleges and universities. Standardized procedures were used to measure the height and weight of participants, and the matching desks and chairs models were selected according to the height. The subjective comfort of students on matching desks and chairs was investigated, and their objective comfort was evaluated by using a self-designed questionnaire. The χ2 test was used to analyze the differences of subjective perception and objective evaluation in comfort between different types of desks and chairs.

Results

About 84.1% of the students subjectively thought that large desks and small chairs were very comfortable or relatively comfortable, followed by large desks and chairs (75.7%), and the proportion of small desks and chairs was the lowest among the three types (46.2%), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=722.46, P < 0.01). The reporting rates of primary school, junior high school and senior high school students who subjectively considered large desks and chairs to be very comfortable/relatively comfortable were higher than that of other types of desks and chairs, and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=297.49, 252.82, 343.67, P < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in the subjective comfort evaluation of different types of desks and chairs among kindergarten children (χ2=3.21, P > 0.05), and 66.3% of the students in colleges and universities felt very comfortable/relatively comfortable when they used the matching standard desks and chairs. The objective evaluation results of the comfort for the three types of desks and chairs were consistent with the subjective evaluation, but the proportions of the objective evaluation as very comfortable/relatively comfortable were higher than that of the subjective evaluation (χ2=20.76-813.47,P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Large desks and chairs, as well as large desks with small chairs are perceived comfortable, while small desks and chairs are perceived less comfortable. It is recommended to match the large desks and chairs or large desks and small chairs that are suitable for them according to the "standard", to promote physical and mental health of students.

Desk and chair  /  Match  /  Comfortable degree  /  Students
徐涛, 罗春燕, 刘忠慧, 王艳, 杨东玲, 曲爽笑, 齐文娟, 黄生垒, 郑柯炀, 张凤云. 中国三市学校课桌椅匹配与学生舒适度调查. 中国学校卫生, 2025 , 46 (3) : 321 -324 . DOI: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025073
Tao XU, Chunyan LUO, Zhonghui LIU, Yan WANG, Dongling YANG, Shuangxiao QU, Wenjuan QI, Shenglei HUANG, Keyang ZHENG, Fengyun ZHANG. Compatibility and comfort assessment of school desks and chairs in three cities in China[J]. Chinese Journal of School Health, 2025 , 46 (3) : 321 -324 . DOI: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025073
Year 2025 volume 46 Issue 3
2
1
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025073
  • Receive Date:2024-10-15
  • Online Date:2026-11-06
  • Published:2025-03-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-10-15
  • Revised:2024-12-31
Funding
Affiliations
    1Educational Technology Equipment Center of Shanghai Education Committee, Shanghai(200070)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgxxws/EN/10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025073
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT