收藏切换
Meta-analysis of the effects of different intervention modalities on non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents
收藏切换
Mengyao ZHENG1, Changjiu HE*, 2, Xin LIU1, Fangling LIANG1, Hui DU1
Chinese Journal of School Health | 2025, 46(4) : 533 - 538
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of School Health | 2025, 46(4): 533-538
• Mental Health •
Meta-analysis of the effects of different intervention modalities on non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents
Full
Mengyao ZHENG1, Changjiu HE*, 2, Xin LIU1, Fangling LIANG1, Hui DU1
Affiliations
  • 1School of Nursing, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu (610083), Sichuan Province, China
Published: 2025-04-25 doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025126
Outline
收藏切换
Objective

To explore the effectiveness of different intervention modalities on non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) in adolescents, so as to provide an evidence-based basis for the intervention strategy of NSSI in adolescents.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials on interventions for adolescent NSSI were retrieved from databases, such as CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, spanning from the inception of these databases to March 5, 2025. Network Meta-analysis was performed by using Stata 17.0 and Review Manager 5.3 software, and the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95%CI were used as the effect indicators to compare the differences in the effectiveness of the interventions and rank the effect.

Results

A total of 26 articles with 2 034 adolescents with NSSI were included in the study, including 10 intervention modalities: dialectical behavior therapy, emotional regulation intervention, mentalization-based therapy, family therapy, cutting down programme, cognitive behavioral therapy, narrative therapy, stepped care approach, positive psychological intervention, and acceptance and commitment therapy. The results showed that compared with the treatment as usual, positive psychological intervention [SMD(95%CI)=-2.12(-3.51 to-0.74)], stepped care intervention [SMD(95%XI)=-2.07(-3.43 to-0.71)], and dialectical behavior therapy [SMD(95%CI)=-1.70(-2.60 to-0.80)], cognitive behavioral therapy [SMD(95%CI)=-1.54(-2.61 to-0.48)], and acceptance and commitment therapy [SMD(95%CI)=-1.50(-2.68 to-0.32)] were statistically significant differences in reducing adolescents' NSSI behaviors(P < 0.05). Positive psychological intervention, stepped care intervention, and dialectical behavior therapy were more effective than the mentalization-based therapy and the cutting down programme (SMD=-2.08, -2.03, -1.66, -2.06, -2.01, -1.64, P < 0.05); the area under the cumulative ranking probability graph revealed that positive psychological intervention may have the best effect in improving NSSI among adolescents (82.5).

Conclusions

Positive psychological interventions show the best results in improving adolescent NSSI among multiple intervention modalities. It is recommended to give priority to positive psychological interventions in clinical interventions.

Intervention  /  Self-injurious behavior  /  Mental health  /  Meta-analysis  /  Adolescent
郑梦瑶, 何昌九, 刘鑫, 梁芳玲, 杜荟. 不同干预方式对青少年非自杀性自伤影响Meta分析. 中国学校卫生, 2025 , 46 (4) : 533 -538 . DOI: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025126
Mengyao ZHENG, Changjiu HE, Xin LIU, Fangling LIANG, Hui DU. Meta-analysis of the effects of different intervention modalities on non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents[J]. Chinese Journal of School Health, 2025 , 46 (4) : 533 -538 . DOI: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025126
Year 2025 volume 46 Issue 4
10
5
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025126
  • Receive Date:2024-09-23
  • Online Date:2026-11-06
  • Published:2025-04-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-09-23
  • Revised:2025-03-10
Affiliations
    1School of Nursing, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu (610083), Sichuan Province, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgxxws/EN/10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2025126
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT